Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
World Journal of Surgery
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2019

04.01.2019 | Scientific Review

Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis

verfasst von: Ka Ting Ng, Azlan Kok Vui Tsia, Vanessa Yu Ling Chong

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive surgery has been considered as an alternative to open surgery by surgeons for colorectal cancer. However, the efficacy and safety profiles of robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer remain unclear in the literature. The primary aim of this review was to determine whether robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RAS) has better clinical outcomes for colorectal cancer patients than conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS).

Methods

All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies were systematically searched in the databases of CENTRAL, EMBASE and PubMed from their inception until January 2018. Case reports, case series and non-systematic reviews were excluded.

Results

Seventy-three studies (6 RCTs and 67 observational studies) were eligible (n = 169,236) for inclusion in the data synthesis. In comparison with the CLS arm, RAS cohort was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of conversion to open surgery (ρ < 0.001, I2 = 65%; REM: OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.30,0.53), all-cause mortality (ρ < 0.001, I2 = 7%; FEM: OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.36,0.64) and wound infection (ρ < 0.001, I2 = 0%; FEM: OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.11,1.39). Patients who received RAS had a significantly shorter duration of hospitalization (ρ < 0.001, I2 = 94%; REM: MD − 0.77; 95% CI 1.12, − 0.41; day), time to oral diet (ρ < 0.001, I2 = 60%; REM: MD − 0.43; 95% CI − 0.64, − 0.21; day) and lesser intraoperative blood loss (ρ = 0.01, I2 = 88%; REM: MD − 18.05; 95% CI − 32.24, − 3.85; ml). However, RAS cohort was noted to require a significant longer duration of operative time (ρ < 0.001, I2 = 93%; REM: MD 38.19; 95% CI 28.78,47.60; min).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggests that RAS provides better clinical outcomes for colorectal cancer patients as compared to the CLS at the expense of longer duration of operative time. However, the inconclusive trial sequential analysis and an overall low level of evidence in this review warrant future adequately powered RCTs to draw firm conclusion.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
2.
Addae JK, Gani F, Fang SY et al (2017) A comparison of trends in operative approach and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery. J Surg Res 208:111–120PubMedCrossRef
3.
Jung YB, Kang J, Park EJ et al (2016) Time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer: comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 26:799–805CrossRef
4.
Chen S-T, Wu M-C, Hsu T-C et al (2017) Comparison of outcome and cost among open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical treatments for rectal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis of nationwide inpatient sample data. J Surg Oncol 117:1–9
5.
Midura EF, Hanseman DJ, Hoehn RS et al (2015) The effect of surgical approach on short-term oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Surg US 158:453–459CrossRef
6.
Kang J, Park YA, Baik SH et al (2016) A comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery in the treatment of right-sided colon cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 26:497–502CrossRef
7.
Sun Z, Kim J, Adam MA et al (2016) Minimally invasive versus open low anterior resection equivalent survival in a national analysis of 14,033 patients with rectal cancer. Ann Surg 263:1152–1158PubMedCrossRef
8.
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic- assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
9.
Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J et al (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645PubMedCrossRef
10.
Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH et al (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): Survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15:767–774PubMedCrossRef
11.
van der Pas MHGM, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218PubMedCrossRef
12.
Wang G, Wang Z, Jiang Z et al (2016) Male urinary and sexual function after robotic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 13:e1725CrossRef
13.
Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H et al (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer the rolarr randomized clinical trial. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 318:1569–1580CrossRef
14.
Kim MJ, Park SC, Park JW et al (2017) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a phase II open label prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 267:243–251CrossRef
15.
Speicher PJ, Englum BR, Ganapathi AM et al (2015) Robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a national perspective on short-term oncologic outcomes. Ann Surg 262:1040–1045PubMedCrossRef
16.
Baek SJ, AL-Asari S, Jeong DH et al (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 27:4157–4163CrossRef
17.
Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A et al (2015) Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center. Surg Today 46:957–962PubMedCrossRef
18.
Wilder FG, Burnett A, Oliver J et al (2015) A review of the long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Indian J Surg 78:214–219PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Liao G, Zhao Z, Lin S et al (2014) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials. World J Surg Oncol 12:122PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Zhang X, Wei ZQ, Bie MJ et al (2016) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 30:5601–5614PubMedCrossRef
21.
Sheng SH, Zhao TC, Wang X (2018) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis: a network meta-analysis. Medicine Baltimore 97:e11817PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015. BMJ 349:g4647CrossRef
23.
Koh FHX, Tan K-K, Lieske B et al (2014) Endowrist versus wrist: a case-controlled study comparing robotic versus hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:452–456PubMedCrossRef
24.
Fernandez R, Anaya DA, Li LT et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus robotic rectal resection for rectal cancer in a veteran population. Am J Surg 206:509–517PubMedCrossRef
25.
26.
McPheeters ML, Kripalani S, Peterson NB et al (2012) Quality improvement interventions to address health disparities. Closing the quality gap: revisiting the state of the science. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 208:G1–2
27.
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J et al (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:1–13CrossRef
28.
29.
30.
Thorlund K, Engstrom J, Wetterslev J et al (2017) User manual for trial sequential analysis (TSA). Copenhagen Trial Unit 1:1–114
31.
Ferrara F, Piagnerelli R, Scheiterle M et al (2016) Laparoscopy versus robotic surgery for colorectal cancer: a single-center initial experience. Surg Innov 23:374–380PubMedCrossRef
32.
Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JDI, Ballantyne GH et al (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 20:1521–1525CrossRef
33.
Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS et al (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1480–1487PubMedCrossRef
34.
Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A et al (2009) Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. JSLS 13:176–183PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A et al (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 24:2888–2894CrossRef
36.
Popescu I, Vasilescu C, Tomulescu V et al (2010) The minimally invasive approach, laparoscopic and robotic, in rectal resection for cancer: a single center experience. Acta Chir Iugosl 57:29–35PubMedCrossRef
37.
Baek J-H, Pastor C, Pigazzi A (2010) Robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 25:521–525PubMedCrossRef
38.
Bertani E, Chiappa A, Biffi R et al (2011) Assessing appropriateness for elective colorectal cancer surgery: clinical, oncological, and quality-of-life short-term outcomes employing different treatment approaches. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:1317–1327PubMedCrossRef
39.
Jiménez Rodríguez RM, Díaz Pavón JM, de La Portilla de Juan F et al (2011) Prospective randomised study: robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer resection. Cirugía Española 89:432–438 (English Ed) PubMedCrossRef
40.
Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J et al (2011) Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:151–156PubMedCrossRef
41.
Patel CB, Ragupathi M, Ramos-Valadez DI et al (2011) A three-arm (laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and robotic) matched-case analysis of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 54:144–150PubMedCrossRef
42.
Erguner I, Aytac E, Boler DE et al (2012) What have we gained by performing robotic rectal resection? Evaluation of 64 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 23:316–319CrossRef
43.
Lim DR, Min BS, Kim MS et al (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-term oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 27:1379–1385PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Monsellato I et al (2013) Total mesorectal excision: A comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 27:1887–1895CrossRef
45.
Helvind NM, Eriksen JR, Mogensen A et al (2013) No differences in short-term morbidity and mortality after robot-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopic resection for colonic cancer: a case-control study of 263 patients. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 27:2575–2580CrossRef
46.
Kang J, Yoon KJ, Min BS et al (2013) The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison - Open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Ann Surg 257:95–101PubMedCrossRef
47.
