Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Artificial Organs 4/2017

27.07.2017 | Original Article

Readmissions after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation

verfasst von: Mitsutoshi Kimura, Kan Nawata, Osamu Kinoshita, Haruo Yamauchi, Yasuhiro Hoshino, Masaru Hatano, Eisuke Amiya, Koichi Kashiwa, Miyoko Endo, Yukie Kagami, Mariko Nemoto, Minoru Ono

Erschienen in: Journal of Artificial Organs | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) therapy has improved the survival of patients with advanced heart failure. However, the readmission rate of CF-LVAD patients is still relatively high. A total of 90 patients who received CF-LVADs between April 2011 and March 2016 at our institute and were discharged home were analyzed retrospectively. They were followed up through March 2017. Clinical data, including frequency, length and etiology of readmission, were obtained from medical records. The mean observation period after initial discharge was 713 ± 322 days. In total, 73 patients (81%) had 236 readmissions, 214 unplanned and 22 planned. The overall and unplanned readmission rates were 1.34 and 1.22 per patient-year, respectively. The rate of freedom from unplanned first readmission at 1 year after initial discharge was 39%. The median interval between the previous hospital discharge and first and second readmissions was 311 and 213 days, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.117). The rate of readmission after more than three readmissions was significantly higher than that of first or second readmission (log-rank test, p < 0.001). The most common etiology of readmission was driveline infection (DLI) (36%), followed by stroke (9%). The median length of hospital stay due to DLI was 23 days. The patients with repeated unplanned readmissions had significantly lower EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire utility score than those with no or just one readmission. Readmission was common in CF-LVAD patients, and the most common etiology of readmissions was DLI. The interval to the next readmission seemed shorter for patients with repeated readmissions.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller LW, Pagani FD, Russell SD, et al. Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:885–96.CrossRefPubMed Miller LW, Pagani FD, Russell SD, et al. Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:885–96.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jakovljevic DG, McDiarmid A, Hallsworth K, et al. Effect of left ventricular assist device implantation and heart transplantation on habitual physical activity and quality of life. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114:88–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jakovljevic DG, McDiarmid A, Hallsworth K, et al. Effect of left ventricular assist device implantation and heart transplantation on habitual physical activity and quality of life. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114:88–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kato NP, Okada I, Imamura T, et al. Quality of life and influential factors in patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device. Circ J. 2015;79:2186–92.CrossRefPubMed Kato NP, Okada I, Imamura T, et al. Quality of life and influential factors in patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device. Circ J. 2015;79:2186–92.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishinaka T, Schima H, Roethy W, et al. The DuraHeart VAD, a magnetically levitated centrifugal pump: the University of Vienna bridge-to-transplant experience. Circ J. 2006;70:1421–5.CrossRefPubMed Nishinaka T, Schima H, Roethy W, et al. The DuraHeart VAD, a magnetically levitated centrifugal pump: the University of Vienna bridge-to-transplant experience. Circ J. 2006;70:1421–5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakaguchi T, Matsumiya G, Yoshioka D, et al. DuraHeart magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device: Osaka University experience. Circ J. 2013;77:1736–41.CrossRefPubMed Sakaguchi T, Matsumiya G, Yoshioka D, et al. DuraHeart magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device: Osaka University experience. Circ J. 2013;77:1736–41.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Saito S, Yamazaki K, Nishinaka T, et al. Post-approval study of a highly pulsed, low-shear-rate, continuous-flow, left ventricular assist device, EVAHEART: a Japanese multicenter study using J-MACS. J Heart Lung Transpl. 2014;33:599–608.CrossRef Saito S, Yamazaki K, Nishinaka T, et al. Post-approval study of a highly pulsed, low-shear-rate, continuous-flow, left ventricular assist device, EVAHEART: a Japanese multicenter study using J-MACS. J Heart Lung Transpl. 2014;33:599–608.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kyo S, Minami T, Nishimura T, Gojo S, Ono M. New era for therapeutic strategy for heart failure: destination therapy by left ventricular assist device. J Cardiol. 2012;59:101–9.CrossRefPubMed Kyo S, Minami T, Nishimura T, Gojo S, Ono M. New era for therapeutic strategy for heart failure: destination therapy by left ventricular assist device. J Cardiol. 2012;59:101–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ono M, Sawa Y, Nakatani T, et al. Japanese multicenter outcomes with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device in patients with small body surface area. Circ J. 2016;80:1931–6.CrossRefPubMed Ono M, Sawa Y, Nakatani T, et al. Japanese multicenter outcomes with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device in patients with small body surface area. Circ J. 2016;80:1931–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshioka D, Matsumiya G, Toda K, et al. Clinical results with Jarvik 2000 axial flow left ventricular assist device: Osaka University Experience. J Artif Organs. 2014;17:308–14.CrossRefPubMed Yoshioka D, Matsumiya G, Toda K, et al. Clinical results with Jarvik 2000 axial flow left ventricular assist device: Osaka University Experience. J Artif Organs. 2014;17:308–14.