Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2012

01.01.2012 | Otology

Sensation recovery of auricle following chronic ear surgery by retroauricular incision

verfasst von: Hung-Soo Kang, Seong-Ki Ahn, Sea-Yuong Jeon, Dong Gu Hur, Jin-Pyeong Kim, Jung Je Park, Dae Woo Kim, Seung Hoon Woo

Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of this prospective analysis was to objectify and quantify the sensory loss in the auricular area that occurs following surgery for chronic otitis media or cholesteatoma, and to assess the exact recovery time of the auricular sensation. Till now, no study has yet been conducted on the sensory loss that is developed after retroauricular incision is performed for chronic ear surgery. Forty-eight patients underwent surgery via retroauricular incision for chronic otitis media or for chronic otitis media or cholesteatoma between March 2009 and January 2010. The skin around the auricle was divided into six areas. The sensation of each area was assessed before the surgery and 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the surgery, using the Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments. The patients were also asked to record the sensation that they felt using the visual analog scale (VAS). In the objective sensory assessment, only area 5, which corresponds to the retroauricular area, showed significant sensory loss. Three months after the surgery, the sensation was recovered to a level comparable to that before the surgery in most of the patients. The mean subjective VAS score was 10 prior to the surgery, 8.56 (±1.08) 3 months after the surgery, and 9.32 (±0.74) 6 months after the surgery, respectively. In conclusion, following chronic ear surgery, the sensation of the auricle was recovered to the previous level within 3 months. Therefore, patients who are to undergo retroauricular incision should be informed that they will experience temporary sensory loss for approximately 3 months after the surgery.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jégoux F, Godey B, Riffaud L, Morandi X (2007) Pneumocephalus as a delayed mastoidectomy complication. J Laryngol Otol 121(4):401–403PubMedCrossRef Jégoux F, Godey B, Riffaud L, Morandi X (2007) Pneumocephalus as a delayed mastoidectomy complication. J Laryngol Otol 121(4):401–403PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen NR, Jacobsen SD (1997) Parotidectomy. Preserving the posterior branch of the great auricular nerve. J Laryngol Otol 111(6):556–559PubMed Christensen NR, Jacobsen SD (1997) Parotidectomy. Preserving the posterior branch of the great auricular nerve. J Laryngol Otol 111(6):556–559PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson DW, Masters FW (1997) Surgical treatment of disease of the salivary glands. Saunders, Philadelphia Robinson DW, Masters FW (1997) Surgical treatment of disease of the salivary glands. Saunders, Philadelphia
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaheen OH (1984) Problems in head and neck surgery. Baillière Tindall, Oxford Shaheen OH (1984) Problems in head and neck surgery. Baillière Tindall, Oxford
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown AM, Wake MJ (1990) Accidental full thickness burn of the ear lobe following division of the great auricular nerve at parotidectomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28(3):178–179PubMedCrossRef Brown AM, Wake MJ (1990) Accidental full thickness burn of the ear lobe following division of the great auricular nerve at parotidectomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28(3):178–179PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hui Y, Wong DS, Wong LY, Ho WK, Wei WI (2003) A prospective controlled double-blind trial of great auricular nerve preservation at parotidectomy. Am J Surg 185(6):574–579PubMedCrossRef Hui Y, Wong DS, Wong LY, Ho WK, Wei WI (2003) A prospective controlled double-blind trial of great auricular nerve preservation at parotidectomy. Am J Surg 185(6):574–579PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Min HJ, Lee HS, Lee YS et al (2007) Is it necessary to preserve the posterior branch of the great auricular nerve in parotidectomy? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137(4):636–641PubMedCrossRef Min HJ, Lee HS, Lee YS et al (2007) Is it necessary to preserve the posterior branch of the great auricular nerve in parotidectomy? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137(4):636–641PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mario S, Hiroshi S, Fernando M et al (2003) Middle ear and mastoid microsurgery. Thieme, New York Mario S, Hiroshi S, Fernando M et al (2003) Middle ear and mastoid microsurgery. Thieme, New York
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Henry W (1982) The ear. Anatomy for surgeons. Saunders, Philadelphia Henry W (1982) The ear. Anatomy for surgeons. Saunders, Philadelphia
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Voerman VF, van Egmond J, Crul BJ (1999) Normal values for sensory thresholds in the cervical dermatomes: a critical note on the use of Semmes–Weinstein monofilament. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 78(1):24–29PubMedCrossRef Voerman VF, van Egmond J, Crul BJ (1999) Normal values for sensory thresholds in the cervical dermatomes: a critical note on the use of Semmes–Weinstein monofilament. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 78(1):24–29PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kesarwani A, Antonyshyn O, Mackinnon SE, Mackinnon SE, Gruss JS, Novak C, Kelly L (1989) Facial sensibility testing in the normal and posttraumatic population. Ann Plast Surg 22(5):416–425PubMedCrossRef Kesarwani A, Antonyshyn O, Mackinnon SE, Mackinnon SE, Gruss JS, Novak C, Kelly L (1989) Facial sensibility testing in the normal and posttraumatic population. Ann Plast Surg 22(5):416–425PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell-Krotoski JA, Fess EE, Figarola JH, Hiltz D (1995) Threshold detection and Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments. J Hand Ther 8(2):155–162PubMed Bell-Krotoski JA, Fess EE, Figarola JH, Hiltz D (1995) Threshold detection and Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments. J Hand Ther 8(2):155–162PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Imai H, Tajima T, Natsuma Y (1989) Interpretation of cutaneous pressure threshold (Semmes–Weinstein monofilament measurement) following median nerve repair and sensory reeducation in the adult. Microsurgery 10(2):142–144PubMedCrossRef Imai H, Tajima T, Natsuma Y (1989) Interpretation of cutaneous pressure threshold (Semmes–Weinstein monofilament measurement) following median nerve repair and sensory reeducation in the adult. Microsurgery 10(2):142–144PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Holewski JJ, Stess RM, Graf PM, Grunfeld C (1988) Aesthesiometry: quantification of cutaneous pressure sensation in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Rehabil Res Dev 25(2):1–10PubMed Holewski JJ, Stess RM, Graf PM, Grunfeld C (1988) Aesthesiometry: quantification of cutaneous pressure sensation in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Rehabil Res Dev 25(2):1–10PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Olmos PR, Cataland S, O’Dorisio TM et al (1995) The Semmes–Weinstein monofilament as a potential predictor of foot ulceration in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes. Am J Med Sci 309(2):76–82PubMedCrossRef Olmos PR, Cataland S, O’Dorisio TM et al (1995) The Semmes–Weinstein monofilament as a potential predictor of foot ulceration in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes. Am J Med Sci 309(2):76–82PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Vieira MB, Maia AF, Ribeiro JC (2002) Randomized prospective study of the validity of the great auricular nerve preservation in parotidectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128(10):11911195 Vieira MB, Maia AF, Ribeiro JC (2002) Randomized prospective study of the validity of the great auricular nerve preservation in parotidectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128(10):11911195
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan WR, Fee WE (2009) Long-term great auricular nerve morbidity after sacrifice during parotidectomy. Laryngoscope 119(6):1140–1146 Ryan WR, Fee WE (2009) Long-term great auricular nerve morbidity after sacrifice during parotidectomy. Laryngoscope 119(6):1140–1146
Metadaten
Titel
Sensation recovery of auricle following chronic ear surgery by retroauricular incision
verfasst von
Hung-Soo Kang
Seong-Ki Ahn
Sea-Yuong Jeon
Dong Gu Hur
Jin-Pyeong Kim
Jung Je Park
Dae Woo Kim
Seung Hoon Woo
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1638-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.