We aimed to examine psychosocial function, suicidality and school dropout in a clinical psychiatric population over a 3-year period from adolescence to young adulthood and explore associations with negative life events.
Methods
This study is part of the Health Survey in Department of Children and Youth, St. Olavs hospital, Norway. In the first study visit (T1), 717 (43.5% of eligible) participated, aged 13–18 years (2009–2011), and 3 years later (T2), 570 answered a questionnaire (school functioning and negative life events), and 549 completed Kiddie SADS as telephone interview assessing DSM-IV diagnoses, psychosocial functioning and suicidality.
Results
Suicidal ideation was more frequent among girls (17.9%) than among boys (5.4%) (risk difference; RD = 12.5%, CI (7.2 to 17.7), p < 0.001), as was suicidal behavior (25.0% vs. 9.5%, RD = 15.5%, CI (9.2 to 21.4), p < 0.001). Girls had lower psychosocial functioning than boys (Children’s Global Assessment Scale; Mean score 68.2 vs. 75.2, Mean difference = − 7.0, CI (− 9.4 to − 4.7), p < 0.001), and more school dropout (22.5% vs. 13.2%, RD = 9.3%, CI (2.8 to 15.5), p = 0.006). For those with a psychiatric disorder, 24.8% of girls had suicidal ideation and 30.0% suicidal behavior, which was larger than for boys (RD = 18.0%, CI (10.8 to 24.7), p < 0.001, and RD = 18.3%, CI (10.2 to 25.8), p < 0.001, respectively). Exposure to negative life events was frequent for both genders, but more girls had experienced sexually uncomfortable or abusive situations, the last 3 years (23.5% vs. 2.9%, RD = 20.6%, CI (15.4 to 25.7), p < 0.001), and ever (44.4% vs. 7.9%, RD = 36.5%, CI (29.9 to 42.7), p < 0.001). Suicidal behavior was associated with having been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt (RD = 16.7%, CI (9.5 to 23.9), p < 0.001), and for girls been put into sexually uncomfortable or abusive situations (RD = 20.1%, CI (10.4 to 29.9), p < 0.001) and seen others violently hurt (RD = 14.6%, CI (3.4 to 25.8), p = 0.011).
Conclusions
The high frequency of suicidality and school dropout confirms the severity of adolescent psychiatric disorders, especially among girls. Specific life events were associated risk factors and should be target points for prevention and intervention.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
K-SADS: Kiddie SADS
Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children
DSM-IV-TR
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV Text revision
ADHD
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
CGAS
Children’s Global Assessment Scale
SES
Socioeconomic status
RD
Risk difference
CI
Confidence interval
Background
Adolescence is the period for transitioning into young adulthood and is usually a time of life characterized by good physical health [1]. However, the majority of mental disorders develop during adolescence and contribute to reduced psychosocial function [1‐3]. Suicidal symptoms increase during this developmental period [4‐6], with a rapid shift from suicidal ideation to suicidal behavior [5, 7, 8], and an estimated lifetime prevalence of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts of 12.1–33% and 4.1–9.3%, respectively [5, 9]. The prevalence of self-harm, defined broadly regardless of motivation and intention to die, has increased among Norwegian adolescents from 4.1 to 16.2% between 2002 and 2018 [10]. Second to road injury, suicide is the most common cause of death among young people worldwide, uncommon before 15 years of age but the frequency increases through adolescence [6, 11‐13]. The prevalence across all ages, countries and gender is 3.77/100000, and in Norway 3.00/100000 [12]. Suicide characteristics differ by gender [6, 12‐15], with girls having higher rates of suicidal thoughts and behavior, and boys highest rates of committed suicide. Suicidal ideation and behavior are common in patients with psychiatric disorders [5, 6, 16] and are more than three times more frequent in clinical samples of youth than in the general population [7, 17]. Accordingly, the rise of suicidal thoughts and behavior through adolescence coexists with increasing frequencies of psychiatric disorders and related psychopathology that by itself provide higher suicide risk, as for example depression, substance use and some anxiety disorders [5, 7, 16].
It is common to have experienced negative or stressful life events or adversities from childhood to young adulthood [18, 19]. Many different life events are found to be associated with youth suicidal symptoms [20‐22]. Such events may include being exposed or witnessed to violence, sexual trauma, or other injury and trauma [19], which are more frequent in clinical psychiatric samples than in the general population [23, 24]. In a systematic review, young people with attempted suicide were more likely to have experienced stressful life events than those with suicidal ideation [20]. A meta-analysis provided strong evidence that early exposure to any interpersonal violence increased the risk of suicide attempts [25]. Many other negative life events have shown associations to suicidal ideation, behavior or committed suicide, as for example death of a parent or a loved one [26, 27], experiences of disasters or accidents [27], peer victimization [28] and multiple other family factors [29, 30]. Experiencing negative life events during demanding developmental periods in childhood and adolescence may increase vulnerability to mental distress by inducing biological changes with long-term effects on nervous, endocrine and immune systems [20, 31]. Thus, negative life events may increase the risk for psychiatric symptoms, including suicidal behavior in vulnerable individuals [20, 32].
Anzeige
Psychiatric disorders and comorbidities in early years influence academic functioning, and may subsequently lead to increased risk of dropping out of school [33] and receiving unemployment benefits or social insurance support [33]. In a population-based study in Central Norway, 17% was registered as being high school dropouts at age 24 [33], and more boys than girls were found to be non-completers in another Norwegian population-based survey [34]. According to World Health Organization, education and health are strongly linked [35]. School dropout was associated with poor mental health in a Danish population-based study [36], and school dropout involve heavy and enduring individual and social costs [37]. The link between suicidal symptoms, psychosocial and school function seems to be bidirectional; Adolescent self-harm or suicidal behavior are found to be associated with later mental health disorders and worse long-term functioning in young adulthood [38, 39]. According to a systematic review with meta-analysis of longitudinal studies, adolescents and young adults with school failure were at higher risk of suicide attempts [40]. There are many risk factors for school dropout [41], and reasons for leaving school vary widely [42]. Negative or stressful life events are found to be associated with intentions of and actual dropout [43], including conflicts with authorities for boys, and relational problems for girls [44]. High school students exposed to severe acute stressors are immediately vulnerable to dropping out [37].
The objective of the present study was to examine suicidality and functioning 3 years after referral to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. We aimed to assess psychosocial function, suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, and school dropout, in the total sample and specified by psychiatric disorders, and furthermore to investigate associations with negative life events. We set out to specify analyses for girls and boys and explore gender differences. Hypotheses were that present suicidal symptoms and school dropout were associated with co-occurring exposure to negative life events, and furthermore, that frequencies differed between girls and boys, with girls having higher rates of suicidal symptoms and boys more school dropout.
