Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 12/2017

17.10.2017 | Original Article

Short-term Prospective Questionnaire Study of Early Postoperative Quality of Life After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

verfasst von: Fumihiko Nakamura, Yutaka Saito, Shin Haruyama, Masau Sekiguchi, Masayoshi Yamada, Taku Sakamoto, Takeshi Nakajima, Seiichiro Yamamoto, Yoshitaka Murakami, Hideki Ishikawa, Takahisa Matsuda

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 12/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become popular as an alternative to laparoscopy-assisted colectomy (LAC) for early colorectal cancer.

Aim

To validate postoperative quality of life (QOL) based on subjective symptoms of patients from questionnaire survey.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled patients planned to undergo ESD for adenoma or Tis/T1a cancer at our institution between December 2011 and January 2013. Controls were prospectively enrolled LAC patients diagnosed with T1b cancer. Patients answered questionnaire survey on QOL on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD14. Questions were scored using visual analog scale (0 points = worst condition, 100 points = best condition) and were classified into six categories: health status, mental status (MeS), motor status (MoS), bodily painless, passage and anorectal function (PAF), and stress for the treatment. Total score was also calculated. We compared the median scores among categories using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Results

A total of 82 ESDs and 41 LACs were included. Median score for the factors in questionnaire (POD1/POD14) in ESDs versus LACs for colonic lesion (rectal lesion) was as follows: MeS, 74/83 versus 54/73 (72/85 vs. 42/62); MoS, 98/96 versus 51/75 (95/90 vs. 66/67); PAF, 90/96 versus 80/80 (90/95 vs. 70/53); total score, 83/91 versus 58/75 (81/87 vs. 51/66). These items showed statistical significant differences between ESDs and LACs.

Conclusions

Postoperative QOL and symptoms are significantly better on POD1 and POD14 following ESD compared with LAC.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Saito Y, Matsuda T, Saito D, et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:1217–1225.CrossRefPubMed Saito Y, Matsuda T, Saito D, et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:1217–1225.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Saito Y, Itoi T, Fujii T, et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc. 2012;24:343–352.CrossRef Saito Y, Itoi T, Fujii T, et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc. 2012;24:343–352.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SU, Chun HK, Chang DK, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection or transanal endoscopic microsurgery for nonpolypoid rectal high grade dysplasia and submucosa-invading rectal cancer. Endoscopy. 2012;44:1031–1036.CrossRefPubMed Park SU, Chun HK, Chang DK, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection or transanal endoscopic microsurgery for nonpolypoid rectal high grade dysplasia and submucosa-invading rectal cancer. Endoscopy. 2012;44:1031–1036.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Repici A, Rerrara E, Malesci A, et al. High efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal laterally spreading tumors larger than 3 cm. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:96–101.CrossRefPubMed Repici A, Rerrara E, Malesci A, et al. High efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal laterally spreading tumors larger than 3 cm. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:96–101.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiriyama S, Saito Y, Kuwano H, et al. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection with laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery for early-stage colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis. Endoscopy. 2012;44:1024–1030.CrossRefPubMed Kiriyama S, Saito Y, Kuwano H, et al. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection with laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery for early-stage colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis. Endoscopy. 2012;44:1024–1030.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hon SS, Leung WW, Lee JF, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs laparoscopic colorectal resection for early colorectal epithelial neoplasia. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;7:1243–1249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hon SS, Leung WW, Lee JF, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs laparoscopic colorectal resection for early colorectal epithelial neoplasia. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;7:1243–1249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura F, Saito Y, Matsuda T, et al. Potential perioperative advantage of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:596–606.CrossRefPubMed Nakamura F, Saito Y, Matsuda T, et al. Potential perioperative advantage of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:596–606.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fu KI, Yoshida S, Fujii T, et al. Staging of early colorectal cancer: magnifying colonoscopy versus endoscopic ultrasonography for estimation of depth of invasion. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:1886–1892.CrossRefPubMed Fu KI, Yoshida S, Fujii T, et al. Staging of early colorectal cancer: magnifying colonoscopy versus endoscopic ultrasonography for estimation of depth of invasion. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:1886–1892.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kudo S, Kusaka H, Watanabe H, et al. Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:8–14.CrossRefPubMed Kudo S, Kusaka H, Watanabe H, et al. Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:8–14.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuda T, Fujii T, Fujimori T, et al. Efficacy of the invasive/non-invasive pattern by magnifying chromoendoscopy to estimate the depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2700–2706.CrossRefPubMed Matsuda T, Fujii T, Fujimori T, et al. Efficacy of the invasive/non-invasive pattern by magnifying chromoendoscopy to estimate the depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2700–2706.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Uraoka T, Saito Y, Sano Y, et al. Sano’s capillary pattern classification for narrow-band imaging of early colorectal lesions. Dig Endosc. 2011;23:112–115.CrossRefPubMed Uraoka T, Saito Y, Sano Y, et al. Sano’s capillary pattern classification for narrow-band imaging of early colorectal lesions. Dig Endosc. 2011;23:112–115.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Aoki T, Nakajima T, Moriyasu F, et al. Assessment of the validity of the clinical pathway for colon endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:3721–3726.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aoki T, Nakajima T, Moriyasu F, et al. Assessment of the validity of the clinical pathway for colon endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:3721–3726.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe T, Kotate K, Sugihara K, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Ing J Clin Oncol. 2012;17:1–29.CrossRef Watanabe T, Kotate K, Sugihara K, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Ing J Clin Oncol. 2012;17:1–29.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, et al. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer. JAMA. 2002;287:321–328.CrossRefPubMed Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, et al. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer. JAMA. 2002;287:321–328.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lloyd AJ, Boyle J, Thompson MM, et al. Comparison of cognitive function and quality of life after endovascular or conventional aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2000;87:443–447.CrossRefPubMed Lloyd AJ, Boyle J, Thompson MM, et al. Comparison of cognitive function and quality of life after endovascular or conventional aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2000;87:443–447.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakamoto T, Matsuda T, Saito Y, et al. Predictive factor of local recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:635–640.CrossRefPubMed Sakamoto T, Matsuda T, Saito Y, et al. Predictive factor of local recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:635–640.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamada M, Saito Y, Matsuda T, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms in 423 cases: a retrospective study. Endoscopy. 2017;49:233–242.CrossRefPubMed Yamada M, Saito Y, Matsuda T, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms in 423 cases: a retrospective study. Endoscopy. 2017;49:233–242.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Velanovich V. Laparoscopic vs open surgery a preliminary comparison of quality of life outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:16–21.CrossRefPubMed Velanovich V. Laparoscopic vs open surgery a preliminary comparison of quality of life outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:16–21.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Oka S, Ishikawa H, Sugihara K, et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter prospective study in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:697–707.CrossRefPubMed Oka S, Ishikawa H, Sugihara K, et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter prospective study in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:697–707.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mchorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. MOS, 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–263.CrossRefPubMed Mchorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. MOS, 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–263.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson KL. Changes in quality of life after lung volume reduction surgery. Am J Crit Care. 1999;8:389–396.PubMed Anderson KL. Changes in quality of life after lung volume reduction surgery. Am J Crit Care. 1999;8:389–396.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Stiggelbout AM, Leer JW, De Haes HJ, et al. The ‘‘utility’’ of the visual analog scale in medical decision making and technology assessment. Intern J Tech Assess Health Care. 1996;12:291–298.CrossRef Stiggelbout AM, Leer JW, De Haes HJ, et al. The ‘‘utility’’ of the visual analog scale in medical decision making and technology assessment. Intern J Tech Assess Health Care. 1996;12:291–298.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Short-term Prospective Questionnaire Study of Early Postoperative Quality of Life After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
verfasst von
Fumihiko Nakamura
Yutaka Saito
Shin Haruyama
Masau Sekiguchi
Masayoshi Yamada
Taku Sakamoto
Takeshi Nakajima
Seiichiro Yamamoto
Yoshitaka Murakami
Hideki Ishikawa
Takahisa Matsuda
Publikationsdatum
17.10.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4787-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2017

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 12/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.