Background
Mammalian antral follicular development is the last step of folliculogenesis and culminates in ovulation or atresia [
1]. This dynamic process requires extensive cross talk between follicular cells (theca, granulosa, cumulus and oocyte) [
1‐
3], which is regulated by endocrine, paracrine and autocrine signaling. Recently, a new mechanism of intercellular communication mediated by cell-secreted vesicles was revealed [
4]. Cell-secreted vesicles, called exosomes (~50-150 nm) and microvesicles (~100-1000 nm), carry bioactive material such as mRNAs, microRNAs (miRNAs), and proteins in different body fluids and deliver their contents to recipient cells [
4]. Exosomes and microvesicles have been identified in ovarian follicular fluid of mares and cows, and these vesicles contain miRNAs and proteins [
5,
6]. MiRNAs, small (~22 nucleotide) non-coding RNAs, regulate gene expression by complementary base-pair interactions in the 3’ untranslated region of mRNA targets, leading to mRNA cleavage or translational repression [
7,
8]. Studies involving specific deletion of Dicer (necessary for mature miRNA synthesis) in ovaries demonstrate miRNAs are necessary for adult ovarian function and fertility [
9]. In addition, miRNA-21 is involved in regulation of granulosa cell apoptosis and corpus luteum formation in mice [
10], and gonadotropins regulate miRNA expression and consequently control estradiol production in sheep [
11]. Finally, studies in mice reveal that transforming growth factor B (TGFB) induces miR-224 and miR-383 expression, which target
Smad4 and
Rbms1 thereby regulating estradiol production in response to gonadotropin stimulation [
12,
13]. These studies clearly indicate that miRNAs are important regulators of ovarian function by controlling various aspects of follicular growth and development, and also demonstrate a role for the TGFB signaling pathway in regulating miRNA transcription, as well as miRNAs controlling TGFB family members expression and function during folliculogenesis [
12].
The TGFB/BMP signaling family is necessary for follicle development and oocyte competence in mammals. Different studies have demonstrated the role of specific family members in theca cells, granulosa cells, cumulus cells and oocytes [
2,
14]. Activins/Inhibins, BMPs, and GDFs are responsible for modulating the effects of both FSH and LH during all stages of follicle development. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms involved in regulating these signaling pathways is important to provide insight into the process of follicle growth and development and oocyte maturation.
Follicle development in the mare has been well described [
15], and is characterized by follicular waves. Emergence of a follicular wave in the mare is defined by the presence of follicles between 6 and 13 mm in diameter, and deviation occurs in this growing cohort of follicles when an (immature) follicle obtains a diameter of ~22 mm while growth of subordinate follicles becomes static. The follicle reaches ~35-45 mm before ovulation is induced with a prolonged, periovulatory LH surge.
The overall goal of this study was to obtain a better understanding of the role of exosomes in follicle development and growth, and test the hypothesis that exosomes isolated from follicular fluid modulate TGFB/BMP signaling in granulosa cells. A miRNA profiling screen on exosomes isolated from mid-estrous and pre-ovulatory follicles identified miRNAs that are predicted to regulate the TGFB/BMP signaling members. In this study, we examined ACVR1 and ID2, two predicted targets of exosomal miRNAs, in granulosa cells and exosomes in follicular fluid of mid-estrous and pre-ovulatory ovarian follicles. In addition, we determined if exosomes isolated from follicular fluid of mid-estrous and pre-ovulatory follicles are capable of altering gene expression in pre-ovulatory granulosa cells.
Methods
Collection of ovarian follicular cells and fluid
Follicular fluid (10 ml) and granulosa cells were aspirated from dominant follicles (~35 mm before induction of follicular maturation - mid-estrus), and (30–34 h after induction of follicular maturation - pre-ovulatory) from young (3–12 yr) estrous mares (
Equus Caballus) that were part of the clinical program at the Equine Reproduction Laboratory, CSU. All procedures were done in accordance with the Colorado State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Mares were housed on dry lots with water and hay. Reproductive tracts of the mares were examined using transrectal ultrasound. A synthetic prostaglandin analog cloprostenol sodium (250 mg of Estrumate® Merck, NJ, USA) was administered during two consecutive days beginning on day 5 or 7 following ovulation or aspiration. Mid-estrus dominant follicles were determined based on follicle growth and diameter (ultrasound), relaxed cervical tone and endometrial edema. For pre-ovulatory follicle collections, follicular maturation was induced by administration of hCG and/or deslorelin (2500 IU and 1.5 mg, respectively, iv), and follicular contents were collected 32 h later by transvaginal, ultrasound-guided follicular aspirations using a 12-GA needle [
16,
17]. A sample of follicular fluid was collected and centrifuged at 300 × g for 10 min, 2000 × g for 10 min, 10000 × g for 30 min and later stored at -80°C until processed for exosome isolation. The follicle antrum was rinsed to recover granulosa cells. Red blood cells were removed by rinsing granulosa cells (3×) in PBS containing 0.02% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). Approximately half of the sample was snap frozen and used for total RNA and protein isolation, whereas the rest of the granulosa cells were pipetted repeatedly to separate cells and placed in DMEM/F-12, (Invitrogen™ #11320-033, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with no addition of fetal bovine serum (FBS). Cells were cultured for 24 h and used in granulosa cell culture and exosome treatment experiments (see below).