Method
Study design
The Health Survey in Department of Children and Youth, Division of Mental Health Care, St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway (St. Olav CAP Survey), is a prospective longitudinal cohort study of a defined clinical population assessed at two time points. Design and procedures are thoroughly described in former publications [45, 46]. At time point 1 (T1) (2009–2011), all patients aged 13–18 years who visited the Department of Children and Youth at least once over a 2-year study period, received oral and written invitations at their first attendance. The exclusion criteria were difficulties in answering the survey due to low cognitive function, visual impairments, insufficient language skills, or an unstable psychiatric state. Emergency patients were invited to take part once they entered a stable phase. The participants and their parents received standard application of services. They gave written informed consent to extract diagnostic data from clinical charts and respond to an electronic survey. At 3-year study follow-up (T2) (2012–2014), age 16–21 years, data were collected from the T1 enrolled sample and their parents, by an electronic survey and a diagnostic telephone interview performed by trained professionals.
Participants
In the T1 study period, 2032 adolescent patients had at least one attendance in the Department of Children and Youth [45, 46]. Figure 1 shows the participant flow in each stage of the survey. At T1, n = 717 participated (393 (54.8%) girls). At T2, all T1 participants who previously consented to further inquiry were invited (eligible n = 685), of whom 570 (83% of eligible) completed the follow-up questionnaire (324 (56.8%) girls), and 549 (80%) completed the diagnostic interview (308 (56.1%) girls).
Fig. 1
Flow-chart of the recruitment and attrition in the present study
×
Anzeige
Participants vs. non-participants
To explore the representativeness of the study population at T1, anonymous information about the total clinical population was collected from annual reports from the Department of Children and Youth, 2009–2011, as previously published [45, 46]. All adolescents in the study period (n = 2032) minus those excluded (n = 289) were defined as reference population (n = 1743). The main reason for referral, age and gender were similar between participants (n = 717, 41.1%) and non-participants (n = 1026, 58.9%) (data not shown). Participants were 0.27 years older: Mean (SD) 15.7 (1.7) vs. 15.4 (2.0), and there were more girls among the participants: 393 (54.8%) vs. 509 (49.6%). Among those with participation at T1, there were 570 participants and 147 non-participants at T2. In depth attrition analyses are reported in a former publication [46]. Age and socioeconomic status were similar among participants and non-participants.
Measures
Psychiatric Diagnoses at T2 were set using the semi-structured Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (K-SADS) [47] according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV Text revision (DSM-IV-TR) [48]. Psychometric properties of the K-SADS, including reliability and validity, are found to be excellent [47], and the interview has previously been applied to populations in young adulthood [49, 50]. Adolescents were interviewed by telephone by trained interviewers, all with graduate degree in medicine or psychology and experience in child and adolescent psychiatric assessment. The interviewers met regularly with a supervisor, an experienced child and adolescent psychiatrist, to assure the quality and harmonization of the diagnostic assessment. All were blinded to T1 diagnoses. Inter-rater reliability in terms of negative agreement and positive agreement as recommended by van de Vet et al. [51], was assessed using second ratings for 28 of the taped telephone interviews. Positive agreement varied from 0.615 to 1.000, and negative agreement varied from 0.884 to 1.000 [46]. The underlying contingency tables showing agreement are previously reported [46].
In the present study, disorders were grouped into the following categories, based on DSM-IV diagnoses at T2; Any psychiatric disorder, Anxiety disorders (DSM-codes 300, 308, 309), Mood disorders (DSM-codes 296, 300.4, 311), ADHD (DSM-code 314) and Other (DSM-codes 291, 292, 295, 298, 299, 301, 303, 304, 305, 307, 312, 313, 316). Due to few participants in some diagnostic groups, for example autism and eating disorders, and especially when examining suicidality and school dropout, we chose to merge children with these diagnoses into “other psychiatric disorders” for the purpose of this manuscript.
The Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) [52] was used to rate general psychosocial functioning on a scale from 1 (extremely impaired, needs constant supervision) to 100 (superior functioning), based on K-SADS interview. The CGAS is designed for children under 18 years, but was in this study used for all participants, also those above the age of 18 years. The inter-rater reliability for CGAS in terms of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.835, based on second ratings for 28 of the taped telephone interviews. Details are given in the Supplementary material (Table S1).
Suicidal ideation or behavior were measured at T2 by asking the following questions during K-SADS interview:
Suicidal ideation; “Sometimes children who get upset or feel bad think about dying or even killing themselves. Have you ever had such thoughts? How would you do it? Did you have a plan?” Assessed and scored as; 0; No information, 1; Not at all, 2; Infrequent or vague thoughts of suicide (e.g., less than once per month), or 3; Recurrent thoughts of suicide. As measure of Suicidal ideation, we used “infrequent or vague thoughts” (2) or “recurrent thoughts of suicide” (3), presently at T2.
Suicidal acts or attempts; “Have you actually tried to kill yourself? When? What did you do? Any other things? Did you really want to die? How close did you come to doing it? Was anybody in the room? In the apartment? Did you tell them in advance? How were you found? Did you really want to die? Did you ask for any help after you did it?” Assessed and scored as; 0; No information, 1; No attempt, 2; Preparations with no actual intent to die (e.g., held pills in hand) or planned attempt but did not follow through, 3; Self injurious behavior with any suicidal intent. There was one more assessment; “Ever attempted suicide”, scored as yes or no. In the present study, Suicidal behavior included “preparations or planned attempt” (2) or “self injurious behavior with any suicidal intent” (3), presently at T2, or yes to the question: “Ever attempted suicide”.
School dropout was self-reported at T2 based on answer “yes” to the following question: “Have you canceled your education (dropped out)?”
Anzeige
Negative life events were registered by self-report at both T1 and T2. At T1, the following questions were asked: “Have any of the following things happened to you?”; “That someone in your family has been seriously ill”, “Death of a loved one”, “A catastrophe (fire, avalanche, tidal wave, hurricane, etc.)”, “A serious accident (ex: a very serious car accident)”, “Been violently hurt (beaten or injured)”, “Seen others violently hurt”, “Been put in sexually uncomfortable/abusive situations by someone about your age”, “Been put in sexually uncomfortable/abusive situations by an adult”, “Been threatened or physically harassed by other students at school for a long time”, “Received painful or frightening treatment at the hospital while being treated for an illness or injury”. These items were also used in the Young-HUNT3 study (https://www.ntnu.edu/hunt/data/que).
At T2, the same questions were asked, and with a supplementary question: “Been seriously ill or injured”.
The answering opportunities were at T1; “No”, “Yes, last year” and “Yes, in my life”, and at T2; “No”, “Yes, last year” and “Yes, last three years”. In the present study, negative life events defined as “last 3 years” were events measured at T2 only, and negative life events defined as “ever” were measured at T1 or T2.
Socioeconomic Status (SES) was measured at T1 by the highest level of mothers’ education, divided into eight categories: 1) less than 9-year primary school; 2) completed 9-year primary school; 3) one or two years in high school; 4) completed high school; 5) completed high school and one-year education/training after high school; 6) academy/university for up to and including 4 years; 7) academy/university for 5 years or more; 8) academy/university including PhD.
Anzeige
Statistical analyses
We compared proportions using the Newcombe hybrid score confidence intervals, as recommended by Fagerland, Lydersen and Laake [53], and the Pearson Chi squared test. Confidence intervals and tests for differences in psychosocial functioning between girls and boys were based on Student’s t-test for independent samples. We used binary linear regression with suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior or school dropout at T2 as dependent variables and negative life events reported at T1 and T2 as covariates, one at a time, to study their associations. The coefficients in binary linear regression represent risk differences. These regression analyses were carried out unadjusted and adjusted for SES as a possible confounder where relevant. Some estimates including suicidal behavior could not be computed when adjusting for SES due to non-convergence of the calculations. We report 95% confidence intervals (CI) where relevant, and two-sided p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Binary linear regression and the Newcombe CI were performed in Stata 16, and the other in SPSS 25.
Results
Suicidal measures and functioning
At T2, psychosocial functioning CGAS score was mean 71.3 (standard deviation 14.5) (Table 1). Girls had lower CGAS score than boys (mean 68.2 vs. 75.2, mean difference = − 7.0, CI (− 9.4 to − 4.7), p < 0.001). The frequency of suicidal ideation was 12.4%, girls 17.9% and boys 5.4% (risk difference; RD = 12.5%, CI (7.2 to 17.7), p < 0.001) (Table 1). Similar gender differences were found in suicidal behavior, were girls had the highest frequencies of suicidal attempts ever (25.0% vs. 9.5%, RD = 15.5%, CI (9.2 to 21.4), p < 0.001). School dropout was more frequent for girls than boys (22.5% vs. 13.2%, RD = 9.3%, CI (2.8 to 15.5), p = 0.006). Among those with a psychiatric disorder, suicidal ideation was higher among girls (24.8%), and suicidal behavior even higher (30.0%), RD for gender differences 18.0%, CI (10.8 to 24.7), p < 0.001, and 18.3%, CI (10.2 to 25.8), p < 0.001, respectively (Table 2). Specified by psychiatric disorder, girls had lower CGAS and higher frequencies of suicidal measures than boys in all diagnostic groups. The frequencies of suicidal ideation and behavior were highest in mood disorders and lowest in ADHD. For school dropout, gender difference was only found among patients with ADHD, with highest frequencies among girls (24.7% vs. 13.5%, RD = 11.3%, CI (0.3 to 22.3), p = 0.043).
Table 1
Clinical characteristics, psychosocial functioning, suicidal measures and school dropout at 3-year follow up
Total
Girls
Boys
Girls versus Boys
Follow-up (T2)
n
Mean
(SD)
n
Mean
(SD)
n
Mean
(SD)
Mean difference
95% CIa
p-valuea
Age (years)
570
18.7
(1.7)
324
19.0
(1.7)
246
18.3
(1.6)
0.7
(0.4 to 0.9)
< 0.001
SES
404
4.8
(1.7)
221
4.9
(1.7)
183
4.8
(1.8)
0.1
(−0.3 to 0.4)
0.714
CGAS
549
71.3
(14.5)
308
68.2
(15.5)
241
75.2
(12.0)
−7.0
(−9.4 to −4.7)
< 0.001
Proportion
(%)
Proportion
(%)
Proportion
(%)
Risk difference (%)
95% CIb
p-valuec
Suicidal ideationd
549
68/548
(12.4)
308
55/307
(17.9)
241
13/241
(5.4)
12.5
(7.2 to 17.7)
< 0.001
Suicidal behavior
549
100/549
(18.2)
308
77/308
(25.0)
241
23/241
(9.5)
15.5
(9.2 to 21.4)
< 0.001
- Suicidal attempts presently
549
9/549
(1.6)
308
9/308
(2.9)
241
0/241
(0.0)
2.9
(0.8 to 5.5)
0.007
- Suicidal attempts ever
549
100/549
(18.2)
308
77/308
(25.0)
241
23/241
(9.5)
15.5
(9.2 to 21.4)
< 0.001
School dropoute
570
101/546
(18.5)
324
70f/311
(22.5)
246
31/235
(13.2)
9.3
(2.8 to 15.5)
0.006
Note:SES Socioeconomic status, SD Standard Deviation, CGAS Children Global Assessment Scale (psychosocial functioning) (1–100, 1 = worst, 100 = best)
aConfidence intervals and tests for differences between girls and boys were based on Student’s t-test for independent samples
bNewcombe hybrid score
cPearson Chi squared test
dSuicidal ideation is defined as suicidal thoughts occasionally or often
eSchool dropout includes patients answering yes to the question “Have you canceled your education (dropped out)?”