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Pagani FD, et al. Seventh INTERMACS annual report: 15,000 patients and counting. J Heart Lung Transp. 2015;34:1495–504.CrossRef Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Pagani FD, et al. Seventh INTERMACS annual report: 15,000 patients and counting. J Heart Lung Transp. 2015;34:1495–504.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Saito S. Towards destination therapy with left ventricular assist devices in Japan. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:537–9.CrossRefPubMed Saito S. Towards destination therapy with left ventricular assist devices in Japan. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:537–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Toda K, Sawa Y. Clinical management for complications related to implantable LVAD use. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:1–7.CrossRefPubMed Toda K, Sawa Y. Clinical management for complications related to implantable LVAD use. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:1–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Da Silva M, MacIver J, Rodger M, et al. Readmissions following implantation of a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. J Card Surg. 2016;31:361–4.CrossRefPubMed Da Silva M, MacIver J, Rodger M, et al. Readmissions following implantation of a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. J Card Surg. 2016;31:361–4.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Forest SJ, Bello R, Friedmann P, et al. Readmissions after ventricular assist device: etiologies, patterns, and days out of hospital. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1276–81.CrossRefPubMed Forest SJ, Bello R, Friedmann P, et al. Readmissions after ventricular assist device: etiologies, patterns, and days out of hospital. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1276–81.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rossing K, Jung MH, Sander K, et al. Outcomes and hospital admissions during long-term support with a HeartMate II. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2015;49:367–75.PubMed Rossing K, Jung MH, Sander K, et al. Outcomes and hospital admissions during long-term support with a HeartMate II. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2015;49:367–75.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Smedira NG, Hoercher KJ, Lima B, et al. Unplanned hospital readmissions after HeartMate II implantation: frequency, risk factors, and impact on resource use and survival. JACC Heart Fail. 2013;1:31–9.CrossRefPubMed Smedira NG, Hoercher KJ, Lima B, et al. Unplanned hospital readmissions after HeartMate II implantation: frequency, risk factors, and impact on resource use and survival. JACC Heart Fail. 2013;1:31–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hata H, Fujita T, Shimahara Y, et al. Early and mid-term outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation and future prospects. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:557–64.CrossRefPubMed Hata H, Fujita T, Shimahara Y, et al. Early and mid-term outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation and future prospects. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:557–64.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimura M, Kinoshita O, Nawata K, et al. Midterm outcome of implantable left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation: single-center experience in Japan. J Cardiol. 2015;65:383–9.CrossRefPubMed Kimura M, Kinoshita O, Nawata K, et al. Midterm outcome of implantable left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation: single-center experience in Japan. J Cardiol. 2015;65:383–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Baras Shreibati J, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Banerjee D, Owens DK, Hlatky MA. Cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices in ambulatory patients with advanced heart failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2017;5:110–9.CrossRefPubMed Baras Shreibati J, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Banerjee D, Owens DK, Hlatky MA. Cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices in ambulatory patients with advanced heart failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2017;5:110–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Moazami N, Steffen RJ, Naka Y, et al. Lessons learned from the first fully magnetically levitated centrifugal LVAD trial in the United States: the DuraHeart trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:541–7.CrossRefPubMed Moazami N, Steffen RJ, Naka Y, et al. Lessons learned from the first fully magnetically levitated centrifugal LVAD trial in the United States: the DuraHeart trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:541–7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Potapov EV, Kaufmann F, Stepanenko A, et al. Pump exchange for cable damage in patients supported with HeartMate II left ventricular assist device. ASAIO J. 2012;58:578–82.CrossRefPubMed Potapov EV, Kaufmann F, Stepanenko A, et al. Pump exchange for cable damage in patients supported with HeartMate II left ventricular assist device. ASAIO J. 2012;58:578–82.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Takura T, Kyo S, Ono M, et al. Preliminary report on the cost effectiveness of ventricular assist devices. J Artif Organs. 2016;19:37–43.CrossRefPubMed Takura T, Kyo S, Ono M, et al. Preliminary report on the cost effectiveness of ventricular assist devices. J Artif Organs. 2016;19:37–43.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Team JET. The development of Japanese EuroQol instrument. Iryo Shakai. 1998;8:109–23. Team JET. The development of Japanese EuroQol instrument. Iryo Shakai. 1998;8:109–23.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Itoda Y, Nawata K, Yamauchi H, et al. Central aortic valve closure successfully treated aortic insufficiency of the patient with Jarvik 2000 continuous flow left ventricular assist device: a case report. J Artif Organs. 