nach oben

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Erschienen in:

02.02.2022 | Editorial

Referring to Workers Within Work Disability Prevention Research: Person-First or Identify-First?

verfasst von: Douglas P. Gross, Teri Slade, Patricia A. Findley

Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Workers experiencing injury, disability, or other health conditions often have preferences related to how they are characterized and described. When referring to communities of workers, it is important to be mindful of how the community prefers to be characterized (where there is a preference) and adhere to their preferences. Using incorrect or inappropriate language can be offensive and even stigmatizing [1]. Two styles of language are commonly used: Person-first or Identity-first [2, 3]. …

Dunn DS, Andrews EE. Person-first and identity-first language: developing psychologists’ cultural competence using disability language. Am Psychol. 2015;70(3):255–264.CrossRef

Rose I and Fitzpatrick C. Using inclusive language when referring to communities with common identifiers. Springer Nature Editorial Policy Newsletter; 2021.

Collier R. Person-first language: noble intent but to what effect? CMAJ. 2012;184(18):1977–1978. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4319.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Botha M, Hanlon J, Williams GL. Does language matter? Identity-first versus person-first language use in autism research: a response to Vivanti. J Autism Dev Disord. 2021;20:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04858-w.CrossRef

Kenny L, Hattersley C, Molins B, Buckley C, Povey C, Pellicano E. Which terms should be used to describe autism? Perspectives from the UK autism community. Autism. 2016;20(4):442–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315588200.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Referring to Workers Within Work Disability Prevention Research: Person-First or Identify-First?
verfasst von: Douglas P. Gross
Teri Slade
Patricia A. Findley
Publikationsdatum: 02.02.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10024-z

Springer Medizin

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Evaluation of Usability and Satisfaction of Two Online Tools to Guide Return to Work for Cancer Survivors on the Cancer and Work Website

Global statements to produce and implement evidence in the post-COVID-19 era provide a path forward for rehabilitation - A joint initiative of Cochrane Rehabilitation and the leading journals in the field

Healthy Minds: Group Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention for Sustainable Return to Work After a Sick Leave Due to Depression

Participant Engagement in Supported Employment: A Systematic Scoping Review

Unravelling the Complexities of Workplace Disclosure Among Persons with Non-Visible Disabilities and Illnesses: A Qualitative Meta-Ethnography

In What Ways Does Health Related Stigma Affect Sustainable Employment and Well-Being at Work? A Systematic Review