Short-term results of continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration versus peritoneal dialysis in 40 neonates with inborn errors of metabolism

Several recent studies have reported that toxic metabolites accumulated in the body as a product of inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) are eliminated more rapidly with continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) than with peritoneal dialysis (PD). However, there is still uncertainty about the impacts of dialysis modalities on the short-term outcome. Here, it was aimed to investigate the effects of dialysis modalities on the short-term outcome. This retrospective study included 40 newborn infants who underwent PD (29 patients) or CVVHDF (11 patients) due to inborn errors of metabolism at a tertiary centre, between June 2013 and March 2018. The outcomes and the potential effects of the dialysis modality were evaluated. Of 40 patients, 21 were urea cycle defect, 14 were organic academia, and 5 were maple syrup urine disease. The median 50% reduction time of toxic metabolites were shorter in patients treated with CVVHDF (p < 0.05). Catheter blockage was the most common complication observed in PD group (24.1%), whereas in CVVHDF group hypotension and filter blockage were more common. There was no significant difference in mortality between dialysis groups (38% vs. 45.4%, p > 0.05). In patients with hyperammonaemia, duration of plasma ammonia > 200 μg/dL was the most important factor influencing mortality (OR 1.05, CI 1.01–1.09, p = 0.007).

Conclusion: This study showed that CVVHDF is more efficient than PD to rapidly eliminate toxic metabolites caused by IEM in newborn infants, but not in improving survival.