Safety and antitumor activity of metformin plus lanreotide in patients with advanced gastro-intestinal or lung neuroendocrine tumors: the phase Ib trial MetNET2
verfasst von:
Sara Pusceddu, Francesca Corti, Natalie Prinzi, Federico Nichetti, Silva Ljevar, Adele Busico, Tommaso Cascella, Rita Leporati, Simone Oldani, Chiara Carlotta Pircher, Jorgelina Coppa, Veronica Resi, Massimo Milione, Marco Maccauro, Rosalba Miceli, Elena Tamborini, Federica Perrone, Carlo Spreafico, Monica Niger, Federica Morano, Filippo Pietrantonio, Ettore Seregni, Luigi Mariani, Vincenzo Mazzaferro, Giorgia Di Liberti, Giovanni Fucà, Filippo de Braud, Claudio Vernieri
In retrospective studies, metformin use has been associated with better clinical outcomes in diabetic patients with advanced, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WDNETs). However, prospective evidence of metformin safety and activity is lacking. Here, we conducted the first-in-human phase Ib MetNET2 trial to investigate the safety and antitumor activity of metformin in combination with the somatostatin analog lanreotide autogel (ATG) in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients with advanced WDNETs of the gastrointestinal (GI) or thoracic tract. Enrolled patients received lanreotide ATG 120 mg plus oral metformin, up to a maximum dosage of 2550 mg/day. We enrolled 20 patients, of whom 18 (90%) and 2 (10%) had WDNETs of the GI and thoracic tract, respectively. Fourteen patients (70%) were non-diabetic. With a 5% incidence of SAEs, the study met its primary objective of demonstrating treatment safety. With a median follow-up of 39 months (95% CI 28-NE), median PFS was 24 months (95% CI 16-NE), with 12-month and 24-month PFS probability of 75% (95% CI 58–97) and 49% (95% CI 31–77), respectively. We found no statistically significant PFS differences between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Among exploratory analyses, the presence of tumor genomic alterations in DNA damage pathways was associated with trend towards worse PFS, whereas a precocious reduction of HOMA-IR index and plasma cholesterol concentration showed a trend towards an association with better PFS. In conclusion, metformin plus lanreotide ATG is a safe and well tolerated combination treatment that is associated with promising antitumor activity in both non-diabetic and diabetic patients with WDNETs, and that warrants further investigation in larger clinical trials.
Sara Pusceddu and Francesca Corti have contributed equally to this article.
Equal senior contribution: Filippo de Braud and Claudio Vernieri.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
DCR
Disease control rate
DM
Diabetes mellitus
GI
Gastro-intestinal
HR
Hazard ratio
IEC
Independent Ethics Committee
IQR
Interquartile range
IRB
Institutional Review Board
Lanreotide ATG
Lanreotide autogel
mTOR
Mammalian target of rapamycin
NGS
Next generation sequencing
OGTT
Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
ORR
Overall response rate
OS
Overall survival
PD
Progression of disease
PFS
Progression free survival
PR
Partial response
PRRT
Peptide receptor radiotherapy
RDI
Relative dose intensity
RECIST
Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors
SAEs
Serious adverse events
SD
Stable disease
SSAs
Somatostatin analogs
trAEs
Treatment-related adverse events
TTP
Time-to-progression
WDNETs
Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors
To the Editor
Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are the mainstay of treatment for patients with advanced, well-differentiated NETs (WDNETs) expressing somatostatin receptors [1, 2]. The antitumor effects of SSAs in WDNETs are in part mediated through the inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK pathways [3]. In retrospective studies, the use of the antidiabetic compound metformin in diabetic patients with advanced WDNETs was associated with better clinical outcomes when combined with standard SSAs plus/minus everolimus [4‐7]. However, no prospective evidence exists to support metformin use in combination with SSAs in advanced WDNET patients with or without diabetes mellitus (DM). Based on these premises, we conducted MetNET-2, a first-in-human, phase Ib clinical trial that investigated the safety and antitumor activity of experimental metformin in combination with standard lanreotide autogel (ATG) in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients with advanced GI or thoracic WDNETs. The primary study objective was to assess the safety of the experimental treatment, as defined as the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). Study Methods are reported in Additional file 1.
Anzeige
Between April 2016 and April 2019 we enrolled a total number of 20 patients, whose characteristics are summarized in Additional file 2: Table S1. Of these, six patients (30%) had a prior diagnosis of DM. Median duration of exposure to the experimental treatment was 15.9 months (IQR range, 5.8–21.0). Study drug exposure is reported in Additional file 3: Fig. S1 and Additional file 4: Table S2. With only one treatment-related SAE (5%, acute renal failure), MetNET-2 met its primary endpoint demonstrating the safety of metformin plus SSAs. The renal SAE was likely to be multifactorial (G2 hypertension NDR, G1 urolithiasis NDR), with a possible contribution of metformin-related pre-renal kidney injury from G1 diarrhea. Of note, this toxicity was reversible after temporary interruption of metformin administration and the initiation of anti-hypertensive therapy. The most common any-grade treatment-related AEs (trAEs) were diarrhea (75%), hyperglycaemia (55%), asthenia (40%) and hypercholesterolemia (40%) (Table 1). Grade 3 trAEs occurred in 15% of patients, and consisted of acute renal failure (n = 1; 5%), diarrhea (n = 1; 5%) and abdominal pain (n = 1; 5%). No grade ≥ 4 trAEs were reported. trAE incidence was not significantly different in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients (Additional file 5: Table S3). In addition, no trAEs led to the discontinuation of Lanreotide ATG or metformin. Treatment-emergent AEs are reported in Additional file 6: Table S4.
Table 1
Most common treatment-related adverse events (trAEs)
Specific AEs
Any grade
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Diarrhea
15 (75.0%)
5 (25.0%)
9 (45.0%)
1 (5.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Hyperglycemia
11 (55.0%)
11 (55.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Asthenia
8 (40.0%)
4 (20.0%)
4 (20.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Hypercholesterolemia
8 (40.0%)
8 (40.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Hypomagnesaemia
7 (35.0%)
6 (30.0%)
1 (5.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Abdominal pain
5 (25.0%)
2 (10.0%)
2 (10.0%)
1 (5.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Anorexia
5 (25.0%)
4 (20.0%)
1 (5.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Creatinine increase
4 (20.0%)
4 (20.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Nausea
4 (20.0%)
3 (15.0%)
1 (5.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Emesis
4 (20.0%)
3 (15.0%)
1 (5.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Hypertriglyceridemia
4 (20.0%)
3 (15.0%)
1 (5.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Hyperuricemia
3 (15.0%)
3 (15.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Hyponatremia
2 (10.0%)
2 (10.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Steatorrhea
2 (10.0%)
0 (0.0%)
2 (10.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Intestinal bloating
2 (10.0%)
2 (10.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
GGT elevation
2 (10.0%)
1 (5.0%)
1 (5.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Dysgeusia
1 (5.0%)
1 (5.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Hypokalemia
1 (5.0%)
0 (0.0%)
1 (5.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Hypophosphatemia
1 (5.0%)
1 (5.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Decreased appetite
1 (5.0%)
1 (5.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Acute renal failure
1 (5.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
1 (5.0%)
0 (0.0%)
The antitumor activity of the experimental treatment is summarized in Additional file 7: Table S5, Additional file 8: Fig. S2 and Additional file 9: Fig. S3. ORR was 10% (95% CI 1–32%) and DCR was 85% (95% CI 62–96%). With a median follow-up of 39 months (95% CI 28 months-NE), median PFS was 24 months (95% CI 16-NE months) (Fig. 1A), with 12-month and 24-month PFS probability of 75% (95% CI 58–97%) and 49% (95% CI 31–77%), respectively. Median TTP was 26 months (95% CI 17-NE months) (Fig. 1B). Diabetic status was not significantly associated with PFS (Additional file 10: Fig. S4). With the exception of non-functioning tumor status, which was associated with a lower risk of disease progression, none of the other clinico-pathological characteristics showed an association with PFS (Additional file 11: Table S6).
×
Then, we explored the potentially prognostic role of tumor genomic alterations, as evaluated through NGS analysis (Additional file 12: Fig. S5). Genomic alterations were not differently distributed between diabetic and non-diabetic patients (Additional file 13: Table S7). We found no statistically significant PFS differences between patients harboring any tumor genomic alteration and patients with wild-type genomic profiles (mPFS: 24 months [95% CI 14-NA] vs. 26 months; [95% CI 5-NA]; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.19–1.96, p = 0.42). Interestingly, patients harboring tumor alterations in genes involved in DNA repair showed a trend towards worse PFS when compared to patients without alterations in DNA repair genes (median PFS 13 months [95% CI 11-NA] vs. 27 months [95% CI 20-NA]; HR 2.74; 95% CI 0.85–8.81; p = 0.09) (Additional file 14: Fig. S6A), whereas FGFR4 gene polymorphisms or ATM gene alterations were not associated with patient PFS (Additional file 14: Fig. S6B–D).
In the whole 24 months follow-up period, we observed no significant changes in any of the metabolic parameters evaluated (Fig. 1C–H; Additional file 15: Table S8). The HOMA-IR index was reduced 3 months after treatment initiation, whereas patient BMI and plasma cholesterol levels were reduced within 6 months (Fig. 1C–H; Additional file 15: Table S8). Patients experiencing higher early reduction of HOMA-IR index and plasma cholesterol concentration showed a trend towards better PFS (p = 0.055 and p = 0.086, respectively, Additional file 16: Table S9).
Anzeige
In conclusion, metformin plus lanreotide ATG is safe, well tolerated and active in both non-diabetic and diabetic patients with WDNETs of the GI or thoracic tract. A precocious reduction of HOMA-IR index and plasma cholesterol may predict higher clinical benefit from this treatment. Larger, prospective clinical trials should be conducted to investigate if adding metformin to SSAs results in outcome improvement when compared to SSAs alone in this clinical setting.
Acknowledgements
We thank all the patients for participating in this study, and their families. We would like to acknowledge IPSEN SPA for funding this study (Q/15/070). Finally, we would like to acknowledge the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC; MFAG 2019-22977 PI: Dr. Claudio Vernieri), The Italian Association for Neuroendocrine Tumour (It.a.net), The Giuliani Foundation—Fondazione Gianmaria e Sabrina Giuliani—and the Scientific Directorate of Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori for supporting our research.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics Committee (IRB/IEC) of the Coordinating Center (Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
SP received honoraria from Novartis, Ipsen, Pfizer, Merck Serono, and Advanced Accelerator Applications—AAA; received institutional research grant by Ipsen, Pfizer; MN received Travel expenses from Celgene and AstraZeneca, speaker honorarium from Accademia della Medicina and Incyte; honoraria from Sandoz, Medpoint SRL and Servier for editorial collaboration. Consultant honoraria from EMD Serono, Basilea Pharmaceutica, Incyte, MSD Italia, Servier, Astrazeneca and Taiho. FP received honoraria from Amgen, Bayer, Servier, Merck-Serono, Lilly, MSD, BMS, Astrazeneca, Pierre-Fabre, Organon, Astellas; research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Agenus, Incyte. MM received honoraria from Novartis, Ipsen, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dhome) research grant by Ignyta, Roche, Adopt bbmri-eric, Transcan2. NP received honoraria and travel accommodation from Novartis, Ipsen, Pfizer, MerckSerono, Italfarmaco, MSD, Advanced Accelerator Applications—AAA. CV received honoraria for advisory boards/speakers bureau from Novartis, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer and Istituto Gentili and research grants from Roche. FdB received honoraria for advisory boards/speakers bureau from Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Incyte, EMD Serono, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Pfizer, Menarini, Sanofi, Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Dephaforum and research funding from Novartis, Roche, Merck Sharp &Dohme, MerckSerono, Pfizer, Servier, NMS Nerviano Medical Science. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
Safety and antitumor activity of metformin plus lanreotide in patients with advanced gastro-intestinal or lung neuroendocrine tumors: the phase Ib trial MetNET2
verfasst von
Sara Pusceddu Francesca Corti Natalie Prinzi Federico Nichetti Silva Ljevar Adele Busico Tommaso Cascella Rita Leporati Simone Oldani Chiara Carlotta Pircher Jorgelina Coppa Veronica Resi Massimo Milione Marco Maccauro Rosalba Miceli Elena Tamborini Federica Perrone Carlo Spreafico Monica Niger Federica Morano Filippo Pietrantonio Ettore Seregni Luigi Mariani Vincenzo Mazzaferro Giorgia Di Liberti Giovanni Fucà Filippo de Braud Claudio Vernieri
Unter Frauen, die ein Levonorgestrel-freisetzendes intrauterines System (IUS) verwenden, ist die Brustkrebsrate um 13% erhöht. Dafür kommt es deutlich seltener zu Endometrium-, Zervix- und Ovarialkarzinomen.
Wie stark Menschen mit fortgeschrittenem NSCLC von einer Therapie mit Immun-Checkpoint-Hemmern profitieren, hängt offenbar auch davon ab, wie sehr die Diagnose ihre psychische Verfassung erschüttert
Ein bispezifischer Antikörper formiert gezielt eine Armee neutrophiler Granulozyten gegen Krebszellen. An den Antikörper gekoppeltes TNF-alpha soll die Zellen zudem tief in solide Tumoren hineinführen.
Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.
Update Onkologie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletterund bleiben Sie gut informiert.