Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Im April diskutierten die Herz-Kreislauf-Spezialisten aus der ganzen Welt auf dem  Kongress des American College of Cardiology (ACC) u.a. neue Therapieansätze bei akutem Myokardinfarkt, koronarer Herzerkrankung, kardiogenem Schock oder Aortenklappenstenose. In unserem Kongress-Dossier haben wir für Sie Berichte über die „Late-Breaking Trials“ und andere wichtige Studien zusammengestellt. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Abdominal Radiology
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2011

01.04.2011

Sources of false positives in computer-assisted CT colonography

verfasst von: Janne J. Näppi, Koichi Nagata

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The application of computer-aided detection (CAD) is expected to improve reader sensitivity and to reduce inter-observer variance in computed tomographic (CT) colonography. However, current CAD systems display a large number of false-positive (FP) detections. The reviewing of a large number of FP CAD detections increases interpretation time, and it may also reduce the specificity and/or sensitivity of a computer-assisted reader. Therefore, it is important to be aware of the patterns and pitfalls of FP CAD detections. This pictorial essay reviews common sources of FP CAD detections that have been observed in the literature and in our experiments in computer-assisted CT colonography. Also the recommended computer-assisted reading technique is described.
Literatur
1.
Lefere P, Dachman AH, Gryspeerdt S (2007) Computed tomographic colonography: clinical value. Abdom Imaging 32:541–551PubMedCrossRef
2.
Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359:1207–1217PubMedCrossRef
3.
Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G, et al. (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA 301:2453–2461PubMedCrossRef
4.
Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200PubMedCrossRef
5.
Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58:130–160PubMedCrossRef
6.
Rockey DC (2009) Computed tomographic colonography: current perspectives and future directions. Gastroenterology 137:7–10PubMedCrossRef
7.
Yoshida H, Näppi J (2007) CAD in CT colonography without and with oral contrast agents: progress and challenges. Comput Med Imaging Graph 31:267–284PubMedCrossRef
8.
Doi K (2005) Current status and future potential of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging. Br J Radiol 78:S3–S19PubMedCrossRef
9.
Petrick N, Haider M, Summers RM, et al. (2008) CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study. Radiology 246:148–156PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zheng B, Ganott MA, Britton CA, et al. (2001) Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings. Radiology 221:633–637PubMedCrossRef
11.
Philpotts LE (2009) Can computer-aided detection be detrimental to mammographic interpretation? Radiology 253:17–22PubMedCrossRef
12.
Taylor SA, Greenhalgh R, Ilangovan R, et al. (2008) CT colonography and computer-aided detection: effect of false-positive results on reader specificity and reading efficiency in a low-prevalence screening population. Radiology 247:133–140PubMedCrossRef
13.
Taylor SA, Brittenden J, Lenton J, et al. (2009) Influence of computer-aided detection false-positives on reader performance and diagnostic confidence for CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1682–1688PubMedCrossRef
14.
Dachman AH, Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Morin M (2007) CT colonography: visualization methods, interpretation, and pitfalls. Radiol Clin N Am 45:347–359PubMedCrossRef
15.
Pickhardt PJ (2004) Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions seen at CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Radiographics 24:1535–1556PubMedCrossRef
16.
Näppi J, Yoshida H (2008) Adaptive correction of the pseudo-enhancement of CT attenuation for fecal-tagging CT colonography. Med Image Anal 12:413–426PubMedCrossRef
17.
Johnson CD, Dachman AH (2000) CT colonography: the next colon screening examination? Radiology 216:331–341PubMed
18.
McFarland EG (2002) Reader strategies for CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 27:275–283PubMed
19.
20.
O’Connor SD, Summers RM, Choi JR, Pickhardt PJ (2006) Oral contrast adherence to polyps on CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:51–57PubMedCrossRef
21.
Laks S, Macari M, Bini EJ (2004) Positional change in colon polyps at CT colonography. Radiology 231:761–766PubMedCrossRef
22.
Chen JC, Dachman AH (2006) Cecal mobility: a potential pitfall of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1086–1089PubMedCrossRef
23.
Iafrate I, Rengo M, Ferrari R, et al. (2007) Spectrum of normal findings, anatomic variants and pathology of ileocecal valve: CT colonography appearances and endoscopic correlation. Abdom Imaging 32:589–595PubMedCrossRef
