Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 1/2012

01.02.2012 | Professional Issues

Talking about Disability in Prenatal Genetic Counseling: A Report of Two Interactive Workshops

verfasst von: Jan Hodgson, Jon Weil

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Women are commonly offered testing in pregnancy to determine the health of their baby. An important component of informed decision-making about prenatal testing is provision of relevant, accurate, meaningful information concerning the conditions that are being tested for—many of which, such as Down syndrome, are associated with a varying degree of physical and intellectual disability. A range of health professionals, including genetic counselors, may provide information and support throughout the testing process, but available data suggest that discussion of disability is frequently absent or limited. To investigate genetic counselors’ perceptions of this situation and identify potential barriers to discussion we facilitated interactive workshops at the 2007 National Society of Genetic Counselors Annual Education Conference (NSGC) and the 2008 European Meeting on Psychosocial Aspects of Genetics (EMPAG). Working groups identified relevant psychosocial issues and impediments to discussion (NSGC) or used a two-part scenario to promote discussion (EMPAG) and reported findings in notes and a closing plenary discussion. Inductive content analysis revealed that participants considered informed decision making to be a major reason for presenting information about disabilities in prenatal genetic counseling and endorsed the value of including information about daily life with Down syndrome and other disabilities. However, they identified three broad types of impediments to such discussion: counseling issues concerning the most appropriate manner to discuss disability under the complex circumstances of prenatal genetic counseling, less than optimal training and experience in addressing these issues, and perceived limitations in the participants’ knowledge and understanding of life with disability. Our analysis of the responses from the workshop participants and additional thoughts on these issues have led us to develop recommendations for further research, training and clinical practice.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Asch, A. (1998). Distracted by disability. The “difference” of disability in the medical setting. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 7(1), 77–87.PubMedCrossRef Asch, A. (1998). Distracted by disability. The “difference” of disability in the medical setting. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 7(1), 77–87.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Asch, A. (1999). Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: A challenge to practice and policy. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1649–1657.PubMedCrossRef Asch, A. (1999). Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: A challenge to practice and policy. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1649–1657.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Biesecker, B., & Hamby, L. (2000). What difference the disability community arguments should make for the delivery of prenatal genetic information. In E. Parens & A. Asch (Eds.), Prenatal testing and disability rights (pp. 340–357). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. Biesecker, B., & Hamby, L. (2000). What difference the disability community arguments should make for the delivery of prenatal genetic information. In E. Parens & A. Asch (Eds.), Prenatal testing and disability rights (pp. 340–357). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Brasington, C. K. (2007). What I wish I knew then. Reflections from personal experience in counseling about Down syndrome. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 731–734.PubMedCrossRef Brasington, C. K. (2007). What I wish I knew then. Reflections from personal experience in counseling about Down syndrome. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 731–734.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bryant, L., Murray, J., Green, J. M., Hewison, J., Sehmi, I., & Ellis, A. (2001). Descriptive information about Down syndrome: A content analysis of serum screening leaflets. Prenatal Diagnosis, 21, 1057–1063.PubMedCrossRef Bryant, L., Murray, J., Green, J. M., Hewison, J., Sehmi, I., & Ellis, A. (2001). Descriptive information about Down syndrome: A content analysis of serum screening leaflets. Prenatal Diagnosis, 21, 1057–1063.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Burke, B. M., & Kolker, A. (1994). Variation in content in prenatal genetic counseling interviews. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 3, 23–38.CrossRef Burke, B. M., & Kolker, A. (1994). Variation in content in prenatal genetic counseling interviews. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 3, 23–38.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll, J. C., Brown, J. B., Reid, A. J., & Pugh, P. (2000). Women’s experience of maternal serum screening. Canadian Family Physician, 46, 614–620.PubMed Carroll, J. C., Brown, J. B., Reid, A. J., & Pugh, P. (2000). Women’s experience of maternal serum screening. Canadian Family Physician, 46, 614–620.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.PubMedCrossRef Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Farrelly, E., Cho, M. K., Erby, L., Roter, D., Stenzel, A., & Ormond, K. E. (2010). Genetic counselors and prenatal testing: Where is the discussion of disability? Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19, 671. Farrelly, E., Cho, M. K., Erby, L., Roter, D., Stenzel, A., & Ormond, K. E. (2010). Genetic counselors and prenatal testing: Where is the discussion of disability? Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19, 671.
Zurück zum Zitat Garel, M., Gosme-Seguret, S., Kaminski, M., & Cuttini, M. (2002). Ethical decision-making in prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: A qualitative survey among physicians and midwives. Prenatal Diagnosis, 22(9), 811–817.PubMedCrossRef Garel, M., Gosme-Seguret, S., Kaminski, M., & Cuttini, M. (2002). Ethical decision-making in prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: A qualitative survey among physicians and midwives. Prenatal Diagnosis, 22(9), 811–817.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goldworth, A. (1999). Informed consent in the genetic age. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 8, 393–400.PubMedCrossRef Goldworth, A. (1999). Informed consent in the genetic age. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 8, 393–400.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hodgson, J. (2006) Testing times, challenging choices. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Hodgson, J. (2006) Testing times, challenging choices. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodgson, J., & Spriggs, M. (2005). A practical account of autonomy: Why genetic counseling is especially well suited to the facilitation of informed autonomous decision making. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 89–97.PubMedCrossRef Hodgson, J., & Spriggs, M. (2005). A practical account of autonomy: Why genetic counseling is especially well suited to the facilitation of informed autonomous decision making. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 89–97.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hodgson, J., Hughes, E., & Lambert, C. (2005). “SLANG”–Sensitive Language and the New Genetics–an exploratory study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 415–421. Hodgson, J., Hughes, E., & Lambert, C. (2005). “SLANG”–Sensitive Language and the New Genetics–an exploratory study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 415–421.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodgson, J., Gillam, L., Sahhar, M., & Metcalfe, S. (2010). “Testing times, challenging choices”: An Australian study of prenatal genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19, 22–37.PubMedCrossRef Hodgson, J., Gillam, L., Sahhar, M., & Metcalfe, S. (2010). “Testing times, challenging choices”: An Australian study of prenatal genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19, 22–37.