Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Herz 3/2011

01.05.2011 | Schwerpunkt/CME

Hauptstamminterventionen

Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der interventionellen Kardiologie

verfasst von: Dr. E. Boudriot, H. Thiele, G. Schuler

Erschienen in: Herz | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Patienten mit signifikanter Hauptstammstenose sollten aus prognostischer Indikation einer Revaskularisationstherapie zugeführt werden. Das dafür vorgesehene Therapieverfahren war bisher die koronare Bypass-Operation. Die Indikation für ein katheterbasiertes Vorgehen beschränkte sich auf Patienten mit inadäquat hohem Operationsrisiko und „geschützter“ Hauptstammstenose. Aktuelle Studien haben zu einer Neubewertung der PCI geführt. Mittlerweile ist die PCI bei Hauptstammstenosen mit einer Klasse-II-Indikation bewertet. Nach den vorliegenden Daten der SYNTAX-Studie kann eine PCI bei Patienten mit isolierter Hauptstammstenose, mit Hauptstammstenose und gleichzeitiger koronarer Eingefäßerkrankung, mit einem SYNTAX-Score unter 33 sowie mit erhöhtem Operationsrisiko mit guten Ergebnissen durchgeführt werden. Patienten mit koronarer Mehrgefäßerkrankung bzw. einem hohen SYNTAX-Score (>33) sind weiterhin Kandidaten für eine Bypass-Operation. Eine Hauptstammintervention sollte spezialisierten Zentren vorbehalten bleiben. Die Therapieentscheidung sollte, wenn möglich, gemeinsam mit dem Kardiochirurgen im sog. Heart-Team erfolgen. Weitere Studien, die beide Therapieverfahren mit ausschließlich „harten“ Endpunkten (Tod, Myokardinfarkt, Schlaganfall) vergleichen, laufen derzeit.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R et al (2004) ACA/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 110:e340–e437PubMedCrossRef Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R et al (2004) ACA/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 110:e340–e437PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P et al (1994) Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet 344:563–570PubMedCrossRef Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P et al (1994) Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet 344:563–570PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Carraciolo EA, Davis KB, Sopko G et al (1995) Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main coronary artery disease. Long term CASS experience. Circulation 91:2325–2334 Carraciolo EA, Davis KB, Sopko G et al (1995) Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main coronary artery disease. Long term CASS experience. Circulation 91:2325–2334
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gruntzig AR, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE (1979) Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 301:61–68PubMedCrossRef Gruntzig AR, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE (1979) Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 301:61–68PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Seung KB, Park D-W, Kim Y-H et al (2008) Stents versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 358:1781–1792PubMedCrossRef Seung KB, Park D-W, Kim Y-H et al (2008) Stents versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 358:1781–1792PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Naik H, White AJ, Chakravarty T et al (2009) A meta-analysis of 3,773 patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:739–747PubMedCrossRef Naik H, White AJ, Chakravarty T et al (2009) A meta-analysis of 3,773 patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:739–747PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein P et al (2010) Outcomes in patients with de novo left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass graft treatment in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. Circulation 121:2645–2653PubMedCrossRef Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein P et al (2010) Outcomes in patients with de novo left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass graft treatment in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. Circulation 121:2645–2653PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, Wijns W, Kolh P et al (2010) Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 31:2501–2555CrossRef European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, Wijns W, Kolh P et al (2010) Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 31:2501–2555CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Buszman PE, Kiesz SR, Bochenek A et al (2008) Acute and late outcomes of unprotected left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:538–545PubMedCrossRef Buszman PE, Kiesz SR, Bochenek A et al (2008) Acute and late outcomes of unprotected left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:538–545PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Boudriot E, Thiele H, Walther T et al (2011) Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with Sirolimus-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in unprotected left main stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:538–545PubMedCrossRef Boudriot E, Thiele H, Walther T et al (2011) Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with Sirolimus-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in unprotected left main stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:538–545PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP et al (2009) Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 360: 961–972PubMedCrossRef Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP et al (2009) Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 360: 961–972PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Valgimigli M, Serruys PW, Tsuchida K et al (2007) Cyphering the complexity of coronary artery disease using the SYNTAX™ score to predict clinical outcome in patients with three-vessel lumen obstruction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 99:1072–1081PubMedCrossRef Valgimigli M, Serruys PW, Tsuchida K et al (2007) Cyphering the complexity of coronary artery disease using the SYNTAX™ score to predict clinical outcome in patients with three-vessel lumen obstruction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 99:1072–1081PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Meliga E, Garcia-Garcia HM, Valgimigli M et al (2008) Longest available clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. The DELFT (Drug Eluting stent for LeFT main) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:2212–2219PubMedCrossRef Meliga E, Garcia-Garcia HM, Valgimigli M et al (2008) Longest available clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. The DELFT (Drug Eluting stent for LeFT main) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:2212–2219PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Buszman PE, Buszman PP, Kiesz RS et al (2009) Early and long-term results of unprotected left main coronary artery stenting. The LE MANS (Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1500–1511PubMedCrossRef Buszman PE, Buszman PP, Kiesz RS et al (2009) Early and long-term results of unprotected left main coronary artery stenting. The LE MANS (Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1500–1511PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Park DW, Kim YH, Yun SC et al (2010) Long-term outcomes after stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. 10-year results of bare-metal stents and 5-year results of drug-eluting stents from ASAN-Main (ASAN medical enter-left MAIN revascularization) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1366–1375PubMedCrossRef Park DW, Kim YH, Yun SC et al (2010) Long-term outcomes after stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. 10-year results of bare-metal stents and 5-year results of drug-eluting stents from ASAN-Main (ASAN medical enter-left MAIN revascularization) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1366–1375PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Seung KB, Park D-W, Kim Y-H et al (2008) Stents versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 358:1781–1792PubMedCrossRef Seung KB, Park D-W, Kim Y-H et al (2008) Stents versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 358:1781–1792PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Park DW, Seung KB, Kim YH et al (2010) Long-term safety and efficacy of stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. 5-year results from the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparision of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:117–125PubMedCrossRef Park DW, Seung KB, Kim YH et al (2010) Long-term safety and efficacy of stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. 