Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastroenterology 7/2017

09.11.2016 | Original Article—Alimentary Tract

Risk factors of nonadherence to colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy and its impact on clinical outcomes: a KASID multicenter study

verfasst von: Chung Hyun Tae, Chang Mo Moon, Seong-Eun Kim, Sung-Ae Jung, Chang Soo Eun, Jae Jun Park, Geom Seog Seo, Jae Myung Cha, Sung Chul Park, Jaeyoung Chun, Hyun Jung Lee, Yunho Jung, Jin Oh Kim, Young-Eun Joo, Dong Il Park

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastroenterology | Ausgabe 7/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

An optimal surveillance program is important to prevent advanced colorectal neoplasm. In this context, we have evaluated the cumulative risk of high-risk adenoma (HRA) or colorectal cancer (CRC) according to surveillance interval time after polypectomy. In addition, we assessed risk factors for late surveillance to determine whether late surveillance can impact the risk of subsequent advanced colorectal neoplasm.

Methods

This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study involving 3562 subjects who had undergone removal of at least one adenoma at the index colonoscopy and who subsequently underwent a surveillance colonoscopy. The subjects were classified into an early, appropriate or late group depending on the timing of the surveillance colonoscopy, performed using modified U.S. guidelines.

Results

With 3% of the study population with LRA and HRA at the index colonoscopy going on to develop HRA or CRC, the estimated surveillance intervals calculated would be 6.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.42–7.10] years and 3.1 (95% CI 2.61–4.45) years, respectively. The predictors of late surveillance were female gender [odd ratio (OR) 1.21; 95% CI 1.04–1.40], having undergone the procedure in small-to-medium-sized cities (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.36–2.72) and HRA at index colonoscopy (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.19–1.59). The risk factors for subsequent HRA or CRC were late surveillance (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.03–1.74), male gender (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.54–2.95), having undergone the procedure in small-to-medium-sized cities (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.11–2.40) and HRA at index colonoscopy (OR 2.60; 95% CI 2.04–3.33).

