nach oben

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Erschienen in:

29.08.2019 | Original Article

Similar Adenoma Detection Rates in Colonoscopic Procedures of Patients with Spinal Cord Injury Compared to Controls

verfasst von: Ana Blanco Belver, Mirko Aach, Wolff Schmiegel, Thomas A. Schildhauer, Renate Meindl, Thorsten Brechmann

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Cancer is a major cause of death in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Preventive strategies, such as colonoscopy, deal with higher burdens that may lead to lower quality.

Aims

The primary objective was to evaluate the adenoma detection rate. Secondary objectives were to investigate other quality indicators regarding bowel preparation, sedation, and endoscopy.

Methods

Consecutive SCI patients who had undergone colonoscopy from 2003 to 2014 were assigned to a control group matched for age, gender, and year of procedure and reviewed retrospectively.

Results

Bowel preparation lasted longer (3.6 ± 1.5 vs. 1.2 ± 0.6 days, p = 0.001), achieved unsatisfactory cleansing results more often (23.7 vs. 3.6%) and caused more adverse events in 236 SCI compared to 414 control patients. Colonoscopy needed a longer time (36.9 vs. 25.0 min) and remained incomplete more often (24.6 vs. 4.6%), resulting in more re-colonoscopies (14.8 vs. 4.3%). Endoscopy- and sedation-related adverse events were equal. However, neither overall nor size-dependent polyp (30.9 vs. 34.8%), adenoma (21.2 vs. 21.0%), advanced adenoma (6.8 vs. 7.2%), or cancer (1.7 vs. 2.0%) detection rates differed.

Conclusion

Despite intensified protocols, bowel preparation shows inferior results in SCI patients; colonoscopy needs more effort to succeed but achieves a comparable quality.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Noonan VK, Fingas M, Farry A, et al. Incidence and prevalence of spinal cord injury in Canada: a national perspective. Neuroepidemiology. 2012;38:219–226. https://doi.org/10.1159/000336014.CrossRefPubMed

O’Connor PJ. Prevalence of spinal cord injury in Australia. Spinal Cord. 2004;43:42–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101666.CrossRef

Strauss DJ, Devivo MJ, Paculdo DR, Shavelle RM. Trends in life expectancy after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1079–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.022.CrossRefPubMed

Middleton JW, Dayton A, Walsh J, Rutkowski SB, Leong G, Duong S. Life expectancy after spinal cord injury: a 50-year study. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:803–811. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.55.CrossRefPubMed

Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–1595. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.002.CrossRefPubMed

Robert Koch-Institut and the Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister. In: Deutschland EV, eds. Krebs in Deutschland 2011/2012. 10th edition. Berlin; 2015.

Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L, Knebel P, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Reduced risk of colorectal cancer up to 10 years after screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:709–717. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.09.001.CrossRefPubMed

Benson VS, Patnick J, Davies AK, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of 35 initiatives in 17 countries. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:1357–1367. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.23273.CrossRefPubMed

Frisbie JH, Chopra S, Foo D, Sarkarati M. Colorectal carcinoma and myelopathy. J Am Paraplegia Soc. 1984;7:33–36.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Roach MJ, Nagy JA, Mejia M, Nemunaitis G. Preventive health care among community-dwelling persons with spinal cord injury. PM&R. 2013;5:496–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.11.004.CrossRef

11.

Lavela SL, Weaver FM, Smith B, Chen K. Disease prevalence and use of preventive services: comparison of female veterans in general and those with spinal cord injuries and disorders. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006;15:301–311. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2006.15.301.CrossRef

12.

Johnston MV, Diab ME, Chu BC, Kirshblum S. Preventive services and health behaviors among people with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2005;28:43–54.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Lynch AC, Wong C, Anthony A, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA. Bowel dysfunction following spinal cord injury: a description of bowel function in a spinal cord-injured population and comparison with age and gender matched controls. Spinal Cord. 2000;38:717–723.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Ancha HR, Spungen AM, Bauman WA, et al. Clinical trial: the efficacy and safety of routine bowel cleansing agents for elective colonoscopy in persons with spinal cord injury: a randomized prospective single-blind study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:1110–1117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04147.x.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Stratton MD, McKirgan LW, Wade TP, et al. Colorectal cancer in patients with previous spinal cord injury. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:965–968.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Burke CA, Church JM. Enhancing the quality of colonoscopy: the importance of bowel purgatives. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:565–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.03.1084.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Gupta N. How to improve your adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2016;151:1054–1057. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.008.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Hayman AV, Guihan M, Fisher MJ, et al. Colonoscopy is high yield in spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013;36:436–442. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000091.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Singal AKA, Rosman AS, Bauman WA, Korsten MA. Recent concepts in the management of bowel problems after spinal cord injury. Adv Med Sci. 2005;51:15–22.

20.

Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1298–1306. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1309086.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Meester RG, Doubeni CA, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, et al. Variation in adenoma detection rate and the lifetime benefits and cost of colorectal cancer screening: a microsimulation model. JAMA. 2015;313:2349–2358. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.6251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Lichtenstein DR, Jagannath S, Baron TH, et al. Sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:815–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.029.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Dumonceau JM, Riphaus A, Schreiber F, et al. Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates Guideline: Updated June 2015. Endoscopy. 2015;47:1175–1189. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1393414.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Riphaus A, Wehrmann T, Hausmann J, et al. Update S3-guideline: “Sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy” 2014 (AWMF-register-no. 021/014). Z Gastroenterol. 2016;54:58–95. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-109680.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Aronchick C. Validation of an instrument to assess colon cleansing [abstract]. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:2667.

26.

Parmar R, Martel M, Rostom A, Barkun AN. Validated scales for colon cleansing: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:197–204. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.417.CrossRefPubMed

27.

World Health Organization. Classification of Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000.

28.

Tutein Nolthenius CJ, Boellaard TN, de Haan MC, et al. Evolution of screen-detected small (6–9 mm) polyps after a 3-year surveillance interval: assessment of growth with CT colonography compared with histopathology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1682–1690.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Winawer SJ, Zauber AG. The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2002;12:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.340.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Aniwan S, Orkoonsawat P, Viriyautsahakul V, et al. The secondary quality indicator to improve prediction of adenoma miss rate apart from adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:723–729. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.440.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Pontone S, Hassan C, Maselli R, et al. Multiple, zonal and multi-zone adenoma detection rates according to quality of cleansing during colonoscopy. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2016;4:778–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640615617356.CrossRef

32.

Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2016;315:2564–2575. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.5989.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Pox C, Aretz S, Bischoff SC, et al. S3-guideline colorectal cancer version 1.0. Z Gastroenterol. 2013;51:753–854. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1350264.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Korsten MA, Spungen AM, Radulovic M, et al. Neostigmine administered with MoviPrep improves bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49:751–756. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000284.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Morris BP, Kucchal T, Burgess AN. Colonoscopy after spinal cord injury: a case-control study. Spinal Cord. 2015;53:32–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2014.164.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Bick BL, Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. Regional center for complex colonoscopy: yield of neoplasia in patients with prior incomplete colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:1239–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.053.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Vallès M, Vidal J, Clavé P, Mearin F. Bowel dysfunction in patients with motor complete spinal cord injury: clinical, neurological, and pathophysiological associations. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2290–2299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00729.x.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Awad RA. Neurogenic bowel dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury, myelomeningocele, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:5035–5048. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i46.5035.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Radaelli F, Paggi S, Hassan C, et al. Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme. Gut. 2017;66:270–277. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310685.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Brenner H, Altenhofen L, Kretschmann J, et al. Trends in adenoma detection rates during the first 10 years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:356–366. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.012.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Similar Adenoma Detection Rates in Colonoscopic Procedures of Patients with Spinal Cord Injury Compared to Controls
verfasst von: Ana Blanco Belver
Mirko Aach
Wolff Schmiegel
Thomas A. Schildhauer
Renate Meindl
Thorsten Brechmann
Publikationsdatum: 29.08.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05814-0

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Aims

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Readmission Following Hospitalization for Alcoholic Hepatitis: Costly or Cost-Effective?

Do Serum Metabolites Predict Weight Regain Following Bariatric Surgery?

Readmission Rates and Associated Outcomes for Alcoholic Hepatitis: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Three-Dimensional High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry Study of the Esophagogastric Junction in Patients with Achalasia

Are Suprapapillary Biliary Stents Superior to Transpapillary Biliary Stents?