Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 12/2021

Open Access 16.09.2021 | Short Communication

Short-, long-, and very long-term results of secondary anterior sphincteroplasty in 20 patients with obstetric injury

verfasst von: Helene Marie Haug, Erik Carlsen, Hans-Olaf Johannessen, Egil Johnson

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 12/2021

Abstract

Purpose

More long-term follow-up studies beyond 10 years after secondary sphincteroplasty for obstetric damage are warranted. This prospective study aimed to compare reported data on incontinence and satisfaction in a cohort of such patients examined at short-, long-, and very long-term follow-up.

Methods

Twenty out of 33 obstetric patients (61%) operated with secondary anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty during February 1996 to April 2004 were evaluated preoperatively and at short-, long-, and very long-term follow-up. Anal incontinence was scored by a combination of Wexner’s and St. Mark’s incontinence scores. The patients also reported degree of treatment satisfaction.

Results

Twenty patients were examined preoperatively and after a median (range) of 5 (2–62), 102 (64–162), and 220 (183–278) months. Corresponding incontinence scores were 11.5 (5–18), 5.5 (1–17) (p < 0.01), 10.0 (0–18) (p > 0.05), and 12.0. (1–18) (p > 0.05). With increasing follow-up times, patients reporting a better outcome were 75%, 65%, and 45%. At very long-term follow-up patients, reports were more dismal than expected in those also reporting improved incontinence cores. Incontinence scores did not improve in patients with neuropathy (n = 5) or patients (n = 5) with more than 10 years of symptoms.

Conclusion

Initial improvement of anal incontinence attenuated with time, in particular from short- to long-term follow-up. Patients with neuropathy experienced no improvement of incontinence. Beyond stoma formation, in compliant patients, one should consider other treatment options like sacral nerve stimulation and neosphincter formation.
Hinweise
Erik Carlsen is retired

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

The reported incidence of overt obstetric anal sphincter injuries in the Nordic countries varies from 0.6 to 4.2% [1]. However, there is evidence of sphincter defects after vaginal delivery in primiparous women evaluated by 3D ultrasound in around 11% and 8,5% in subsequent deliveries [2]. The short-term success rate of secondary repair of sphincter defects after obstetric trauma lies between 64 and 80% [35]. Several studies have shown a deterioration of improved incontinence over time. A review of 16 studies with a median observation time of 58–129 months reported good or excellent outcomes in about 50%. Predictors of long-term failure included advanced age, duration of symptoms, and pudendal neuropathy [6].
In 2010 we reported short- and long-term outcomes (102 months) in 33 obstetric women following treatment of anal incontinence with secondary anterior sphincteroplasty [7]. This study aimed to report results after a very long-term follow-up of these patients.

Material and methods

Twenty of the thirty-three patients (61%) reported in 2010 were eligible for very long-term follow-up in March 2019. Three patients were deceased. Ten patients were excluded because of not responding in seven and needing a stoma in three.
Preoperative ambulatory workup included clinical evaluation (n = 20), recording of incontinence scores (n = 20), manometry (n = 18), ultrasonography (n = 17), pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) (n = 9), and needle electromyography (EMG) (n = 9). A PNTML ≥ 2.3 ms. and needle EMG showing polyphasic potentials and signs of denervation and reinnervation were compatible with neuropathy. At short-term follow-up, patients were scored for incontinence and patient satisfaction (excellent, improved, unaltered, worse) in collaboration with the physician at the ambulatory unit. At long term and very long term, patients were evaluated by phone interview and by completing a questionnaire returned by mail. Incontinence was evaluated using a combination of Wexner’s and St. Mark’s scores. Parameters reported at all follow-ups were leakage of air, leakage of liquid stool, solid stool, and lifestyle alteration expressed as seldom (1 point), monthly (2 points), weekly (3 points), and daily (4 points). Use of pad expressed as yes (2 points) and no (0 points); complete incontinence giving a maximum score of 18.
The median number of vaginal births was 2 (range 1–4). Eleven had an overt rupture of the anal sphincters. Of these, three had delivery by vacuum extraction and breech birth in one. Three had episiotomy performed during delivery. Judged by peroperative findings and anal ultrasonography, all patients had third or fourth-degree sphincter tear: grade 3a (n = 1), 3b (n = 11), 3c (n = 6), or 4 (n = 2).
The patients were operated with an adapting and overlapping sphincteroplasty of the external sphincter, including puborectal sling adaptation, using slowly resorbable monofil polydioxanone 2–0 sutures, [7]. The skin was adapted with an intracutaneous resorbable polyfilament suture over a subcutaneous drain. An experienced consultant always participated in the operations. Three patients (15%) had more than one operation. One had repeat anal reefing and plasty of the puborectal sling after 46 months. The second had anal reconstruction after 78 months, followed by separate suturing of the internal and external sphincter after 210 months at another hospital. The third patient had a sphincteroplasty with separate suturing at another hospital after approximately 144 months.
Comparison of incontinence scores was made with non-parametric repeated measures using ANOVA (Friedman multiple comparisons test). We used Graphpad Instat version 3.0 for Windows (San Diego, USA), and p values < 0.05 were defined as significant.

Results

At initial sphincteroplasty median (range) age and duration of symptoms for the 20 patients were 36 years (29–59) and 3 (1–20) years. They were examined at short-, long-, and very long-term follow-up after median (range) 5 (2–62), 102 (64–162), and 220 (183–278) months. Median (range) incontinence scores preoperatively, after short-, long-, and very long-term evaluation, were 11.5 (5–18), 5.5 (1–17) (p < 0.01), 10.0 (0–18) (p > 0.05), and 12.0. (1–18) (p > 0.05).
Incontinence score was matched with patient satisfaction. At short-term follow-up, the percentage of patients reporting normalized score/excellent results were 10/10, reduced score/improved result 70/65, unaltered/unaltered 5/20, and increased score/worse result 15/5. At long term, the numbers were 15/15, 50/50, 10/30, and 25/5, and at very long term, 5/10, 60/35, 10/30, and 25/25. Interestingly, 25% of the patients reported a deteriorated treatment result at a very long-time evaluation despite a persistent incontinence score. During the 18 years of observation time, the fraction of patients reporting excellent and improved results declined from 75 to 45%.
Eleven (55%), 8 (40%), 11 (55%), and 10 (50%) patients wore a pad before operation and after the respective times of follow-up. Corresponding figures for patients using constipating medicines were 5%, 5%, 15%, and 10%. After long- and very long-term follow-up, 11 (55%) and 10 (50%) of the patients could defer defecation for 15 min or more.
Results concerning the degree of incontinence and lifestyle alteration preoperatively and at follow-up are shown in Fig. 1. There was no longer any improvement of continence concerning solid and liquid stool after very long-time follow-up compared with before operation.
The patients were analyzed for incontinence scores related to the degree of sphincter tear without revealing striking differences in incontinence. Grade 3a (n = 1) had incontinence score of median (range) 17 preoperatively, 17 at short term, 13 at long term, and 15 at very long term. Grade 3b (n = 11), 11 (6–17), 8 (1–15), 12 (1–16), 12 (1–17). 3c (n = 6), 11 (5–16), 5,5 (1–13), 7 (2–14), 10,5 (2–18). Grade 4 (n = 2): 13,5 (12–15), 8 (2–14), 11,5 (6–17), 11 (8–14).
Five patients without neuropathy, who had very long symptom duration of median 15 years (range 10–20), proved to have little effect of operation. Respective scores were 14 (11–19), 13 (7–16), 15 (6–18), and 17 (12–20).
In patients without known neuropathy (n = 15), the preoperative and post-operative incontinence scores with increasing follow-up times were 11 (5–16), 5 (1–13) (p < 0.05), 6 (0–15) (p > 0.05), and 9 (1–18) (p > 0.05), respectively. In patients (n = 5) with neuropathy, corresponding scores were 16 (13–18), 13 (8–17) (p > 0.05), 15 (14–18) (p > 0.05), and 14 (12–17) (p > 0.05).

Discussion

After very long-term follow-up after secondary sphincter repair for obstetric damage, the main result was that improved continence deteriorated more strongly from short- to long-time (4.5 points) versus long- to very long-time (2 points) follow-up.
However, in the 15 patients without neuropathy, although not significant, there probably was a treatment effect with improved continence after both 8.5 years (5 points) and 18 years (2 points) of follow-up. The pattern of reduced continence as a function of observation times, mostly from 10 to 120 months, but also after 18 years, was consistent with other reports [8]. In line with other studies [6], the precise control of continence for flatus was not improved by sphincteroplasty.
The five patients with neuropathy based on delayed PNTML and needle EMG had no definitive improvement of continence. Still, the scores remained stable at long and very long-term follow-up, supporting that sphincteroplasty per se consolidated the sphincter.
The discrepancy at very long-term evaluation reported between reduced incontinence score in 65% and improved treatment results in only 45% of the patients could partly be owing to a negative psychological effect because of many years with persisting incontinence. However, at the ultimate evaluation, only half of the patients wore a pad, comparable with both before operation and after long time evaluation. This corresponds with findings that the major decline of incontinence took place from short- to long-time follow-up (Fig. 1). However, without operation, these patients undoubtedly would have been even worse off regarding the degree of incontinence.
We found that degree of sphincter tear did not have any crucial influence on the treatment results in this cohort of 20 patients. On the contrary, five patients with long symptom duration without neuropathy had no symptomatic benefit of sphincteroplasty. This is consistent with other reports [9].
Reasons for early failure of a sphincteroplasty can be lack of a tension-free repair and complications from hematoma, wound infection, and fecal impaction. Crucial factors for long-term failure are less evident but could be denervation of the external sphincter muscle during dissection [10] and time-dependent muscular fibrosis and atrophy.
Further treatment options, particularly for older women with progressing intolerable long-term incontinence, could be placement of a stoma. Alternatively, in younger and compliant patients’ sacral nerve, stimulation or formation of a neosphincter by dynamic graciloplasty or artificial bowel sphincter is potential but also complex treatment options with inherent complications and low success rate [2, 11].

Conclusion

In conclusion, even after 18 years, 20 out of 33 patients (61%) reported data after secondary sphincteroplasty. The incontinence and lifestyle alteration results most strongly declined from short- to long-term follow-up. The degree of incontinence reached the preoperative level at the hitherto almost unparalleled very long-term follow-up of 18 years. Although not statistically significant, patients without neuropathy still had an improved result at ultimate follow-up. Thus, secondary sphincteroplasty for obstetric damage is worthwhile, but the effect deteriorates, and one should consider additional treatment options in selected patients.

Declarations

Ethics approval

The study was approved on February 29th, 2019, by the local data protection office at Oslo University Hospital, reference number: 19/03646.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Die Chirurgie

Print-Titel

Das Abo mit mehr Tiefe

Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.

Bis 30. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr nur 199 € zahlen!

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

e.Med Innere Medizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Laine K, Gissler M, Pirhonen J (2009) Changing incidence of anal sphincter tears in four Nordic countries through the last decades. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 146(1):71–75CrossRef Laine K, Gissler M, Pirhonen J (2009) Changing incidence of anal sphincter tears in four Nordic countries through the last decades. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 146(1):71–75CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA (2008) Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management. Ann Surg 247(2):224–237CrossRef Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA (2008) Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management. Ann Surg 247(2):224–237CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rasmussen OO, Puggaard L, Christiansen J (1999) Anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma: age affects outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 42(2):193–195CrossRef Rasmussen OO, Puggaard L, Christiansen J (1999) Anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma: age affects outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 42(2):193–195CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Barisic GI, Krivokapic ZV, Markovic VA, Popovic MA (2006) Outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair after 3 months and after a mean of 80 months. Int J Colorectal Dis 21(1):52–56CrossRef Barisic GI, Krivokapic ZV, Markovic VA, Popovic MA (2006) Outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair after 3 months and after a mean of 80 months. Int J Colorectal Dis 21(1):52–56CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Zorcolo L, Covotta L, Bartolo DC (2005) Outcome of anterior sphincter repair for obstetric injury: comparison of early and late results. Dis Colon Rectum 48(3):524–531CrossRef Zorcolo L, Covotta L, Bartolo DC (2005) Outcome of anterior sphincter repair for obstetric injury: comparison of early and late results. Dis Colon Rectum 48(3):524–531CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Glasgow SC, Lowry AC (2012) Long-term outcomes of anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 55(4):482–490CrossRef Glasgow SC, Lowry AC (2012) Long-term outcomes of anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 55(4):482–490CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson E, Carlsen E, Steen TB, Backer Hjorthaug JO, Eriksen MT, Johannessen HO (2010) Short- and long-term results of secondary anterior sphincteroplasty in 33 patients with obstetric injury. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89(11):1466–1472CrossRef Johnson E, Carlsen E, Steen TB, Backer Hjorthaug JO, Eriksen MT, Johannessen HO (2010) Short- and long-term results of secondary anterior sphincteroplasty in 33 patients with obstetric injury. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89(11):1466–1472CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbosa M, Glavind-Kristensen M, Moller Soerensen M, Christensen P (2020) Secondary sphincter repair for anal incontinence following obstetric sphincter injury: functional outcome and quality of life at 18 years of follow-up. Colorectal Dis 22(1):71–79CrossRef Barbosa M, Glavind-Kristensen M, Moller Soerensen M, Christensen P (2020) Secondary sphincter repair for anal incontinence following obstetric sphincter injury: functional outcome and quality of life at 18 years of follow-up. Colorectal Dis 22(1):71–79CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ctercteko GC, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Weakley FL, Melia M (1988) Anal sphincter repair: a report of 60 cases and review of the literature. Aust N Z J Surg 58(9):703–710CrossRef Ctercteko GC, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Weakley FL, Melia M (1988) Anal sphincter repair: a report of 60 cases and review of the literature. Aust N Z J Surg 58(9):703–710CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (2000) Long-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 355(9200):260–265CrossRef Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (2000) Long-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 355(9200):260–265CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Goos M, Baumgartner U, Löhnert M, Thomusch O, Ruf G (2013) Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres. BMC Surg 13(1):45CrossRef Goos M, Baumgartner U, Löhnert M, Thomusch O, Ruf G (2013) Experience with a new prosthetic anal sphincter in three coloproctological centres. BMC Surg 13(1):45CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Short-, long-, and very long-term results of secondary anterior sphincteroplasty in 20 patients with obstetric injury
verfasst von
Helene Marie Haug
Erik Carlsen
Hans-Olaf Johannessen
Egil Johnson
Publikationsdatum
16.09.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 12/2021
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-04026-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2021

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 12/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.