Isolation of exosomes from follicular fluid
Exosomes were isolated from ovarian follicular fluid starting with the three first steps of differential centrifugation as described [
18], followed by Exoquick™ (SBI System Biosciences, Inc, Mountain View, CA, USA) precipitation, a polymer-based reagent that precipitate exosomes. Briefly, following centrifugation, 400 μl of follicular fluid supernatant was added to 100 μl of Exoquick. This preparation was incubated overnight at 4°C and centrifuged at 1500 × g for 30 min to obtain an exosome pellet. Exosome pellets were resuspended in 250 μl of PBS (pH 7.4) and used for miRNAs real time PCR analysis (n = 6 mares at mid-estrus, and n = 6 mares at pre-ovulation).
Granulosa cell culture and exosome treatment
Granulosa cells from pre-ovulatory follicles were placed in 24-well dishes (Nunc, Inc. #142475, Waltham, MA, USA) at 37°C and density of 5×10
6 cells per well in 2 ml of DMEM/F-12 medium without FCS. Granulosa cells attached to the dishes and were confluent. Cells were cultured for 24 h and exposed to exosomes for 24 h (totalizing 48 h in culture). These culture conditions were modified based on Davidson, et al., 2002 [
19] Medium was replaced after the first day to remove any dead cells, and treatment started on the second day. Exosomes isolated from 800 μl of follicular fluid were resuspended in 250 μl of media. Treatment was composed of 1.75 ml of medium and 250 μl of resuspended exosomes. Control was composed of 2 ml of medium without the addition of exosomes. Granulosa cells from pre-ovulatory follicles (n = 4 mares) were placed in culture independently and treated with exosomes isolated from follicular fluid from pre-ovulatory (n = 4 mares) or mid-estrus (n = 4 mares) follicles, or not treated with isolated exosomes. Cells and exosomes were collected and used for total RNA and protein isolation.
Western blot analysis
Granulosa cell and exosomal proteins were isolated using TRI Reagent®BD (Molecular Research, Inc.) according the manufacturer’s instructions, and exosomal proteins were resuspended in 8 M urea. Protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford assay. A total of 30 μg of protein was loaded and resolved in 12% SDS-PAGE polyacrylamide gels (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Protein samples were run at 30 mA for 45 min and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Biotrace NT, Pall life Sciences, Pensacolla, FL, USA) for 1 h at 100 V. Membranes were incubated in blocking buffer (5% non-fat dried milk in TBST) for 2 h at room temperature, and the presence of ACVR1 was assessed by exposing membranes to a goat polyclonal antibody raised against a peptide mapping to the N-terminus of ACVR1 of human origin (0.4 μg/ml, sc-5671, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) overnight at 4˚C. In addition, membranes were exposed to ACTB mouse monoclonal antibody raised against ACTB of avian origin (0.1 μg/ml, sc-47778, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA), as a reference protein. Membranes were washed three times in 1X TBST for 5 min, and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-goat secondary antibody (0.2 μg/ml, sc-2020, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) or horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (1 μg/ml, ab-6789, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA), respectively (Table
1). Membranes were washed three times in 1X TBST for 5 min and incubated for 5 min in ECL Plus Prime Western Blotting Detection System solution (Amersham™, Buckinghamshire, UK) for color development, and image and band analyses were performed using ChemiDoc MP Image System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
Table 1
Antibodies utilized for Western blot analysis
ACVR1 | Antibody raised against a peptide mapping to the N-terminus of ACVR1 of human origin | sc-5671 | Q04771 | Goat polyclonal | 0.4 μg/ml |
| Horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-goat secondary antibody | sc-2020 | | | 0.2 μg/ml |
ACTB | Antibody raised against ACTB of avian origin | sc-47778 | P60709 | Mouse monoclonal | 0.1 μg/ml |
| Horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody | ab-6789 | | | 1 μg/ml |
mRNA and miRNA isolation and reverse transcription
Total RNA including miRNA was isolated from exosome preparations using TRI Reagent ®BD (Molecular Research, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentration and purity were determined using the NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer. Samples were stored at -80°C until further use.
