Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Drug Investigation 11/2009

01.11.2009 | Original Research Article

Safety/Tolerability and Efficacy of Rivastigmine in Taiwanese Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease

A Prospective Post-Marketing Surveillance Study

verfasst von: Pai-Yi Chiu, Dao-En Dai, Hai-Pei Hsu, Chao Lee, Juei-Jueng Lin, Hung-Chou Kuo, Ying-Chih Huang, Yung-Chang Liu, Dr Ching-Piao Tsai

Erschienen in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Ausgabe 11/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Rivastigmine is approved for the symptomatic treatment of mild to moderate dementia in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. The drug was launched in Taiwan in 2000. The primary objective of this post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study was to describe the safety/tolerability of treatment with rivastigmine capsules in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. The secondary objectives of this study were to define the optimal titration pattern, maintenance dose, efficacy and patient satisfaction with treatment with rivastigmine capsules.
Methods: This was a prospective, non-interventional post-marketing observational study in patients who met the criteria for mild or moderate Alzheimer’s disease. The primary outcome measure for this trial was the incidence of emerging adverse events. Dosages related to titration patterns and maintenance doses were summarized. Efficacy evaluations conducted using the Mini-Mental State Examination, Clinical Dementia Rating and modified Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scales were also primary outcome measures, and results are shown descriptively. The patients’ therapeutic responses to rivastigmine and satisfaction with rivastigmine were secondary outcome measures. Therapeutic response and treatment satisfaction were summarized descriptively.
Results: A total of 264 patients were enrolled into the study. The mean duration of exposure to rivastigmine during the study was 151.1 days. Patients were taking rivastigmine 1.5–6 mg twice daily and the most frequent maintenance dose level was 4.5 mg twice daily. Among patients treated with rivastigmine, all primary and secondary outcome measures showed improvement or stabilization of cognition and global functioning. Of the 253 safety analysis patients, 155 patients (61.3%) reported at least one adverse event. The most frequent adverse events by system organ class were psychiatric disorders (9.1%) and gastrointestinal disorders (8.3%). The most common adverse events observed were dizziness (5.5%), insomnia (5.1%), anorexia (4.0%) and gastrointestinal symptoms such as constipation (4.0%), vomiting (4.0%) and nausea (3.6%). These symptoms were mild in severity. A total of 12 patients (4.7%) reported 16 serious adverse events, including two deaths, three fractures, three behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, one syncope with head trauma, one peptic ulcer, and six other hospitalizations. None were reported to be related to rivastigmine.
Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, rivastigmine administered usually at a dose of 3–6 mg twice daily was found to be well tolerated. Although the rate of adverse events was high, the majority of these symptoms were mild in severity and short in duration. This study also demonstrated the efficacy of rivastigmine in at least stabilizing the symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Graves AB, Kukull WA. The epidemiology of dementia. In: Morris JC, editor. Handbook of dementing illnesses. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1994: 23–69 Graves AB, Kukull WA. The epidemiology of dementia. In: Morris JC, editor. Handbook of dementing illnesses. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1994: 23–69
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinstock M. Selectivity of cholinesterase inhibition. CNS Drugs 1999; 12: 307–23CrossRef Weinstock M. Selectivity of cholinesterase inhibition. CNS Drugs 1999; 12: 307–23CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballard CG. Advances in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: benefits of dual cholinesterase inhibition. Eur Neurol 2002; 47: 64–70PubMedCrossRef Ballard CG. Advances in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: benefits of dual cholinesterase inhibition. Eur Neurol 2002; 47: 64–70PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Corey-Bloom J, Anand R, Veach J. A randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of ENA 713 (rivastigmine tartrate), a new acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychopharmacol 1998; 1: 55–65 Corey-Bloom J, Anand R, Veach J. A randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of ENA 713 (rivastigmine tartrate), a new acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychopharmacol 1998; 1: 55–65
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rösler M, Anand R, Cicin-Sain A, et al. Efficacy and safety of rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: international randomized controlled trial. BMJ 1999; 318: 633–40PubMedCrossRef Rösler M, Anand R, Cicin-Sain A, et al. Efficacy and safety of rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: international randomized controlled trial. BMJ 1999; 318: 633–40PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Small GW, Kaufer D, Mendiondo MS, et al. Cognitive performance in Alzheimer’s disease patients receiving rivastigmine for up to 5 years. Int J Clin Pract 2005; 59: 473–7PubMedCrossRef Small GW, Kaufer D, Mendiondo MS, et al. Cognitive performance in Alzheimer’s disease patients receiving rivastigmine for up to 5 years. Int J Clin Pract 2005; 59: 473–7PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Plosker GL, Keating GM. Management of mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: defining the role of rivastigmine. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2004; 12: 55–72CrossRef Plosker GL, Keating GM. Management of mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: defining the role of rivastigmine. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2004; 12: 55–72CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Raina P, Santaguida P, Ismaila A, et al. Effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for treating dementia: evidence review for a clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 379–97PubMed Raina P, Santaguida P, Ismaila A, et al. Effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for treating dementia: evidence review for a clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 379–97PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Grossberg G, Irwin P, Satlin A, et al. Rivastigmine in Alzheimer disease: efficacy over two years. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004; 12: 420–31PubMed Grossberg G, Irwin P, Satlin A, et al. Rivastigmine in Alzheimer disease: efficacy over two years. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004; 12: 420–31PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kavirajan H, Schneider LS. Efficacy and adverse effects of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in vascular dementia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 782–92PubMedCrossRef Kavirajan H, Schneider LS. Efficacy and adverse effects of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in vascular dementia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 782–92PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hogan DB, Bailey P, Black S, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of dementia: 5. Nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapy for mild to moderate dementia. CMAJ 2008; 179: 1019–26PubMedCrossRef Hogan DB, Bailey P, Black S, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of dementia: 5. Nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapy for mild to moderate dementia. CMAJ 2008; 179: 1019–26PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sikdar S. Should titration schedules for cholinesterase inhibitors be changed? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2003; 18: 1063–4PubMedCrossRef Sikdar S. Should titration schedules for cholinesterase inhibitors be changed? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2003; 18: 1063–4PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Farlow M, Anand R, Messina Jr J, et al. A 52-week study of the efficacy of rivastigmine in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s disease. Eur Neurol 2000; 44: 234–41CrossRef Farlow M, Anand R, Messina Jr J, et al. A 52-week study of the efficacy of rivastigmine in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s disease. Eur Neurol 2000; 44: 234–41CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Potkin SG, Anand R, Hartman R, et al. Impact of Alzheimer’s disease and rivastigmine treatment on activities of daily living over the course of mild to moderately severe disease. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2002; 26: 713–20CrossRef Potkin SG, Anand R, Hartman R, et al. Impact of Alzheimer’s disease and rivastigmine treatment on activities of daily living over the course of mild to moderately severe disease. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2002; 26: 713–20CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Aguglia E, Onor ML, Saina M, et al. An open-label, comparative study of rivastigmine, donepezil and galantamine in a real-world setting. Curr Med Res Opin 2004; 20: 1747–52PubMedCrossRef Aguglia E, Onor ML, Saina M, et al. An open-label, comparative study of rivastigmine, donepezil and galantamine in a real-world setting. Curr Med Res Opin 2004; 20: 1747–52PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Holmes C, Lovestone S. Long-term cognitive and functional decline in late onset Alzheimer’s disease: therapeutic implications. Age Ageing 2003; 32: 200–4PubMedCrossRef Holmes C, Lovestone S. Long-term cognitive and functional decline in late onset Alzheimer’s disease: therapeutic implications. Age Ageing 2003; 32: 200–4PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dooley M, Lamb HM. Donepezil: a review of its use in Alzheimer’s disease. Drugs Aging 2000; 16: 199–226PubMedCrossRef Dooley M, Lamb HM. Donepezil: a review of its use in Alzheimer’s disease. Drugs Aging 2000; 16: 199–226PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Safety/Tolerability and Efficacy of Rivastigmine in Taiwanese Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease
A Prospective Post-Marketing Surveillance Study
verfasst von
Pai-Yi Chiu
Dao-En Dai
Hai-Pei Hsu
Chao Lee
Juei-Jueng Lin
Hung-Chou Kuo
Ying-Chih Huang
Yung-Chang Liu
Dr Ching-Piao Tsai
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2009
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Ausgabe 11/2009
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11315320-000000000-00000

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2009

Clinical Drug Investigation 11/2009 Zur Ausgabe