5-year results from the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparision of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:117–125PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Palmerini T, Sangiorgi D, Marzocchi A et al (2009) Ostial and midshaft lesions vs. bifurcation lesions in 1111 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with drug eluting stents: results of the survey from the Italien Society of Invasive Cardiology. Eur Heart J 30:2087–2094PubMedCrossRef Palmerini T, Sangiorgi D, Marzocchi A et al (2009) Ostial and midshaft lesions vs. bifurcation lesions in 1111 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with drug eluting stents: results of the survey from the Italien Society of Invasive Cardiology. Eur Heart J 30:2087–2094PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Colombo A, Stankovic G, Orlic D et al (2003) Modified T-stenting technique with crushing for bifurcation lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 60:145–151PubMedCrossRef Colombo A, Stankovic G, Orlic D et al (2003) Modified T-stenting technique with crushing for bifurcation lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 60:145–151PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Iakovou I, Lei G, Colombo A (2005) Contemporary stent treatment of coronary bifurcations. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:1446–1455PubMedCrossRef Iakovou I, Lei G, Colombo A (2005) Contemporary stent treatment of coronary bifurcations. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:1446–1455PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Stankovic G, Darremont O, Ferenc M et al (2009) Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesions: 2008 consensus document from the fourth meeting of the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 5:39–49PubMedCrossRef Stankovic G, Darremont O, Ferenc M et al (2009) Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesions: 2008 consensus document from the fourth meeting of the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 5:39–49PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Katritsis DG, Siontis GCM, Ioannidis JPA (2009) Double versus single stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions. A meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:409–415PubMedCrossRef Katritsis DG, Siontis GCM, Ioannidis JPA (2009) Double versus single stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions. A meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:409–415PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YH, Park SW, Hong MK et al (2006) Comparison of simple and complex stenting techniques in the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation stenosis. Am J Cardiol 97:1597–1601PubMedCrossRef Kim YH, Park SW, Hong MK et al (2006) Comparison of simple and complex stenting techniques in the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation stenosis. Am J Cardiol 97:1597–1601PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Valgimigli M, Malagutti P, Rodriguez-Granillo GA et al (2006) Single-vessel versus bifurcation stenting for the treatment of distal left main coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stenting era: clinical and angiographic insights into the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) and Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (T-Search) registries. Am Heart J 152:896–902PubMedCrossRef Valgimigli M, Malagutti P, Rodriguez-Granillo GA et al (2006) Single-vessel versus bifurcation stenting for the treatment of distal left main coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stenting era: clinical and angiographic insights into the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) and Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (T-Search) registries. Am Heart J 152:896–902PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Palmerini T, Marzocchi A, Tamburino C et al (2008) Impact of bifurcation technique on 2-year clinical outcomes in 773 patients with distal unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with drug eluting stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 1:185–192PubMedCrossRef Palmerini T, Marzocchi A, Tamburino C et al (2008) Impact of bifurcation technique on 2-year clinical outcomes in 773 patients with distal unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with drug eluting stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 1:185–192PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Medina A, Surez Lezo J de, Pan M (2006) A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions. Rev Esp Cardiol 2:183–184CrossRef Medina A, Surez Lezo J de, Pan M (2006) A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions. Rev Esp Cardiol 2:183–184CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen SL, Santoso T, Zhang JJ et al (2011) A randomized clinical study comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:914–920PubMedCrossRef Chen SL, Santoso T, Zhang JJ et al (2011) A randomized clinical study comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:914–920PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Niemelä M, Kervinen K, Erglis A et al (2011) Randomized comparison of final kissing balloon dilatation versus no final kissing balloon dilatation in patients with coronary artery bifurcation leasions treated with main vessel stenting. The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study III. Circulation 123:79–86PubMedCrossRef Niemelä M, Kervinen K, Erglis A et al (2011) Randomized comparison of final kissing balloon dilatation versus no final kissing balloon dilatation in patients with coronary artery bifurcation leasions treated with main vessel stenting. The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study III. Circulation 123:79–86PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Parise H, Maehara A, Stone GW et al (2011) Meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing intravascular ultrasound versus angiographic guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention in pre-drug eluting stent era. Am J Cardiol 107:374–382PubMedCrossRef Parise H, Maehara A, Stone GW et al (2011) Meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing intravascular ultrasound versus angiographic guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention in pre-drug eluting stent era. Am J Cardiol 107:374–382PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW et al (2009) Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance on long-term mortality in stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:167–177PubMedCrossRef Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW et al (2009) Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance on long-term mortality in stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:167–177PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Stone GW, Mintz GS (2009) Unprotected left main intervention. The light at the end of the tunnel? Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:167–177;2:156–158 Stone GW, Mintz GS (2009) Unprotected left main intervention. The light at the end of the tunnel? Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:167–177;2:156–158
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YH, Park DW, Lee SW et al (2009) Long-term safety and effectiveness of unprotected left main coronary stenting with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents. Circulation 120:400–407PubMedCrossRef Kim YH, Park DW, Lee SW et al (2009) Long-term safety and effectiveness of unprotected left main coronary stenting with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents. Circulation 120:400–407PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamburino C, Di Salvo ME, Capodonno D et al (2009) Are drug-eluting stents superior to bare-metal stents in patients with unprotected non-bifurcational left main disease? Insights from a multicentre registry. Eur Heart J 30:1171–1179PubMedCrossRef Tamburino C, Di Salvo ME, Capodonno D et al (2009) Are drug-eluting stents superior to bare-metal stents in patients with unprotected non-bifurcational left main disease? Insights from a multicentre registry. Eur Heart J 30:1171–1179PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Byrne RA et al (2009) Paclitaxel- versus Sirolimus-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:1760–1768PubMedCrossRef Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Byrne RA et al (2009) Paclitaxel- versus Sirolimus-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:1760–1768PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JY, Park DW, Yun SC et al (2009) Long-term clinical outcomes of Sirolimus- versus Paclitaxel-eluting stents for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Analysis of the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for unprotected left main coronary stenosis: Comparison of percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus surgical revascularization) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:853–859PubMedCrossRef Lee JY, Park DW, Yun SC et al (2009) Long-term clinical outcomes of Sirolimus- versus Paclitaxel-eluting stents for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Analysis of the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for unprotected left main coronary stenosis: Comparison of percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus surgical revascularization) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:853–859PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Hauptstamminterventionen
Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der interventionellen Kardiologie
verfasst von
Dr. E. Boudriot
H. Thiele
G. Schuler
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2011
Verlag
Urban and Vogel
Erschienen in
Herz / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0340-9937
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-011-3460-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

