Introduction
Helicobacter pylori (
H. pylori) is a gram-negative bacterium that infects over half of the world’s population, and causes various gastric diseases including gastritis, chronic atrophic gastritis, peptic ulcers, gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, and even gastric cancer [
1,
2]. Therefore,
H. pylori eradication therapy is recommended to reduce the recurrence of peptic ulcer disease and the incidence of gastric cancer [
3,
4].
Recently, the regimen for
H. pylori eradication therapy includes dual therapy, triple therapy, and the bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) [
5]. Triple therapy remains the standard of care in the published international guidelines of the European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group in areas of low clarithromycin resistance [
3]. However, the clarithromycin- or metronidazole-based triple therapy for
H. pylori infection is no longer recommended in China because of its associated high antibiotic resistance and low eradication efficacy [
6]. Thus, bismuth quadruple therapy is recommended as the first-line eradication regimen in China [
6]. No matter which regimens were used in eradication therapy, several concerns and barriers regarding the widespread use of the antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were raised [
7,
8].
H. pylori eradication consists of PPIs and antibiotics that can cause disruption of gut microbiota, which is considered a major contributing factor in pseudomembranous colitis associated with
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), diarrhea, or antibiotic resistance [
9]. PPIs can alter gastrointestinal pH which might affect gut microbiota and the survival of enteric pathogens. Moreover, the administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics can reduce microbiota diversity, disrupt the microbiota, and enrich the antibiotic-resistant strains [
10]. Eradication therapy may induce the pathogenesis of various disorders through the changes and dysbiosis in gut microbiota. Recently, several studies have assessed the impact of
H. pylori eradication on the gut microbiota. Shortly after the
H. pylori eradication therapy, the bacterial diversity was significantly reduced [
8,
11‐
13]. Therefore, studying the effects of eradication therapy on the composition of the gut microbiota and exploring the potential strategy to maintain the microbiota homeostasis are extremely important.
Probiotics are microbes that are beneficial for the host’s health. Previous studies used certain probiotics during eradication therapy to decrease side effects, improve compliance, and thereby increase eradication rates [
5]. A study conducted in Spain where 209 consecutive patients were prescribed eradication therapy and randomly received probiotics (
Lactobacillus plantarum and
Pediococcus acidilactici) or matching placebo showed that the eradication rates and side effects were similar [
14]; however, other studies showed that probiotics improved the eradication rate and decreased the incidence of diarrhea, abdominal distension, and constipation [
15]. Therefore, the role of probiotics in eradication therapy is still debated. Additionally, whereas previous studies mainly focused on the effect of probiotics on the eradication rate and side effects, few studies analyzed the influence of probiotics on the gut microbiota on a community-wide scale and the function of the gut microbiome in bismuth quadruple therapy. In particular, knowledge of the optimal supplementation such as the species, duration, dosage, and the suitable population is extremely limited.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of probiotics supplementation on the eradication rate, homeostasis, and functional potential of gut microbiota after bismuth quadruple therapy.
Methods
Patients and Study Design
This multicenter randomized clinical trial was performed at seven hospitals in China from March 2019 to November 2019. Inclusion criteria: patients aged between 18 and 65 years, at least two positive tests of rapid urease test and 13C-urea breath test (13C-UBT). Patients with any one of the following criteria were excluded from the study: history of gastrectomy, previous eradication therapy for H. pylori, peptic ulcer or other upper gastrointestinal lesions, gastrointestinal malignant tumor, contraindication or previous allergic reactions to the study drugs, severe concurrent diseases or malignancy, pregnant or lactating women, the use of antiacids or gastric mucosal protective drugs or antibiotics or probiotics in the past month, and patients who could not give informed consent. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before enrollment, and this trial was approved by Ethics Committee of Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University and also approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of each participating hospital (please see supplementary material for list of IRB names). This study was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments. The trial was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1900022116).
On the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 162 patients receiving eradication therapy were randomly assigned to the probiotics or placebo group. An independent statistician who was not involved in the enrollment generated a random number. In total, 83 patients received the 14-day BQT (esomeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, furazolidone 100 mg, bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg, all given twice daily) supplemented with probiotics (Medilac-S; Enterococcus faecium 4.5 × 108 and Bacillus subtilis 5.0 × 107, Hanmi, Beijing, China) three times a day for 4 weeks. In total, 79 patients received 14-day BQT supplemented with placebo (maltodextrin) three times a day. Gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed at baseline for all patients and on weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 after therapy. 13C-UBT was used to evaluate the H. pylori eradication effect at 6 weeks after completion of treatment.
