Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Herz 3/2011

01.05.2011 | Main topic/CME

Second- and third-generation drug-eluting coronary stents

Progress and safety

verfasst von: I. Akin, H. Schneider, H. Ince, S. Kische, T.C. Rehders, T. Chatterjee, C.A. Nienaber, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: Herz | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have revolutionized the treatment of coronary artery disease by reducing the rate of in-stent restenosis from 20–40% with bare-metal stent (BMS) to 6–8% with DES. However, with widespread use of DES, safety concerns have risen due to the observation of late stent thrombosis. With this in mind and better understanding of mechanism and pathophysiology of stent thrombosis, the technological platform, especially innovative anti-restenotic agents, polymeric coatings, and stent platforms, improved with newer DES. Two second-generation DES, the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) and the Xience-V everolimus-eluting stent (EES), have provided promising results in both randomized controlled trials (SPIRIT and ENDEAVOR) and registries (E-Five, COMPARE) compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) and first-generation DES. Newer third-generation stent technology, especially biodegradable polymers, polymer-free stents, and biodegradable stents on the basis of poly-L-lactide (PLLA) or magnesium, has been evaluated in preclinical and initial clinical trials. However, despite encouraging initial results, long-term data of large-scale randomized trials as well as registries comparing them to currently approved first- and second-generation DES are still lacking.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Stone GW, Moses JW, Ellis SG et al (2007) Safety and efficacy of sirolimus-and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med 356:998–1008PubMedCrossRef Stone GW, Moses JW, Ellis SG et al (2007) Safety and efficacy of sirolimus-and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med 356:998–1008PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S et al (2007) Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet 370:937–948PubMedCrossRef Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S et al (2007) Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet 370:937–948PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nienaber CA, Akin I, Schneider S et al (2009) Clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting, paclitaxel-eluting and bare-metal stents (from the first phase of the prospective multicenter German DES.DE registry. Am J Cardiol 104:1362–1369PubMedCrossRef Nienaber CA, Akin I, Schneider S et al (2009) Clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting, paclitaxel-eluting and bare-metal stents (from the first phase of the prospective multicenter German DES.DE registry. Am J Cardiol 104:1362–1369PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfisterer M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Buser PT et al (2006) Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:2584–2591PubMedCrossRef Pfisterer M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Buser PT et al (2006) Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:2584–2591PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagerqvist B, James SK, Stenestrand U et al (2007) Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden. N Engl J Med 356:1009–1019PubMedCrossRef Lagerqvist B, James SK, Stenestrand U et al (2007) Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden. N Engl J Med 356:1009–1019PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirtane AJ, Gupta A, Iyengar S et al (2009) Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting and bare metal stents: comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies. Circulation 119:3198–3206PubMedCrossRef Kirtane AJ, Gupta A, Iyengar S et al (2009) Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting and bare metal stents: comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies. Circulation 119:3198–3206PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mauri L, Hsieh WH, Massaro JM et al (2007) Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med 356:1020–1029PubMedCrossRef Mauri L, Hsieh WH, Massaro JM et al (2007) Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med 356:1020–1029PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Finn AV, Kolodgie FD, Harnek J et al (2005) Differential response of delayed healing and persistent inflammation at sites of overlapping sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents. Circulation 112:270–278PubMedCrossRef Finn AV, Kolodgie FD, Harnek J et al (2005) Differential response of delayed healing and persistent inflammation at sites of overlapping sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents. Circulation 112:270–278PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Virmani R, Guagliumi G, Farb A et al. Localized hypersensitivity and late coronary thrombosis secondary to a sirolimus-eluting stent: should we be cautious? Circulation 109:701–705 Virmani R, Guagliumi G, Farb A et al. Localized hypersensitivity and late coronary thrombosis secondary to a sirolimus-eluting stent: should we be cautious? Circulation 109:701–705
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Iakovou I, Schmidt T, Bonizzoni E et al (2005) ncidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents. JAMA 293:2126–2130PubMedCrossRef Iakovou I, Schmidt T, Bonizzoni E et al (2005) ncidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents. JAMA 293:2126–2130PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Daemen J, Wenaweser P, Tsuchida K et al (2007) Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study. Lancet 369:667–678PubMedCrossRef Daemen J, Wenaweser P, Tsuchida K et al (2007) Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study. Lancet 369:667–678PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wenaweser P, Daemen J, Zwahlen M et al (2008) Incidence and correlates of drug-eluting stent thrombosis in routine clinical practice. 4-year results from a large 2-institutional cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1134–1140PubMedCrossRef Wenaweser P, Daemen J, Zwahlen M et al (2008) Incidence and correlates of drug-eluting stent thrombosis in routine clinical practice. 4-year results from a large 2-institutional cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1134–1140PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Garg P, Cohen DJ, Gaziano T, Mauri L (2008) Balancing the risks of restenosis and stent thrombosis in bare-metal versus drug-eluting stents: results of a decision analytic model. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:1844–1853PubMedCrossRef Garg P, Cohen DJ, Gaziano T, Mauri L (2008) Balancing the risks of restenosis and stent thrombosis in bare-metal versus drug-eluting stents: results of a decision analytic model. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:1844–1853PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Stone GW, Ellis SG, Colombo A et al (2007) Offsetting impact of thrombosis and restenosis on the occurrence of death and myocardial infarction after paclitaxel-eluting and bare metal stent implantation. Circulation 115:2842–2847PubMedCrossRef Stone GW, Ellis SG, Colombo A et al (2007) Offsetting impact of thrombosis and restenosis on the occurrence of death and myocardial infarction after paclitaxel-eluting and bare metal stent implantation. Circulation 115:2842–2847PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Virmani R, Liistro F, STankovic G et al (2002) Mechanism of late in-stent restenosis after implantation of a paclitaxel derivate-eluting polymer stent system in humans. Circulation 106:2649–2651PubMedCrossRef Virmani R, Liistro F, STankovic G et al (2002) Mechanism of late in-stent restenosis after implantation of a paclitaxel derivate-eluting polymer stent system in humans. Circulation 106:2649–2651PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Joner M, Finn AV, Farb A et al (2006) Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:193–202PubMedCrossRef Joner M, Finn AV, Farb A et al (2006) Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:193–202PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Dirschinger J et al (2001) Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO) trial. Circulation 103:2816–2821PubMed Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Dirschinger J et al (2001) Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO) trial. Circulation 103:2816–2821PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Popma JJ, Mauri L, O‘Shaughnessy C et al (2009) Frequency and clinical consequences associated with sidebranch occlusion during stent implantation using zotarolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:133–139PubMedCrossRef Popma JJ, Mauri L, O‘Shaughnessy C et al (2009) Frequency and clinical consequences associated with sidebranch occlusion during stent implantation using zotarolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:133–139PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Meredith IT, Ormiston J, Whitbourn R et al (2005) First-in-human study of the Endeavor ABT-578-eluting phosphorylcholine-encapsulated stent system in de novo native coronary artery lesions: Endeavor I Trial. EuroIntervention 1:157–164PubMed Meredith IT, Ormiston J, Whitbourn R et al (2005) First-in-human study of the Endeavor ABT-578-eluting phosphorylcholine-encapsulated stent system in de novo native coronary artery lesions: Endeavor I Trial. EuroIntervention 1:157–164PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Awata M, Nanto S, Uematsu M et al (2008) Angioscopic comparison of neointimal coverage between zotarolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:789–790PubMedCrossRef Awata M, Nanto S, Uematsu M et al (2008) Angioscopic comparison of neointimal coverage between zotarolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:789–790PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Guagliumi G, Sirbu V, Musumeci G et al (2010) Strut coverage and vessel wall response to a new-generation paclitaxel-eluting stent with an ultrathin biodegradable abluminal polymer: Optical Coherence Tomography Drug-Eluting STent Investigation (OCTDESI). Circ Cardiovasc Interv 3:367–375PubMedCrossRef Guagliumi G, Sirbu V, Musumeci G et al (2010) Strut coverage and vessel wall response to a new-generation paclitaxel-eluting stent with an ultrathin biodegradable abluminal polymer: Optical Coherence Tomography Drug-Eluting STent Investigation (OCTDESI). Circ Cardiovasc Interv 3:367–375PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Fajadet J, Wijns W, Laarman GJ et al (2006) domized, double-blind, multicenter study of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting phosphorylcholine-encapsulated stent for treatment of native coronary artery lesions: clinical and angiographic results of the ENDEAVOR II trial. Circulation 114:798–806PubMedCrossRef Fajadet J, Wijns W, Laarman GJ et al (2006) domized, double-blind, multicenter study of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting phosphorylcholine-encapsulated stent for treatment of native coronary artery lesions: clinical and angiographic results of the ENDEAVOR II trial. Circulation 114:798–806PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kandzari DE, Leon MB, Popma JJ et al (2006) Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with native coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. J AM Coll Cardiol 48:2440–2447PubMedCrossRef Kandzari DE, Leon MB, Popma JJ et al (2006) Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with native coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. J AM Coll Cardiol 48:2440–2447PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Leon MB, Mauri L, Popma JJ et al (2010) A randomized comparison of the ENDEAVOR zotarolimus-eluting stent versus