24.
Yitta S, Tatineny KC, Cipriani NA, Dachman AH (2006) Characterization of normal ileocecal valve density on CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:58–61PubMedCrossRef
25.
Näppi J, Yoshida H (2007) Fully automated three-dimensional detection of polyps in fecal-tagging CT colonography. Acad Radiol 14:287–300PubMedCrossRef
26.
Cai W, Zalis ME, Näppi J, Harris GJ, Yoshida H (2008) Structure-analysis method for electronic cleansing in cathartic and noncathartic CT colonography. Med Phys 35:3259–3277PubMedCrossRef
27.
Summers RM, Franaszek M, Miller MT, et al. (2005) Computer-aided detection of polyps on oral contrast-enhanced CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:105–108PubMed
28.
Näppi J, Yoshida H (2009) Virtual tagging for laxative-free CT colonography: pilot evaluation. Med Phys 36:1830–1838PubMedCrossRef
29.
Macari M, Megibow AJ (2001) Pitfalls of using three-dimensional CT colonography with two-dimensional imaging correlation. Am J Roentgenol 176:137–143
30.
Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Baekelandt M, Dewyspelaere J, van Holsbeeck B (2003) Diverticular disease in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 13:L62–L74PubMedCrossRef
31.
Lee MW, Kim SH, Park HS, et al. (2009) An anthropomorphic phantom study of computer-aided detection performance for polyp detection on CT colonography: a comparison of commercially and academically available systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:445–454PubMedCrossRef
32.
Hein PA, Krug LD, Romano VC, et al. (2010) Computer-aided detection in computed tomography colonography with full fecal tagging: comparison of standalone performance of 3 automated polyp detection systems. Can Assoc Radiol J 61:102–108PubMedCrossRef
33.
Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck B (2004) Laxative-free CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:945–948PubMed
34.
Johnson CD, Manduca A, Fletcher JG, et al. (2008) Noncathartic CT colonography with stool tagging: performance with and without electronic stool subtraction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:361–366PubMedCrossRef
35.
Taylor SA, Suzuki N, Beddoe G, Halligan S (2009) Flat neoplasia of the colon: CT colonography with CAD. Abdom Imaging 34:173–181PubMedCrossRef
36.
Summers RM, Frentz SM, Liu J, et al. (2009) Conspicuity of colorectal polyps at CT colonography: visual assessment, CAD performance, and the important role of polyp height. Acad Radiol 16:4–14PubMedCrossRef
37.
Lee SS, Park SH, Kim JK, et al. (2009) Panoramic endoluminal display with minimal image distortion using circumferential radial ray-casting for primary three-dimensional interpretation of CT colonography. Eur Radiol 19:1951–1958PubMedCrossRef
38.
de Vries AH, Bipat S, Dekker E, et al. (2010) Polyp measurement based on CT colonography and colonoscopy: variability and systematic differences. Eur Radiol 20:1404–1413PubMedCrossRef
39.
Park SH, Choi EK, Lee SS, et al. (2007) Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens. Radiology 244:157–164PubMedCrossRef
40.
Taylor SA, Robinson C, Boone D, Honeyfield L, Halligan S (2009) Polyp characteristics correctly annotated by computer-aided detection software but ignored by reporting radiologists during CT colonography. Radiology 253:715–718PubMedCrossRef
41.
Fisichella VA, Jäderling F, Horvath S, et al. (2009) Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers. Clin Radiol 64:972–982PubMedCrossRef
42.
Mang T, Peloschek P, Plank C, et al. (2007) Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17:2598–2607PubMedCrossRef
43.
Bielen D, Kiss G (2007) Computer-aided detection for CT colonography: update 2007. Abdom Imaging 32:571–581PubMedCrossRef
44.
Yoshida H, Näppi J, MacEneaney P, Rubin DT, Dachman AH (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. Radiographics 22:963–979PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Sources of false positives in computer-assisted CT colonography
verfasst von
Janne J. Näppi
Koichi Nagata
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2011
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-010-9625-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2011

Abdominal Radiology 2/2011 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Petersen’s hernia as a complication of bariatric surgery: CT findings

Report

Scrotal swelling caused by acute necrotizing pancreatitis: CT diagnosis

OriginalPaper

Virtual colonoscopy in the US Army: current utilization at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center

Report

Appendicitis in an obturator hernia

OriginalPaper

High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation in hepatic and pancreatic cancer: complications

OriginalPaper

Complications following pancreatic transplantations: imaging features

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise