Introduction
The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (MabThera
®/Rituxan
®, manufactured by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd) targets and depletes CD20+ B cells and is a biologic immunosuppressive therapy indicated for use in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) since 2006 [
1,
2]. Rituximab in combination with methotrexate (MTX) improves disease symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe, active RA who responded inadequately to ≥ 1 antitumor necrosis factor agent (aTNF). Rituximab also reduces the rate of progression of joint damage as measured by X-ray and improves physical function [
3‐
10].
Long-term follow-up data from rituximab trials have demonstrated a well-tolerated safety profile in patients with RA (up to 11 years’ follow-up) [
11] as well as in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (up to 5 years’ follow-up), for which rituximab is also indicated [
12,
13]. Although these data are encouraging, it is important to continue monitoring the long-term safety of rituximab in patients with autoimmune diseases to identify potential cumulative risks associated with prolonged and repeated peripheral blood B-cell depletion, such as immunosuppression-associated malignancy.
Patients with RA have a slightly higher overall malignancy risk than the general population due to an elevated risk of specific malignancies, including lymphoma, lung cancer, and nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) [
14‐
16]. It is unclear whether this increased malignancy risk is a consequence of the underlying inflammatory activity associated with the disease itself or the immunosuppressive therapies used to treat RA. Several studies in patients with RA have reported no additional risk of overall malignancy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologics, including aTNFs [
17‐
20], Janus kinase inhibitors [
21], tocilizumab [
22,
23], and rituximab [
17,
20]. However, there are conflicting findings concerning the risk of NMSC with aTNF therapy [
18‐
20,
24‐
26].
A recent analysis of data from patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis treated with rituximab found no increase in malignancy risk compared with that in the general population [
27]. Similarly, there was no increased risk of malignancy in patients with RA treated with rituximab in long-term clinical trials over 11 years compared with that observed in the general population or in published data in adults with RA [
11]. The aim of our analysis is to further evaluate and characterize the potential risk of malignancy in patients with RA treated with rituximab using spontaneous postmarketing data and available clinical trial data.
Methods
Analysis of the Rituximab Global Company Safety Database in RA
The global company safety database includes all serious and nonserious cases from spontaneous sources where rituximab is considered “suspect” (irrespective of reporter and company causality assessment), in addition to the serious adverse events and designated nonserious adverse events reported from global clinical trials. To provide cumulative malignant events for patients receiving rituximab for RA, the global company safety database was searched up to June 17, 2014, using the standard Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA; Version 17.0), with a subsequent search covering the period of June 18, 2014, to April 30, 2017 (MedDRA Version 20.0). The search used the standardized MedDRA queries (SMQs) “Malignant tumors wide” and “Skin malignant tumors wide.” Cumulative data for the five most frequently reported high-level group terms are presented, including the most frequently reported MedDRA preferred terms and patient characteristics (sex, age, and history of prior malignancy). Incidence rates of malignant events could not be estimated, as it was not possible to accurately calculate overall patient exposure from the global safety database.
Based on the potentially increased risk of skin cancer or NMSC in patients with RA treated with biologics [
26], additional searches and analyses were conducted for patients with skin malignancies. The SMQ “Skin malignant tumors wide” was used to broadly cover all skin malignant tumor preferred terms, including preferred terms of interest for further evaluation of NMSC (basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of skin, Bowen disease) and skin cancer. Cases with reported preferred terms of NMSC and skin cancer were analyzed further at the case level.
Analyses conducted to investigate any causative link between NMSC and rituximab took into account the following factors: latency of onset from first dose of rituximab and from most recent dose of rituximab, rituximab therapy duration, and cumulative dose of rituximab before the onset of the NMSC event; latency of other immunosuppressants (first/last dose); ethnicity; concomitant medications as risk factors; other known risk factors; history of malignancy/concurrent malignancy; and diagnosis confirmed by a biopsy.
Analysis of the rituximab global company safety database for RA was an observational study that used only de-identified patient records and did not involve the collection, use, or transmittal of individually identifiable data; therefore, institutional review board approval to conduct this analysis was not necessary. The analysis of the RA clinical trial database was a pooled observed case analysis of safety data from patients who participated in the RA clinical trial program. Study designs and results of the clinical trials have been previously published and the study protocols for each clinical trial were approved by an ethics committee or institutional review board at each participating center before the start of each study. All patients provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Analysis of the RA Global Clinical Trial Database
The RA clinical trial database included patients with moderate-to-severe active RA treated with rituximab plus MTX enrolled in a global clinical trial program, which included MTX-naive patients as well as patients with an inadequate response to prior DMARDs including aTNFs. It comprised eight randomized clinical trials, two long-term open-label extensions, and one open-label prospective study [
3‐
10,
28,
29] as of September 2012 (final clinical cut-off date). Eligibility criteria, study designs, and treatment regimens for these trials have been previously published [
3‐
10,
28,
29]. The rituximab all-exposure population consisted of all patients exposed to at least one or part of one rituximab infusion, regardless of dose. The clinical database of the all-exposure RA population was searched for malignancy events using the SMQ (MedDRA Version 16.0) “Malignant tumors wide.”
The analysis of the RA clinical trial database was a pooled observed case analysis of safety data from patients who participated in the RA clinical trial program. Study designs and results of the clinical trials have been previously published and the study protocols for each clinical trial were approved by an ethics committee or institutional review board at each participating center before the start of each study. All patients provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Statistical Analyses
Malignancy rates are reported as events per 1000 patient-years (PY). Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated as the ratio of number of observed malignancies to expected malignancies based on background rates within general population samples. Age- and sex-specific reference values of non-NMSC malignancy rates in patients with RA and in the general US population were obtained from previously published reports [
11] and from the US National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database [
30], respectively. Where available, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported.
Discussion
This study represents the most comprehensive analysis of long-term malignancy reporting rates in patients treated with rituximab for RA, drawing on all spontaneously reported safety events since 2006 and RA clinical trials covering a period up to 11 years of follow-up. Analysis of organ-specific malignancies of interest in patients with RA found no increased risk with rituximab treatment. Breast cancer was the most frequently reported malignant event in the rituximab global company safety database and the most frequently reported solid tumor observed in the clinical trial program. However, reported rates did not differ from those of the general population of adults with RA [
32]. Skin neoplasms were the most frequent high-level group terms in the rituximab global company safety database, of which the majority were NMSC, a type of malignancy previously suggested to be increased by exposure to biologics [
19,
24,
26]. The incidence rate of NMSC in the rituximab clinical trial program (4.6 per 1000 PY) [
11] was lower than those reported in patients with RA who received aTNFs (18.9 per 1000 PY), nonbiologic DMARDs (12.7 per 1000 PY) [
33], as well as other therapies (18.1 per 1000 PY) [
34]. In addition, a detailed review of NMSC cases in the safety database did not reveal any specific pattern and was consistent with epidemiology and literature reports in nononcology indications, indicating no additional risk of NMSC related to rituximab [
16,
30].
The extended analysis of long-term follow-up data from the rituximab clinical trial program in RA [
11] showed no trend toward increased overall risk of malignancies with rituximab over time. These robust data pooled from randomized controlled trials provide information from a frequently assessed patient population in which significant comorbidities such as prior malignancy were excluded, reducing confounding factors. Importantly, the lack of increased malignancy risk with rituximab in patients with RA was supported by analysis of the global safety database, with less stringent inclusion criteria. Findings from the British Society of Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) and the Swedish Rheumatology Quality/Anti-Rheumatic Therapy in Sweden (SRQ/ARTIS) registries [
20,
35] and recent data from the SUNSTONE registry [
36] further support the conclusion that malignancy risk in patients with RA is not increased by treatment with rituximab compared with nonbiologic treatment.
A strength of this analysis is the presentation of safety data from both the global company safety database and the RA clinical trials database. Although an incidence rate could be calculated for the clinical trials database, patients with significant comorbidities are excluded from clinical trials. The spontaneously reported data from the global safety database, on the other hand, included patients with any comorbidities and pre-existing conditions but could not yield an incidence rate due to the inability to accurately calculate overall patient exposure. In addition, because safety data for rituximab are widely known, there may be a channeling bias related to treatment, with patients at higher risk of malignancy or recurrence being treated with rituximab [
6,
8,
11,
17]. This may result in an increased rate of malignancy in observational databases. Thus, the sum of this report gives the most complete picture of malignancies in patients with RA exposed to rituximab with the data currently available.
A major confounding factor in the analysis of malignancy in patients with RA following rituximab treatment is that many patients with RA receive rituximab therapy after treatment with other DMARDs or biologics for RA [
37,
38]. Many patients had received prior DMARDs, including aTNF therapy, prior to enrollment and, therefore, had a cumulative exposure to biologic treatment longer than the stated follow-up periods. Indeed, aTNF treatment may increase the risk of NMSC [
18,
19,
24,
26]. An additional limitation of the analysis is that patients stopping rituximab therapy are more likely to have been lost to follow-up than those staying on therapy, which may have led to an exclusion of certain patient sub-populations within this analysis. It is also possible that some cases of malignancy among patients with RA receiving rituximab may not have been reported to the rituximab global company safety database and therefore were not included in this analysis. Finally, the SEER database that was used for comparison of age- and sex-matched SIRs contained data from the US general population whereas clinical trial data were obtained from patients with RA in multiple global countries.
Conclusions
This safety analysis of the global company postmarketing safety database and long-term clinical trial data identified no additional increased risk of malignancy of any type with long-term use of rituximab treatment among patients with RA. Malignancy reporting rates from patients in RA clinical trials remained stable over time, and malignancy types were consistent with those expected in patients with RA.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the patients, investigators, and investigative staff who contributed to the rituximab global company safety database and who participated in the rituximab global RA clinical trial program.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.