Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health 3/2018

08.07.2017 | Original Paper

Spiritual Openness, Revisiting a Potentially Important Aspect of Spirituality: Scale Review and Revision

verfasst von: Joshua C. Eyer, Shweta Kapoor, Martha A. Combs, Emberly M. Jay, Beverly E. Thorn

Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Religiousness and spirituality (R/S) exert important influences on individuals across a range of domains. Spiritual Openness is theoretically linked with the personality trait of Openness to Experience, suggesting promise for future research. Using responses from 366 undergraduates on the Spiritual Experience Index-Revised (SEI-R: subscales of Spiritual Openness and Spiritual Support), analyses evaluated and revised the SEI-R, deleting poor items and generating a 10-item measure. The new SEI-S exhibits better psychometric properties and reduced participant burden, and subscales displayed a curvilinear relationship in which increases in Spiritual Openness showed a trade-off in levels of Spiritual Support.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Costa, P. T., & MacCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO FFI): Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Costa, P. T., & MacCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO FFI): Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Zurück zum Zitat Csarny, R. J., Piedmont, R. L., Sneck, W. J., & Cheston, S. E. (2000). An evaluation of the incremental validity of the Spiritual Experience Index-Revised. In J. M. Greer & D. O. Moberg (Eds.), Research in the social scientific study of religion (Vol. 11, pp. 117–132). Stamford, CT: Jai Press. Csarny, R. J., Piedmont, R. L., Sneck, W. J., & Cheston, S. E. (2000). An evaluation of the incremental validity of the Spiritual Experience Index-Revised. In J. M. Greer & D. O. Moberg (Eds.), Research in the social scientific study of religion (Vol. 11, pp. 117–132). Stamford, CT: Jai Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis, D. E., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Hook, J. N., & Hill, P. C. (2013). Research on religion/spirituality and forgiveness: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5, 233–241. doi:10.1037/a0033637.CrossRef Davis, D. E., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Hook, J. N., & Hill, P. C. (2013). Research on religion/spirituality and forgiveness: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5, 233–241. doi:10.​1037/​a0033637.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Jager Meezenbroek, E., Garssen, B., van den Berg, M., Tuytel, G., van Dierendonck, D., Visser, A., et al. (2012a). Measuring spirituality as a universal human experience: Development of the spiritual attitude and involvement list (SAIL). Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 30, 141–167. doi:10.1080/07347332.2011.651258.CrossRefPubMed de Jager Meezenbroek, E., Garssen, B., van den Berg, M., Tuytel, G., van Dierendonck, D., Visser, A., et al. (2012a). Measuring spirituality as a universal human experience: Development of the spiritual attitude and involvement list (SAIL). Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 30, 141–167. doi:10.​1080/​07347332.​2011.​651258.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat de Jager Meezenbroek, E., Garssen, B., van den Berg, M., van Dierendonck, D., Visser, A., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012b). Measuring spirituality as a universal human experience: A review of spirituality questionnaires. Journal of Religion and Health, 51, 336–354. doi:10.1007/s10943-010-9376-1.CrossRefPubMed de Jager Meezenbroek, E., Garssen, B., van den Berg, M., van Dierendonck, D., Visser, A., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012b). Measuring spirituality as a universal human experience: A review of spirituality questionnaires. Journal of Religion and Health, 51, 336–354. doi:10.​1007/​s10943-010-9376-1.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(3), 1–13. Available online: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=17&n=3. Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(3), 1–13. Available online: http://​pareonline.​net/​getvn.​asp?​v=​17&​n=​3.
Zurück zum Zitat Genia, V. (1997). The Spiritual Experience Index: Revision and reformulation. Review of Religious Research, 38, 344–361.CrossRef Genia, V. (1997). The Spiritual Experience Index: Revision and reformulation. Review of Religious Research, 38, 344–361.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harcrow, M. S. (2010). Relationships between religiosity, spirituality, and health behaviors among college students. Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL. Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations & Theses (AAT 3439814). Harcrow, M. S. (2010). Relationships between religiosity, spirituality, and health behaviors among college students. Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL. Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations & Theses (AAT 3439814).
Zurück zum Zitat Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational research methods, 7(2), 191–205. Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational research methods, 7(2), 191–205.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill, P. C., & Pargament, K. I. (2008). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, S(1), 3–17. doi:10.1037/1941-1022.S.1.3.CrossRef Hill, P. C., & Pargament, K. I. (2008). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, S(1), 3–17. doi:10.​1037/​1941-1022.​S.​1.​3.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44, 153–166. doi:10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y.CrossRef Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44, 153–166. doi:10.​1007/​s11135-008-9190-y.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hooker, S. A., Masters, K. S., & Carey, K. B. (2013). Multidimensional assessment of religiousness/spirituality and health behaviors in college students. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. doi:10.1080/10508619.2013.808870. (online). Hooker, S. A., Masters, K. S., & Carey, K. B. (2013). Multidimensional assessment of religiousness/spirituality and health behaviors in college students. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. doi:10.​1080/​10508619.​2013.​808870. (online).