fOf these, 6 had given childbirth
Table 2
General psychosocial functioning, suicidal ideation or behavior and school dropout at 3-year follow up, specified by psychiatric disorders
Total (n = 549)
Girls (n = 308)
Boys (n = 241)
Girls versus Boys
Any psychiatric disordera
n= 385
n= 223
n= 162
Mean
(SD)
Mean
(SD)
Mean
(SD)
Mean difference
95% CId
p-valued
CGAS
66.8
(14.0)
63.3
(14.4)
71.6
(12.0)
−8.3
(−10.9 to − 5.6)
< 0.001
n
(%)
n
(%)
n
(%)
RD (%)
95% CI of RDe
p-valuef
Suicidal ideationb
66/384
(17.2)
55/222
(24.8)
11/162
(6.8)
18.0
(10.8 to 24.7)
< 0.001
Suicidal behaviorc
86/385
(22.3)
67/223
(30.0)
19/162
(11.7)
18.3
(10.2 to 25.8)
< 0.001
School dropout
77/361
(21.3)
53/211
(25.1)
24/150
(16.0)
9.1
(0.5 to 17.1)
0.037
Anxiety disorders
n= 218
n= 168
n= 50
Mean
(SD)
Mean
(SD)
Mean
(SD)
Mean difference
95% CI of Difference
p-value
CGAS
61.6
(13.3)
60.5
(13.9)
65.2
(10.4)
−4.7
(−8.2 to −1.0)
0.012
n
(%)
n
(%)
n
(%)
RD (%)
95% CI of RD
p-value
Suicidal ideation
48/218
(22.0)
43/168
(25.6)
5/50
(10.0)
15.6
(2.7 to 24.7)
0.019
Suicidal behavior
64/218
(29.4)
55/168
(32.7)
9/50
(18.0)
14.7
(0.3 to 25.8)
0.045
School dropout
50/205
(24.4)
42/159
(26.4)
8/46
(17.4)
9.0
(−5.7 to 20.1)
0.209
Mood disorders
n= 98
n= 80
n= 18
Mean
(SD)
Mean
(SD)
Mean
(SD)
Mean difference
95% CI of Difference
p-value
CGAS
55.8
(11.3)
54.5
(11.4)
61.4
(9.6)
−6.9
(−12.7 to −1.2)
0.018
n
(%)
n
(%)
n
(%)
RD (%)
95% CI of RD
p-value
Suicidal ideation
42/98
(42.9)
38/80
(47.5)
4/18
(22.2)
25.3
(−0.0 to 42.4)
0.050
Suicidal behavior
39/98
(39.8)
36/80
(45.0)
3/18
(16.7)
28.3
(3.5 to 43.7)
0.026
School dropout
30/90
(33.3)
23/73
(31.5)
7/17
(41.2)
−9.7
(−34.4 to 13.0)
0.446
ADHD
n= 211
n= 99
n= 112
Mean
(SD)
Mean
(SD)
Mean
(SD)
Mean difference
95% CI of Difference
p-value
CGAS
69.2
(13.6)
65.9
(14.9)
72.1
(11.6)
−6.2
(−9.9 to −2.6)
0.001
n
(%)
n
(%)
n
(%)
RD (%)
95% CI of RD
p-value
Suicidal ideation
22/210
(10.5)
16/98
(16.3)
6/112
(5.4)
10.9
(2.6 to 20.0)
0.010
Suicidal behavior
41/211
(19.4)
27/99
(27.3)
14/112
(12.5)
14.8
(4.0 to 25.5)
0.007
School dropout
37/197
(18.8)
23/93
(24.7)
14/104
(13.5)
11.3
(0.3 to 22.3)
0.043
Other psychiatric disorders
n= 120
n= 59
n= 61
Mean
(SD)
Mean
(SD)
Mean
(SD)
Mean difference
95% CI of Difference
p-value
CGAS
63.2
(14.5)
57.7
(14.2)
68.4
(12.9)
−10.7
(−15.7 to −5.8)
< 0.001
n
(%)
n
(%)
n
(%)
RD (%)
95% CI of RD
p-value
Suicidal ideation
27/120
(22.5)
20/59
(33.9)
7/61
(11.5)
22.4
(7.5 to 36.4)
0.003
Suicidal behavior
31/120
(25.8)
23/59
(39.0)
8/61
(13.1)
25.9
(10.2 to 40.1)
0.001
School dropout
31/114
(27.2)
19/57
(33.3)
12/57
(21.0)
12.3
(−4.1 to 27.8)
0.141
Note:SD Standard Deviation, CGAS Children Global Assessment Scale (general psychosocial functioning) (1–100, 1 = worst, 100 = best), RD Risk difference
aPsychiatric disorder includes both primary and additional diagnoses
bSuicidal ideation is defined as suicidal thoughts occasionally or often
cSuicidal behavior is defined as suicidal acts or attempts, presently at T2or ever, also suicidal acts and attempts with suicidal thoughts
dConfidence intervals and tests for differences between girls and boys were based on Student’s t-test for independent samples
eNewcombe hybrid score
fPearson Chi squared test
Negative life events
Having serious illness of someone in family or death of a loved one, were the most common negative life events in this study (57.7% last 3 years and 85.7% ever), with higher frequencies among girls than boys only for the last 3 years (63.2% vs. 50.4%, RD = 12.8%, CI (4.5 to 20.8), p = 0.002) (Table 3). Having been seriously ill, injured or received painful or frightening treatment in hospital were more frequent among girls than boys both for the last 3 years and ever (26.5% vs. 16.5%, RD = 10.0%, CI (3.1 to 16.6), p = 0.005, and 38.0% vs. 27.0%, RD = 11.0%, CI (7.6 to 22.5), p < 0.001, respectively). Ever been exposed to a serious accident or catastrophe, were more frequent among girls (37.0% vs. 24.0%, RD = 13.0%, CI (5.4 to 20.4), p = 0.001). There were highly significant differences between girls and boys in having been put into sexually uncomfortable or abusive situations, both during the last 3 years and ever (23.5% vs. 2.9%, RD = 20.6%, CI (15.4 to 25.7), p < 0.001, and 44.4% vs. 7.9%, RD = 36.5%, CI (29.9 to 42.7), p < 0.001, respectively).
Table 3
Negative life events at 3-year follow up
Self-reported questionnaire
(T1 and T2)a
Total (n = 570)
Girls (n = 324)
Boys (n = 246)
Girls versus Boys
Last 3 yearsb
Everb
Last 3 years
Ever
Last 3 years
Ever
Last 3 years
Ever
n
(%)
n
(%)
n
(%)
n
(%)
n
(%)
n
(%)
95% CIc
pd
95% CI
p
Serious illness of someone in family or death of a loved one
326/565
(57.7)
485/566
(85.7)
204/323
(63.2)
284/323
(87.9)
122/242
(50.4)
201/242
(83.1)
(4.5 to 20.8)
0.002
(−0.9 to 11.0)
0.080
Been seriously ill or injured, received painful or frightening treatment at hospital
126/566
(22.3)
178/566
(31.4)
86/324
(26.5)
123/324
(38.0)
40/242
(16.5)
55/242
(22.7)
(3.1 to 16.6)
0.005
(7.6, to 22.5)
< 0.001
Exposed to a serious accident or catastrophe
74/566
(13.1)
178/566
(31.4)
45/324
(13.9)
120/324
(37.0)
29/242
(12.0)
58/242
(24.0)
(−3.9 to 7.4)
0.506
(5.4 to 20.4)
0.001
Been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt
124/566
(21.9)
262/566
(46.3)
77/324
(23.8)
160/324
(49.4)
47/242
(19.4)
101/242
(41.7)
(−2.6 to 11.0)
0.216
(−0.6 to 15.8)
0.088
Seen others violently hurt
131/566
(23.1)
241/566
(42.6)
65/324
(20.1)
140/324
(43.2)
66/242
(27.3)
101/242
(41.7)
(−14.4 to −0.2)
0.044
(−6.7 to 9.6)
0.726
Been put in sexually uncomfortable/abusive situations
83/566
(14.7)
163/566
(28.8)
76/324
(23.5)
144/324
(44.4)
7/242
(2.9)
19/242
(7.9)
(15.4 to 25.7)
< 0.001
(29.9 to 42.7)
< 0.001
Note:aSame questions at both T1and T2, except for question “Been seriously ill”, which was only asked at T2
bNegative life events defined as “last 3 years” were events measured at T2only, and negative life events defined as “ever” were measured at T1or T2
cNewcombe hybrid score
dPearson Chi squared test
Associations
Binary linear regression with suicidal ideation as dependent variable and negative life events as covariates showed associations for several life events (Table 4). After adjustment for SES, the strongest associations were for been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt (RD = 8.9%, CI (2.0 to 15.9), p = 0.012) and having been put into sexually uncomfortable or abusive situations (RD = 10.4%, CI (1.8 to 19.0), p = 0.018). Gender-specific analyses adjusted for SES, showed associations with having serious illness of someone in the family or death of a loved one, and being threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt for girls, but no associations were present for boys.