Kuo LJ, Lin YK, Chang CC et al (2014) Clinical outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: Comparison with conventional laparoscopy and multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robotic surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:555–562PubMedCrossRef
48.
Melich G, Hong YK, Kim J et al (2014) Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 29:558–568CrossRef
49.
Tam MS, Abbass M, Abbas MA (2014) Robotic-laparoscopic rectal cancer excision versus traditional laparoscopy. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 18(e2014):00020
50.
Byrn JC, Hrabe JE, Armstrong JG et al (2015) Single-incision robotic colectomy: are costs prohibitive? Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 12:303–308CrossRef
51.
Colombo PE, Bertrand MM, Alline M et al (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for Sphincter-saving surgery: is there any difference in the transanal TME rectal approach? A single-center series of 120 consecutive patients. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1594–1600PubMedCrossRef
52.
Ramji KM, Cleghorn MC, Josse JM et al (2015) Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center. Surg Endosc 30:1337–1343PubMedCrossRef
53.
Shibata J, Ishihara S, Tada N et al (2015) Surgical stress response after colorectal resection: a comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery. Tech Coloproctol 19:275–280PubMedCrossRef
54.
Gorgun E, Aytac E, Gurland B et al (2015) Case-matched comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery : initial institutional experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:148–151CrossRef
55.
Sawada H, Egi H, Hattori M et al (2015) Initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case-control study. World J Surg Oncol 13:1–6CrossRef
56.
Bedirli A, Salman B, Yuksel O (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection for mid and low rectal cancers. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 20(e2015):00110
57.
Bozkurt MA, Kocatas A, Gemici E et al (2016) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal operations: a-single center experience. Turkish J Surg 32:93–96CrossRef
58.
Cardinali L, Ortenzi M (2016) robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: short-term outcomes and influence of Body Mass index on conversion rate. Minerva Chir 71:217–222PubMed
59.
de’Angelis N, Lizzi V, Azoulay D et al (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: analysis of the initial simultaneous learning curve of a surgical fellow. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 26:882–892CrossRef
60.
de Jesus JP, Valadão M, de Castro Araujo RO et al (2016) The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:808–812PubMedCrossRef
61.
Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM et al (2008) Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: Short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 22:1601–1608CrossRef
62.
Gorgun E, Ozben V, Costedio M et al (2016) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients. Color Dis 18:1063–1071CrossRef
63.
Law WL, Foo DCC (2016) Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 31:2798–2807CrossRef
64.
Morelli L, Guadagni S, Lorenzoni V et al (2016) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer in a single surgeon’s experience: a cost analysis covering the initial 50 robotic cases with the da Vinci Si. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1639–1648PubMedCrossRef
65.
Panteleimonitis S, Ahmed J, Ramachandra M et al (2016) Urogenital function in robotic vs laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:241–248PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
66.
Shiomi A, Kinugasa Y, Yamaguchi T et al (2016) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer: the impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1701–1710PubMedCrossRef
67.
Allemann P, Duvoisin C, Di Mare L et al (2016) Robotic-assisted surgery improves the quality of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer compared to laparoscopy: results of a case-controlled analysis. World J Surg 40:1010–1016PubMedCrossRef
68.
Ahmed J, Cao H, Panteleimonitis S et al (2017) Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal surgery in high-risk patients. Color Dis 19:1092–1099CrossRef
69.
Huang Y-M, Huang YJ, Wei P-L (2017) Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and the effect of learning curve. Medicine Baltimore 96:e8171PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
Ielpo B, Duran H, Diaz E et al (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and costs. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:1423–1429PubMedCrossRef
71.
Kim J, Baek S-J, Kang D-W et al (2017) Robotic resection is a good prognostic factor in rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic resection: long-term survival analysis using propensity score matching. Dis Colon Rectum 60:266–273PubMed
72.
Kim HJ, Choi G-S, Park JS et al (2017) Selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: a comparative study of the robotic versus laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 32:2466–2473PubMedCrossRef
73.
Silva-Velazco J, Dietz DW, Stocchi L et al (2017) Considering value in rectal cancer surgery: an analysis of costs and outcomes based on the open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach for proctectomy. Ann Surg 265:960–968PubMedCrossRef
74.
Widmar M, Keskin M, Strombom P et al (2017) Lymph node yield in right colectomy for cancer: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Color Dis 19:888–894CrossRef
75.
Kamali D, Omar K, Imam SZ et al (2017) Patient quality of life and short-term surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic anterior resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Tech Coloproctol 21:355–361PubMedCrossRef
76.
Kamali D, Reddy A, Imam S et al (2017) Short-term surgical outcomes and patient quality of life between robotic and laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 99:607–613PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
77.
Shin JY (2012) Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between a robotic colectomy and a laparoscopic colectomy during early experience. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 28:19–26PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
78.
Park JS, Choi G-S, Lim KH et al (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17:3195–3202PubMedCrossRef
79.
Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99:1219–1226PubMedCrossRef
80.
Park SY, Choi G-S, Park JS et al (2012) Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 27:48–55PubMedCrossRef
81.
Park EJ, Kim CW, Cho MS et al (2014) Is the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection shorter than laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer? A comparative analysis of clinicopathologic outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries. Medicine US 93:1–11
82.
Cho MS, Kim CW, Baek SJ et al (2015) Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients. Surg US 157:1121–1129CrossRef
83.
Kim YS, Kim MJ, Park SC et al (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: case-matched study of short-term outcomes. Cancer Res Treat 48:225–231PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
84.
Kim JC, Yu CS, Lim SB et al (2016) Comparative analysis focusing on surgical and early oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopy-assisted, and robot-assisted approaches in rectal cancer patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1179–1187PubMedCrossRef
85.
Lim DR, Bae SU, Hur H et al (2016) Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 31:1728–1737CrossRef
86.
Buonpane C, Efiong E, Hunsinger M et al (2017) Predictors of utilization and quality assessment in robotic rectal cancer resection: a review of the national cancer database. Am Surg 83:918–924PubMed
87.
Levic K, Donatsky AM, Bulut O et al (2015) A comparative study of single-port laparoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Innov 22:368–375PubMedCrossRef
88.
Serin KR, Gultekin FA, Batman B et al (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of short-term outcomes. J Robot Surg 9:187–194PubMedCrossRef
89.
Corbellini C, Biffi R, Luca F et al (2016) Open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for rectal cancer: medium-term comparative outcomes from a multicenter study. Tumori 102:414–421PubMedCrossRef
90.
Feroci F, Vannucchi A, Pietro Bianchi P et al (2016) Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs robotic surgery. World J Gastroenterol 22:3602–3610PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
91.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Phelan M, Smith BR et al (2015) Outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic abdominoperineal resections in patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 58:1123–1129PubMedCrossRef
92.
Mirkin KA, Kulaylat AS, Hollenbeak CS et al (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for stage I-III colon cancer: oncologic and long-term survival outcomes. Surg Endosc 32:2894–2901PubMedCrossRef
93.
Allaix ME, Degiuli M, Arezzo A et al (2013) Does conversion affect short-term and oncologic outcomes after laparoscopy for colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 27:4596–4607CrossRef
94.
Allaix ME, Furnée EJB, Mistrangelo M et al (2016) Conversion of laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer: what is the impact on short-term outcomes and survival? World J Gastroenterol 22:8304PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
95.
Scheidbach H, Garlipp B, Oberländer H et al (2011) Conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: impact on short- and long-term outcome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 21:923–927CrossRef
96.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Masoomi H, Mills SD et al (2014) Outcomes of conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 18(e2014):00230
97.
de Neree Tot Babberich MPM, van Groningen JT, Dekker E et al (2018) Laparoscopic conversion in colorectal cancer surgery; is there any improvement over time at a population level? Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 32:1–13
98.
Spinoglio G, Marano A, Priora F, et al. (2014) History of robotic surgery. Spinoglio G in collaboration with Marano A, Formisano G In: Robotic surgery: current applications and new trends, Springer, Italia, pp 1–12
99.
Szold A, Bergamaschi R, Broeders I et al (2015) European association of endoscopic surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 29:253–288CrossRef
100.
Teljeur C, O’Neill M, Moran PS et al (2014) Economic evaluation of robot-assisted hysterectomy: a cost-minimisation analysis. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 121:1546–1553CrossRef
101.
102.
Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG et al (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2095–2101PubMedCrossRef
103.
Xiong B, Ma L, Zhang C et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Surg Res 188:404–414PubMedCrossRef
104.
Lee SH, Lim S, Kim JH et al (2015) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Treat Res 89:190–201PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
105.
Wang Y, Zhao G-H, Yang H et al (2016) A pooled analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26:259–264PubMedCrossRef
106.
Sun Y, Xu H, Li Z et al (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 14:1–8CrossRef
107.
Li X, Wang T, Yao L et al (2017) The safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic TME in patients with rectal cancer. Medicine US 96:e7585CrossRef
108.
Prete FP, Pezzolla A, Prete F et al (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 267:1–13
109.
Cui Y, Li C, Xu Z et al (2017) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic operation in anus-preserving rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 13:1247–1257PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
110.
Ortiz-Oshiro E, Sánchez-Egido I, Moreno-Sierra J et al (2012) Robotic assistance may reduce conversion to open in rectal carcinoma laparoscopic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 8:360–370CrossRef
111.
Najarian S, Fallahnezhad M, Afshari E (2011) Advances in medical robotic systems with specific applications in surgery-a review. J Med Eng Technol 35:19–33PubMedCrossRef
112.
Banaszkiewicz Z, Cierzniakowska K, Tojek K et al (2017) Surgical site infection among patients after colorectal cancer surgery. Pol Przegl Chir 89:9–15PubMedCrossRef
113.
Rawlinson A, Kang P, Evans J et al (2011) A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93:583–588PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
114.
Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J et al (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic approach in colonic resections for cancer and Benign diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 10:1–27CrossRef
115.
El Nakeeb A, Fikry A, El Metwally T et al (2009) Early oral feeding in patients undergoing elective colonic anastomosis. Int J Surg 7:206–209PubMedCrossRef
116.
Fujii T, Morita H, Sutoh T et al (2014) Benefit of oral feeding as early as one day after elective surgery for colorectal cancer: oral feeding on first versus second postoperative day. Int Surg 99:211–215PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
117.
Wang Z, Zhong B, Xiang J et al (2013) Effect of early oral enteral nutrition on clinical outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 16:735–738PubMed
118.
Di Fronzo LA, Cymerman J, O’Connell TX (1999) Factors affecting early postoperative feeding following elective open colon resection. Arch Surg 134:941–946PubMedCrossRef
119.
Yang Y, Wang F, Zhang P et al (2012) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19:3727–3736PubMedCrossRef
120.
Lim S, Kim JH, Baek S-J et al (2016) Comparison of perioperative and short-term outcomes between robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Treat Res 90:328–339PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis
verfasst von
Ka Ting Ng
Azlan Kok Vui Tsia
Vanessa Yu Ling Chong
Publikationsdatum
04.01.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-04896-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

World Journal of Surgery 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Reply, Letter to the Editor

Authors’ Reply: Routine Pathology and Postoperative Follow-Up are not Cost-Effective in Cholecystectomy for Benign Gallbladder Disease

Original Scientific Report

Morbid Obesity’s Silver Lining: An Armor for Hollow Viscus in Blunt Abdominal Trauma

Original Scientific Report

Anastomotic Leakage After Stoma Reversal Combined with Incisional Hernia Repair

Original Scientific Report

Taeniectomy Versus Transverse Coloplasty as Neorectum After Low Rectal Resection

Original Scientific Report

Surgical Management of the Axilla in Breast Cancer Patients with Negative Sentinel Lymph Node: A Method to Reduce False-Negative Rate

Original Scientific Report

Hurdles to Take for Adequate Treatment of Morbidly Obese Children and Adolescents: Attitudes of General Practitioners Towards Conservative and Surgical Treatment of Paediatric Morbid Obesity

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.