Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Drug Safety 6/2002

01.05.2002 | Short Communication

Statistical Techniques for Signal Generation

The Australian Experience

verfasst von: Dr Patrick Purcell, Simon Barty

Erschienen in: Drug Safety | Ausgabe 6/2002

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

National voluntary reporting systems generate large volumes of clinical data pertinent to drug safety. Currently descriptive statistical techniques are used to assist in the detection of drug safety ‘signals’. Australian data have been coded according to guidelines formulated almost 30 years ago and which have resulted in many drugs which are not associated with an adverse drug reaction or ‘innocent bystander’ drugs being recorded as ‘suspected’ in individual reports. In this paper we explore the application of an iterative probability filtering algorithm titled ‘PROFILE’. This serves to identify the ‘signals’ and remove the ‘innocent bystander’ drugs, thus providing a clearer view of the drugs most likely to have caused the reactions. Reaction terms analysed include neutropenia, agranulocytosis, hypotension, hypertension, myocardial infarction, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and rectal haemorrhage. In this version of PROFILE, Fishers exact test has been used as the statistical tool but other methods could be used in future. Advantages and limitations of the method and its assumptions are discussed together with the rationale underlying the method and suggestions for further enhancements.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans SJW, Waller P, Davis S. Proportional reporting ratios: the uses of epidemiological methods for signal generation. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1998; 7Suppl. 2: S102 Evans SJW, Waller P, Davis S. Proportional reporting ratios: the uses of epidemiological methods for signal generation. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1998; 7Suppl. 2: S102
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bate A, Lindquist M, Edwards IR, et al. A bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 54: 315–21PubMedCrossRef Bate A, Lindquist M, Edwards IR, et al. A bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 54: 315–21PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bate A, Lindquist M, Orre R, et al. Identifying and quantifying signals automatically [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1998; 7Suppl. 2: S103 Bate A, Lindquist M, Orre R, et al. Identifying and quantifying signals automatically [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1998; 7Suppl. 2: S103
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindquist M, Edwards IR, Bate A, et al. From association to alert: a revised approach to international signal analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1998; 7: S15–25CrossRef Lindquist M, Edwards IR, Bate A, et al. From association to alert: a revised approach to international signal analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1998; 7: S15–25CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyboom RHB. Signal assessment: detecting adverse drug reactions: pharmacovigilance in the Netherlands. The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Foundation, LAREB, 1998 Oct Meyboom RHB. Signal assessment: detecting adverse drug reactions: pharmacovigilance in the Netherlands. The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Foundation, LAREB, 1998 Oct
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyboom RHB, Egberts ACG, Edwards IR, et al. Principles of signal detection in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 1997 Jun; 16(6): 355–65PubMedCrossRef Meyboom RHB, Egberts ACG, Edwards IR, et al. Principles of signal detection in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 1997 Jun; 16(6): 355–65PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Statistical Techniques for Signal Generation
The Australian Experience
verfasst von
Dr Patrick Purcell
Simon Barty
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2002
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Drug Safety / Ausgabe 6/2002
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200225060-00005

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2002

Drug Safety 6/2002 Zur Ausgabe