Introduction
A strict separation of compartments is essential to ensure the correct mechanical function of the joint. Alterations at the joint compartment boundaries are frequently found in inflammatory or degenerative joint diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The destruction of articular structures of the joint, such as cartilage and bone, through synovial fibroblasts (SF) is a crucial event especially in RA [
1,
2].
The chronic autoimmune disease RA is of unknown origin but finally leads to joint destruction [
1]. The so-called 'tumour-like' or 'activated' SF are localized in the hyperplastic synovium of patients with RA. Supported by adhesion molecules, these rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts (RASF) attach to cartilage, where matrix-degrading enzymes released by RASF finally cause the destruction of the joint [
3].
As loss of integrity of compartment borders in the joint between cartilage and SF is a key event in RA, we were interested in analyzing molecular cues, such as the repellent factors, that might be deregulated in RA patients and thereby contribute to destruction of joint borders.
Repellent factors of the Roundabout (Robo)- and Slit-family are primarily known to be involved in regulating cell-cell interactions and cell-matrix interactions of migrating cells during embryonic development [
4] and by mediating axon guidance through attraction or repulsion of growth cones [
5‐
7]. Over the past decade, the Robo-/Slit-system has also been described to mediate cell adhesion of fibroblasts [
8] and to induce tumor angiogenesis [
6].
There are four human Robo transmembrane receptors (Robo1, Robo2, Robo3, and Robo4) that share fibronectin type III and immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domains, but vary in their cytoplasmatic domains. The ligands for the Robo receptors are the secreted Slit molecules (Slit1, Slit2 and Slit3) consisting of four leucine-rich repeat domains (D1 to D4), seven to nine epidermal growth factor-like domains, a laminin G domain, and a C-terminal cysteine-rich domain [
5]. Slit binding to Robo receptors is mediated by the second of the four highly conserved leucine-rich repeat domains of the ligand Slit and the first extracellular Ig domain of the Robo receptor [
9‐
11].
In our study, we first analyzed the expression of Robo1, Robo2, Robo3, Slit1, Slit2, and Slit3 in the SF of patients with RA and continued to evaluate the influence of Robo3 expression and effects of Slit3 on RASF as a potential therapeutic tool.
Materials and methods
Primary fibroblasts
Synovial tissue samples were obtained from synovectomy and arthroplastic surgery from patients with RA (RASF) or from trauma surgery patients (normal SF) after informed consent and approval of the local ethics committee. All RA patients fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology 1987 criteria for the diagnosis of RA. In RA patients, material was sampled from the wrist or proximal interphalangeal joints with the joints exhibiting florid synovitis and/or arthritic destructions. Normal SF deriving from normal synovial tissue was taken from knee joints of two patients within two to four hours after knee injury. Both patients underwent surgery because of displaced tibial plateau fractures. Synovial tissue was minced mechanically, washed extensively in sterile PBS and digested with 150 mg/ml Dispase II (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) for one hour at 37°C under continuous agitation. The resulting cell suspension was seeded into tissue culture dishes and cultured in DMEM (Gibco Life Technologies, Basel, Switzerland) containing 10% FCS and 100 U/ml penicillin per 100 μg/ml streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C followed by the addition of 5% carbon dioxide. In different passages, adhering fibroblasts were washed, trypsinized, and used for RNA isolation or in the assays.
Normal dermal fibroblasts were obtained and used as described previously [
12].
The number of donors used in each experiment is given in each figure legend.
Transient transfection
Primary fibroblasts were transfected using the Amaxa Nucleofector System (Amaxa, GmbH, Cologne, Germany) with the Amaxa Normal Human Dermal Fibroblast Nucleofector
® Kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (program: U23) [
13]. The transfection efficiency was about 30%, toxicity was 20%.
For analysing Robo3 effects, synovial cells in late passages (P5 and P6) or dermal fibroblasts were transiently transfected with mouse Robo3 expression construct, which was a gift from Shyng-Shiou Yuan [
14]. Vector pCMX [
13] was used as control. Transfection efficiency was quantified by quantitative real-time (RT)-PCR.
Genetic association study
Genome-wide data from a recently published screen for polymorphisms associated with RA were employed to survey the complete
ROBO3 gene region
in silico [
15]. All successfully genotyped SNPs on the Affymetrix GeneChip
® Human Mapping 500K Array Set (Santa clara, CA, USA) on chromosome 11 in the
ROBO3 region with approximately 40 kb on either side of the gene (position 124,200,001 and 124,300,000; human genome build 18) were included. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) data were accessed on by 26 June 2007 [
15,
16]. Data of the HapMap phase II release 22 data were used to assess linkage disequilibrium patterns of the
ROBO3 gene region [
17].
RNA isolation and reverse transcription
Total cellular RNA was isolated from cultured cells using the RNeasy kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and cDNAs were generated by reverse transcriptase reaction as described previously [
18].
