Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2016

22.02.2016

Surgical margin-negative endoscopic mucosal resection with simple three-clipping technique: a randomized prospective study (with video)

verfasst von: Hirohito Mori, Hideki Kobara, Noriko Nishiyama, Shintaro Fujihara, Nobuya Kobayashi, Maki Ayaki, Tsutomu Masaki

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Although endoscopic mucosal resection is an established colorectal polyp treatment, local recurrence occurs in 13 % of cases due to inadequate snaring. We evaluated whether pre-clipping to the muscularis propria resulted in resected specimens with negative surgical margins without thermal denaturation.

Methods

Of 245 polyps from 114 patients with colorectal polyps under 20 mm, we included 188 polyps from 81 patients. We randomly allocated polyps to the conventional injection group (CG) (97 polyps) or the pre-clipping injection group (PG) (91 polyps). The PG received three-point pre-clipping to ensure ample gripping to the muscle layer on the oral and both sides of the tumor with 4 mL local injection. Endoscopic ultrasonography was performed to measure the resulting bulge. Outcomes included the number of instances of thermal denaturation of the horizontal/vertical margin (HMX/VMX) or positive horizontal/vertical margins (HM+/VM+), the shortest distance from tumor margins to resected edges, and the maximum bulge distances from tumor surface to the muscularis propria.

Results

The numbers of HMX and HM+ in the CG and PG were 27 and 6, and 9 and 2 (P = 0.001), and VMX and VM+ were 8 and 5, and 0 and 0 (P = 0.057). The shortest distance from tumor margin to resected edge [median (range), mm] in polyps in the CG and PG was 0.6 (0–2.7) and 4.7 (2.1–8.9) (P = 0.018). The maximum bulge distances were 4.6 (3.0–8.0) and 11.0 (6.8–17.0) (P = 0.005).

Conclusions

Pre-clipping enabled surgical margin-negative resection without thermal denaturation.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, Hisabe T, Yao T, Watanabe M, Yoshida M, Kudo SE, Tsuruta O, Sugihara K, Watanabe T, Saitoh Y, Igarashi M, Toyonaga T, Ajioka Y, Ichinose M, Matsui T, Sugita A, Sugano K, Fujimoto K, Tajiri H (2015) (JGES Guideline) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines. Dig Endosc 27:417–434CrossRefPubMed Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, Hisabe T, Yao T, Watanabe M, Yoshida M, Kudo SE, Tsuruta O, Sugihara K, Watanabe T, Saitoh Y, Igarashi M, Toyonaga T, Ajioka Y, Ichinose M, Matsui T, Sugita A, Sugano K, Fujimoto K, Tajiri H (2015) (JGES Guideline) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines. Dig Endosc 27:417–434CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Carvalho R, Areia M, Brito D, Saraiva S, Alves S, Cadime AT (2013) Endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps: prospective evaluation of recurrence and complications. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 76:225–230PubMed Carvalho R, Areia M, Brito D, Saraiva S, Alves S, Cadime AT (2013) Endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps: prospective evaluation of recurrence and complications. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 76:225–230PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Saito Y, Sakamoto T, Nakajima T, Matsuda T (2014) Colorectal ESD: current indications and latest technical advances. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 24:245–255CrossRefPubMed Saito Y, Sakamoto T, Nakajima T, Matsuda T (2014) Colorectal ESD: current indications and latest technical advances. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 24:245–255CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Saito Y, Fujii T, Kondo H, Mukai H, Yokota T, Kozu T, Saito D (2001) Endoscopic treatment for laterally spreading tumors in the colon. Endoscopy 33:682–686CrossRefPubMed Saito Y, Fujii T, Kondo H, Mukai H, Yokota T, Kozu T, Saito D (2001) Endoscopic treatment for laterally spreading tumors in the colon. Endoscopy 33:682–686CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Messmann H (2014) Endoscopic resection: when is EMR/ESD sufficient? Recent Results Cancer Res 203:25–30CrossRefPubMed Messmann H (2014) Endoscopic resection: when is EMR/ESD sufficient? Recent Results Cancer Res 203:25–30CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, Zhang XH, Ge J, Yang CM, Liu JY, Zhao SL (2014) Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 20:8282–8287CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang J, Zhang XH, Ge J, Yang CM, Liu JY, Zhao SL (2014) Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 20:8282–8287CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka S, Toyonaga T, Morita Y, Hoshi N, Ishida T, Ohara Y, Yoshizaki T, Kawara F, Azuma T (2015) Feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal tumors. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:223–228CrossRefPubMed Tanaka S, Toyonaga T, Morita Y, Hoshi N, Ishida T, Ohara Y, Yoshizaki T, Kawara F, Azuma T (2015) Feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal tumors. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:223–228CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhatt A, Abe S, Kumaravel A, Vargo J, Saito Y (2015) Indications and techniques for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Am J Gastroenterol 110:784–791CrossRefPubMed Bhatt A, Abe S, Kumaravel A, Vargo J, Saito Y (2015) Indications and techniques for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Am J Gastroenterol 110:784–791CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mizushima T, Kato M, Iwanaga I, Sato F, Kubo K, Ehira N, Uebayashi M, Ono S, Nakagawa M, Mabe K, Shimizu Y, Sakamoto N (2015) Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors. Surg Endosc 29:133–139CrossRefPubMed Mizushima T, Kato M, Iwanaga I, Sato F, Kubo K, Ehira N, Uebayashi M, Ono S, Nakagawa M, Mabe K, Shimizu Y, Sakamoto N (2015) Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors. Surg Endosc 29:133–139CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, Panish JF, Stewart ET, Waye JD (2012) Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 366:687–696CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, Panish JF, Stewart ET, Waye JD (2012) Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 366:687–696CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Repici A, Hassan C, Vitetta E, Ferrara E, Manes G, Gullotti G, Princiotta A, Dulbecco P, Gaffuri N, Bettoni E, Pagano N, Rando G, Strangio G, Carlino A, Romeo F, de Paula Pessoa Ferreira D, Zullo A, Ridola L, Malesci A (2012) Safety of cold polypectomy for <10 mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 44:27–31CrossRefPubMed Repici A, Hassan C, Vitetta E, Ferrara E, Manes G, Gullotti G, Princiotta A, Dulbecco P, Gaffuri N, Bettoni E, Pagano N, Rando G, Strangio G, Carlino A, Romeo F, de Paula Pessoa Ferreira D, Zullo A, Ridola L, Malesci A (2012) Safety of cold polypectomy for <10 mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 44:27–31CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamiński MF, Hassan C, Bisschops R, Pohl J, Pellisé M, Dekker E, Ignjatovic-Wilson A, Hoffman A, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Heresbach D, Dumonceau JM, East JE (2014) Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 46:435–449CrossRefPubMed Kamiński MF, Hassan C, Bisschops R, Pohl J, Pellisé M, Dekker E, Ignjatovic-Wilson A, Hoffman A, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Heresbach D, Dumonceau JM, East JE (2014) Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 46:435–449CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jang HW, Park SJ, Cheon JH, Kim TI, Kim WH, Hong SP (2014) Does magnifying narrow-band imaging or magnifying chromoendoscopy help experienced endoscopists assess invasion depth of large sessile and flat polyps? Dig Dis Sci 59:1520–1528CrossRefPubMed Jang HW, Park SJ, Cheon JH, Kim TI, Kim WH, Hong SP (2014) Does magnifying narrow-band imaging or magnifying chromoendoscopy help experienced endoscopists assess invasion depth of large sessile and flat polyps? Dig Dis Sci 59:1520–1528CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wanders LK, East JE, Uitentuis SE, Leeflang MM, Dekker E (2013) Diagnostic performance of narrowed spectrum endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging, and confocal laser endomicroscopy for optical diagnosis of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 14:1337–1347CrossRefPubMed Wanders LK, East JE, Uitentuis SE, Leeflang MM, Dekker E (2013) Diagnostic performance of narrowed spectrum endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging, and confocal laser endomicroscopy for optical diagnosis of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 14:1337–1347CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee KH, Lee JS, Nam JH, Choi C, Lee MC, Park CS, Juhng SW, Lee JH (2011) Promoter methylation status of hMLH1, hMSH2, and MGMT genes in colorectal cancer associated with adenoma–carcinoma sequence. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:1017–1026CrossRefPubMed Lee KH, Lee JS, Nam JH, Choi C, Lee MC, Park CS, Juhng SW, Lee JH (2011) Promoter methylation status of hMLH1, hMSH2, and MGMT genes in colorectal cancer associated with adenoma–carcinoma sequence. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:1017–1026CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka S, Terasaki M, Hayashi N, Oka S, Chayama K (2013) Warning for unprincipled colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: accurate diagnosis and reasonable treatment strategy. Dig Endosc 25:107–116CrossRefPubMed Tanaka S, Terasaki M, Hayashi N, Oka S, Chayama K (2013) Warning for unprincipled colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: accurate diagnosis and reasonable treatment strategy. Dig Endosc 25:107–116CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujiya M, Tanaka K, Dokoshi T, Tominaga M, Ueno N, Inaba Y, Ito T, Moriichi K, Kohgo Y (2015) Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 81:583–595CrossRefPubMed Fujiya M, Tanaka K, Dokoshi T, Tominaga M, Ueno N, Inaba Y, Ito T, Moriichi K, Kohgo Y (2015) Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 81:583–595CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujita M, Tsuruta O, Ikeda H, Toyonaga A, Tanikawa K (1997) Local recurrence of colorectal tumors after endoscopic mucosal resection. Int J Oncol 11:533–538PubMed Fujita M, Tsuruta O, Ikeda H, Toyonaga A, Tanikawa K (1997) Local recurrence of colorectal tumors after endoscopic mucosal resection. Int J Oncol 11:533–538PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ortiz AM, Bhargavi P, Zuckerman MJ, Othman MO (2014) Endoscopic mucosal resection recurrence rate for colorectal lesions. South Med J 107:615–621CrossRefPubMed Ortiz AM, Bhargavi P, Zuckerman MJ, Othman MO (2014) Endoscopic mucosal resection recurrence rate for colorectal lesions. South Med J 107:615–621CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Surgical margin-negative endoscopic mucosal resection with simple three-clipping technique: a randomized prospective study (with video)
verfasst von
Hirohito Mori
Hideki Kobara
Noriko Nishiyama
Shintaro Fujihara
Nobuya Kobayashi
Maki Ayaki
Tsutomu Masaki
Publikationsdatum
22.02.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4816-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.