Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 3/2005

01.09.2005 | Current Opinion

The Chinese pharmaceutical market at the crossroads

Pro-competition solutions to improve access, quality and affordability

verfasst von: Dr Y. Richard Wang

Erschienen in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | Ausgabe 3/2005

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The Chinese pharmaceutical market is large in absolute size (the second largest in Asia), but it faces similar problems to those that plague other developing countries, such as a lack of adequate patent protection, low pharmaceutical spending per capita, but high pharmaceutical expenditure as a proportion of total medical spending, and a lack of health insurance coverage. In this article, the pros and cons of two pro-competition policy proposals for China are explored. The first proposal is to follow the E5 guideline of the International Conference on Harmonisation and waive unnecessary local clinical trials for global new drugs that have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency (except for drugs for which there is a real possibility of there being ethnic differences in patient responses). The second proposal is to tighten the standards for generic drugs and approve only bioequivalent ones. While the first proposal encourages price competition between similar compounds in the same therapeutic class, the second proposal enhances generic competition for off-patent drugs. Working together, these two proposals would improve access to and the quality and affordability of pharmaceuticals in China.
Fußnoten
1
1The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat IMS Health. IMS market prognosis, Asia 2004–2008. London: IMS Health, 2004 May IMS Health. IMS market prognosis, Asia 2004–2008. London: IMS Health, 2004 May
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kremer M. Pharmaceuticals and the developing world. J Econ Perspect 2002 Fall; 16(4): 67–90PubMedCrossRef Kremer M. Pharmaceuticals and the developing world. J Econ Perspect 2002 Fall; 16(4): 67–90PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang YR, Ji L, Lin YA. Intellectual property right protection for pharmaceuticals in developing countries: a case study of administrative protection in China. Pharm Dev Regul 2003; 1(4): 277–82 Wang YR, Ji L, Lin YA. Intellectual property right protection for pharmaceuticals in developing countries: a case study of administrative protection in China. Pharm Dev Regul 2003; 1(4): 277–82
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Danzon PM, Wang YR, Wang L. The impact of price regulation on the launch delay of new drugs: evidence from twenty-five major markets in the 1990s. Health Econ 2005 Mar; 14(3): 269–92PubMedCrossRef Danzon PM, Wang YR, Wang L. The impact of price regulation on the launch delay of new drugs: evidence from twenty-five major markets in the 1990s. Health Econ 2005 Mar; 14(3): 269–92PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. E5: Ethnic factors in the acceptability of foreign clinical data. Feb 1998. Geneva: ICH [online]. Available at URL: http://www.ich.org [Accessed 2005 Sep 2005] International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. E5: Ethnic factors in the acceptability of foreign clinical data. Feb 1998. Geneva: ICH [online]. Available at URL: http://​www.​ich.​org [Accessed 2005 Sep 2005]
6.
Zurück zum Zitat IMS Health. MIDAS database 1998–2003. Fairfield (CT): IMS Health, 2003. (Data on file) IMS Health. MIDAS database 1998–2003. Fairfield (CT): IMS Health, 2003. (Data on file)
Metadaten
Titel
The Chinese pharmaceutical market at the crossroads
Pro-competition solutions to improve access, quality and affordability
verfasst von
Dr Y. Richard Wang
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2005
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy / Ausgabe 3/2005
Print ISSN: 1175-5652
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1896
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00148365-200504030-00002

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2005

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 3/2005 Zur Ausgabe