Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology
Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology 4/2018

21.09.2018 | Endoscopy (P Siersema, Section Editor)

Selection of EMR and ESD for Laterally Spreading Lesions of the Colon

verfasst von: Ji Young Bang, MD MPH, Michael J. Bourke, MBBS FRACP

Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Colonic laterally spreading lesions (LSL) are increasingly managed using endoscopic methods that comprise two main techniques: endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

Purpose of Review

In this review, we aimed to review the most recent literature on selection of the best endoscopic technique in the management of colonic LSL.

Recent Findings

EMR and ESD are complimentary techniques in the management of patients with colonic LSL.

Summary

EMR is safe and effective in most patients with LSL, except for cancers with submucosal invasion in whom R0 resection is favored.
Literatur
1.
Bourke MJ, Neuhaus H, Bergman JJ. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: indications and application in Western endoscopy practice. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:1887–900.CrossRef
2.
Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Dumonceau JM, Paspatis G, et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy. 2017;49:270–97.CrossRef
3.
Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, et al. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:417–34.CrossRef
4.
Rex DK, Hassan C, Bourke MJ. The colonoscopist’s guide to the vocabulary of colorectal neoplasia: histology, morphology, and management. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:253–63.CrossRef
5.
Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, Brown G, Tam W, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1909–18.CrossRef
6.
Uraoka T, Saito Y, Matsuda T, Ikehara H, Gotoda T, Saito D, et al. Endoscopic indications for endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading tumours in the colorectum. Gut. 2006;55:1592–7.CrossRef
7.
• Burgess NG, Hourigan LF, Zanati SA, et al. Risk stratification for covert invasive cancer among patients referred for colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a large multicenter cohort. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:732–742.e1. This study examines endoscopic features of colonic LSL associated with malignant lesions.CrossRef
8.
Klein A, Bourke MJ. Advanced polypectomy and resection techniques. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015;25:303–33.CrossRef
9.
Hassan C, Repici A, Sharma P, Correale L, Zullo A, Bretthauer M, et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2016;65:806–20.CrossRef
10.
Tate DJ, Bahin FF, Desomer L, Sidhu M, Gupta V, Bourke MJ. Cold-forceps avulsion with adjuvant snare-tip soft coagulation (CAST) is an effective and safe strategy for the management of non-lifting large laterally spreading colonic lesions. Endoscopy. 2018;50:52–62.CrossRef
11.
Sidhu M, Tate DJ, Desomer L, Brown G, Hourigan LF, Lee EYT, et al. The size, morphology, site, and access score predicts critical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon. Endoscopy. 2018;50:684–92.CrossRef
12.
Tate DJ, Desomer L, Klein A, et al. Adenoma recurrence after piecemeal colonic EMR is predictable: the Sydney EMR recurrence tool. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:647–656.e6.CrossRef
13.
Klein A, Jayasekeran V, Hourigan LF, Tate DJ, Singh R, Brown GJ, et al. 812b a multi-center randomized control trial of thermal ablation of the margin of the post endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) mucosal defect in the prevention of adenoma recurrence following EMR: preliminary results from the SCAR; study. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:S1266–7.CrossRef
14.
Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, Brown G, Tam W, Singh R, et al. Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut. 2015;64:57–65.CrossRef
15.
Desomer L, Tutticci N, Tate DJ, Williams SJ, McLeod D, Bourke MJ. A standardized imaging protocol is accurate in detecting recurrence after EMR. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:518–26.CrossRef
16.
Fahrtash-Bahin F, Holt BA, Jayasekeran V, et al. Snare tip soft coagulation achieves effective and safe endoscopic hemostasis during wide-field endoscopic resection of large colonic lesions (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:158–163.e1.CrossRef
17.
Bahin FF, Rasouli KN, Byth K, Hourigan LF, Singh R, Brown GJ, et al. Prediction of clinically significant bleeding following wide-field endoscopic resection of large sessile and laterally spreading colorectal lesions: a clinical risk score. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:1115–22.CrossRef
18.
Albeniz E, Fraile M, Ibanez B, et al. A scoring system to determine risk of delayed bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:1140–7.CrossRef
19.
Bahin FF, Rasouli KN, Williams SJ, Lee EY, Bourke MJ. Prophylactic clipping for the prevention of bleeding following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading colorectal lesions: an economic modeling study. Endoscopy. 2016;48:754–61.CrossRef
20.
Burgess NG, Bassan MS, McLeod D, Williams SJ, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Deep mural injury and perforation after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a new classification and analysis of risk factors. Gut. 2017;66:1779–89.CrossRef
21.
Swan MP, Bourke MJ, Moss A, Williams SJ, Hopper A, Metz A. The target sign: an endoscopic marker for the resection of the muscularis propria and potential perforation during colonic endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:79–85.CrossRef
22.
Fuccio L, Hassan C, Ponchon T, et al. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:74–86.e17.CrossRef
23.
Takamaru H, Saito Y, Yamada M, et al. Clinical impact of endoscopic clip closure of perforations during endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:494–502.e1.CrossRef
24.
• Fujiya M, Tanaka K, Dokoshi T, et al. Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:583–95. This meta-analysis summarized the efficacy and safety of EMR compared to ESD in the managmeent of colonic LSL.CrossRef
25.•
Bahin FF, Heitman SJ, Rasouli KN, Mahajan H, McLeod D, Lee EYT, et al. Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading colorectal lesions: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gut. 2017. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​gutjnl-2017-313823. This study examines the cost-effectiveness of EMR and ESD in the management of colonic LSL.CrossRef
26.
Schmidt A, Bauerfeind P, Gubler C, Damm M, Bauder M, Caca K. Endoscopic full-thickness resection in the colorectum with a novel over-the-scope device: first experience. Endoscopy. 2015;47:719–25.CrossRef
27.
Schmidt A, Beyna T, Schumacher B, Meining A, Richter-Schrag HJ, Messmann H, et al. Colonoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device: a prospective multicentre study in various indications. Gut. 2018;67:1280–9.CrossRef
28.
Awadie H, Repici A, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic management of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: selective treatment algorithms are needed. Endoscopy. 2017;49:214–6.CrossRef
29.
Heitman SJ, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic submucosal dissection and EMR for large colorectal polyps: “the perfect is the enemy of good”. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:87–9.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Selection of EMR and ESD for Laterally Spreading Lesions of the Colon
verfasst von
Ji Young Bang, MD MPH
Michael J. Bourke, MBBS FRACP
Publikationsdatum
21.09.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1092-8472
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-309X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-018-0198-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Intractable Disease in the Elderly: When Conventional Therapy Fails (S Katz, Section Editor)

Update on Vaccinating the Patient With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Motility (H Parkman and R Schey, Section Editors)

Parkinson’s Disease and Current Treatments for Its Gastrointestinal Neurogastromotility Effects

Pancreas (V Chandrasekhara, Section Editor)

Pancreatic Cancer and Diabetes Mellitus

Endoscopy (P Siersema, Section Editor)

What Is the Best Endoscopic Strategy in Acute Non-variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding?

Stomach (P Malfertheiner, Section Editor)

Potent Acid Suppression with PPIs and P-CABs: What’s New?

Invited Commentary

Timing of Endoscopic Necrosectomy Following Transmural Stent Placement for Pancreatic Necrosis

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise