Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

27.01.2022 | Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

The effect of intraoperative wound protector use on the risk of surgical site infections in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Karim Hassan, Sumera Baloch, Elsie Jia Zhi Tan, James Chamberlain, Ahsan Ashfaq, Jigar Shah, Shahin Hajibandeh, Shahab Hajibandeh

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aims

To evaluate the effect of intraoperative wound protectors on the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.

Methods

In compliance with PRISMA statement standards, electronic databases were searched to identify all studies comparing wound protector use with no wound protector use in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. SSI (superficial or deep) was considered primary outcome measure. The secondary outcome measures included superficial SSI, deep SSI, and organ-space SSI. Random effects modelling was applied to calculate pooled outcome data. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE system.

Results

A total of 12159 patients from four studies were included. The included populations in both groups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics. The use of wound protector was associated with lower risk of superficial or deep SSI (OR: 0.55, 95% CI 0.43–0.70, P<0.00001), superficial SSI (OR: 0.59, 95% CI 0.46–0.76, P<0.0001), and organ-space SSI (OR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.72–0.90, P=0.0002). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of the risk of deep SSI (OR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.43–1.06, P=0.09) although this may be subject to type 2 error.

Conclusions

The results of current study suggests that the use of intraoperative wound protector during pancreatoduodenectomy may reduce the risk of postoperative SSI. The quality of the available evidence is moderate with high certainty. While evidence from future randomised controlled trials could increase the robustness of our conclusions, we do not hesitate to recommend the use of wound protectors during pancreatoduodenectomy based on the current evidence.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilgiç Ç, Keske Ş, Sobutay E, Can U, Zenger S, Gürbüz B, Ergönül Ö, Bilge O (2020) Surgical site infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy: preoperative biliary system interventions and antimicrobial prophylaxis. Int J Infect Dis. 95:148–152 (Jun)CrossRef Bilgiç Ç, Keske Ş, Sobutay E, Can U, Zenger S, Gürbüz B, Ergönül Ö, Bilge O (2020) Surgical site infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy: preoperative biliary system interventions and antimicrobial prophylaxis. Int J Infect Dis. 95:148–152 (Jun)CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL,WilkinsonWE, Sexton DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20: 725–730. Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL,WilkinsonWE, Sexton DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20: 725–730.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fadayomi AB, Kasumova GG, Tabatabaie O, de Geus SWL, Kent TS, Ng SC et al (2018 Jul) Unique predictors and economic burden of superficial and deep/organ space surgical site infections following pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford). 20(7):658–668CrossRef Fadayomi AB, Kasumova GG, Tabatabaie O, de Geus SWL, Kent TS, Ng SC et al (2018 Jul) Unique predictors and economic burden of superficial and deep/organ space surgical site infections following pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford). 20(7):658–668CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ceppa EP, Pitt HA, House MG, Kilbane EM, Nakeeb A, Schmidt CM et al (2013 May) Reducing surgical site infections in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. HPB (Oxford). 15(5):384–391CrossRef Ceppa EP, Pitt HA, House MG, Kilbane EM, Nakeeb A, Schmidt CM et al (2013 May) Reducing surgical site infections in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. HPB (Oxford). 15(5):384–391CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Zimlichman E, Henderson D, Tamir O et al (2013) Health careassociated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med 173:2039e2046CrossRef Zimlichman E, Henderson D, Tamir O et al (2013) Health careassociated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med 173:2039e2046CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards JP, Ho AL, Tee MC, Dixon E, Ball CG (2012 Jul) Wound protectors reduce surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 256(1):53–59CrossRef Edwards JP, Ho AL, Tee MC, Dixon E, Ball CG (2012 Jul) Wound protectors reduce surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 256(1):53–59CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mihaljevic AL, Müller TC, Kehl V, Friess H, Kleeff J (2015) Wound edge protectors in open abdominal surgery to reduce surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 10(3):e0121187CrossRef Mihaljevic AL, Müller TC, Kehl V, Friess H, Kleeff J (2015) Wound edge protectors in open abdominal surgery to reduce surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 10(3):e0121187CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang L, Elsolh B, Patel SV (2018 Mar) Wound protectors in reducing surgical site infections in lower gastrointestinal surgery: an updated meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 32(3):1111–1122CrossRef Zhang L, Elsolh B, Patel SV (2018 Mar) Wound protectors in reducing surgical site infections in lower gastrointestinal surgery: an updated meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 32(3):1111–1122CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al (2009 Jul) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 21(339):b2700CrossRef Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al (2009 Jul) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 21(339):b2700CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (eds) (2019) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (UK) Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (eds) (2019) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (UK)
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editors. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Updated October 2013. The GRADE Working Group, 2013. Available at GRADE handbook (gradepro.org) (last accessed 28 November 2020). Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editors. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Updated October 2013. The GRADE Working Group, 2013. Available at GRADE handbook (gradepro.​org) (last accessed 28 November 2020).
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JPT, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Sterne JAC. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020). Cochrane, 2020. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. (last accessed 28 November 2020). Higgins JPT, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Sterne JAC. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020). Cochrane, 2020. Available from www.​training.​cochrane.​org/​handbook. (last accessed 28 November 2020).
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M et al (2016 Oct) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 12(355):i4919CrossRef Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M et al (2016 Oct) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 12(355):i4919CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tee MC, Chen L, Franko J, Edwards JP, Raman S, Ball CG. Effect of wound protectors on surgical site infection in patients undergoing whipple procedure. HPB (Oxford). 2020 Dec 15:S1365-182X(20)32391-1. Tee MC, Chen L, Franko J, Edwards JP, Raman S, Ball CG. Effect of wound protectors on surgical site infection in patients undergoing whipple procedure. HPB (Oxford). 2020 Dec 15:S1365-182X(20)32391-1.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat De Pastena M, Marchegiani G, Paiella S, Fontana M, Esposito A, Casetti L et al (2020) Use of an intraoperative wound protector to prevent surgical-site infection after pancreatoduodenectomy: randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 107(9):1107–1113CrossRef De Pastena M, Marchegiani G, Paiella S, Fontana M, Esposito A, Casetti L et al (2020) Use of an intraoperative wound protector to prevent surgical-site infection after pancreatoduodenectomy: randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 107(9):1107–1113CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawrence SA, McIntyre CA, Pulvirenti A, Seier K, Chou Y, Gonen M et al (2019) Perioperative bundle to reduce surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective cohort study. J Am Coll Surg. 228(4):595–601CrossRef Lawrence SA, McIntyre CA, Pulvirenti A, Seier K, Chou Y, Gonen M et al (2019) Perioperative bundle to reduce surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective cohort study. J Am Coll Surg. 228(4):595–601CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bressan AK, Aubin JM, Martel G, Dixon E, Bathe OF, Sutherland FR et al (2018) Efficacy of a dual-ring wound protector for prevention of surgical site infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with intrabiliary stents: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 268(1):35–40 (Jul)CrossRef Bressan AK, Aubin JM, Martel G, Dixon E, Bathe OF, Sutherland FR et al (2018) Efficacy of a dual-ring wound protector for prevention of surgical site infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with intrabiliary stents: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 268(1):35–40 (Jul)CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed K, Connelly TM, Bashar K, Walsh SR (2016 Feb) Are wound ring protectors effective in reducing surgical site infection post appendectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ir J Med Sci. 185(1):35–42CrossRef Ahmed K, Connelly TM, Bashar K, Walsh SR (2016 Feb) Are wound ring protectors effective in reducing surgical site infection post appendectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ir J Med Sci. 185(1):35–42CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu JB, Baker MS, Thompson VM, Kilbane EM, Pitt HA (2019) Wound protectors mitigate superficial surgical site infections after pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 21(1):121–131CrossRef Liu JB, Baker MS, Thompson VM, Kilbane EM, Pitt HA (2019) Wound protectors mitigate superficial surgical site infections after pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 21(1):121–131CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The effect of intraoperative wound protector use on the risk of surgical site infections in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Karim Hassan
Sumera Baloch
Elsie Jia Zhi Tan
James Chamberlain
Ahsan Ashfaq
Jigar Shah
Shahin Hajibandeh
Shahab Hajibandeh
Publikationsdatum
27.01.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02420-5

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Verbände und Cremes gegen Dekubitus: „Wir wissen nicht, was sie bringen!“

Die Datenlage zur Wirksamkeit von Verbänden oder topischen Mitteln zur Prävention von Druckgeschwüren sei schlecht, so die Verfasser einer aktuellen Cochrane-Studie. Letztlich bleibe es unsicher, ob solche Maßnahmen den Betroffenen nutzen oder schaden.

Nackenschmerzen nach Bandscheibenvorfall: Muskeltraining hilft!

Bei hartnäckigen Schmerzen aufgrund einer zervikalen Radikulopathie schlägt ein Team der Universität Istanbul vor, lokale Steroidinjektionen mit einem speziellen Trainingsprogramm zur Stabilisierung der Nackenmuskulatur zu kombinieren.

US-Team empfiehlt Gastropexie nach Hiatushernien-Op.

Zur Vermeidung von Rezidiven nach Reparatur einer paraösophagealen Hiatushernie sollte einem US-Team zufolge der Magen bei der Op. routinemäßig an der Bauchwand fixiert werden. Das Ergebnis einer randomisierten Studie scheint dafür zu sprechen.

Mit Lidocain kommt der Darm nicht schneller in Schwung

Verzögertes Wiederanspringen der Darmfunktion ist ein Hauptfaktor dafür, wenn Patientinnen und Patienten nach einer Kolonresektion länger als geplant im Krankenhaus bleiben müssen. Ob man diesem Problem mit Lidocain vorbeugen kann, war Thema einer Studie.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.