the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent in de novo native coronary lesions 12-month outcomes from the ENDEAVOR IV trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:543–554PubMedCrossRef Leon MB, Mauri L, Popma JJ et al (2010) A randomized comparison of the ENDEAVOR zotarolimus-eluting stent versus the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent in de novo native coronary lesions 12-month outcomes from the ENDEAVOR IV trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:543–554PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Rasmussen K, Maeng M, Kaltoft A et al (2010) Efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents in routine clinical care (SORT-OUT III): a randomised controlled superiority trial. Lancet 375:1090–1099PubMedCrossRef Rasmussen K, Maeng M, Kaltoft A et al (2010) Efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents in routine clinical care (SORT-OUT III): a randomised controlled superiority trial. Lancet 375:1090–1099PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lotan C, Meredith IT, Liu M et al (2009) Safety and effectiveness of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent in real-world clinical practice: 12-month data from the E-Five Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv 2:1227–1235 Lotan C, Meredith IT, Liu M et al (2009) Safety and effectiveness of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent in real-world clinical practice: 12-month data from the E-Five Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv 2:1227–1235
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Camenzind E, Wijns W, Mauri L et al (2009) Rationale and design of the Patient Related OuTcomes with Endeavor versus Cypher stenting Trial (PROTECT): randomized controlled trial comparing the incidence of stent thrombosis and clinical events after sirolimus or zotarolimus drug-eluting stent implantation. Am Heart J 158:902–909PubMedCrossRef Camenzind E, Wijns W, Mauri L et al (2009) Rationale and design of the Patient Related OuTcomes with Endeavor versus Cypher stenting Trial (PROTECT): randomized controlled trial comparing the incidence of stent thrombosis and clinical events after sirolimus or zotarolimus drug-eluting stent implantation. Am Heart J 158:902–909PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Serruys PW, Ong AT, Piek JJ et al (2005) A randomized comparison of a durable polymer Everolimus-eluting stent with a bare metal coronary stent: The SPIRIT first trial. EuroIntervention 1:58–65PubMed Serruys PW, Ong AT, Piek JJ et al (2005) A randomized comparison of a durable polymer Everolimus-eluting stent with a bare metal coronary stent: The SPIRIT first trial. EuroIntervention 1:58–65PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Joner M, Nakazawa G, Finn AV et al (2008) Endothelial cell recovery between comparator polymer-based drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:333–342PubMedCrossRef Joner M, Nakazawa G, Finn AV et al (2008) Endothelial cell recovery between comparator polymer-based drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:333–342PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiemer M, Serruys PW, Miquel-Hebert K et al (2010) Five-year long-term clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions: the SPIRIT FIRST trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75:997–1003PubMed Wiemer M, Serruys PW, Miquel-Hebert K et al (2010) Five-year long-term clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions: the SPIRIT FIRST trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75:997–1003PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Garg S, Serruys PW, Onuma Y et al (2009) 3-year clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions: the SPIRIT II trial (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary STent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:1190–1198PubMedCrossRef Garg S, Serruys PW, Onuma Y et al (2009) 3-year clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions: the SPIRIT II trial (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary STent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:1190–1198PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Stone GW, Midei M, Newman W et al (2008) Comparison of an everolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. JAMA 299:1903–1913PubMedCrossRef Stone GW, Midei M, Newman W et al (2008) Comparison of an everolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. JAMA 299:1903–1913PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kedhi E, Joesoef KS, McFadden E et al (2010) Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice (COMPARE): a randomised trial. Lancet 375:201–209PubMedCrossRef Kedhi E, Joesoef KS, McFadden E et al (2010) Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice (COMPARE): a randomised trial. Lancet 375:201–209PubMedCrossRef
34.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Claessen BE, Beijk MA, Legrand V et al (2009) Two-year clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions: the SPIRIT II trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:339–347PubMedCrossRef Claessen BE, Beijk MA, Legrand V et al (2009) Two-year clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions: the SPIRIT II trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:339–347PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Stone GW, Rizvi A, Newman W et al (2010) Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 362:1663–1674PubMedCrossRef Stone GW, Rizvi A, Newman W et al (2010) Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 362:1663–1674PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Lansky AJ, Applegate R, Hermiller JB et al (2009) Side-branch occlusion with Xience V everolimus-eluting and Taxus Express2 paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year results from the SPIRIT III randomized trial. Am J Cardiol 104(Suppl 6A):135D Lansky AJ, Applegate R, Hermiller JB et al (2009) Side-branch occlusion with Xience V everolimus-eluting and Taxus Express2 paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year results from the SPIRIT III randomized trial. Am J Cardiol 104(Suppl 6A):135D
