Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 11/2007

01.11.2007

Surgery for Rectal Cancer Performed at Teaching Hospitals Improves Survival and Preserves Continence

verfasst von: Juan C. Gutierrez, Noor Kassira, Rabih M. Salloum, Dido Franceschi, Leonidas G. Koniaris

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 11/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

We sought to compare the outcomes of teaching and community hospitals on long-term outcomes for patients with rectal cancer. All rectal adenocarcinomas treated in Florida from 1994 to 2000 were examined. Overall, 5,925 operative cases were identified. Teaching hospitals treated 12.5% of patients with a larger proportion of regionally advanced, metastatic disease, as well as high-grade tumors. Five- and 10-year overall survival rates at teaching hospitals were 64.8 and 53.9%, compared to 59.1 and 50.5% at community hospitals (P = 0.002). The greatest impact on survival was observed for the highest stage tumors: patients with metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma experienced 5- and 10-year survival rates of 30.5 and 26.6% at teaching hospitals compared to 19.6 and 17.4% at community hospitals (P = 0.009). Multimodality therapy was most frequently administered in teaching hospitals as was low anterior resection. On multivariate analysis, treatment at a teaching hospital was a significant independent predictor of improved survival (hazard ratio = 0.834, P = 0.005). Rectal cancer patients treated at teaching hospitals have significantly better survival than those treated at community-based hospitals. Patients with high-grade tumors or advanced disease should be provided the opportunity to be treated at a teaching hospital.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(1):43–66PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(1):43–66PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cameron JL. Current surgical therapy. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby, 2004. Cameron JL. Current surgical therapy. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby, 2004.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Bass EB, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ, Heitmiller RF, Choti MA, Burleyson GP, Hsieh G, Cameron JL. Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 1999;189(1):46–56.PubMedCrossRef Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Bass EB, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ, Heitmiller RF, Choti MA, Burleyson GP, Hsieh G, Cameron JL. Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 1999;189(1):46–56.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hannan EL, O’Donnell JF, Kilburn H, Jr., Bernard HR, Yazici A. Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals. JAMA 1989;262(4):503–510.PubMedCrossRef Hannan EL, O’Donnell JF, Kilburn H, Jr., Bernard HR, Yazici A. Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals. JAMA 1989;262(4):503–510.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hannan EL, Radzyner M, Rubin D, Dougherty J, Brennan MF. The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. Surgery 2002;131(1):6–15.PubMedCrossRef Hannan EL, Radzyner M, Rubin D, Dougherty J, Brennan MF. The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. Surgery 2002;131(1):6–15.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Harmon JW, Tang DG, Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Choti MA, Kaufman HS, Bender JS, Duncan MD, Magnuson TH, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL. Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann Surg 1999;230(3):404–11 (discussion 411–413).PubMedCrossRef Harmon JW, Tang DG, Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Choti MA, Kaufman HS, Bender JS, Duncan MD, Magnuson TH, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL. Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann Surg 1999;230(3):404–11 (discussion 411–413).PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Riley G, Lubitz J. Outcomes of surgery among the Medicare aged: surgical volume and mortality. Health Care Financ Rev 1985;7(1):37–47.PubMed Riley G, Lubitz J. Outcomes of surgery among the Medicare aged: surgical volume and mortality. Health Care Financ Rev 1985;7(1):37–47.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, Cohen AM, Warren JL, Begg CB. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA 2000;284(23):3028–3035.PubMedCrossRef Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, Cohen AM, Warren JL, Begg CB. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA 2000;284(23):3028–3035.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bunker JP, Luft HS, Enthoven A. Should surgery be regionalized? Surg Clin North Am 1982; 62(4):657–668.PubMed Bunker JP, Luft HS, Enthoven A. Should surgery be regionalized? Surg Clin North Am 1982; 62(4):657–668.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wibe A, Eriksen MT, Syse A, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Soreide O. Effect of hospital caseload on long-term outcome after standardization of rectal cancer surgery at a national level. Br J Surg 2005;92(2):217–224.PubMedCrossRef Wibe A, Eriksen MT, Syse A, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Soreide O. Effect of hospital caseload on long-term outcome after standardization of rectal cancer surgery at a national level. Br J Surg 2005;92(2):217–224.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Holm T, Johansson H, Cedermark B, Ekelund G, Rutqvist LE. Influence of hospital- and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Br J Surg 1997;84(5):657–663.PubMedCrossRef Holm T, Johansson H, Cedermark B, Ekelund G, Rutqvist LE. Influence of hospital- and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Br J Surg 1997;84(5):657–663.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Blomqvist P, Ekbom A, Nyren O, Krusemo UB, Bergstrom R, Adami HO. Survival after rectal cancer: differences between hospital catchment areas. A nationwide study in Sweden. Gut 1999;45(1):39–44.PubMedCrossRef Blomqvist P, Ekbom A, Nyren O, Krusemo UB, Bergstrom R, Adami HO. Survival after rectal cancer: differences between hospital catchment areas. A nationwide study in Sweden. Gut 1999;45(1):39–44.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Simons AJ, Ker R, Groshen S, Gee C, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Vukasin P, Ross RK, Beart RW, Jr. Variations in treatment of rectal cancer: the influence of hospital type and caseload. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40(6):641–646.PubMedCrossRef Simons AJ, Ker R, Groshen S, Gee C, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Vukasin P, Ross RK, Beart RW, Jr. Variations in treatment of rectal cancer: the influence of hospital type and caseload. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40(6):641–646.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schroen AT, Cress RD. Use of surgical procedures and adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer treatment: a population-based study. Ann Surg 2001; 234(5):641–651.PubMedCrossRef Schroen AT, Cress RD. Use of surgical procedures and adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer treatment: a population-based study. Ann Surg 2001; 234(5):641–651.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Local recurrence rate in a randomised multicentre trial of preoperative radiotherapy compared with operation alone in resectable rectal carcinoma. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. Eur J Surg 1996; 162(5):397–402. Local recurrence rate in a randomised multicentre trial of preoperative radiotherapy compared with operation alone in resectable rectal carcinoma. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. Eur J Surg 1996; 162(5):397–402.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cedermark B, Johansson H, Rutqvist LE, Wilking N. The Stockholm I trial of preoperative short term radiotherapy in operable rectal carcinoma. A prospective randomized trial. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Cancer 1995; 75(9):2269–2275.PubMedCrossRef Cedermark B, Johansson H, Rutqvist LE, Wilking N. The Stockholm I trial of preoperative short term radiotherapy in operable rectal carcinoma. A prospective randomized trial. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Cancer 1995; 75(9):2269–2275.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Diaz-Canton EA, Pazdur R. Adjuvant medical therapy for colorectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77(1):211–228.PubMedCrossRef Diaz-Canton EA, Pazdur R. Adjuvant medical therapy for colorectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77(1):211–228.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman JW, Myerson RJ. Adjuvant radiation therapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77(1):15–25.PubMedCrossRef Fleshman JW, Myerson RJ. Adjuvant radiation therapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77(1):15–25.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Krook JE, Moertel CG, Gunderson LL, Wieand HS, Collins RT, Beart RW, Kubista TP, Poon MA, Meyers WC, Mailliard JA, et al. Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991;324(11):709–715.PubMedCrossRef Krook JE, Moertel CG, Gunderson LL, Wieand HS, Collins RT, Beart RW, Kubista TP, Poon MA, Meyers WC, Mailliard JA, et al. Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991;324(11):709–715.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Christian CK, Gustafson ML, Betensky RA, Daley J, Zinner MJ. The volume-outcome relationship: don’t believe everything you see. World J Surg 2005;29(10):1241–1244.PubMedCrossRef Christian CK, Gustafson ML, Betensky RA, Daley J, Zinner MJ. The volume-outcome relationship: don’t believe everything you see. World J Surg 2005;29(10):1241–1244.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Surgery for Rectal Cancer Performed at Teaching Hospitals Improves Survival and Preserves Continence
verfasst von
Juan C. Gutierrez
Noor Kassira
Rabih M. Salloum
Dido Franceschi
Leonidas G. Koniaris
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 11/2007
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0308-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2007

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 11/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.