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan, D. (1993). Prenatal screening and its impact on persons with disabilities. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 36, 605–612.PubMedCrossRef Kaplan, D. (1993). Prenatal screening and its impact on persons with disabilities. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 36, 605–612.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Madeo, A. C., Biesecker, B. B., Brasington, C., Erby, L. H., & Peters, K. F. (2011). The relationship between the genetic counseling profession and the disability community: A commentary. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 155, 1777–1785.CrossRef Madeo, A. C., Biesecker, B. B., Brasington, C., Erby, L. H., & Peters, K. F. (2011). The relationship between the genetic counseling profession and the disability community: A commentary. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 155, 1777–1785.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marteau, T. M., Slack, J., Kidd, J., & Shaw, R. W. (1992). Presenting a routine screening test in antenatal care: Practice observed. Public Health, 106(2), 131–141.PubMedCrossRef Marteau, T. M., Slack, J., Kidd, J., & Shaw, R. W. (1992). Presenting a routine screening test in antenatal care: Practice observed. Public Health, 106(2), 131–141.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matloff, E. T. (1994). Practice variability in prenatal genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 3, 215–232.CrossRef Matloff, E. T. (1994). Practice variability in prenatal genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 3, 215–232.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Connor, A., & O’Brien-Pallas, L. (1989). Decisional conflict. In G. McFarland & E. McFarlane (Eds.), Nursing diagnosis and intervention: Planning for patient care (pp. 486–496). St Louis: Mosby. O’Connor, A., & O’Brien-Pallas, L. (1989). Decisional conflict. In G. McFarland & E. McFarlane (Eds.), Nursing diagnosis and intervention: Planning for patient care (pp. 486–496). St Louis: Mosby.
Zurück zum Zitat Parens, E., & Asch, A. (2000). Prenatal testing and disability rights. Washington: Georgetown University Press. Parens, E., & Asch, A. (2000). Prenatal testing and disability rights. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Petersen, A. (2006). The best experts: The narratives of those who have a genetic condition. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 32–34.PubMedCrossRef Petersen, A. (2006). The best experts: The narratives of those who have a genetic condition. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 32–34.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Prince, M. J. (2010). What about a disability rights act for Canada? Practices and lessons from America, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Canadian Public Policy, 36, 199–214.PubMedCrossRef Prince, M. J. (2010). What about a disability rights act for Canada? Practices and lessons from America, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Canadian Public Policy, 36, 199–214.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts, C., Stough, L., & Parrish, L. (2002). The role of genetic counseling in the elective termination of pregnancies involving fetuses with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 36(1), 48–55.PubMedCrossRef Roberts, C., Stough, L., & Parrish, L. (2002). The role of genetic counseling in the elective termination of pregnancies involving fetuses with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 36(1), 48–55.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Santalahti, P., Hemminki, E., Latikka, A.-M., & Ryynanen, M. (1998). Women’s decision-making in prenatal screening. Social Science & Medicine, 46(8), 1067–1076.CrossRef Santalahti, P., Hemminki, E., Latikka, A.-M., & Ryynanen, M. (1998). Women’s decision-making in prenatal screening. Social Science & Medicine, 46(8), 1067–1076.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saxton, M. (1984). Born and unborn: The implications of reproductive technologies for people with disabilities. In R. Arditti, R. D. Klein, & S. Minden (Eds.), Test-tube women: What future for motherhood? (pp. 298–312). Boston: Pandora. Saxton, M. (1984). Born and unborn: The implications of reproductive technologies for people with disabilities. In R. Arditti, R. D. Klein, & S. Minden (Eds.), Test-tube women: What future for motherhood? (pp. 298–312). Boston: Pandora.
Zurück zum Zitat Shakespeare, T. (2003). Disability, human rights and contemporary genetics. In D. N. Cooper (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of the human genome (pp. 1–3). Chichester: Wiley. Shakespeare, T. (2003). Disability, human rights and contemporary genetics. In D. N. Cooper (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of the human genome (pp. 1–3). Chichester: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, D. K., Slack, J., Shaw, R. W., & Marteau, T. M. (1994). Lack of knowledge in health professionals: A barrier to providing information to patients? Quality in Health Care, 3(2), 75–78.PubMedCrossRef Smith, D. K., Slack, J., Shaw, R. W., & Marteau, T. M. (1994). Lack of knowledge in health professionals: A barrier to providing information to patients? Quality in Health Care, 3(2), 75–78.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Statham, H., & Green, J. (1993). Serum screening for Down’s syndrome: Some women’s experiences. British Medical Journal, 307, 174–176.PubMedCrossRef Statham, H., & Green, J. (1993). Serum screening for Down’s syndrome: Some women’s experiences. British Medical Journal, 307, 174–176.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weil, J. (2000). Psychosocial genetic counseling. New York: Oxford University Press. Weil, J. (2000). Psychosocial genetic counseling. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Weil, J. (2010). Countertransference: Making the unconscious conscious. In B. S. LeRoy, P. McCarthy Veach, & D. Bartels (Eds.), Genetic counseling practice: Advanced concepts and skills (pp. 175–197). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. Weil, J. (2010). Countertransference: Making the unconscious conscious. In B. S. LeRoy, P. McCarthy Veach, & D. Bartels (Eds.), Genetic counseling practice: Advanced concepts and skills (pp. 175–197). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Weil, J., Ormond, K., Peters, J., Peters, K., Biesecker, B. B., & LeRoy, B. (2006). The relationship of nondirectiveness to genetic counseling: Report of a workshop at the 2003 NSGC Annual Education Conference. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 85–93.PubMedCrossRef Weil, J., Ormond, K., Peters, J., Peters, K., Biesecker, B. B., & LeRoy, B. (2006). The relationship of nondirectiveness to genetic counseling: Report of a workshop at the 2003 NSGC Annual Education Conference. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 85–93.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, C., Alderson, P., & Farsides, B. (2002). What constitutes ‘balanced’ information in the practitioners’ portrayals of Down’s syndrome? Midwifery, 18(3), 230–237.PubMedCrossRef Williams, C., Alderson, P., & Farsides, B. (2002). What constitutes ‘balanced’ information in the practitioners’ portrayals of Down’s syndrome? Midwifery, 18(3), 230–237.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Talking about Disability in Prenatal Genetic Counseling: A Report of Two Interactive Workshops
verfasst von
Jan Hodgson
Jon Weil
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2012
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-011-9410-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Journal of Genetic Counseling 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Antikörper-Wirkstoff-Konjugat hält solide Tumoren in Schach

16.05.2024 Zielgerichtete Therapie Nachrichten

Trastuzumab deruxtecan scheint auch jenseits von Lungenkrebs gut gegen solide Tumoren mit HER2-Mutationen zu wirken. Dafür sprechen die Daten einer offenen Pan-Tumor-Studie.

Mammakarzinom: Senken Statine das krebsbedingte Sterberisiko?

15.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen mit lokalem oder metastasiertem Brustkrebs, die Statine einnehmen, haben eine niedrigere krebsspezifische Mortalität als Patientinnen, die dies nicht tun, legen neue Daten aus den USA nahe.

S3-Leitlinie zur unkomplizierten Zystitis: Auf Antibiotika verzichten?

15.05.2024 Harnwegsinfektionen Nachrichten

Welche Antibiotika darf man bei unkomplizierter Zystitis verwenden und wovon sollte man die Finger lassen? Welche pflanzlichen Präparate können helfen? Was taugt der zugelassene Impfstoff? Antworten vom Koordinator der frisch überarbeiteten S3-Leitlinie, Prof. Florian Wagenlehner.

Gestationsdiabetes: In der zweiten Schwangerschaft folgenreicher als in der ersten

13.05.2024 Gestationsdiabetes Nachrichten

Das Risiko, nach einem Gestationsdiabetes einen Typ-2-Diabetes zu entwickeln, hängt nicht nur von der Zahl, sondern auch von der Reihenfolge der betroffenen Schwangerschaften ab.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.