Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 11/2020

20.08.2020 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Recent trends in embryo disposition choices made by patients following in vitro fertilization

verfasst von: Vinita M. Alexander, Joan K. Riley, Emily S. Jungheim

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 11/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To assess longitudinal trends in in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients’ choices for disposing of cryopreserved embryos.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of embryo disposition forms submitted between January 2000 and February 2020 at a university-based fertility clinic. Primary outcome was disposition decision. Binary and multivariable logistic regression were performed to determine odds ratios (OR) for decisions according to female age, education, race, religion, state of residence, area deprivation index based on zip code, and IVF pregnancy history. We also assessed disposition year, storage duration, and number of stored embryos.

Results

Forms were reviewed from 615 patients; 50.6% chose to discard embryos, 45.4% donated to research, and 4.1% chose reproductive donation. In the regression model, two factors were significantly associated with donation to research: female listing “no preference” or declining to list religious preference (OR 2.56, 95%CI 1.44–4.54) and live birth of multiples after IVF (OR 1.58, 95%CI 1.05–2.36). Before 2012, females younger than age 30 at storage were equally likely to choose to donate embryos to research as discard them. However, between 2013 and 2020, females younger than 30 were significantly more likely to discard than donate embryos for research (OR 2.87, 95%CI 1.13–7.28).

Conclusion

Since 2013, the majority of patients younger than 30 at storage have chosen to discard cryopreserved embryos. Before then, patients were more likely to donate embryos for research. To ensure sufficient embryos are available for research, young patients, who are most likely to have cryopreserved embryos, should be counseled about options for donation.
Literatur
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(2):139–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmw038.CrossRef Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(2):139–55. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​humupd/​dmw038.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zweifel JE, Rathert MA, Klock SC, Walaski HP, Pritts EA, Olive DL, et al. Comparative assessment of pre- and post-donation attitudes towards potential oocyte and embryo disposition and management among ovum donors in an oocyte donation programme. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(5):1325–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei468.CrossRef Zweifel JE, Rathert MA, Klock SC, Walaski HP, Pritts EA, Olive DL, et al. Comparative assessment of pre- and post-donation attitudes towards potential oocyte and embryo disposition and management among ovum donors in an oocyte donation programme. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(5):1325–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​humrep/​dei468.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Burton PJ, Sanders K. Patient attitudes to donation of embryos for research in Western Australia. Med J Aust. 2004;180(11):559–61.CrossRef Burton PJ, Sanders K. Patient attitudes to donation of embryos for research in Western Australia. Med J Aust. 2004;180(11):559–61.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Recent trends in embryo disposition choices made by patients following in vitro fertilization
verfasst von
Vinita M. Alexander
Joan K. Riley
Emily S. Jungheim
Publikationsdatum
20.08.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 11/2020
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01927-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2020

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 11/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to Editor

Letter to editor

Hirsutismus bei PCOS: Laser- und Lichttherapien helfen

26.04.2024 Hirsutismus Nachrichten

Laser- und Lichtbehandlungen können bei Frauen mit polyzystischem Ovarialsyndrom (PCOS) den übermäßigen Haarwuchs verringern und das Wohlbefinden verbessern – bei alleiniger Anwendung oder in Kombination mit Medikamenten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bislang gibt es kein Medikament zur Prävention von Wochenbettdepressionen. Das Injektionsanästhetikum Esketamin könnte womöglich diese Lücke füllen.

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

22.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Kongressbericht

Durch die Häufung nach der COVID-19-Pandemie sind Infektionen mit dem Respiratorischen Synzytial-Virus (RSV) in den Fokus gerückt. Fachgesellschaften empfehlen eine Impfung inzwischen nicht nur für Säuglinge und Kleinkinder.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.