Zurück zum Zitat Johnstone, B., Yoon, D. P., Franklin, K. L., Schopp, L., & Hinkebein, J. (2009). Re-conceptualizing the factor structure of the brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality. Journal of Religion and Health, 48, 146–163. doi:10.1007/s10943-008-9179-9.CrossRefPubMed Johnstone, B., Yoon, D. P., Franklin, K. L., Schopp, L., & Hinkebein, J. (2009). Re-conceptualizing the factor structure of the brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality. Journal of Religion and Health, 48, 146–163. doi:10.​1007/​s10943-008-9179-9.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 user’s reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International Inc. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 user’s reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawler, K. A., & Younger, J. W. (2002). Theobiology: An analysis of spirituality, cardiovascular responses, stress, mood, and physical health. Journal of Religion and Health, 41(4), 347–362. doi:10.1023/A:1021126510680.CrossRef Lawler, K. A., & Younger, J. W. (2002). Theobiology: An analysis of spirituality, cardiovascular responses, stress, mood, and physical health. Journal of Religion and Health, 41(4), 347–362. doi:10.​1023/​A:​1021126510680.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Masters, K. S., Carey, K. B., Maisto, S. A., Caldwell, P. E., Wolfe, T. V., Hackney, H. L., et al. (2009). Psychometric examination of the brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality among college students. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 106–120. doi:10.1080/10508610802711194.CrossRef Masters, K. S., Carey, K. B., Maisto, S. A., Caldwell, P. E., Wolfe, T. V., Hackney, H. L., et al. (2009). Psychometric examination of the brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality among college students. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 106–120. doi:10.​1080/​1050861080271119​4.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paloutzian, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being, and quality of life. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 224–237). New York: Wiley. Paloutzian, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being, and quality of life. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 224–237). New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., & Perez, L. M. (2000). The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 519–543.CrossRefPubMed Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., & Perez, L. M. (2000). The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 519–543.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Brady, M. J., Hernandez, L., & Cella, D. (2002). Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy–spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp). Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 49–58. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_06.CrossRefPubMed Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Brady, M. J., Hernandez, L., & Cella, D. (2002). Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy–spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp). Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 49–58. doi:10.​1207/​S15324796ABM2401​_​06.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Quandt, S. A., Verhoef, M. J., Arcury, T. A., Lewith, G. T., Steinsbekk, A., Kristoffersen, A. E., et al. (2009). Development of an international questionnaire to measure use of complementary and alternative medicine (I-CAM-Q). The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15(4), 331–339. doi:10.1089/acm.2008.0521.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Quandt, S. A., Verhoef, M. J., Arcury, T. A., Lewith, G. T., Steinsbekk, A., Kristoffersen, A. E., et al. (2009). Development of an international questionnaire to measure use of complementary and alternative medicine (I-CAM-Q). The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15(4), 331–339. doi:10.​1089/​acm.​2008.​0521.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts, J. S., Laughlin, J. E., & Wedell, D. H. (1999). Validity issues in the Likert and Thurstone approaches to attitude measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 211–233. doi:10.1177/00131649921969811.CrossRef Roberts, J. S., Laughlin, J. E., & Wedell, D. H. (1999). Validity issues in the Likert and Thurstone approaches to attitude measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 211–233. doi:10.​1177/​0013164992196981​1.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sterling, E. W., Silke, A., Tucker, S., Fricks, L., & Druss, B. G. (2010). Integrating wellness, recovery, and self-management for mental health consumers. Community Mental Health Journal, 46, 130–138. doi:10.1007/s10597-009-9276-6.CrossRefPubMed Sterling, E. W., Silke, A., Tucker, S., Fricks, L., & Druss, B. G. (2010). Integrating wellness, recovery, and self-management for mental health consumers. Community Mental Health Journal, 46, 130–138. doi:10.​1007/​s10597-009-9276-6.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Zurück zum Zitat Younger, J. W., Piferi, R. L., Jobe, R. L., & Lawler, K. A. (2004). Dimensions of forgiveness: The views of laypersons. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 837–855. doi:10.1177/0265407504047843.CrossRef Younger, J. W., Piferi, R. L., Jobe, R. L., & Lawler, K. A. (2004). Dimensions of forgiveness: The views of laypersons. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 837–855. doi:10.​1177/​0265407504047843​.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Spiritual Openness, Revisiting a Potentially Important Aspect of Spirituality: Scale Review and Revision
verfasst von
Joshua C. Eyer
Shweta Kapoor
Martha A. Combs
Emberly M. Jay
Beverly E. Thorn
Publikationsdatum
08.07.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Religion and Health / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0444-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Journal of Religion and Health 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe