Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2019

16.01.2019 | Review

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly versus non-elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Nobuaki Hoshino, Yudai Fukui, Koya Hida, Yoshiharu Sakai

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer has spread globally. The usefulness of laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients was initially indicated by comparison with open surgery. However, whether the procedure is safe for elderly as well as non-elderly patients with colorectal cancer remains unclear.

Methods

In this review, patients aged ≥ 75 were defined as elderly. We conducted literature searches using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials. Two authors independently reviewed resultant articles to identify relevant observational studies. Data synthesis was performed with a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was investigated by using forest plots and I2 statistics. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed by the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots.

Results

Twenty-two studies were included. The incidence of overall complications was slightly higher in elderly patients than in non-elderly patients, with statistical significance (risk ratio (RR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–1.34). There was no difference between them in the incidence of anastomotic leakage (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.86–1.80) and mortality (risk difference 0.00, 95% CI − 0.01 to 0.01).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is mostly safe for elderly patients as well as non-elderly patients. Preoperative comorbidities or poor physical capacity should be cared for in the elderly.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pascual M, Salvans S, Pera M (2016) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: current status and implementation of the latest technological innovations. World J Gastroenterol 22:704–717CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pascual M, Salvans S, Pera M (2016) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: current status and implementation of the latest technological innovations. World J Gastroenterol 22:704–717CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiphorst AH, Pronk A, Borel Rinkes IH, Hamaker ME (2014) Representation of the elderly in trials of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Color Dis 16:976–983CrossRef Schiphorst AH, Pronk A, Borel Rinkes IH, Hamaker ME (2014) Representation of the elderly in trials of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Color Dis 16:976–983CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Grailey K, Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Aboud R, Ziprin P, Faiz O (2013) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in the elderly population. Surg Endosc 27:19–30CrossRefPubMed Grailey K, Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Aboud R, Ziprin P, Faiz O (2013) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in the elderly population. Surg Endosc 27:19–30CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2015) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery confers lower mortality in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 66,483 patients. Surg Endosc 29:322–333CrossRefPubMed Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2015) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery confers lower mortality in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 66,483 patients. Surg Endosc 29:322–333CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujii S, Tsukamoto M, Fukushima Y, Shimada R, Okamoto K, Tsuchiya T, Nozawa K, Matsuda K, Hashiguchi Y (2016) Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients. World J Gastrointest Oncol 8:573–582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fujii S, Tsukamoto M, Fukushima Y, Shimada R, Okamoto K, Tsuchiya T, Nozawa K, Matsuda K, Hashiguchi Y (2016) Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients. World J Gastrointest Oncol 8:573–582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, Ueno M, Yamaguchi T (2009) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1614–1618CrossRefPubMed Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, Ueno M, Yamaguchi T (2009) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1614–1618CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Arimoto A, Hasegawa H, Sugiyama H, Yamashita K, Matsuda T, Tominaga M, Sumi Y, Suzuki S, Kakeji Y (2017) Safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic colorectal resection in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching study. Anticancer Res 37:4195–4198PubMed Arimoto A, Hasegawa H, Sugiyama H, Yamashita K, Matsuda T, Tominaga M, Sumi Y, Suzuki S, Kakeji Y (2017) Safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic colorectal resection in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching study. Anticancer Res 37:4195–4198PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bottino V, Esposito MG, Mottola A, Marte G, di Maio V, Sciascia V, Nunziante M, Fregola G, Cuzzovaglia S, Galante F, Andreoli F, Breglia A, Giuliano ME, Papaleo D, Della Rocca P, Maida P (2012) Early outcomes of colon laparoscopic resection in the elderly patients compared with the younger. BMC Surg 12(Suppl 1):S8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bottino V, Esposito MG, Mottola A, Marte G, di Maio V, Sciascia V, Nunziante M, Fregola G, Cuzzovaglia S, Galante F, Andreoli F, Breglia