Herz 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

„Jeder Fall von plötzlichem Tod muss obduziert werden!“

17.05.2024 Plötzlicher Herztod Nachrichten

Ein signifikanter Anteil der Fälle von plötzlichem Herztod ist genetisch bedingt. Um ihre Verwandten vor diesem Schicksal zu bewahren, sollten jüngere Personen, die plötzlich unerwartet versterben, ausnahmslos einer Autopsie unterzogen werden.

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

17.05.2024 Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien Nachrichten

Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.

Schlechtere Vorhofflimmern-Prognose bei kleinem linken Ventrikel

17.05.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Nicht nur ein vergrößerter, sondern auch ein kleiner linker Ventrikel ist bei Vorhofflimmern mit einer erhöhten Komplikationsrate assoziiert. Der Zusammenhang besteht nach Daten aus China unabhängig von anderen Risikofaktoren.

Semaglutid bei Herzinsuffizienz: Wie erklärt sich die Wirksamkeit?

17.05.2024 Herzinsuffizienz Nachrichten

Bei adipösen Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz des HFpEF-Phänotyps ist Semaglutid von symptomatischem Nutzen. Resultiert dieser Benefit allein aus der Gewichtsreduktion oder auch aus spezifischen Effekten auf die Herzinsuffizienz-Pathogenese? Eine neue Analyse gibt Aufschluss.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.