Quantifiable, reverse transcribed mRNA was generated using qScript™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Quanta Biosciences Cat#95047, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), which contains both random and oligo (dT) primers, according to the manufacture’s instructions. Briefly, the reverse transcription reaction was carried out using approximately 30 ng of total RNA for each selected gene. RNA was incubated with 5× qScript Reaction Mix, qScript Reverse Transcriptase, and DNase-free water at 22°C for 5 min, at 42°C for 30 min, and at 85°C for 5 min.
Quantifiable, reverse transcribed miRNAs were generated using the miScript PCR System (Qiagen® #218193, Venlo, Limburg, Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the reverse transcription reaction was carried out with approximately 100 ng of total RNA for 384 miRNAs. Total RNA, including the small RNA fraction, was incubated with 5X miScript HiFlex Buffer, 10X miScript Nucleic Mix, RNase-free water, and miScript Reverse Transcriptase at 37°C for 60 min followed by 5 min at 95°C.
Real-time PCR expression analysis of mRNAs and miRNAs
Relative levels of mRNAs were examined in granulosa cells recovered from ovarian follicles of young mares at mid-estrus (n = 6 mares) and pre-ovulation (n = 6 mares). In addition, mRNAs levels were examined in granulosa cells from pre-ovulatory follicles exposed in culture for 24 h to exosomes isolated from follicular fluid collected at mid-estrus or pre-ovulation. Gene specific primers were designed using Primer3 - BioTools software and are presented on Table
2. Each analysis was performed in 10 μl reactions containing 2X SYBR Green I master mix (Roche Applied Sciences, Indianapolis, IN, USA), 0.5 μM of forward and reverse primers (primers were designed against equine gene sequences, and are provided in Table
2), and 1 μl cDNA. The PCR cycle conditions were as followed: 95°C for 5 min, 45 cycles of 95°C for 10 sec, 60°C for 15 sec, and 72°C for 15 sec, followed by melt curve analysis to confirm amplification of single cDNA products. To identify differences in mRNA levels in granulosa cells before treatment or after treatment with exosomes from mid-estrus (n = 4 mares) or pre-ovulatory (n = 4 mares) follicles, raw Ct values were normalized to the geometrical mean of two internal controls (
ACTB,
GAPDH) previously used in different reproductive tissues [
20,
21], and statistical differences were assessed using a Student’s t-test. Geometric mean of the two selected internal controls was 27 and 18 in granulosa cells for the in vivo and in vitro experiments, respectively.
Table 2
Primers used for real-time PCR analysis and normalized Ct values in granulosa cells
ACVR1
| CCTCTCCTGTGGGAATGAGG | CTGGAAGCAGCCTTTCTGGT | XM_001491549.3 | 8.95 ± 0.32 | 60 | 100 |
ACVR2B
| ATGTACCGGCATCGAAAACC | CGAGCCTTGATCTCCAACAG | XM_001488736.4 | 13.99 ± 0.39 | 60 | 119 |
TGFBR2
| GACCCCAAGCTCACCTACCA | TGCACTCATCAGAGCTACAGGA | XM_005600872.1 | 0.8 ± 0.43 | 60 | 124 |
CDKN2B
| CCGAGCTGCTACTGCTCCAC | CACCAGCGTGTCCAGGAAG | XM_001496235.3 | 13.93 ± 0.70 | 60 | 107 |
COL1A2
| AGGTTTCCAAGGACCTGCTG | GGTTTTCCAGGGTGACCATC | XM_005609220.1 | 16.21 ± 0.75 | 60 | 117 |
COL3A1
| GTCCCAACCCAGAGATTCCA | CGCTACTTTCATTTCCTTTCAGG | XM_001917620.3 | 2.05 ± 0.57 | 60 | 102 |
USF2
| GGATACCACGGCTGTGTCAG | ATCGTCCTCTGCGTTCCTGT | XM_005596152.1 | 4.23 ± 0.70 | 60 | 114 |
IL6
| GGCAGAAAAAGACGGATGCT | CACCCTTGAACTCGTTCTGGA | XM_005609172.1 | 13.03 ± 0.38 | 60 | 122 |
ITGB7
| TGCCGAAGGATACCCTGTAGA | CTGCAGCTTCTCCAGCAAGG | XM_005611222.1 | 14.58 ± 0.82 | 60 | 112 |
TGFB1
| CTCAGTGCCCACTGCTCCT | CATCAATGGTGGCCAGATCA | XM_005596086.1 | 2.68 ± 0.27 | 60 | 100 |
ID1
| ACATGAACGGCTGCTACTCG | TCCAACTCCAGGTCCCAGAT | XM_005604549.1 | 10.02 ± 0.51 | 60 | 124 |
ID2
| CATCCCCCAGAACAAGAAGG | TGGTGATGCAGGCTGACAAT | XM_001503611.3 | 2.37 ± 0.18 | 60 | 180 |
ACTB
| CGACATCCGTAAGGACCTGT | CAGGGCTGTGATCTCCTTCT | NM_001081838.1| | | 60 | 99 |
GAPDH
| AGAAGGAGAAAGGCCCTCAG | GGAAACTGTGGAGGTCAGGA | NM_001163856.1 | | 60 | 87 |
The relative levels of 384 mature miRNAs were examined in exosome preparations isolated from follicular fluid of different mares at mid-estrus (n = 6 mares) and pre-ovulatory (n = 6 mares), using Human miRNome Profiler plates (SBI) with miRNA sequences conserved between horses and humans. Based on the initial PCR screen, miRNAs were considered for second analysis if present in at least 3 out of six samples and significantly different between groups. Selected miRNAs were analyzed using DIANA TOOLS [
22] as a group since they were contained within exosomes. Based on the initial screen, levels of mature miRNAs predicted to target members of the TGFB superfamily were examined in granulosa cells and exosomes isolated from follicular fluid, as well as cells in culture after treatment with exosomes from mid-estrus follicles (n = 4 mares) and pre-ovulatory follicles (n = 4 mares). Each analysis was performed in 6 μl reactions containing 2X SYBR Green I master mix (Roche Applied Sciences, Indianapolis, IN, USA), 10 μM Universal reverse primer (Qiagen, Venlo, Limburg, Netherlands) and miRNA specific forward primer, and 0.03 μl cDNA. Real-time PCR was conducted using the LightCycler480 PCR system (Roche Applied Sciences, Indianapolis, IN, USA) in 384-well plates. The PCR cycle conditions were as followed: 95°C for 5 min, 45 cycles of 95°C for 10 sec, 55°C for 15 sec, and 72°C for 15 sec followed by a melt curve analysis to confirm amplification of single cDNA products. To identify differences in the presence of exosomal miRNAs isolated from follicular fluid or miRNAs in granulosa cells, raw Ct values were normalized to miR-99b; invariable present in all samples (mid-estrous Ct = 19.5 ± 0.6, pre-ovulatory Ct = 19.7 ± 0.5).
Statistical analysis
Data presented a normal distribution and statistical differences were assessed using an unpaired Student’s t-test. Normalized data were compared between follicular stage groups, using the average of at least three samples per group and data were plotted as 1/ΔCt.
Discussion
The goal of this study was to demonstrate that exosomes isolated from follicular fluid of equine ovarian follicles at mid-estrous and pre-ovulatory stages could regulate gene expression in granulosa cells during follicular maturation. Initially this was based on bioinformatics analysis, which revealed that exosomal miRNAs are predicted to target and regulate 44 genes of the TGFB/BMP signaling family. Of the initial 12 genes profiled in equine granulosa cells, we focused on ACVR1 and ID2.
ACVR1 (also known as ALK2) is a receptor involved in regulating
ID2 expression and the BMP response pathway, which in turn is known for its importance during follicular development [
2,
14]. During bovine follicle development, both FSH and estradiol regulate
ACVR1, and BMP7 signaling through ACVR2A/ACVR1 in granulosa cells is thought to play a role in follicle growth [
23]. Furthermore,
ACVR1 levels in granulosa cells increase with follicle size [
23,
24]. Similarly,
ID2 levels increase during follicle development in hens, and are highest in fully differentiated granulosa cells and cumulus-oocyte-complexes in pigs. It has been proposed that ID2 is necessary for increasing LH receptor levels [
25,
26]. Interestingly, in addition to BMP/ACVR1 signaling, CCAAT enhancer binding protein (C/EBP)B also regulates
Id2 expression [
27], and C/EBPB knockout female mice are sterile and exhibit a failure of granulosa cell differentiation in periovulatory follicles [
28]. In this study we detected ACVR1 mRNA and protein in equine granulosa cells collected from mid-estrus and pre-ovulatory follicles. Although
ACVR1 levels were not different between mid-estrous and pre-ovulatory granulosa cells, average ACVR1 protein levels appeared ~3 fold higher (not significantly) in pre-ovulatory granulosa cells. ACVR1 increases with follicular size; however, no significant difference was observed between immature and mature follicles in cattle [
24].
