nach oben

Erschienen in:

15.10.2018 | Breast

Six-year prospective evaluation of second-look US with volume navigation for MRI-detected additional breast lesions

verfasst von: Alfonso Fausto, Marco Bernini, Daniele La Forgia, Annarita Fanizzi, Marco Marcasciano, Luca Volterrani, Donato Casella, Maria Antonietta Mazzei

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to present a 6-year prospective evaluation of second-look ultrasound (US) using volume navigation (V Nav) for MRI-detected additional breast lesions.

Methods

After IRB approvals in both institutions, 1930 consecutive prone MRI breast examinations in 1437 patients were prospectively evaluated. All patients with an MRI-detected additional lesion underwent second-look US, and if occult, contrast-enhanced MRI in supine position was performed for US and MRI co-registration. For patients with breast hypertrophy, MRI-guided biopsy was performed directly. Pathologic examination was the standard of reference. One-way ANOVA and chi-square tests were used.

Results

In 490 MRI examinations (25.4%, 490/1930), at least one additional breast lesion was detected for a total of 722 only MRI-detected lesions. Second-look US identified 549 additional lesions (23 ± 8 mm); 362 (65.9%, 362/549) proved benign at pathology and 187 (34.1%, 187/549) malignant. Second-look US with V Nav identified 151 additional lesions (17 ± 9 mm, p = n.s.); 67 (44.4%, 67/151) proved benign at pathology and 84 (55.6%, 84/151) malignant. MRI-guided biopsy was performed on 22 additional breast lesions (22 ± 8 mm, p = n.s.); pathology revealed 20 (90.9%, 20/22) benign lesions and 2 (9.1%, 2/22) malignant ones. Mass lesions were significantly higher in the second-look US group (p < 0.001). No significant difference in lesion dimension was found between the three groups (p = 0.729).

Conclusions

Second-look US with V Nav can be effective in detecting a large number of additional breast lesions occult at second-look US and to biopsy a significant number of malignant lesions safely and irrespective of distance from skin or lesion position.

Key Points

• Second-look US with volume navigation is effective in detecting occult additional lesions.

• Permits safe biopsies irrespective of position and depth

• Reduces the need for MRI-guided biopsy

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Beran L, Liang W, Nims T, Paquelet J, Sickle-Santanello B (2005) Correlation of targeted ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities of the breast. Am J Surg 190:592–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.019 CrossRefPubMed

Destounis S (2006) The role of MRI and “second-look” ultrasound for evaluation of breast cancer. Appl Radiol 35:10–20

Erguvan-Dogan B, Whitman GJ (2007) Breast ultrasound MR imaging correlation. Ultrasound Clin 1:593–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cult.2006.10.001 CrossRef

Demartini WB, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2009) Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1128–1134. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3987 CrossRefPubMed

Carbognin G, Girardi V, Calciolari C et al (2010) Utility of second-look ultrasound in the management of incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast MR imaging. Radiol Med 115:1234–1245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-010-0561-9 CrossRefPubMed

Candelaria R, Fornage BD (2011) Second-look US examination of MR-detected breast lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 39:115–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.20784 CrossRefPubMed

Spick C, Baltzer PA (2014) Diagnostic utility of second-look US for breast lesions identified at MR imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 273:401–409. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14140474 CrossRefPubMed

Fausto A, Casella D, Mantovani L, Giacalone G, Volterrani L (2012) Clinical value of second-look ultrasound: is there a way to make it objective? Eur J Radiol 81:S36–S40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(12)70015-3 CrossRefPubMed

Rizzatto G, Fausto A (2009) Breast imaging and volume navigation: MR imaging and ultrasound coregistration. Ultrasound Clin 4:261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cult.2009.10.006 CrossRef

10.

Fausto A, Rizzatto G, Preziosa A et al (2012) A new method to combine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging during live ultrasound of the breast using volume navigation technique: a study for evaluating feasibility, accuracy and reproducibility in healthy volunteers. Eur J Radiol 81:332–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.11.001 CrossRef

11.

Pons EP, Azcón FM, Casas MC, Meca SM, Espona JL (2014) Real-time MRI navigated US: role in diagnosis and guided biopsy of incidental breast lesions and axillary lymph nodes detected on breast MRI but not on second look US. Eur J Radiol 83:942–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.03.006 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Canavese G et al (2008) Indications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Consensus document “Attualità in senologia”, Florence 2007. Radiol Med 113:1085–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0340-z CrossRefPubMed

13.

Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K, Boetes C (2008) Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol 18:1307–1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0863-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Sigurdson LJ, Kirkland SA (2006) Breast volume determination in breast hypertrophy: an accurate method using two anthropomorphic measurements. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:313–320. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000227627.75771.5c CrossRefPubMed

15.

Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Sinnatamby R, Lebeau A et al (2009) Interdisciplinary consensus on the uses and technique of MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB): results of a European consensus meeting. Eur J Radiol 72:289–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.010 CrossRefPubMed

16.

LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD, Liberman L (2003) Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology 227:856–861. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2273012210 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.00.4960 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW (2009) Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 59:27–41. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20008 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Telegrafo M, Rella L, Stabile Ianora AA, Angelelli G, Moschetta M (2016) Supine breast US: how to correlate breast lesions from prone MRI. Br J Radiol 89:20150497. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150497 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A et al (2006) Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer 106:982–999. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21720 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Fischer U, Schwethelm L, Baum FT, Luftner-Nagel S, Teubner J (2009) Effort, accuracy and histology of MR-guided vacuum biopsy of suspicious breast lesions--retrospective evaluation after 389 interventions. Rofo 181:774–781. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1109532 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Guo Y, Sivaramakrishna R, Lu CC, Suri JS, Laxminarayan S (2006) Breast image registration techniques: a survey. Med Biol Eng Comput 44:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-005-0016-y CrossRefPubMed

23.

Nakano S, Yoshida M, Fujii K et al (2009) Fusion of MRI and sonography image for breast cancer evaluation using real-time virtual sonography with magnetic navigation: first experience. Jpn J Clin Oncol 39:552–559. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyp087 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Wein W, Brunke S, Khamene A, Callstrom MR, Navab N (2008) Automatic CT-ultrasound registration for diagnostic imaging and image-guided intervention. Med Image Anal 12:577–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2008.06.006 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Tozaki M, Fukuda K (2006) Supine MR mammography using VIBE with parallel acquisition technique for the planning of breast-conserving surgery: clinical feasibility. Breast 15:137–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2005.03.003 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Alderliesten T, Loo C, Paape A et al (2010) On the feasibility of MRI-guided navigation to demarcate breast cancer for breast-conserving surgery. Med Phys 37:2617–2626. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3429048 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Aribal E, Tureli D, Kucukkaya F, Kaya H (2017) Volume navigation technique for ultrasound-guided biopsy of breast lesions detected only at MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:1400–1409. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.16808 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Clauser P, Mann R, Athanasiou A et al (2018) A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 28:1909–1918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5121-4 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Nakamura R, Nagashima T, Sakakibara M et al (2008) Breast-conserving surgery using supine magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast 17:245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2007.10.007 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Six-year prospective evaluation of second-look US with volume navigation for MRI-detected additional breast lesions
verfasst von: Alfonso Fausto
Marco Bernini
Daniele La Forgia
Annarita Fanizzi
Marco Marcasciano
Luca Volterrani
Donato Casella
Maria Antonietta Mazzei
Publikationsdatum: 15.10.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5765-8

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Six-year prospective evaluation of second-look US with volume navigation for MRI-detected additional breast lesions