Conclusions

Women, having undergone the procedure in small-to-medium-sized cities and the presence of an HRA at the index colonoscopy were found to be independent risk factors for late surveillance colonoscopy. Late surveillance is significantly predictive of subsequent HRA or CRC.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–81.CrossRefPubMed Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–81.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher SW, Dauphinee WD. Should colorectal carcinoma be sought in periodic health examinations?—an approach to the evidence. Clin Invest Med. 1981;4:23–31.PubMed Fletcher SW, Dauphinee WD. Should colorectal carcinoma be sought in periodic health examinations?—an approach to the evidence. Clin Invest Med. 1981;4:23–31.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Cha JM. Impact of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: an evidence-based review of published prospective and retrospective studies. Intest Res. 2014;12:268–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Cha JM. Impact of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: an evidence-based review of published prospective and retrospective studies. Intest Res. 2014;12:268–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:901–6.CrossRefPubMed Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:901–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. A randomized surveillance study of patients with pedunculated and small sessile tubular and tubulovillous adenomas. The Funen Adenoma Follow-up Study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995;30:686–92. Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. A randomized surveillance study of patients with pedunculated and small sessile tubular and tubulovillous adenomas. The Funen Adenoma Follow-up Study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995;30:686–92.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertario L, Russo A, Sala P, et al. Predictors of metachronous colorectal neoplasms in sporadic adenoma patients. Int J Cancer. 2003;105:82–7.CrossRefPubMed Bertario L, Russo A, Sala P, et al. Predictors of metachronous colorectal neoplasms in sporadic adenoma patients. Int J Cancer. 2003;105:82–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:832–41.CrossRefPubMed Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:832–41.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonithon-Kopp C, Piard F, Fenger C, et al. Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:323–33.CrossRefPubMed Bonithon-Kopp C, Piard F, Fenger C, et al. Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:323–33.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ, et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002). Gut. 2010;59:666–89.CrossRefPubMed Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ, et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002). Gut. 2010;59:666–89.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–57.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–57.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau JM, et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2013;45:842–51.CrossRefPubMed Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau JM, et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2013;45:842–51.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong SN, Yang DH, Kim YH, et al. Korean guidelines for post-polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2012;59:99–117.CrossRefPubMed Hong SN, Yang DH, Kim YH, et al. Korean guidelines for post-polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2012;59:99–117.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee HH, Kim SK, Choi HH, et al. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers in average-risk Korean subjects with a normal initial colonoscopy. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016;27:17–22.CrossRefPubMed Lee HH, Kim SK, Choi HH, et al. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers in average-risk Korean subjects with a normal initial colonoscopy. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016;27:17–22.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung WK, Lau JY, Suen BY, et al. Repeat-screening colonoscopy 5 years after normal baseline-screening colonoscopy in average-risk Chinese: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2028–34.CrossRefPubMed Leung WK, Lau JY, Suen BY, et al. Repeat-screening colonoscopy 5 years after normal baseline-screening colonoscopy in average-risk Chinese: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2028–34.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV, et al. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1077–85.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV, et al. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1077–85.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon M, Kim N, Nam B, et al. Changing trends in colorectal cancer in the Republic of Korea: contrast with Japan. Epidemiol Health. 2015;37:e2015038.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yoon M, Kim N, Nam B, et al. Changing trends in colorectal cancer in the Republic of Korea: contrast with Japan. Epidemiol Health. 2015;37:e2015038.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryu SY, Crespi CM, Maxwell AE. Colorectal cancer among Koreans living in South Korea versus California: incidence, mortality, and screening rates. Ethn Health. 2014;19:406–23.CrossRefPubMed Ryu SY, Crespi CM, Maxwell AE. Colorectal cancer among Koreans living in South Korea versus California: incidence, mortality, and screening rates. Ethn Health. 2014;19:406–23.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Iskandar H, Yan Y, Elwing J, et al. Predictors of poor adherence of US gastroenterologists with colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:971–8.CrossRefPubMed Iskandar H, Yan Y, Elwing J, et al. Predictors of poor adherence of US gastroenterologists with colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:971–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Radaelli F, Paggi S, Bortoli A, et al. Overutilization of post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy in clinical practice: a prospective, multicentre study. Dig Liver Dis. 2012;44:748–53.CrossRefPubMed Radaelli F, Paggi S, Bortoli A, et al. Overutilization of post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy in clinical practice: a prospective, multicentre study. Dig Liver Dis. 2012;44:748–53.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson MR, Grubber J, Grambow SC, et al. Physician nonadherence to colonoscopy interval guidelines in the veterans affairs healthcare system. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:938–51.CrossRef Johnson MR, Grubber J, Grambow SC, et al. Physician nonadherence to colonoscopy interval guidelines in the veterans affairs healthcare system. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:938–51.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Stock C, Holleczek B, Hoffmeister M, et al. Adherence to physician recommendations for surveillance in opportunistic colorectal cancer screening: the necessity of organized surveillance. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82676.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stock C, Holleczek B, Hoffmeister M, et al. Adherence to physician recommendations for surveillance in opportunistic colorectal cancer screening: the necessity of organized surveillance. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82676.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat van Heijningen EM, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Steyerberg EW, et al. Adherence to surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomas: a large, community-based study. Gut. 2015;64:1584–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Heijningen EM, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Steyerberg EW, et al. Adherence to surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomas: a large, community-based study. Gut. 2015;64:1584–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonkers D, Ernst J, Pladdet I, et al. Endoscopic follow-up of 383 patients with colorectal adenoma: an observational study in daily practice. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2006;15:202–10.CrossRefPubMed Jonkers D, Ernst J, Pladdet I, et al. Endoscopic follow-up of 383 patients with colorectal adenoma: an observational study in daily practice. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2006;15:202–10.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy CC, Lewis CL, Golin CE, et al. Underuse of surveillance colonoscopy in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:633–41.CrossRefPubMed Murphy CC, Lewis CL, Golin CE, et al. Underuse of surveillance colonoscopy in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:633–41.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang Y, Gong W, Su B, et al. Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:838–45.CrossRefPubMed Huang Y, Gong W, Su B, et al. Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:838–45.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenspan M, Chehl N, Shawron K, et al. Patient non-adherence and cancellations are higher for screening colonoscopy compared with surveillance colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:2930–6.CrossRefPubMed Greenspan M, Chehl N, Shawron K, et al. Patient non-adherence and cancellations are higher for screening colonoscopy compared with surveillance colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:2930–6.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Lukin DJ, Jandorf LH, Dhulkifl RJ, et al. Effect of comorbid conditions on adherence to colorectal cancer screening. J Cancer Educ. 2012;27:269–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lukin DJ, Jandorf LH, Dhulkifl RJ, et al. Effect of comorbid conditions on adherence to colorectal cancer screening. J Cancer Educ. 2012;27:269–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh A, Kuo YF, Goodwin JS. Many patients who undergo surgery for colorectal cancer receive surveillance colonoscopies earlier than recommended by guidelines. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(65–72):e1. Singh A, Kuo YF, Goodwin JS. Many patients who undergo surgery for colorectal cancer receive surveillance colonoscopies earlier than recommended by guidelines. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(65–72):e1.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Chun H, Khang YH, Kim IH, et al. Explaining gender differences in ill-health in South Korea: the roles of socio-structural, psychosocial, and behavioral factors. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:988–1001.CrossRefPubMed Chun H, Khang YH, Kim IH, et al. Explaining gender differences in ill-health in South Korea: the roles of socio-structural, psychosocial, and behavioral factors. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:988–1001.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Watkines Kevin. Team for the preparation of Human development report. 1st ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006. Watkines Kevin. Team for the preparation of Human development report. 1st ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro JA, Klabunde CN, Thompson TD, et al. Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21:895–904.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shapiro JA, Klabunde CN, Thompson TD, et al. Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21:895–904.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodwin JS, Singh A, Reddy N, et al. Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1335–43.CrossRefPubMed Goodwin JS, Singh A, Reddy N, et al. Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1335–43.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheffield KM, Han Y, Kuo YF, et al. Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: variation by physician and geographic region. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:542–50.CrossRefPubMed Sheffield KM, Han Y, Kuo YF, et al. Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: variation by physician and geographic region. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:542–50.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Laiyemo AO, Pinsky PF, Marcus PM, et al. Utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy in the continued follow-up study of the polyp prevention trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:562–7 (quiz 497). Laiyemo AO, Pinsky PF, Marcus PM, et al. Utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy in the continued follow-up study of the polyp prevention trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:562–7 (quiz 497).
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Sint Nicolaas J, de Jonge V, Cahen DL, et al. Awareness of surveillance recommendations among patients with colorectal adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:405–11.CrossRefPubMed Sint Nicolaas J, de Jonge V, Cahen DL, et al. Awareness of surveillance recommendations among patients with colorectal adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:405–11.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Saini SD, Nayak RS, Kuhn L, et al. Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines?: results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:554–8.CrossRefPubMed Saini SD, Nayak RS, Kuhn L, et al. Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines?: results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:554–8.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L, et al. Role of colonoscopy and polyp characteristics in colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polyp detection: a population-based case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:225–32.CrossRefPubMed Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L, et al. Role of colonoscopy and polyp characteristics in colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polyp detection: a population-based case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:225–32.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Sint Nicolaas J, de Jonge V, van Baalen O, et al. Optimal resource allocation in colonoscopy: timing of follow-up colonoscopies in relation to adenoma detection rates. Endoscopy. 2013;45:545–52.CrossRefPubMed Sint Nicolaas J, de Jonge V, van Baalen O, et al. Optimal resource allocation in colonoscopy: timing of follow-up colonoscopies in relation to adenoma detection rates. Endoscopy. 2013;45:545–52.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Seo JY, Chun J, Lee C, et al. Novel risk stratification for recurrence after endoscopic resection of advanced colorectal adenoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:655–64.CrossRefPubMed Seo JY, Chun J, Lee C, et al. Novel risk stratification for recurrence after endoscopic resection of advanced colorectal adenoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:655–64.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat van Enckevort CC, de Graaf AP, Hollema H, et al. Predictors of colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy: based on initial and consecutive findings. Neth J Med. 2014;72:139–45.PubMed van Enckevort CC, de Graaf AP, Hollema H, et al. Predictors of colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy: based on initial and consecutive findings. Neth J Med. 2014;72:139–45.PubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. Risk of advanced lesions at first follow-up colonoscopy in high-risk groups as defined by the United Kingdom post-polypectomy surveillance guideline: data from a single U.S. center. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:299–306.CrossRefPubMed Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. Risk of advanced lesions at first follow-up colonoscopy in high-risk groups as defined by the United Kingdom post-polypectomy surveillance guideline: data from a single U.S. center. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:299–306.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Risk factors of nonadherence to colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy and its impact on clinical outcomes: a KASID multicenter study
verfasst von
Chung Hyun Tae
Chang Mo Moon
Seong-Eun Kim
Sung-Ae Jung
Chang Soo Eun
Jae Jun Park
Geom Seog Seo
Jae Myung Cha
Sung Chul Park
Jaeyoung Chun
Hyun Jung Lee
Yunho Jung
Jin Oh Kim
Young-Eun Joo
Dong Il Park
Publikationsdatum
09.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastroenterology / Ausgabe 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0944-1174
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-5922
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-016-1280-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2017

Journal of Gastroenterology 7/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract

Quantitative diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis using EUS elastography

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Triglyzeridsenker schützt nicht nur Hochrisikopatienten

10.05.2024 Hypercholesterinämie Nachrichten

Patienten mit Arteriosklerose-bedingten kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen, die trotz Statineinnahme zu hohe Triglyzeridspiegel haben, profitieren von einer Behandlung mit Icosapent-Ethyl, und zwar unabhängig vom individuellen Risikoprofil.

Gibt es eine Wende bei den bioresorbierbaren Gefäßstützen?

In den USA ist erstmals eine bioresorbierbare Gefäßstütze – auch Scaffold genannt – zur Rekanalisation infrapoplitealer Arterien bei schwerer PAVK zugelassen worden. Das markiert einen Wendepunkt in der Geschichte dieser speziellen Gefäßstützen.

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Wie managen Sie die schmerzhafte diabetische Polyneuropathie?

10.05.2024 DDG-Jahrestagung 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit Capsaicin-Pflastern steht eine neue innovative Therapie bei schmerzhafter diabetischer Polyneuropathie zur Verfügung. Bei therapierefraktären Schmerzen stellt die Hochfrequenz-Rückenmarkstimulation eine adäquate Option dar.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.