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Torre Hernández JM de la, Alfonso F, Gimeno F et al (2010) Thrombosis of second-generation drug-eluting stents in real practice results from the multicenter Spanish registry ESTROFA-2 (Estudio Espanol SObre Trombosis de Stents Farmacoactivos de Segunda Generacion-2). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:911–919CrossRef Torre Hernández JM de la, Alfonso F, Gimeno F et al (2010) Thrombosis of second-generation drug-eluting stents in real practice results from the multicenter Spanish registry ESTROFA-2 (Estudio Espanol SObre Trombosis de Stents Farmacoactivos de Segunda Generacion-2). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:911–919CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Serruys PW, Silber S, Garg S et al (2010) Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med 363:136–146PubMedCrossRef Serruys PW, Silber S, Garg S et al (2010) Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med 363:136–146PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Meredith IT, Worthley S, Whitbourn R et al (2007) The next-generation Endeavor Resolute stent: 4-month clinical and angiographic results from the Endeavor Resolute first-in-man trial. EuroIntervention 3:50–53PubMed Meredith IT, Worthley S, Whitbourn R et al (2007) The next-generation Endeavor Resolute stent: 4-month clinical and angiographic results from the Endeavor Resolute first-in-man trial. EuroIntervention 3:50–53PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Windecker S, Serruys PW, Wandel S et al (2008) Biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer versus sirolimus-eluting stent with durable polymer for coronary revascularisation (LEADERS): a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 372:1163–1173PubMedCrossRef Windecker S, Serruys PW, Wandel S et al (2008) Biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer versus sirolimus-eluting stent with durable polymer for coronary revascularisation (LEADERS): a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 372:1163–1173PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Barlis P, Regar E, Serruys PW et al (2010) An optical coherence tomography study of a biodegradable vs. durable polymer-coated limus-eluting stent: a LEADERS trial sub-study. Eur Heart J 31:165–176PubMedCrossRef Barlis P, Regar E, Serruys PW et al (2010) An optical coherence tomography study of a biodegradable vs. durable polymer-coated limus-eluting stent: a LEADERS trial sub-study. Eur Heart J 31:165–176PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Wessely R et al (2006) Randomized trial of a nonpolymer-based rapamycin-eluting stent versus a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent for the reduction of late lumen loss. Circulation 113:273–279PubMedCrossRef Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Wessely R et al (2006) Randomized trial of a nonpolymer-based rapamycin-eluting stent versus a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent for the reduction of late lumen loss. Circulation 113:273–279PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruef J, Störger H, Schwarz F, Haase J (2008) Comparison of a polymer-free rapamycin-eluting stent (YUKON) with a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent (TAXUS) in real-world coronary artery lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71:333–339PubMedCrossRef Ruef J, Störger H, Schwarz F, Haase J (2008) Comparison of a polymer-free rapamycin-eluting stent (YUKON) with a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent (TAXUS) in real-world coronary artery lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71:333–339PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Ormiston JA, Serruys PW, Regar E et al (2008) A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system for patients with single de-novo coronary artery lesions (ABSORB): a prospective open-label trial. Lancet 371:899–907PubMedCrossRef Ormiston JA, Serruys PW, Regar E et al (2008) A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system for patients with single de-novo coronary artery lesions (ABSORB): a prospective open-label trial. Lancet 371:899–907PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Onuma Y, Serruys PW, Ormiston JA et al (2010) Three-year results of clinical follow-up after a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold in patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the ABSORB trial. EuroIntervention 6:447–453PubMedCrossRef Onuma Y, Serruys PW, Ormiston JA et al (2010) Three-year results of clinical follow-up after a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold in patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the ABSORB trial. EuroIntervention 6:447–453PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Erbel R, Di Mario C, Bartunek J et al (2007) Temporary scaffolding of coronary arteries with bioabsorbable magnesium stents: a prospective, non-randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 369:1869–1875PubMedCrossRef Erbel R, Di Mario C, Bartunek J et al (2007) Temporary scaffolding of coronary arteries with bioabsorbable magnesium stents: a prospective, non-randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 369:1869–1875PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Second- and third-generation drug-eluting coronary stents
Progress and safety
verfasst von
I. Akin
H. Schneider
H. Ince
S. Kische
T.C. Rehders
T. Chatterjee
C.A. Nienaber, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2011
Verlag
Urban and Vogel
Erschienen in
Herz / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0340-9937
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-011-3458-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

Herz 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Das Risiko für Vorhofflimmern in der Bevölkerung steigt

02.05.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Das Risiko, im Lauf des Lebens an Vorhofflimmern zu erkranken, ist in den vergangenen 20 Jahren gestiegen: Laut dänischen Zahlen wird es drei von zehn Personen treffen. Das hat Folgen weit über die Schlaganfallgefährdung hinaus.

VHF-Ablation nützt wohl nur bei reduzierter Auswurfleistung

02.05.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Ob die Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern bei Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz die Komplikationsraten senkt, scheint davon abzuhängen, ob die Auswurfleistung erhalten ist oder nicht. Das legen die Ergebnisse einer Metaanalyse nahe.

Weniger Extremitätenischämien mit dualer Plättchenhemmung

02.05.2024 Thrombozytenaggregationshemmer Nachrichten

Eine Behandlung mit Ticagrelor zusätzlich zu ASS kann das Risiko für Revaskularisierungen und Amputationen von Extremitäten bei Diabetikern mit stabiler KHK deutlich reduzieren, vor allem für solche mit PAVK. Dafür spricht eine Auswertung der Interventionsstudie THEMIS.

Beutel versus Maschine: Beste Beatmungstechnik bei Herzstillstand gesucht

02.05.2024 Kardiopulmonale Reanimation Nachrichten

Stehen die Chancen auf eine Rückkehr der Spontanzirkulation nach Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand bei manueller oder maschineller Beatmung besser? Und unterscheidet sich das neurologische Outcome nach der Reanimation? Das belgische Herzstillstand-Register liefert die Daten für einen direkten Vergleich zwischen Beutel und Beatmungsgerät.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.