2017;20:99–101.CrossRefPubMed Itoda Y, Nawata K, Yamauchi H, et al. Central aortic valve closure successfully treated aortic insufficiency of the patient with Jarvik 2000 continuous flow left ventricular assist device: a case report. J Artif Organs. 2017;20:99–101.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Imamura T, Kinugawa K, Nitta D, et al. Fontan-like hemodynamics complicated with ventricular fibrillation during left ventricular assist device support. Int Heart J. 2016;57:515–8.CrossRefPubMed Imamura T, Kinugawa K, Nitta D, et al. Fontan-like hemodynamics complicated with ventricular fibrillation during left ventricular assist device support. Int Heart J. 2016;57:515–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Naito N, Kinoshita O, Ono M. Prolonged left ventricular assist device support (18 months) in refractory ventricular fibrillation. J Heart Lung Transpl. 2014;33:772–3.CrossRef Naito N, Kinoshita O, Ono M. Prolonged left ventricular assist device support (18 months) in refractory ventricular fibrillation. J Heart Lung Transpl. 2014;33:772–3.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Akhter SA, Badami A, Murray M, et al. Hospital readmissions after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation: incidence, causes, and cost analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:884–9.CrossRefPubMed Akhter SA, Badami A, Murray M, et al. Hospital readmissions after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation: incidence, causes, and cost analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:884–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimura M, Nishimura T, Kinoshita O, et al. Successful treatment of pump pocket infection after left ventricular assist device implantation by negative pressure wound therapy and omental transposition. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;20:842–5.CrossRefPubMed Kimura M, Nishimura T, Kinoshita O, et al. Successful treatment of pump pocket infection after left ventricular assist device implantation by negative pressure wound therapy and omental transposition. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;20:842–5.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka S, Nawata K, Kitahara H, et al. A successful management of infection of the left ventricular assist device by pump exchange: conversion from DuraHeart to Jarvik 2000. J Artif Organs. 2016;19:387–91.CrossRefPubMed Tanaka S, Nawata K, Kitahara H, et al. A successful management of infection of the left ventricular assist device by pump exchange: conversion from DuraHeart to Jarvik 2000. J Artif Organs. 2016;19:387–91.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Jennings DL, Chopra A, Chambers R, Morgan JA. Clinical outcomes associated with chronic antimicrobial suppression therapy in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. Artif Organs. 2014;38:875–9.CrossRefPubMed Jennings DL, Chopra A, Chambers R, Morgan JA. Clinical outcomes associated with chronic antimicrobial suppression therapy in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. Artif Organs. 2014;38:875–9.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Haglund NA, Davis ME, Tricarico NM, Keebler ME, Maltais S. Readmissions after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation: differences observed between two contemporary device types. ASAIO J. 2015;61:410–6.CrossRefPubMed Haglund NA, Davis ME, Tricarico NM, Keebler ME, Maltais S. Readmissions after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation: differences observed between two contemporary device types. ASAIO J. 2015;61:410–6.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimura M, Nawata K, Kinoshita O, et al. Cerebrovascular accident rate is different between centrifugal and axial-flow pumps, but survival and driveline infection rates are similar. Transpl Proc. 2017;49:121–4.CrossRef Kimura M, Nawata K, Kinoshita O, et al. Cerebrovascular accident rate is different between centrifugal and axial-flow pumps, but survival and driveline infection rates are similar. Transpl Proc. 2017;49:121–4.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyata H, Gotoh M, Hashimoto H, et al. Challenges and prospects of a clinical database linked to the board certification system. Surg Today. 2014;44:1991–9.CrossRefPubMed Miyata H, Gotoh M, Hashimoto H, et al. Challenges and prospects of a clinical database linked to the board certification system. Surg Today. 2014;44:1991–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Readmissions after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation
verfasst von
Mitsutoshi Kimura
Kan Nawata
Osamu Kinoshita
Haruo Yamauchi
Yasuhiro Hoshino
Masaru Hatano
Eisuke Amiya
Koichi Kashiwa
Miyoko Endo
Yukie Kagami
Mariko Nemoto
Minoru Ono
Publikationsdatum
27.07.2017
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Journal of Artificial Organs / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1434-7229
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-0904
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-017-0975-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Journal of Artificial Organs 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Recycling im OP – möglich, aber teuer

02.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Auch wenn sich Krankenhäuser nachhaltig und grün geben – sie tragen aktuell erheblich zu den CO2-Emissionen bei und produzieren jede Menge Müll. Ein Pilotprojekt aus Bonn zeigt, dass viele Op.-Abfälle wiederverwertet werden können.

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Gegen postoperative Darmmotilitätsstörung: Erster Kaffee schon im Aufwachraum

30.04.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Nach einer Operation kann es zu einer vorübergehenden Störung der Darmmotilität kommen, ohne dass es eine mechanische Ursache gibt. Auf eine postoperative Darmmotilitätsstörung weist besonders hin, wenn Nahrung oral nicht toleriert wird.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.