The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12978-017-0299-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Antenatal care reduces maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity through the detection and treatment of some conditions, but its coverage is less than optimal within certain populations. Supply kits for maternal health were designed to overcome barriers present when providing care during pregnancy and childbirth particularly to women from underserved population.
We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review on the use of supply kits. This manuscript presents the findings from qualitative studies that reported barriers, facilitators, and user’s recommendation in the adoption and implementation of any type of kit designed to be used during pregnancy or childbirth.
This review included eight studies, and seven were implemented in developing countries. Most studies assessed the implementation of clean delivery kits to be used during labour and delivery, and contributed to gain insights into factors that may hinder or foster the use of kits.
Clean delivery kits were conceived to cope with barriers related mainly to access. The most important barrier identified were those related to the socio-cultural and the lack of knowledge dimension such as who held the decision-making authority in the household, as well as popular beliefs behind the idea that birth preparation could bring bad luck, may prevent clients from adhering to their use. In addition, financial constraints and limited understanding of the instructions of use were accessibility barriers found. On the other hand, once used, clean delivery kits for maternal health were accepted by women and health workers. Convenience, hygienic components, and avoidance of delays in receiving care were viewed as satisfactory features.
Supply kits are mostly affordable and easily deployable. Increasing awareness among the population about the offered kits and providing information on their benefits emerges as a critical step to foster use in settings where kits are available. Implementation of this strategy requires low complexity resources and could make the use of kits an accepted alternative to increase the use of evidence-based interventions and thus improve quality of care during pregnancy, childbirth and neonatal period mainly at the community level in low income countries and remote areas with low access.
Additional file 1: Annex I Search Strategy. (DOCX 15 kb)12978_2017_299_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Additional file 2: Annex II Components of the kits. (DOCX 18 kb)12978_2017_299_MOESM2_ESM.docx
Additional file 3: Annex III Quality assessment by individual study and summary of methodological quality assessment of risk of bias. (DOCX 94 kb)12978_2017_299_MOESM3_ESM.docx
Lincetto O, Mothebesoane-Anoh S, Gomez P, Munjanja S. Chpter 2 Antenatal Care. World Health Organization (WHO). http://www.who.int/pmnch/media/publications/aonsectionIII_2.pdf. Accessed Mar 2017.
WHO & UNICEF. Countdown to 2015: A Decade of Tracking Progress for Maternal, Newborn and Child Survival The 2015 Report; 2015. https://www.globalmnh2015.org/portfolio/countdown-to-2015-the-final-report/. Accessed Mar 2017.
Ashford L. Hidden suffering: disabilities from pregnancy and childbirth in less developed countries. MEASURE communication policy brief. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau; 2002.
UNICEF. State of the World’s Children 2009. New York: UNICEF; 2009. CrossRef
Aleman, Tomasso G, Cafferata ML, Colomar M, Betran AP. Effectiveness of the use of kits for maternal care during antenatal care and delivery: a systematic review. In press.
Ciapponi A, Glujovsky D, Bardach A, García Martí S, Comande D. EROS: a new software for early stage of systematic reviews. ISPOR 3rd Latin America Conference. Mexico City: Hilton Mexico City Reforma; 2011.
Steen M, Calvert J. Self-administered homeopathy part two: a follow-up study. Br J Midwifery. 2007;359–365:7.
Dietsch E, Mulimbalimba-Masururu L-. Learning Lessons from a traditional midwifery workforce in Western Kenya. Midwifery. 2011;27:324–30.
Winani S, Coffey P, Wood S, Mosha F, Chirwa T, Changalucha J, for Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH) 2005. Evaluation of a clean delivery kit intervention in preventing cord infection and puerperal sepsis in Mwanza, Tanzania. https://www.path.org/publications/files/TS-MCHN_delivery_kit_eval_tanzania.pdf (last Accessed July 29, 2016)
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH) 2002. Use of the clean home delivery kit in Nepal: a qualitative study. http://www.path.org/publications/detail.php?i=1206. Accessed 3 Mar 2017.
Nessa S, Arco ES, Kabir IA. Birth kits for safe motherhood in Bangladesh. World Health Forum. 1992:13:66–9. PubMed
Rifkin S, Pridmore P. Partners in planning. London: Macmillan; 2001.
Mungambe BH, Vidler M, Bique C, Sawchuck D, Firoz T, Tatenda Makanga P, Qureshi R, Macete E, Menéndez C, von Dadelszen P, Sevene E. Barriers and facilitators to health care seeking behaviours in pregnancy in rural communities of southern Mozambique. Reprod Health. 2016;13 Suppl 1:3.
Mason L, Dellicour S, Ter Kuile F, Ouma P, Phillips-Howard P, Were F, Laserson K, Desai M. Barriers and facilitators to antenatal and delivery care in western Kenya: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:26. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0453-z.
Sarfraz M, Tariq S, Hamid S, Iqbal N. Social and societal barrers in utilization of maternal health services in rural Punjab, Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2015;27(4):843–9. PubMed
- Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care during antenatal care and delivery: a mixed-methods systematic review, the qualitative approach.
Maria Luisa Cafferata
Ana Pilar Betran
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet
Mail Icon II