Table 4
Binary linear regression with suicidal ideation at 3-year follow up as dependent variable, and negative life events as covariates
Suicidal ideationa at T2
Crude
Adjusted for SES
Negative life events
No Neg. life event
Neg. life event
RDb
95% CI for RD
RD
95% CI for RD
n
n
(%)
n
(%)
%
Lower
Upper
p value
%
Lower
Upper
p value
Total sample
549
Serious illness of someone in family or death of a loved one
535
3/73c
(4.1)
63/462c
(13.6)
9.5
4.0
15.1
0.001
8.1
0.9
15.2
0.027
Been seriously ill or injured, received painful or frightening treatment at hospital
536
39/367
(10.6)
27/169
(16.0)
5.3
−1.0
11.7
0.100
8.6
0.9
16.3
0.028
Exposed to a serious accident or catastrophe
536
40/365
(11.0)
26/171
(15.2)
4.2
−2.0
10.5
0.184
5.5
−2.2
13.3
0.160
Been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt
536
26/287
(9.1)
40/249
(16.1)
7.0
1.4
12.7
0.015
8.9
2.0
15.9
0.012
Seen others violently hurt
536
32/306
(10.5)
34/230
(14.8)
4.3
−1.4
10.1
0.139
5.7
−1.4
12.7
0.115
Been put in sexually uncomfortable/abusive situations
536
36/383
(9.4)
30/153
(19.6)
10.2
3.3
17.2
0.004
10.4
1.8
19.0
0.018
SES
385
0.2d
−1.7
2.2
0.820
Girls
308
Serious illness of someone in family or death of a loved one
304
2/35
(5.7)
52/269
(19.3)
13.6
4.6
22.6
0.003
12.7
0.8
24.5
0.037
Been seriously ill or injured, received painful or frightening treatment at hospital
305
30/188
(16.0)
24/117
(20.5)
4.6
−4.5
13.6
0.322
8.4
−2.7
19.6
0.138
Exposed to a serious accident or catastrophe
305
31/192
(16.2)
23/113
(20.4)
4.2
−4.9
13.3
0.364
7.2
−4.3
18.7
0.221
Been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt
305
21/153
(13.7)
33/152
(21.7)
8.0
−0.5
16.5
0.067
11.1
0.2
21.9
0.045
Seen others violently hurt
305
25/170
(14.7)
29/135
(21.5)
6.8
−2.0
15.5
0.129
9.1
−2.0
20.2
0.109
Been put in sexually uncomfortable/abusive situations
305
27/170
(15.9)
27/135
(20.0)
4.1
−4.6
12.8
0.354
6.1
−4.9
17.0
0.277
SES
210
−0.4
−3.6
2.8
0.806
Boys
241
Serious illness of someone in family or death of a loved one
231
1/38
(2.6)
11/193
(5.7)
3.1
−3.0
9.1
0.321
0.9
−6.8
8.6
0.821
Been seriously ill or injured, received painful or frightening treatment at hospital
231
9/179
(5.0)
3/52
(5.8)
0.7
−6.4
7.9
0.838
3.9
−4.9
12.7
0.387
Exposed to a serious accident or catastrophe
231
9/173
(5.2)
3/58
(5.2)
0.0
−6.6
6.6
0.993
3.0
−8.8
2.8
0.308
Been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt
231
5/134
(3.7)
7/97
(7.2)
3.5
−2.6
9.6
0.261
3.6
−3.5
10.7
0.317
Seen others violently hurt
231
7/136
(5.2)
5/95
(5.3)
0.1
−5.7
6.0
0.969
0.8
− 5.9
7.4
0.820
Been put in sexually uncomfortable/abusive situations
231
9/213
(4.2)
3/18
(16.7)
12.4
−5.0
29.9
0.163
3.2
−11.0
17.4
0.659
SES
175
1.1
−0.1
2.4
0.072
Note: Binary linear regression is based on paired data displayed in Supplemental Material Table S2. SES Socioeconomic status
aSuicidal ideation includes suicidal thoughts occasionally or often
bRD is risk difference, the difference between the proportions of patients with suicidal thoughts or behavior and negative life events compared with patients with suicidal thoughts or behavior without negative life event
cThe numbers in this table, for example 3/73 (4.1) and 63/462 (13.6), indicate that among the 73 patients with no negative life event, 3 had suicidal ideation at T2, and among the 462 patients with the negative life event, 63 had suicidal ideation at T2
dThe risk of having suicidal ideation increases with 0.2% per one unit increase in level of mothers education
Anzeige
With suicidal behavior as dependent variable, adjusted associations were present for been seriously ill or injured (RD = 10.6%, CI (2.8 to 18.4), p = 0.008), exposure to a serious accident or catastrophe (RD = 10.1%, CI (1.9 to 18.3), p = 0.015), and been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt (RD = 16.7%, CI (9.5 to 23.9), p < 0.001) (Table 5). Having seen others violently hurt was associated with suicidal behavior in girls only (RD = 14.6%, CI (3.4 to 25.8), p = 0.011). Some estimates could not be adjusted for SES due to non-convergence of the calculations. Thus, the association with having been put into sexually uncomfortable or abusive situations (RD = 21.8%, CI (13.6 to 29.9), p < 0.001) could not be adjusted for SES, neither could the corresponding association that was present only for girls (RD = 20.1%, CI (10.4 to 29.9), p < 0.001). Having been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt was related to suicidal behavior for both girls (RD = 17.6%, CI (6.9 to 28.3), p = 0.001) and unadjusted for boys (RD = 12.0%, CI (3.8 to 20.2), p = 0.004). There was an association between SES and suicidal behavior (RD = − 2.3%, CI (− 4.4 to − 0.8), p = 0.005). Specified by diagnostic groups, associations with suicidal behavior were highly significant for Mood disorders and Anxiety disorders (p < 0.001) and the group Other disorders (p = 0.007), adjusted for SES (data not shown).
Table 5
Binary linear regression with suicidal behavior at 3-year follow up as dependent variable, and negative life events as covariates
Suicidal behaviora at T2
Crude
Adjusted for SES
Negative life events
No Neg. life event
Neg. life event
RDb
95% CI for RD
RD
95% CI for RD
n
n
(%)
n
(%)
%
Lower
Upper
p value
%
Lower
Upper
p value
Total sample
549
Serious illness of someone in family or death of a loved one
536
8/73c
(11.0)
89/463c
(19.2)
8.3
−0.2
16.3
0.043
-d
–
–
–
Been seriously ill or injured, received painful or frightening treatment at hospital
537
50/368
(13.6)
48/169
(28.4)
14.8
7.2
22.5
< 0.001
10.6
2.8
18.4
0.008
Exposed to a serious accident or catastrophe
537
52/365
(14.2)
46/172
(26.7)
12.5
5.0
20.0
0.001
10.1
1.9
18.3
0.015
Been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt
537
28/287
(9.8)
70/250
(28.0)
18.2
11.7
24.8
< 0.001
16.7
9.5
23.9
< 0.001
Seen others violently hurt
537
37/306
(12.1)
61/231
(26.4)
14.3
7.6
21.1
< 0.001
10.7
3.4
18.1
0.004
Been put in sexually uncomfortable/abusive situations
537
46/383
(12.0)
52/154
(33.8)
21.8
13.6
29.9
< 0.001
–
–
–
–
SES
386
−2.3e
−4.4
−0.8
0.005
Girls
308
Serious illness of someone in family or death of a loved one
305
7/35
(20.0)
68/270
(25.2)
5.2
−9.1
19.4
0.476
–
–
–
–
Been seriously ill or injured, received painful or frightening treatment at hospital
306
37/189
(19.6)
39/117
(33.3)
13.8
3.5
24.0
0.009
7.4
−3.5
18.3
0.184
Exposed to a serious accident or catastrophe
306
39/192
(20.3)
37/114
(32.5)
12.1
1.8
22.5
0.021
6.3
−5.1
17.6
0.280
Been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt
306
22/153
(14.4)
54/153
(35.3)
20.9
11.5
30.3
< 0.001
17.6
6.9
28.3
0.001
Seen others violently hurt
306
27/170
(15.9)
49/136
(36.0)
20.1
10.4
29.9
< 0.001
14.6
3.4
25.8
0.011
Been put in sexually uncomfortable/abusive situations
306
27/170
(15.9)
49/136
(36.0)
20.1
10.4
29.9
< 0.001
–
–
–
–
SES
211
−3.6
−6.5
0.6
0.017
Boys
241
Serious illness of someone in family or death of a loved one
231
1/38
(2.6)
21/193
(10.9)
8.3
1.5
15.0
0.016
–
–
–
–
Been seriously ill or injured, received painful or frightening treatment at hospital
231
13/179
(7.3)
9/52
(17.3)
10.0
−0.9
21.0
0.073
–
–
–
–
Exposed to a serious accident or catastrophe
231
13/173
(7.5)
9/58
(15.5)
8.0
−2.1
18.1
0.122
11.1
−0.4
22.7
0.152
Been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt
231
6/134
(4.5)
16/97
(16.5)
12.0
3.8
20.2
0.004
–
–
–
–
Seen others violently hurt
231
10/136
(7.4)
12/95
(12.6)
5.3
−2.7
13.3
0.196
5.1
−2.8
13.0
0.206
Been put in sexually uncomfortable/abusive situations
231
19/213
(8.9)
3/18
(16.7)
7.7
−9.9
25.4
0.390
15.7
−5.8
37.2
0.152
SES
175
−1.7
−3.4
−0.0
0.047
Note: Binary linear regression is based on paired data displayed in Supplemental Material Table S3. SES Socioeconomic status
aSuicidal behavior includes suicidal acts or attempts, presently at T2or ever, also suicidal acts and attempts with suicidal thoughts
bRD is risk difference, the difference between the proportions of patients with suicidal thoughts or behavior and negative life events compared with patients with suicidal thoughts or behavior without negative life event
cThe numbers in this table, for example 3/73 (4.1) and 63/462 (13.6), indicate that among the 73 patients with no negative life event, 3 had suicidal ideation at T2, and among the 462 patients with the negative life event, 63 had suicidal ideation at T2
dEstimates could not be computed due to non-convergence of the calculations
eThe risk of having suicidal behavior decreases with 2.3% per one unit increase in level of mothers education
There were associations between school dropout and having seen others been violently hurt or been put in sexually uncomfortable/abusive situations, but after adjusting for SES, the associations only persisted for having seen others been violently hurt (RD = 10.8%, CI (2.9 to 18.8), p = 0.007), and only among girls (RD = 11.7%, CI (0.5 to 22.9), p = 0.041) (Table 6). Results were mainly unchanged when excluding those who gave childbirth (n = 6) (data not shown). An association found between suicidal behavior and school dropout was attenuated after adjustment for SES in the total sample (RD = 7.0%, CI (− 3.9 to 17.9), p = 0.209).
Table 6
Binary linear regression with school dropout at 3-year follow up as dependent variable, and negative life events as covariate
School dropouta at T2
Crude
Adjusted for SES
Negative life events
No Neg. life event
Neg. life event
RDb
95% CI for RD
RD
95% CI for RD
n
n
(%)
n
(%)
%
Lower
Upper
p value
%
Lower
Upper
p value
Total sample
570
Serious illness of someone in family or death of a loved one
541
9/74c
(12.2)
91/467c
(19.5)
7.3
−1.0
15.6
0.083
5.8
−3.3
15.0
0.213
Been seriously ill or injured, received painful or frightening treatment at hospital
542
67/376
(17.8)
34/166
(20.5)
2.7
−4.6
9.9
0.472
3.3
−4.8
11.4
0.424
Exposed to a serious accident or catastrophe
542
65/371
(17.5)
36/171
(21.0)
3.5
−3.7
10.8
0.339
0.9
−7.1
8.9
0.830
Been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt
542
43/289
(14.9)
58/253
(22.9)
8.0
1.4
14.7
0.017
6.2
−1.3
13.8
0.106
Seen others violently hurt
542
40/312
(12.8)
61/230
(26.5)
13.7
6.9
20.5
< 0.001
10.8
2.9
18.8
0.007
Been put in sexually uncomfortable/abusive situations
542
59/386
(15.3)
42/156
(26.9)
11.6
3.8
19.5
0.004
7.4
−1.4
16.3
0.100
SES
404
−1.1d
−3.2
1.1
0.319
Girls
324
Serious illness of someone in family or death of a loved one
310
5/35
(14.3)
64/275
(23.3)
9.0
−3.7
21.6
0.164
8.2
−5.7
22.2
0.247
Been seriously ill or injured, received painful or frightening treatment at hospital
311
42/195
(21.5)
28/116
(24.1)
2.6
−7.1
12.3
0.600
3.1
−8.1
14.3
0.588
Exposed to a serious accident or catastrophe
311
44/195
(22.6)
26/116
(22.4)
−0.2
−9.8
9.5
0.976
−1.7
−12.6
9.1
0.756
Been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt
311
30/156
(19.2)
40/155
(25.8)
6.6
−2.7
15.8
0.165
2.2
−8.4
12.7
0.688
Seen others violently hurt
311
28/177
(15.8)
42/134
(31.3)
15.5
6.0
25.1
0.001
11.7
0.5
22.9
0.041
Been put in sexually uncomfortable/abusive situations
311
34/173
(19.7)
36/138
(26.1)
6.4
−3.0
15.9
0.181
3.7
−7.2
14.6
0.505
SES
221
−1.5
−4.8
1.7
0.351
Boys
246
Serious illness of someone in family or death of a loved one
231
4/39
(10.3)
27/192
(14.1)
3.8
−6.9
14.5
0.487
2.5
−9.2
14.2
0.674
Been seriously ill or injured, received painful or frightening treatment at hospital
231
25/181
(13.8)
6/50
(12.0)
−1.8
−12.1
8.5
0.731
0.6
−10.8
11.9
0.923
Exposed to a serious accident or catastrophe
231
21/176
(11.9)
10/55
(18.2)
6.3
−5.0
17.5
0.278
1.8
−10.1
13.6
0.770
Been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt
231
13/133
(9.8)
18/98
(18.4)
8.6
−0.6
17.8
0.067
9.4
−1.5
20.4
0.092
Seen others violently hurt
231
12/135
(8.9)
19/96
(19.8)
10.9
1.6
20.2
0.022
9.3
−1.5
20.1
0.091
Been put in sexually uncomfortable/abusive situations
231
25/213
(11.7)
6/18
(33.3)
21.6
−0.7
43.8
0.057
10.2
−11.7
32.0
0.362
SES
183
−0.7
−3.3
2.0
0.621
Note: Binary linear regression is based on paired data displayed in Supplemental Material Table S4. SES Socioeconomic status
aSchool dropout includes patients answering yes to the question “Have you canceled your education (dropped out)?”
bRD is risk difference, the difference between the proportions of patients with school dropout and negative life events compared with patients with school dropout without negative life event
cThe numbers in this table, for example 9/74 (12.2) and 91/467 (19.5), indicate that among the 74 patients with no negative life event, 9 had school dropout at T2, and among the 467 patients with a negative life event, 91 had school dropout at T2
dThe risk of having school dropout decreases with 1.1% per one unit increase in level of mothers education
Discussion
This study is one of few surveys following a general clinical psychiatric population of adolescents who received standard clinical care, studying symptoms and function over time. Reassessed after 3 years, suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior were frequent, especially among girls, and across all subgroups of psychiatric disorders. Girls had lower psychosocial functioning than boys, and more school dropout. Associations were found between negative life events and suicidal ideation and behavior. Most marked were the associations between suicidal behavior and having been exposed to interpersonal violence for both girls and boys. For girls only, sexually uncomfortable or abusive situations were also related to suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior, as was having seen others been violently hurt. Furthermore, having serious illness of someone in family or death of a loved one were also associated with suicidal ideation for the total sample, and SES was linked to suicidal behavior for both girls and boys. School dropout was associated with having seen others be violently hurt among girls with ADHD.
In our sample assessed 3 years after referral for psychiatric disorders, the prevalence of suicidal ideation and behavior were similar to earlier research on clinical samples [7, 17]. The frequent occurrence of suicidal attempts may reflect that this is a follow up of former patients, with high rates of psychiatric disorders [46], and the results correspond well with earlier research describing that the majority of youth with suicidal behaviors have pre-existing mental disorders [5]. Still, the reasons for the high rates of suicidal ideation and behavior may be diverse, both depending on the persistence of psychiatric disorders [46], treatment given and the general vulnerability of the adolescents in this clinical population. There were large gender differences with girls having much higher rates than boys of both suicidal ideation and behavior, in line with earlier research [5], and especially described in the systematic review of 67 population-based longitudinal studies with focus on gender differences in suicidal behavior in adolescents and young adults [14]. In our study, almost one out of two girls with mood disorders had both suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior, whereas less than one out of four boys with mood disorders had the same symptoms. Boys with ADHD or other psychiatric disorders had the lowest frequencies of suicidal ideation or behavior. This follow up of former adolescent patients underscores the large gender differences and added risk for girls when it comes to suicidal symptoms.
Psychosocial function as measured by CGAS with values in the sub-normal range, indicated better functioning than expected in a clinical sample with frequent comorbidity. The inter-rater reliability was tested and shown to be good. CGAS was lower among girls than among boys, corresponding with earlier findings by Gårdvik et al. [46], showing that female participants had higher rates of psychiatric disorders and seemed to be more prone to develop co-occurring psychiatric disorders and a higher burden of disease. School dropout was also significantly higher among girls compared to boys, which may once again reflect a higher burden of disease among girls in this sample. Earlier research has showed that poor health, and especially mental health, has been significantly associated with dropout of school among adolescents, most marked for boys in higher education [33, 36]. Development and persistence of psychiatric disorders is prone to impact function in school and socialization, with possible long-term consequences [2]. It is therefore crucial to break the cycle at an early stage and hinder maintenance of problems.
The frequencies of experiencing negative life events are in accordance with earlier research reporting associations between psychiatric disorders and earlier negative life events or childhood adversities [54‐56]. The most common experiences, in both genders, were serious illness of someone in the family or death of a loved one, reported for eight to nine out of ten adolescents. Almost half of the adolescents had been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt, or seen others violently hurt, with no gender differences, whereas there were large gender differences in exposure to sexually uncomfortable or abusive situations. Less than one out of ten boys had such experiences, but almost one out of two girls were exposed. The results underline the importance of assessing negative life events among adolescents with psychiatric symptoms and disorders, in order to reveal any such risks, give proper treatment and if possible, prevent further traumatic events.
We examined possible associations between suicidal ideation at follow-up and negative life events. There was a significant association between suicidal ideation and having been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt in the total sample, but in gender-specific analyses, the association was present only for girls. Suicidal ideation was also associated with exposure to sexually uncomfortable or abusive situations for the total sample, corresponding with earlier research described in the meta-analysis of 50 years of research by Franklin et al. [21]. Furthermore, we found that suicidal ideation was associated with having serious illness of someone in the family or death of a loved one, but only for girls. Losing a loved one by death may be a very stressful event for children and adolescents, and a systematic review and meta-analysis by Howarth et al., found that stressful life events increased the risk of both reported suicidal ideation and behavior [22].
Earlier studies have demonstrated associations between suicidal behavior in adolescents and experiences of negative life events, as described in the systematic review by Serafini et al. [20]. In our study, we found associations between suicidal behavior and all negative life events. There was a strong association between suicidal behavior and having been threatened, physically harassed or violently hurt, for the total sample and for both girls and boys, which is in line with previous research, as described in the meta-analysis by Castellví et al. [25]. Among adolescents, victimization by peers is highly prevalent and associated with increased risk of suicidal attempts, and the longer history of victimization, the greater risk [28]. For girls only, suicidal behavior was related to having seen others violently hurt, as reported in earlier research [27]. Suicidal behavior was furthermore associated with exposure to sexually uncomfortable or abusive situations for girls only. Sexual abuse or violence has been found to be strongly associated to suicide attempts and behavior [27], and contributing the most to suicide attempts in youths and young adults together with bullying [25]. Opposite to suicidal ideations, serious illness of someone in the family or death of a loved one, was associated with suicidal behavior for boys only. This association has been found in earlier research [26, 27], but not specified by gender. Having been seriously ill, injured or received painful or frightening treatment in hospital, was associated with suicidal behavior in the total sample, in line with the meta-analysis of 50 years of research [21]. In the WHO World Mental Health Surveys, a cross-national analysis of the associations between traumatic events and suicidal behavior were investigated, and accidents and disasters were associated with suicidal behavior [27], as also found in our study. A systematic review of population-based studies by Evans et al. [57], found that suicidal phenomena in adolescents were associated with female gender, mental health problems, negative life events and poor family functioning, corresponding well with our findings.
In our clinical sample, an association was found between suicidal behavior and SES, for both girls and boys. The risk of having suicidal behavior decreased for the total sample with 2.3% per unit increase in level of mothers’ education. This indicates that SES does have an effect on the presence of suicidal behavior at follow-up, and that higher maternal education may be a protective factor for development of these symptoms. A large national register-based study showed strong associations between SES and suicidal risk [58].
School dropout is related to many different risk factors. A meta-analytic review by Gubbels et al. [41] described 23 risk domains with significant overall effect on school dropout, where mental health problems of the child and adverse childhood experiences were two of these domains. In our sample, we found associations between school dropout and having seen others been violently hurt, among girls only. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies by Castellví et al. [40] showed that adolescents and young adults who had school failure were at higher risk of a suicide attempt. In our clinical sample, the association found between suicidal behavior and school dropout in the crude analysis, did not withstand adjustment for SES. Therefore, SES may be a confounding factor for associations between suicidal behavior and school dropout, but may as well reflect larger p-values due to lower number of participants with SES information, or that the attrition was not random, i.e. that those with SES information were not representative for the entire sample.
One strength of the present study is the inclusion of a large clinical sample receiving standard clinical care, assessed after 3 years with a high response rate from T1 to T2. Furthermore, suicidal ideation and behavior were assessed in-depth by clinicians during the diagnostic interview, and not based on self-report measures which involves the limitations of less accuracy in establishing psychopathology. Some limitations need to be considered. The attrition rate was high in the initial recruitment, and even though the T1 sample did not differ in age, gender or reason for referral compared to non-participants, we cannot exclude that this high attrition rate may have affected the results. Since there were more girls than boys among participants compared to non-participants in this study, we may have lost some of the boys with psychiatric disorders, suicidality symptoms and impaired function. Life events and school dropout were measured by self-report only. School dropout was reported by one question, and additional information would have strengthened the measure, either by using several questions or information from other sources, supplemented by asking about the subjective reasons for the respective school dropout. Family characteristics including unemployment and low socioeconomic status influence mental health in off-spring [59], and may have important influence on many of the negative life events measured in this study, and their associations with suicidal measures or school dropout. Using level of maternal education to indicate socioeconomic status may not enclose the complete concept of socioeconomics, and furthermore, this information was accessible for a reduced sample, which may not reflect the total study population. Also, the reduced sample resulted in reduced power in the association analyses. The fact that some estimates including suicidal behavior could not be computed due to non-convergence of the calculations, was a statistical limitation. Treatment plausibly impact the course of suicidal ideations or behavior, also both general psychosocial function and school dropout, and information on treatment measures would have strengthened this study.
Clinical implications
The results of this study bring an important message to clinical practice. Even though clinicians know about increasing symptoms of suicidal ideation and behavior during adolescence, the self-reported high rates of suicidal attempts in this patient group should be an extra reminder, also the high rates of school dropout, especially among girls. The burden of exposure to negative life events must also be acknowledged. Comprehensive assessment of mental health problems should of course include important risk factors, and asking adolescent patients about suicidal ideation and behavior, experiences of negative life events and school functioning seems to be important, especially for female psychiatric patients, in order to reveal any such risks and prevent further traumatic events.
Conclusion
In this clinical sample reassessed after 3 years, one out of four adolescent girls with a persisting psychiatric disorder had suicidal ideations, and one out of three had a previous history of suicidal behavior. Girls had lower psychosocial functioning and higher rates of school dropout and experiences of negative life events than boys. Negative life events, especially exposure to interpersonal violence, were associated with suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior or school dropout. The high frequency of suicidal symptoms, school dropout and experiences of negative life events, indicates a high burden of challenges in functioning. The results reinforce the need to include these symptoms and associated factors in an extensive follow-up of psychiatric disorders in this age group.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge research assistant Anne Regine Sveen for coordinating data collection (T2), and a special gratitude is extended to the adolescents participating in the Health Survey in Department of Children and Youth, Division of Mental Health Care, St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Written informed consent was obtained from adolescents and parents participating at T1 and T2, according to study procedures. Study approval was given by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics of Central Norway (REK Midt) (reference numbers CAP survey T1: 4.2008.1393, T2: 2011/1435/REK Midt, and present study using T1 and T2 data: 2017/589/REK Midt). The Norwegian Social Science Data Services, The Data Protection Official for Research, gave permission to compare the main reason for referral, age and sex between participants and non-participants at baseline (reference number CAP survey: 19976). The research followed the agreement of the ethical standards in the Declaration of Helsinki from 1964 and later amendments, and we confirm that all methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Wenn Demenzkranke aufgrund von Symptomen wie Agitation oder Aggressivität mit Antipsychotika behandelt werden, sind damit offenbar noch mehr Risiken verbunden als bislang angenommen.
Die Kombination aus Medikamenten und Psychotherapie gilt als effektivster Ansatz bei Depressionen. Das ist bei betagten Menschen nicht anders, trotz Besonderheiten.
Um Menschen nach der Flucht aus einem Krisengebiet bestmöglich medizinisch betreuen zu können, ist es gut zu wissen, welche Erkrankungen im jeweiligen Herkunftsland häufig sind. Dabei hilft eine Internetseite der CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
