The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of soft tissue presence on the segmentation accuracy of the 3D hard tissue models from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Seven pairs of CBCT Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) datasets, containing data of human cadaver heads and their respective dry skulls, were used. The effect of the soft tissue presence on the accuracy of the segmented models was evaluated by performing linear and angular measurements and by superimposition and color mapping of the surface discrepancies after splitting the mandible and maxillo-facial complex in the midsagittal plane.
The linear and angular measurements showed significant differences for the more posterior transversal measurements on the mandible (p < 0.01). By splitting and superimposing the maxillo-facial complex, the mean root-mean-square error (RMSE) as a measurement of inaccuracy decreased insignificantly from 0.936 to 0.922 mm (p > 0.05). The RMSE value for the mandible, however, significantly decreased from 1.240 to 0.981 mm after splitting (p < 0.01).
The soft tissue presence seems to affect the accuracy of the 3D hard tissue model obtained from a cone-beam CT, below a generally accepted level of clinical significance of 1 mm. However, this level of accuracy may not meet the requirement for applications where high precision is paramount.
Accuracy of CBCT-based 3D surface-rendered models, especially of the hard tissues, are crucial in several dental and medical applications, such as implant planning and virtual surgical planning on patients undergoing orthognathic and navigational surgeries. When used in applications where high precision is paramount, the effect of soft tissue presence should be taken into consideration during the segmentation process.
Kaeppler G (2010) Applications of cone beam computed tomography in dental and oral medicine. Int J Comput Dent 13:203–219 PubMed
de Waard O, Rangel FA, Fudalej PS, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Breuning KH (2014) Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 146:328–336 CrossRef
Cevidanes LH, Tucker S, Styner M, Kim H, Chapuis J, Reyes M, et al. (2010) Three-dimensional surgical simulation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 138:361–371 CrossRef
Van der Meer WJ, Raghoebar GM, Gerrits PO, Noorda WD, Vissink A, Visser A (2012) Digitally designed surgical guides for placing implants in the nasal floor of dentate patients: a series of three cases. Int J Prosthodont 25:245–251 PubMed
Grauer D, Cevidanes LS, Proffit WR (2009) Working with DICOM craniofacial images. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 136:460–470 CrossRef
Fourie Z, Damstra J, Schepers RH, Gerrits PO, Ren Y (2012) Segmentation process significantly influences the accuracy of 3D surface models derived from cone beam computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 81:524–530 CrossRef
Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Nackaerts O, SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium, Willems G (2011) Comparison of 6 cone-beam computed tomography systems for image quality and detection of simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140:129–139 CrossRef
Spin-Neto R, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A (2014) Variation in voxel value distribution and effect of time between exposures in six CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130376
Kovacs M, Fejerdy P, Dobo NC (2008) Metal artefact on head and neck cone-beam CT images. Fogorv Sz 101:171–178 PubMed
Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, Syriopoulos K, van der Stelt P (2014) Assessment of metal artefact reduction around dental titanium implants in cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140019
Weissheimer A, Menezes LM, Sameshima GT, Enciso R, Pham J, Grauer D (2012) Imaging software accuracy for 3-dimensional analysis of the upper airway. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 142:801–813 CrossRef
Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG (2007) Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 132:550–560 CrossRef
Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y (2010) Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 137:16e1–16e6
Swennen GR, Mollemans W, Schutyser F (2009) Three-dimensional treatment planning of orthognathic surgery in the era of virtual imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg: Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:2080–2092 CrossRef
Nada RM, Maal TJ, Breuning KH, Berge SJ, Mostafa YA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (2011) Accuracy and reproducibility of voxel based superimposition of cone beam computed tomography models on the anterior cranial base and the zygomatic arches. PLoS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016520
Jayaratne YS, McGrath CP, Zwahlen RA (2012) How accurate are the fusion of cone-beam CT and 3-D stereophotographic images? PLoS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049585
Congalton RG, Green K (2009) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices: second edition. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton
Cevidanes LH, Heymann G, Cornelis MA, DeClerck HJ, Tulloch JF (2009) Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 136:94–99 CrossRef
Rossini G, Cavallini C, Cassetta M, Barbato E (2011) 3D cephalometric analysis obtained from computed tomography. Rev Lit Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2:31–39
El-Beialy AR, Fayed MS, El-Bialy AM, Mostafa YA (2011) Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography measurements: influence of head orientation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140:157–165 CrossRef
- Soft tissue coverage on the segmentation accuracy of the 3D surface-rendered model from cone-beam CT
J. K. Dusseldorp
H. C. Stamatakis
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin
Mail Icon II