A, Giuliano ME, Papaleo D, Della Rocca P, Maida P (2012) Early outcomes of colon laparoscopic resection in the elderly patients compared with the younger. BMC Surg 12(Suppl 1):S8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Denet C, Fuks D, Cocco F, Chopinet S, Abbas M, Costea C, Levard H, Perniceni T, Gayet B (2017) Effects of age after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: are there any specific outcomes? Dig Liver Dis 49:562–567CrossRefPubMed Denet C, Fuks D, Cocco F, Chopinet S, Abbas M, Costea C, Levard H, Perniceni T, Gayet B (2017) Effects of age after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: are there any specific outcomes? Dig Liver Dis 49:562–567CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fiscon V, Portale G, Frigo F, Migliorini G (2010) Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer: matched comparison in elderly and younger patients. Tech Coloproctol 14:323–327CrossRefPubMed Fiscon V, Portale G, Frigo F, Migliorini G (2010) Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer: matched comparison in elderly and younger patients. Tech Coloproctol 14:323–327CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirano Y, Hattori M, Sato Y, Maeda K, Douden K, Hashizume Y (2012) The outcome of single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy for colon carcinoma in the elderly. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:338–340CrossRefPubMed Hirano Y, Hattori M, Sato Y, Maeda K, Douden K, Hashizume Y (2012) The outcome of single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy for colon carcinoma in the elderly. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:338–340CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Inoue Y, Kawamoto A, Okugawa Y et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 3:897–901CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Inoue Y, Kawamoto A, Okugawa Y et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 3:897–901CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong DH, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Kim NK (2013) Safety and feasibility of a laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in elderly patients. Ann Coloproctol 29:22–27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jeong DH, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Kim NK (2013) Safety and feasibility of a laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in elderly patients. Ann Coloproctol 29:22–27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang T, Kim HO, Kim H, Chun HK, Han WK, Jung KU (2015) Age over 80 is a possible risk factor for postoperative morbidity after a laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Coloproctol 31:228–234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kang T, Kim HO, Kim H, Chun HK, Han WK, Jung KU (2015) Age over 80 is a possible risk factor for postoperative morbidity after a laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Coloproctol 31:228–234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kazama K, Aoyama T, Hayashi T, Yamada T, Numata M, Amano S, Kamiya M, Sato T, Yoshikawa T, Shiozawa M, Oshima T, Yukawa N, Rino Y, Masuda M (2017) Evaluation of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged over 75 years old: a multi-institutional study (YSURG1401). BMC Surg 17:29CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kazama K, Aoyama T, Hayashi T, Yamada T, Numata M, Amano S, Kamiya M, Sato T, Yoshikawa T, Shiozawa M, Oshima T, Yukawa N, Rino Y, Masuda M (2017) Evaluation of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged over 75 years old: a multi-institutional study (YSURG1401). BMC Surg 17:29CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kvasnovsky CL, Adams K, Sideris M, Laycock J, Haji AK, Haq A, Nunoo-Mensah J, Papagrigoriadis S (2016) Elderly patients have more infectious complications following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Color Dis 18:94–100CrossRef Kvasnovsky CL, Adams K, Sideris M, Laycock J, Haji AK, Haq A, Nunoo-Mensah J, Papagrigoriadis S (2016) Elderly patients have more infectious complications following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Color Dis 18:94–100CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim SW, Kim YJ, Kim HR (2017) Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in patients over 80 years of age: the morbidity outcomes. Ann Surg Treat Res 92:423–428CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lim SW, Kim YJ, Kim HR (2017) Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in patients over 80 years of age: the morbidity outcomes. Ann Surg Treat Res 92:423–428CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Mori T, Nakashima M, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y (2004) Laparoscopy-assisted surgery for colorectal neoplasm is justifiable regardless of advanced age. Hepatogastroenterology 51:152–155PubMed Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Mori T, Nakashima M, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y (2004) Laparoscopy-assisted surgery for colorectal neoplasm is justifiable regardless of advanced age. Hepatogastroenterology 51:152–155PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura T, Mitomi H, Onozato W, Sato T, Ikeda A, Naito M, Ogura N, Kamata H, Ooki A, Watanabe M (2011) Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colon cancer: a comparison of patients 64 years or younger with those 75 years or older. Hepatogastroenterology 58:1200–1204CrossRefPubMed Nakamura T, Mitomi H, Onozato W, Sato T, Ikeda A, Naito M, Ogura N, Kamata H, Ooki A, Watanabe M (2011) Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colon cancer: a comparison of patients 64 years or younger with those 75 years or older. Hepatogastroenterology 58:1200–1204CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Otsuka K, Kimura T, Hakozaki M, Yaegashi M, Matsuo T, Fujii H, Sato K, Hatanaka T, Sasaki A (2017) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: a case-matched comparison of short- and long-term outcomes with middle-aged patients. Surg Today 47:587–594CrossRefPubMed Otsuka K, Kimura T, Hakozaki M, Yaegashi M, Matsuo T, Fujii H, Sato K, Hatanaka T, Sasaki A (2017) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: a case-matched comparison of short- and long-term outcomes with middle-aged patients. Surg Today 47:587–594CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pędziwiatr M, Pisarska M, Wierdak M, Major P, Rubinkiewicz M, Kisielewski M, Matyja M, Lasek A, Budzyński A (2015) The use of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer--a comparative analysis of patients aged above 80 and below 55. Pol Przegl Chir 87:565–572PubMed Pędziwiatr M, Pisarska M, Wierdak M, Major P, Rubinkiewicz M, Kisielewski M, Matyja M, Lasek A, Budzyński A (2015) The use of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer--a comparative analysis of patients aged above 80 and below 55. Pol Przegl Chir 87:565–572PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Roscio F, Boni L, Clerici F, Frattini P, Cassinotti E, Scandroglio I (2016) Is laparoscopic surgery really effective for the treatment of colon and rectal cancer in very elderly over 80 years old? A prospective multicentric case-control assessment. Surg Endosc 30:4372–4382CrossRefPubMed Roscio F, Boni L, Clerici F, Frattini P, Cassinotti E, Scandroglio I (2016) Is laparoscopic surgery really effective for the treatment of colon and rectal cancer in very elderly over 80 years old? A prospective multicentric case-control assessment. Surg Endosc 30:4372–4382CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17:923–929CrossRefPubMed Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17:923–929CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan KY, Konishi F, Kawamura YJ, Maeda T, Sasaki J, Tsujinaka S, Horie H (2011) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients: a case-control study of 15 years of experience. Am J Surg 201:531–536CrossRefPubMed Tan KY, Konishi F, Kawamura YJ, Maeda T, Sasaki J, Tsujinaka S, Horie H (2011) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients: a case-control study of 15 years of experience. Am J Surg 201:531–536CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tokuhara K, Nakatani K, Ueyama Y, Yoshioka K, Kon M (2016) Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 27:66–71CrossRefPubMed Tokuhara K, Nakatani K, Ueyama Y, Yoshioka K, Kon M (2016) Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 27:66–71CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Tomimaru Y, Ide Y, Murata K (2011) Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in elderly patients. Asian J Endosc Surg 4:1–6CrossRefPubMed Tomimaru Y, Ide Y, Murata K (2011) Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in elderly patients. Asian J Endosc Surg 4:1–6CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, Baba H, Kitajima M (2003) Short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic colonic surgery in octogenarians: a matched case-control study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:95–100CrossRefPubMed Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, Baba H, Kitajima M (2003) Short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic colonic surgery in octogenarians: a matched case-control study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:95–100CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SY, Park JE, Lee YJ, Seo HJ, Sheen SS, Hahn S, Jang BH, Son HJ (2013) Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity. J Clin Epidemiol 66:408–414CrossRefPubMed Kim SY, Park JE, Lee YJ, Seo HJ, Sheen SS, Hahn S, Jang BH, Son HJ (2013) Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity. J Clin Epidemiol 66:408–414CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic review of intervention 5. 1. 0. The cochrane collaboration Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic review of intervention 5. 1. 0. The cochrane collaboration
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Millan M, Merino S, Caro A, Feliu F, Escuder J, Francesch T (2015) Treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly. World J Gastrointest Oncol 7:204–220CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Millan M, Merino S, Caro A, Feliu F, Escuder J, Francesch T (2015) Treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly. World J Gastrointest Oncol 7:204–220CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Biondi A, Vacante M, Ambrosino I, Cristaldi E, Pietrapertosa G, Basile F (2016) Role of surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly. World J Gastrointest Surg 8:606–613CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Biondi A, Vacante M, Ambrosino I, Cristaldi E, Pietrapertosa G, Basile F (2016) Role of surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly. World J Gastrointest Surg 8:606–613CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly versus non-elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Nobuaki Hoshino
Yudai Fukui
Koya Hida
Yoshiharu Sakai
Publikationsdatum
16.01.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03234-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.