Based on previous findings that miRNA-148a regulates ACVR1, and consequently down-regulate SMADs and
ID2 [
29], we determined the relative level of miRNAs predicted to target
ACVR1 and
ID2 in both granulosa cells and follicular fluid exosomes. We were unable to detect miR-148a in isolated exosomes from equine ovarian follicular fluid, but did identify other exosomal miRNAs predicted to target
ACVR1 and
ID2. MiRNA-27b (predicted regulator of
ACVR1 and
ID2) was not detected in granulosa cells consistently, however was detected at significantly higher levels in exosomes isolated from mid-estrous follicles. The source of exosomal miR-27b in follicular fluid is unclear. Analyzing miRNA cDNA libraries obtained from sheep ovarian follicles [
30] revealed that medium size follicles have increased abundance of miR-27b compared to pre-ovulatory follicles, although the definite follicular cell type that expresses this miRNA is not known [
11]. Interestingly, miR-27b was present at higher levels in cumulus cells from pre-ovulatory follicles of young compared to old mares [
5].
MiR-372 and miR-382 (predicted regulators of
ACVR1) levels were elevated in granulosa cells from mid-estrous follicles compared to pre-ovulatory follicles (miR-382 was not detected in granulosa cells from pre-ovulatory follicles). This expression pattern was recapitulated in exosomes collected from follicular fluid. In addition to
ACVR1, miR-372 is involved in regulation of cell cycle inhibitors p21, p27 and p53 [
31], that affect cell proliferation and differentiation. Interestingly, miR-382 has been identified in the ovarian cortex of bovine, and not in the cumulus cells or corpus luteum, suggesting this miRNA originates from theca or stromal cells [
32].
To further investigate a possible function for exosomes on granulosa cells, we performed an
in vitro experiment using pre-ovulatory granulosa cells and treatment with or without exosomes isolated from follicular fluid of mid-estrous or pre-ovulatory follicles. Initially, we evaluated the level of
ACVR1 and demonstrate that levels were significantly decreased in pre-ovulatory granulosa cells following exposure to exosomes from either mid-estrous or pre-ovulatory follicles. Combined with the observation that follicular fluid exosomes contain miR-372 and miR-382, and levels increase in granulosa cells following exosome treatment, it is possible these exosomal miRNAs regulate
ACVR1 levels in pre-ovulatory granulosa cells. Moreover, miR-27b also is predicted to target
ID2, which was down-regulated in pre-ovulatory granulosa cells following exosomes treatment. Analysis of ACVR1 protein level in pre-ovulatory granulosa cells indicates ACVR1 levels are ~ 3 fold higher compared to mid-estrous granulosa cells. This could be explained if exosomes contain ACVR1 themselves and is transferred to granulosa cells. Previously,
ACVR1 was identified in exosomes originating from MC/9 murine cells and SW480 human colorectal carcinoma cells [
33,
34]. We observed exosomes from mid-estrous follicles had higher levels of ACVR1 mRNA (~3.7 fold) and protein (~1.8 fold) compared to exosomes from pre-ovulatory follicles. However, the relative level of ACVR1 protein was quite variable in exosomes, which could be due to heterogeneous population of follicular fluid derived exosomes, and it is unclear if granulosa cells, cumulus cells, or both release exosomes containing ACVR1. Overall these data indicate that exosomes isolated from follicular fluid of mid-estrous follicles possibly transfer ACVR1 mRNA and/or protein.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by benefactors for the Preservation of Equine Genetics, Cecil and Irene Hylton Foundation, and financial support from the Abney Foundation, Ed H. Honnen Award, the France Stone Scholarship, and the Assisted Reproduction Program at Colorado State University.
The authors like to thank Drs. Lisa McLellan and Dawn Sessions-Bresnahan for their help with management of the mares. We also like to thank Drs. Jacobo Rodriguez, Julhiano Rossini and Bernardo Rodrigues for their help with the experimental design and the follicular aspirations, Jennifer Halleran, Stephanie Krick and Werner Glanzner for their help in the laboratory. Finally, we are grateful to the staff and students at the Equine Reproduction Laboratory for all their help with the animal husbandry and sample collections.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Competing interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.
Authors’ contributions
JS conceived the work, performed sample collection, experimental design, experiments, data analysis, co-wrote the manuscript; EC managed the horses, follicle selections and experimental design; QW contributed reagents and assisted with the manuscript; GJB conceived and supervised the work, co-wrote the manuscript. All authors read, corrected and approved the final manuscript.