Quantitative RT-PCR
Quantitative RT-PCR was performed on a LightCycler (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) using 10 μl N', N'-dimethyl-N-[4-[(E)-(3-methyl-1,3-benzothiazol-2-ylidene)methyl]-1-phenylquinolin-1-ium-2-yl]-N-propylpropane-1,3-diamine (SYBR) MIX (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan), 0.5 μl (20 μM) of forward and reverse primers and 1 or 2 μl cDNA template in a total of 20 μl. cDNA fragments of Robo1, Robo2, Robo3, Slit1, Slit2, and Slit3 in SF in early passages (P3 and P4) were amplified according to the following PCR program: 30 seconds at 95°C (initial denaturation); 20°C/second temperature transition rate up to 95°C for 5 seconds, 10 seconds at 55°C (Robo1, Robo2, Slit2)/56°C (Slit1, Slit3)/58°C (Robo3), 15 seconds at 72°C, 10 seconds at 82°C (Robo1, Robo2, Slit2)/86°C (Slit1, Slit3)/85°C (Robo3) acquisition mode single, repeated for 40 times (amplification).
Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 and MMP-3 quantitative RT-PCR was performed 48 hours after transfection at 95°C for 5 seconds, 3 seconds at 68°C (MMP-1) or 62°C (MMP-3), 10 seconds at 72°C and 8 seconds at 82°C (MMP-1) or 82°C (MMP-3) acquisition mode single. Annealing temperature was optimized for each primer set and the PCR reaction was evaluated by melting curve analysis following the manufacturer's instructions and checked by electrophoresis. Beta-actin mRNA was amplified to ensure cDNA integrity and to normalize expression. Each quantitative PCR was performed at least in duplicate for two sets of RNA preparations.
The following primers were used: Robo1 (for: AGG AAG AAG ACG AAG CCG AC, rev: CGA AGA ACT AAC ACT GGA GCG), Robo2 (for: GAG ACC TCA CAA TCA CCA ACA TTC AAC, rev: CAG TAA CGC TGT ACC ATC CAC TGC), Robo3 (for: GCGCTTCTCAGTGTCTCCAAG, rev: TGGTCCCTGGAGGATGACA), Slit1 (for: ACT CGC TGG TCC TCT ATG GAA, rev: CGC AAA TGA AAG GGT TCT GGG), Slit2 (for: TGC CTT TGC CCA CCT GAG TA, rev: TGT CGC AGT GTT CAC CTA CG), Slit3 (for: TGA TGG CAA CGA GGA GAG TA, rev: ACG GCT GTT AGG TGG TTT CC) MMP1 (for: TGG ACC AAG GTC TCT GAG GGT CAA, rev: GGA TGC CAT CAA TGT CAT CCT GA) and MMP3 (for: GGC ACA ATA TGG GCA CTT TAA ATG AAG C, rev: GTC TAC ACA GAT ACA GTC ACT TGT CTG).
Cell proliferation assay
Proliferation was measured using the Cell Proliferation Kit II (Roche,, Mannheim, Germany) according to the supplier's instructions. It is based on a colorimetric (XTT) measured non-radioactive quantification of cell proliferation performed for four days. RASF in passage 3 and 4 were treated with recombinant mouse Slit3 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in a concentration of 0.1 μg/ml. Experiments were repeated at least twice.
Migration assay
Migration assay were performed using Boyden Chambers containing polycarbonate filters with 8 μm pore size (Costar, Bodenheim, Germany), as described previously [
18]. Briefly, filters were coated with gelatin. The lower compartment was filled with fibroblast-conditioned medium, used as a chemo-attractant. Synovial cells in early passages (P3 and P4) and in late passages (P5 and P6; as indicated) were harvested with trypsin incubation for two minutes, resuspended in DMEM without FCS at a density of 3 × 10
4 cells/ml and injected in the upper compartment of the chamber on the filter. After incubation at 37°C for four hours, all cells attached to the upper surface of the membrane were removed. Cells adhering to the lower surface were fixed, stained and counted. Recombinant mouse Slit3 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was added either to the upper or the lower chamber of the system in a concentration of 0.1 μg/ml. All experiments were performed in triplicates and repeated at least twice.
Cartilage destruction assay
Cartilage was obtained from donors after informed consent and approval of the local ethics committee. Normal cartilage with no significant softening or surface fibrillation was obtained at autopsy within 48 h after death. Cartilage was kept at -80°C before use. SF (50,000 cells per attempt) in early passages (P3 and P4) and synovial cells in late passages (P5 and P6) or dermal fibroblasts with Robo3 transfection (as indicated) were incubated with pieces of cartilage (8 pieces of 2 mm3 (50 mg) per attempt) in 400 μl of medium for 10 days. After 10 days, the supernatant was collected and amounts of glycosaminoglycans (GAG) were measured using the sGAG quantitative kit (Euro-Diagnostica, Malmo, Sweden). Each attempt was measured in parallel and repeated twice with different donors of SF.
FACS analysis
To analyse Robo3 expression on RASF, cells in early passages (P3 andP4) were detached from flasks using 5 mM EDTA in PBS. Cells were resuspended in PBS and 2.5 × 105 cells per approach were fixed in 100% Methanol for 10 minutes, twice washed with PBS and permeabilized with 0.1% Tween/PBS. Cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated with anti-Robo3 at room temperature for one hour (1:50; Everest Biotech, Oxfordshire, UK) in 1% BSA/PBS. After three washing steps with PBS, the cells were stained with the Cy™5-conjugated anti-goat secondary antibody (1:100, Jackson ImmunoResearch, Suffolk, UK) in 1% BSA/PBS for 30 minutes. After three washing steps the samples were resuspended in 250 μl PBS. All steps were performed at 4°C. FACS data were analyzed using the BD FACSDiva software (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) and WinMDI. RASF from four donors were analyzed.
ELISA
Pro- and active form of MMP1 (n = 3) and MMP3 (n = 4) were analysed with RayBio Human MMP-1 and MMP-3 ELISA Kit (Norcross, GA, USA). Supernatant of mRobo3 and control transfected synovial cells used in the GAG assay was diluted 1:50 in one times assay diluent and subsequent analysed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Statistical analysis
Calculations were performed using the GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad software Inc, San Diego, CA, USA). All results are expressed as mean +/- standard deviation (range) or in percentage. Error bars represent standard deviation. Comparison between groups was performed using the Student's t-test.
Discussion
Destruction of the joint in RA is a complex mechanism of deregulation of cartilage homeostasis. In this study, we focused on the repellent factor family Slit and their receptors Robo, which are already known to mediate cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions of migrating cells during embryonic development [
8,
20]. However, little is known about Slit-Robo regulation in SF, which are known to gain invasive potential especially during RA resulting in cartilage destruction [
1,
21].
By analyzing the expression pattern of Robos and Slits in SF, we detected strong differences in expression of Robo3 and Slit3 comparing RASF with normal SF.
Upregulation of Robo3 in RASF compared with normal SF may play a role in gaining an aggressive phenotype of SF in RA [
5,
6]. This hypothesis is supported by our data showing induction of migratory and destructive behavior of SF cells after Robo3 transfection. Interestingly, even dermal fibroblasts gain an aggressive phenotype after expression of Robo3. At least part of this aggressive behavior can be explained by the strong induction of MMP1 and MMP3 after Robo3 expression. Both MMPs are known as markers for RA inflammation [
14], which are produced by synovial lining cells and are responsible for matrix degradation. Synovial fluids of RA patients contain about 100-fold higher concentration of MMP3 and increased levels have been found in the sera of patients with RA. MMP1 in the synovial fluid correlates with the degree of synovial inflammation. Upregulation of MMPs after Robo3 transfection might either be regulated via upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, growth factors and matrix molecules [
3] or by direct activation via Robo3 signalling.
Slits are known to convey repulsive signals via Robo receptors. Recombinant Slit3 slightly, but not significantly, decreased cell proliferation of RASF and not of normal SF, indicating that Slit3 has only minor influence on cell cycle regulation of human SF.
Several groups could show that Slit can inhibit migration of neuronal cells [
1,
22] and chemotaxis of leucocytes [
23], so we tested the effect of Slit on migration of RASF. Here, we clearly showed that Slit3 inhibits migration of RASF in early passages, whereas these fibroblasts in higher passages and normal SF were not affected. It has been published that Slit2 has a repulsive function towards glioma cells, which is mediated by the Robo1 receptor [
1]. So, we speculate that losing repulsive activity towards Slit3 in SF of RA in higher passages (P10) compared with passage 3 might be due to significant reduction of Robo3 expression from passage 3 to 10 and could explain why normal SF are not inhibited in migration by Slit3. This finding further supports the role of Robo3 in RA.
A possible significance of our in vitro findings to the pathophysiology of RA is supported by analysis of SNPs within the ROBO3 gene. The SNP marker rs11604758 showed region-wide significant association with susceptibility to RA (P corrected for 15 analysed markers = 0.012). This could point to the fact that Robo3 is a potential risk factor for RA. To unravel the genetic contribution to RA risk from ROBO3 gene, replication and fine-mapping studies are now required.
Conclusions
Until today, the treatment of RA is based on a symptomatic therapy with non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [
24] and on new anti-inflammatory therapies that modulate the immune system and have improved RA treatment [
4,
25]. However, new strategies try to concentrate on the regulation of activated SF in RA patients (e.g. via dexamethasone) [
26], which play an important role in the development of RA. Therefore, the repellent factor family Slit may be a novel therapeutic tool in RA therapy by directly inhibiting SF migration and invasion.
Taken together, our data could show that Slit3 reduces the migratory activity of synovial cells from patients with RA, potentially by repulsion of the cells in analogy to the neuronal system [
4,
9]. Deregulation of the Robo3 receptor in the SF in RA seems to correlate with aggressiveness of the fibroblasts.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests. AB and TS are applying for a patent related to the content of the manuscript.
Authors' contributions
AD and SK carried out most experiments presented in this study, and were involved in analysis and interpretation of the data. KS was involved in the design of the statistical experiments and in the drafting of the manuscript. TL and JS participated in the interpretation of the data and performed the isolation of primary cells. TS was involved in developing the hypothesis, in designing the study, in analysis and interpretation of the data and in drafting the manuscript. AKB conceived the study and was responsible for its design and coordination, analysis and interpretation of the data and for drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.