Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics
Erschienen in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 4/2013

01.10.2013 | Original Clinical Article

Review of current technologies and methods supplementing brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

verfasst von: Andrew Chan, Edmond Lou, Doug Hill

Erschienen in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To report on the current technologies and methods supplementing brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Methods

A comprehensive literature review was performed to determine the effectiveness of bracing, to report on imaging techniques that can assist in the assessment of bracing, to understand the roles of the biomechanical treatment concepts on bracing and to address the importance of the quality of life of the brace wearers.

Results

The effectiveness of bracing still remains controversial. Many technologies are still in development to improve the bracing process and quantify the effects of bracing. Imaging techniques with decreased or no radiation are promising in providing more frequent data on curve progression for patients. Computer-assisted design models have been used for both fitting and manufacturing the brace to patient contours. Ultrasound has been developed as a new means of diagnosing scoliosis and determining the effects of a brace on a patient’s spine in real time. The brace treatment outcomes are correlated to the quantity and the quality of brace usage. Compliance monitors and force sensors have been developed to track the quality of brace usage. Improvements to brace wear also require consideration of patient quality of life. Surveys have been developed to describe the effects of family influence and self-image on bracing effectiveness of patient quality of life.

Conclusions

Bracing remains a highly qualitative process, relying on the empirical judgment of the physicians and orthotists, along with buy-in with the patient. The suggested improvements will help to push bracing into a more evidence-based practice.
Literatur
1.
Hattori T, Sakaura H, Iwasaki M, Nagamoto Y, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K (2011) In vivo three-dimensional segmental analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 20:1745–1750CrossRef
2.
Escalada F, Marco E, Duarte E, Ma Muniesa J, Boza R, Tejero M, Cáceres E (2009) Assessment of angle velocity in girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 4:20CrossRef
3.
Asher MA, Burton DC (2006) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects. Scoliosis 1:2CrossRef
4.
Sevastikoglou JA, Linderholm H, Lindgren U (1976) Effect of the Milwaukee brace on vital and ventilatory capacity of scoliotic patients. Acta Orthop Scand 47:540–545CrossRef
5.
Weiss HR, Negrini S, Rigo M, Kotwicki T, Hawes MC, Grivas TB, Maruyama T, Landauer F; SOSORT Guideline Committee (2006) Indications for conservative management of scoliosis (guidelines). Scoliosis 1:5CrossRef
6.
Richards BS, Bernstein RM, D’Amato CR, Thompson GH (2005) Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies: SRS Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2068–2075; discussion 2076–7CrossRef
7.
Emans JB, Hedequist D, Miller R, Cassella M, Hresko MT, Karlin L, Magin M, Ryan K, Hall JE, Miller J, McCarthy C (2003) Reference manual for the Boston scoliosis brace
8.
Negrini S, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J, Zaina F, Chockalingam N, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Romano M, Vasiliadis ES (2010) Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD006850
9.
Nachemson AL, Peterson LE (1995) Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:815–822
10.
Wong MS, Cheng JC, Lam TP, Ng BK, Sin SW, Lee-Shum SL, Chow DH, Tam SY (2008) The effect of rigid versus flexible spinal orthosis on the clinical efficacy and acceptance of the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1360–1365CrossRef
11.
Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, Danielsson A, Morcuende JA (2008) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 371:1527–1537CrossRef
12.
Negrini S, Aulisa AG, Aulisa L, Circo AB, de Mauroy JC, Durmala J, Grivas TB, Knott P, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Minozzi S, O’Brien JP, Papadopoulos D, Rigo M, Rivard CH, Romano M, Wynne JH, Villagrasa M, Weiss HR, Zaina F (2012) 2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis 7:3CrossRef
13.
Kotwicki T, Cheneau J (2008) Biomechanical action of a corrective brace on thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: Cheneau 2000 orthosis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 3:146–153CrossRef
14.
Nnadi C, Fairbank J (2010) Scoliosis: a review. Paediatr Child Health 20:215–220CrossRef
15.
Negrini S, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Rigo M, Zaina F; International Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT) (2009) Guidelines on “Standards of management of idiopathic scoliosis with corrective braces in everyday clinics and in clinical research”: SOSORT Consensus 2008. Scoliosis 4:2CrossRef
16.
Canavese F, Kaelin A (2011) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: indications and efficacy of nonoperative treatment. Indian J Orthop 45:7–14CrossRef
17.
Schiller JR, Thakur NA, Eberson CP (2010) Brace management in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:670–678CrossRef
18.
Sponseller PD (2011) Bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in practice today. J Pediatr Orthop 31:S53–S60CrossRef
19.
Heary RF, Bono CM, Kumar S (2008) Bracing for scoliosis. Neurosurgery 63:125–130CrossRef
20.
Romine SE, Talwalkar VR (2008) Bracing in idiopathic scoliosis. Curr Orthop Practice 19:649–654CrossRef
21.
Deschênes S, Charron G, Beaudoin G, Labelle H, Dubois J, Miron MC, Parent S (2010) Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:989–994CrossRef
22.
McKenna C, Wade R, Faria R, Yang H, Stirk L, Gummerson N, Sculpher M, Woolacott N (2012) EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 16:1–188CrossRef
23.
Wong MS, Cheng JC, Wong MW, So SF (2005) A work study of the CAD/CAM method and conventional manual method in the fabrication of spinal orthoses for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Prosthet Orthot Int 29:93–104CrossRef
24.
Ajemba PO, Durdle NG, Hill DL, Raso VJ (2007) A torso-imaging system to quantify the deformity associated with scoliosis. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 56:1520CrossRef
25.
Périé D, Aubin CE, Petit Y, Beauséjour M, Dansereau J, Labelle H (2003) Boston brace correction in idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1672–1677
26.
Périé D, Aubin CE, Petit Y, Labelle H, Dansereau J (2004) Personalized biomechanical simulations of orthotic treatment in idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 19:190–195CrossRef
27.
Périé D, Sales De Gauzy J, Hobatho MC (2002) Biomechanical evaluation of Cheneau–Toulouse–Munster brace in the treatment of scoliosis using optimisation approach and finite element method. Med Biol Eng Comput 40:296–301CrossRef
28.
Villemure I, Aubin CE, Dansereau J, Labelle H (2004) Biomechanical simulations of the spine deformation process in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from different pathogenesis hypotheses. Eur Spine J 13:83–90CrossRef
29.
Villemure I, Aubin CE, Dansereau J, Labelle H (2002) Simulation of progressive deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a biomechanical model integrating vertebral growth modulation. J Biomech Eng 124:784–790CrossRef
30.
Clin J, Aubin CE, Parent S, Labelle H (2011) Biomechanical modeling of brace treatment of scoliosis: effects of gravitational loads. Med Biol Eng Comput 49:743–753CrossRef
31.
Clin J, Aubin CE, Parent S, Labelle H (2010) A biomechanical study of the Charleston brace for the treatment of scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E940–E947CrossRef
32.
Clin J, Aubin CE, Parent S, Sangole A, Labelle H (2010) Comparison of the biomechanical 3D efficiency of different brace designs for the treatment of scoliosis using a finite element model. Eur Spine J 19:1169–1178CrossRef
33.
Clin J, Aubin CE, Sangole A, Labelle H, Parent S (2010) Correlation between immediate in-brace correction and biomechanical effectiveness of brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1706–1713CrossRef
34.
Chen W, Lou EH, Le LH (2011) Using ultrasound imaging to identify landmarks in vertebra models to assess spinal deformity. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011:8495–8498
35.
Li M, Cheng J, Ying M, Ng B, Zheng YP, Lam TP, Wong WY, Wong MS (2012) Could clinical ultrasound improve the fitting of spinal orthosis for the patients with AIS? Eur Spine J 21:1926–1935CrossRef
36.
Vandal S, Rivard CH, Bradet R (1999) Measuring the compliance behavior of adolescents wearing orthopedic braces. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 22:59–73CrossRef
37.
Havey R, Gavin T, Patwardhan A, Pawelczak S, Ibrahim K, Andersson GB, Lavender S (2002) A reliable and accurate method for measuring orthosis wearing time. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:211–214CrossRef
38.
Nicholson GP, Ferguson-Pell MW, Smith K, Edgar M, Morley T (2003) The objective measurement of spinal orthosis use for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2243–2250; discussion 2250–1CrossRef
39.
Lou E, Raso JV, Hill DL, Mahood JK, Moreau MJ (2004) Correlation between quantity and quality of orthosis wear and treatment outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Prosthet Orthot Int 28:49–54
40.
Takemitsu M, Bowen JR, Rahman T, Glutting JJ, Scott CB (2004) Compliance monitoring of brace treatment for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:2070–2074; discussion 2074CrossRef
41.
Rahman T, Borkhuu B, Littleton AG, Sample W, Moran E, Campbell S, Rogers K, Bowen JR (2010) Electronic monitoring of scoliosis brace wear compliance. J Child Orthop 4:343–347CrossRef
42.
Helfenstein A, Lankes M, Ohlert K, Varoga D, Hahne HJ, Ulrich HW, Hassenpflug J (2006) The objective determination of compliance in treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with spinal orthoses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:339–344CrossRef
43.
Hasler CC, Wietlisbach S, Büchler P (2010) Objective compliance of adolescent girls with idiopathic scoliosis in a dynamic SpineCor brace. J Child Orthop 4:211–218CrossRef
44.
Rahman T, Bowen JR, Takemitsu M, Scott C (2005) The association between brace compliance and outcome for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 25:420–422CrossRef
45.
Lou E, Hill D, Hedden D, Mahood J, Moreau M, Raso J (2011) An objective measurement of brace usage for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Med Eng Phys 33:290–294CrossRef
46.
Lou E, Chan C, Raso V, Hill D, Moreau M, Mahood J, Donauer A (2005) A smart orthosis for the treatment of scoliosis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:1008–1011
47.
Chan A, Lou E, Hill D, Faulkner G (2012) Design and validation of transducers to measure interface force distribution in a spinal orthosis. Med Eng Phys 34:1310–1316CrossRef
48.
Rivett L, Rothberg A, Stewart A, Berkowitz R (2009) The relationship between quality of life and compliance to a brace protocol in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:5CrossRef
49.
Bunge EM, de Bekker-Grob EW, van Biezen FC, Essink-Bot ML, de Koning HJ (2010) Patients’ preferences for scoliosis brace treatment: a discrete choice experiment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:57–63CrossRef
50.
Lindeman M, Behm K (1999) Cognitive strategies and self-esteem as predictors of brace-wear noncompliance in patients with idiopathic scoliosis and kyphosis. J Pediatr Orthop 19:493–499CrossRef
51.
Donnelly MJ, Dolan LA, Grande L, Weinstein SL (2004) Patient and parent perspectives on treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Iowa Orthop J 24:76–83
52.
Olafsson Y, Saraste H, Ahlgren RM (1999) Does bracing affect self-image? A prospective study on 54 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 8:402–405CrossRef
53.
MacLean WE Jr, Green NE, Pierre CB, Ray DC (1989) Stress and coping with scoliosis: psychological effects on adolescents and their families. J Pediatr Orthop 9:257–261CrossRef
54.
Kahanovitz N, Weiser S (1989) The psychological impact of idiopathic scoliosis on the adolescent female. A preliminary multi-center study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:483–485CrossRef
55.
Kuru T, Yilmaz H (2012) Assessment of stress in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients while wearing a brace. Scoliosis 7(Suppl 1):O4CrossRef
56.
Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Hacker DG, Luckyanov N, Land CE (2000) Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. Scoliosis Cohort Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2052–2063CrossRef
57.
Schmitz A, König R, Kandyba J, Pennekamp P, Schmitt O, Jaeger UE (2005) Visualisation of the brace effect on the spinal profile in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 14:138–143CrossRef
58.
Adam C, Izatt M, Askin G (2010) Design and evaluation of an MRI compatible axial compression device for 3D assessment of spinal deformity and flexibility in AIS. Stud Health Technol Inform 158:38–43
59.
Aroeira RM, Leal JS, de Melo Pertence AE (2011) New method of scoliosis assessment: preliminary results using computerized photogrammetry. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:1584–1591CrossRef
60.
Suzuki S, Yamamuro T, Shikata J, Shimizu K, Iida H (1989) Ultrasound measurement of vertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:252–255
61.
Gorton GE 3rd, Young ML, Masso PD (2012) Accuracy, reliability, and validity of a 3-dimensional scanner for assessing torso shape in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:957–965CrossRef
62.
Eldeeb H, Asfour S, Boubekri N (2000) CT/MR imaging: a design tool for custom orthosis. Disabil Rehabil 22:583–590CrossRef
63.
Nie WZ, Ye M, Liu ZD, Wang CT (2009) The patient-specific brace design and biomechanical analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Biomech Eng 131:041007CrossRef
64.
Cheng FH, Shih SL, Chou WK, Liu CL, Sung WH, Chen CS (2010) Finite element analysis of the scoliotic spine under different loading conditions. Biomed Mater Eng 20:251–259
65.
Berteau JP, Pithioux M, Mesure S, Bollini G, Chabrand P (2011) Beyond the classic correction system: a numerical nonrigid approach to the scoliosis brace. Spine J 11:424–431CrossRef
66.
Landauer F, Wimmer C, Behensky H (2003) Estimating the final outcome of brace treatment for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis at 6-month follow-up. Pediatr Rehabil 6:201–207
67.
Katz DE, Herring JA, Browne RH, Kelly DM, Birch JG (2010) Brace wear control of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1343–1352CrossRef
68.
Miller DJ, Franzone JM, Matsumoto H, Gomez JA, Avendaño J, Hyman JE, Roye DP Jr, Vitale MG (2012) Electronic monitoring improves brace-wearing compliance in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:717–721CrossRef
69.
Wong MS, Evans JH (1998) Biomechanical evaluation of the Milwaukee brace. Prosthet Orthot Int 22:54–67
70.
Pham VM, Houilliez A, Schill A, Carpentier A, Herbaux B, Thevenon A (2008) Study of the pressures applied by a Chêneau brace for correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Prosthet Orthot Int 32:345–355CrossRef
71.
Aubin CE, Labelle H, Ruszkowski A, Petit Y, Gignac D, Joncas J, Dansereau J (1999) Variability of strap tension in brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:349–354CrossRef
72.
Loukos I, Zachariou C, Nicolopoulos C, Korres D, Efstathopoulos N (2011) Analysis of the corrective forces exerted by a dynamic derotation brace (DDB). Prosthet Orthot Int 35:365–372CrossRef
73.
Antonelli MG, Beomonte Zobel P, Raimondi P, Raparelli T, Costanzo G (2009) A new brace for the treatment of scoliosis. In: Brebbia CA (ed) Modelling in medicine and biology VIII. WIT Press Publishing, UK, pp 159–169CrossRef
74.
Chalmers E, Lou E, Hill D, Zhao VH, Wong MS (2012) Development of a pressure control system for brace treatment of scoliosis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 20:557–563CrossRef
75.
Lou E, Hill D, Raso J, Donauer A, Moreau M, Mahood J, Hedden D (2012) Smart brace versus standard rigid brace for the treatment of scoliosis: a pilot study. Stud Health Technol Inform 176:338–341
76.
Eliason MJ, Richman LC (1984) Psychological effects of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. J Dev Behav Pediatr 5:169–172CrossRef
77.
Kotwicki T, Kinel E, Stryła W, Szulc A (2007) Estimation of the stress related to conservative scoliosis therapy: an analysis based on BSSQ questionnaires. Scoliosis 2:1CrossRef
78.
Danielsson AJ, Hasserius R, Ohlin A, Nachemson AL (2010) Health-related quality of life in untreated versus brace-treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a long-term follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:199–205CrossRef
79.
Sapountzi-Krepia D, Psychogiou M, Peterson D, Zafiri V, Iordanopoulou E, Michailidou F, Christodoulou A (2006) The experience of brace treatment in children/adolescents with scoliosis. Scoliosis 1:8CrossRef
80.
Theologis TN, Jefferson RJ, Simpson AH, Turner-Smith AR, Fairbank JC (1993) Quantifying the cosmetic defect of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:909–912CrossRef
81.
Ugwonali OF, Lomas G, Choe JC, Hyman JE, Lee FY, Vitale MG, Roye DP Jr (2004) Effect of bracing on the quality of life of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 4:254–260CrossRef
82.
Andersen MO, Christensen SB, Thomsen K (2006) Outcome at 10 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:350–354CrossRef
83.
Müller C, Fuchs K, Winter C, Rosenbaum D, Schmidt C, Bullmann V, Schulte TL (2011) Prospective evaluation of physical activity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis or kyphosis receiving brace treatment. Eur Spine J 20:1127–1136CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Review of current technologies and methods supplementing brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
verfasst von
Andrew Chan
Edmond Lou
Doug Hill
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1863-2521
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2548
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-013-0500-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 4/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Original Clinical Article

Eight plate should not be used for treating leg length discrepancy

Calendar of Events

Upcoming meetings and courses

Original Clinical Article

Prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip in preterm infants with maternal risk factors

Original Clinical Article

Scoliosis after chest wall resection

Original Clinical Article

Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: the results of an evolving protocol of management

Original Clinical Article

Prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip in children with clubfoot

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise