Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2016

05.11.2015

Resident participation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of outcomes from the ACS-NSQIP database

verfasst von: Laura Doyon, Alejandro Moreno-Koehler, Rocco Ricciardi, Dmitry Nepomnayshy

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

As clinical outcome data are increasingly tied to hospital reimbursement, balancing quality care with training of surgical residents has become critical. We used the ACS-NSQIP database to determine impact of resident participation in laparoscopic gastric bypass on 30-day morbidity and mortality.

Methods

We queried the ACS-NSQIP database from 1/2005 to 12/2012 for laparoscopic gastric bypass, dividing cases between those with or without resident involvement. Univariate and multivariate analyses of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were assessed. A sub-analysis was performed to address whether different resident training levels affected outcomes.

Results

A total of 43,477 laparoscopic gastric bypass cases were available for analysis; 22,189 had resident involvement (resident = R), and 21,288 did not (no resident = NR). Preoperative characteristics were similar between groups. On multivariate analysis, procedures with resident assistance had increased risk of the following complications: superficial site infection (R = 2.1 vs. 1.5 %, p < 0.001), renal failure (R = 0.4 vs. NR = 0.3 %, p = 0.002), urinary tract infection (R = 1.1 vs. 0.9 %, p = 0.027), and sepsis (R = 0.8 vs. NR = 0.6 %, p = 0.019). Increased operative time in the resident group (29 min, p < 0.0001) demonstrated direct linear association with resident trainee level. There was no statistical difference in the incidences of the following: pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, deep surgical site infection, organ space infection, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, mechanical ventilation >48 h, septic shock, cardiac arrest, return to the operating room, or mortality.

Conclusion

Resident participation in laparoscopic gastric bypass was associated with statistically significant, but clinically insignificant increase in incidence of superficial site infection, renal failure, readmission rate, and length of stay. Therefore, although resident participation in laparoscopic gastric bypass is associated with significantly increased operative time, it does not lead to increased mortality and has no clinically significant effect on morbidity.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wheeler HB (1993) Myth and reality in general surgery. Bull Am Coll Surg 78:21–27PubMed Wheeler HB (1993) Myth and reality in general surgery. Bull Am Coll Surg 78:21–27PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB, Jeyarajah DR, Swanstrom LL, Aye RW, Wexner SD, Martinez JM, Ross SB, Awad MM, Franklin ME, Arregui ME, Schirmer BD, Minter RM (2013) General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg 258:440–449CrossRefPubMed Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB, Jeyarajah DR, Swanstrom LL, Aye RW, Wexner SD, Martinez JM, Ross SB, Awad MM, Franklin ME, Arregui ME, Schirmer BD, Minter RM (2013) General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg 258:440–449CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Igwe E, Hernandez E, Rose S, Uppal S (2014) Resident participation in laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact of trainee involvement on operative times and surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 211(484):e1–e7PubMed Igwe E, Hernandez E, Rose S, Uppal S (2014) Resident participation in laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact of trainee involvement on operative times and surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 211(484):e1–e7PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis SS Jr, Husain FA, Lin E, Nandipati KC, Perez S, Sweeney JF (2013) Resident participation in index laparoscopic general surgical cases: impact of the learning environment on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 216:96–104CrossRefPubMed Davis SS Jr, Husain FA, Lin E, Nandipati KC, Perez S, Sweeney JF (2013) Resident participation in index laparoscopic general surgical cases: impact of the learning environment on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 216:96–104CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Advani V, Ahad S, Gonczy C, Markwell S, Hassan I (2012) Does resident involvement effect surgical times and complication rates during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis? An analysis of 16,849 cases from the ACS-NSQIP. Am J Surg 203:347–351 (discussion 351–352) CrossRefPubMed Advani V, Ahad S, Gonczy C, Markwell S, Hassan I (2012) Does resident involvement effect surgical times and complication rates during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis? An analysis of 16,849 cases from the ACS-NSQIP. Am J Surg 203:347–351 (discussion 351–352) CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorgun E, Benlice C, Corrao E, Hammel J, Isik O, Hull T, Remzi FH (2014) Outcomes associated with resident involvement in laparoscopic colorectal surgery suggest a need for earlier and more intensive resident training. Surgery 156:825–832CrossRefPubMed Gorgun E, Benlice C, Corrao E, Hammel J, Isik O, Hull T, Remzi FH (2014) Outcomes associated with resident involvement in laparoscopic colorectal surgery suggest a need for earlier and more intensive resident training. Surgery 156:825–832CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross SW, Oommen B, Kim M, Walters AL, Green JM, Heniford BT, Augenstein VA (2014) A little slower, but just as good: postgraduate year resident versus attending outcomes in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 28:3092–3100CrossRefPubMed Ross SW, Oommen B, Kim M, Walters AL, Green JM, Heniford BT, Augenstein VA (2014) A little slower, but just as good: postgraduate year resident versus attending outcomes in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 28:3092–3100CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Krell RW, Birkmeyer NJ, Reames BN, Carlin AM, Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, Collaborative Michigan Bariatric Surgery (2014) Effects of resident involvement on complication rates after laparoscopic gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg 218:253–260CrossRefPubMed Krell RW, Birkmeyer NJ, Reames BN, Carlin AM, Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, Collaborative Michigan Bariatric Surgery (2014) Effects of resident involvement on complication rates after laparoscopic gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg 218:253–260CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen ME, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY, Zhou L, Huffman K, Wang X, Liu Y, Kraemer K, Meng X, Merkow R, Chow W, Matel B, Richards K, Hart AJ, Dimick JB, Hall BL (2013) Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus. J Am Coll Surg 217(336–46):e1 Cohen ME, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY, Zhou L, Huffman K, Wang X, Liu Y, Kraemer K, Meng X, Merkow R, Chow W, Matel B, Richards K, Hart AJ, Dimick JB, Hall BL (2013) Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus. J Am Coll Surg 217(336–46):e1
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tseng WH, Jin L, Canter RJ, Martinez SR, Khatri VP, Gauvin J, Bold RJ, Wisner D, Taylor S, Chen SL (2011) Surgical resident involvement is safe for common elective general surgery procedures. J Am Coll Surg 213:19–26 (discussion 26–28) CrossRefPubMed Tseng WH, Jin L, Canter RJ, Martinez SR, Khatri VP, Gauvin J, Bold RJ, Wisner D, Taylor S, Chen SL (2011) Surgical resident involvement is safe for common elective general surgery procedures. J Am Coll Surg 213:19–26 (discussion 26–28) CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Iordens GI, Klaassen RA, van Lieshout EM, Cleffken BI, van der Harst E (2012) How to train surgical residents to perform laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass safely. World J Surg 36:2003–2010CrossRefPubMed Iordens GI, Klaassen RA, van Lieshout EM, Cleffken BI, van der Harst E (2012) How to train surgical residents to perform laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass safely. World J Surg 36:2003–2010CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fanous M, Carlin A (2012) Surgical resident participation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y bypass: is it safe? Surgery 152:21–25CrossRefPubMed Fanous M, Carlin A (2012) Surgical resident participation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y bypass: is it safe? Surgery 152:21–25CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) Consortium, Flum DR, Belle SH, King WC, Wahed AS, Berk P, Chapman W, Pories W, Courcoulas A, McCloskey C, Mitchell J, Patterson E, Pomp A, Staten MA, Yanovski SZ, Thirlby R, Wolfe B (2009) Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 361:445–454CrossRef Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) Consortium, Flum DR, Belle SH, King WC, Wahed AS, Berk P, Chapman W, Pories W, Courcoulas A, McCloskey C, Mitchell J, Patterson E, Pomp A, Staten MA, Yanovski SZ, Thirlby R, Wolfe B (2009) Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 361:445–454CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Finks JF, Carlin A, Share D, O’Reilly A, Fan Z, Birkmeyer J, Birkmeyer N, Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative from the Michigan Surgical Collaborative for Outcomes Research Evaluation (2011) Effect of surgical techniques on clinical outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass–results from the Michigan Bariatric surgery collaborative. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:284–289CrossRefPubMed Finks JF, Carlin A, Share D, O’Reilly A, Fan Z, Birkmeyer J, Birkmeyer N, Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative from the Michigan Surgical Collaborative for Outcomes Research Evaluation (2011) Effect of surgical techniques on clinical outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass–results from the Michigan Bariatric surgery collaborative. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:284–289CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Parina RP, Chang DC, Rose JA, Talamini MA (2015) Is a low readmission rate indicative of a good hospital? J Am Coll Surg 220:169–176CrossRefPubMed Parina RP, Chang DC, Rose JA, Talamini MA (2015) Is a low readmission rate indicative of a good hospital? J Am Coll Surg 220:169–176CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Etzioni DA, Wasif N, Dueck AC, Cima RR, Hohmann SF, Naessens JM, Mathur AK, Habermann EB (2015) Association of hospital participation in a surgical outcomes monitoring program with inpatient complications and mortality. JAMA 313(5):505–511CrossRefPubMed Etzioni DA, Wasif N, Dueck AC, Cima RR, Hohmann SF, Naessens JM, Mathur AK, Habermann EB (2015) Association of hospital participation in a surgical outcomes monitoring program with inpatient complications and mortality. JAMA 313(5):505–511CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Resident participation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of outcomes from the ACS-NSQIP database
verfasst von
Laura Doyon
Alejandro Moreno-Koehler
Rocco Ricciardi
Dmitry Nepomnayshy
Publikationsdatum
05.11.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4627-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.