Fecal Sample Collection
Fresh stool samples were collected from all patients at baseline (before treatment) and at weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 after treatment. Participants were asked to return the fecal specimen to the research assistant in the hospital on the day of sample collection. All stool samples were immediately frozen and stored at − 80 °C.
16S rRNA Gene Amplification and Sequencing
Total DNA from the fecal samples was isolated by using TIANamp Stool DNA Kit (TIANGEN Biotech Co. Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNA concentration was quantified using a Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, USA), and its integrity was assessed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA was stored at − 20 °C until use. The V3–V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA were amplified using 341F and 785R primers: forward primer 5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′. The amplifications were performed employing a step cycling protocol consisting of 95 °C for 30 min, 25 cycles of 98 °C for 15 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s, ending with the final elongation at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR amplicons were purified using Agencourt AMPure Beads (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN) and quantified using the PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The purified amplicons were then sequenced on an Illumina Miseq platform (Illumina, San Diego, USA) by Longsee Biomedical Corporation (Guangzhou, China).
Fecal Microbiota Analysis
The Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology 2 (QIIME2, version 2019. 7) platform within a conda environment was used to process the sequencing data on our Linux server (i7-8700K, 64 Gb RAM). The bioinformatic analysis processes were performed according to the official “Moving Pictures” tutorial provided by the QIIME2 website (
https://docs.qiime2.org/2019.7/tutorials). Firstly, the pair-end fastq format sequence files (spanning the entire 16S rRNA gene V3–V4 region) were imported into QIIME2 by using the “qiime tools import” command. Then, sequence quality control and feature table construction were performed by using the “qiime dada2 denoise-paired” command of QIIME2 with the following parameters: p-trim-left-f = 9, p-trim-left-r = 9, p-trunc-len-f = 250, p-trunc-len-r = 250. DADA2 is a pipeline for detecting and correcting (where possible) Illumina amplicon sequence data, which group unique sequences to construct amplicon sequence variant (the equivalent of 100% OTU in QIIME1 and also called “feature” in QIIME2). As implemented in the q2-dada2 plugin, this quality control process will additionally filter any phiX reads (commonly present in marker gene Illumina sequence data) that are identified in the sequencing data, and will filter chimeric sequences. After the quality filtering step had completed, the “qiime feature-table summarize” command was used to generate a feature-table listing how many sequences are associated with each sample and with each feature. A sampling-depth of 12,200 was chosen on the basis of the sample with the lowest number of sequences, which is a decent amount of sequences and also allowed us to retain all of our samples. Then the “qiime feature-table rarefy” command was used to subsample frequencies from all samples so that the sum of frequencies in each sample is equal to sampling-depth and generated a rarefied feature table. After rarefaction, a rooted tree and an unrooted tree were constructed for further phylogenetic diversity analyses by using the “qiime phylogeny align-to-tree-mafft-fasttree” command. Then, all the alpha diversity and beta diversity were calculated by “qiime diversity alpha” and “qiime diversity beta” commands from the rarefied feature-table. After diversity metrics were computed, the PCoA results were calculated by the “qiime diversity pcoa” command and visualized by the “qiime emperor plot” command. In the context of the sample metadata, a pre-trained naive Bayes classifier (silva-132-99-nb-classifier.qza) and the “qiime feature-classifier classify-sklearn” command were used to explore the taxonomic composition of the samples. This classifier was trained from the Silva database release 132 with 99% similarity, where the sequences have been trimmed to only include the V3–V4 region of the 16S that was sequenced in this analysis. Furthermore, linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was used to select significant candidates at the genus level. We compare relative abundance of taxa between the two groups and different time periods within each group using a nonparametric Mann–Whitney
U test, followed by a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to estimate the effect size of each microbial feature with differential abundance. Taxa with an LDA score greater than 2.0 and
p < 0.05 were considered significantly enriched.
Functional Pathway Prediction
The 16S rRNA functional prediction by used amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) is performed by PICRUSt2 (Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States, version 2). Then ASVs were categorized into Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) and into Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome (KEGG) orthology (KO). According to the COG database, the descriptive information of each COG and its functional information were parsed from the eggNOG database to obtain the functional abundance spectrum. KO, Pathway, and Enzyme (EC) information were obtained according to the KEGG database while the abundance of each functional category was calculated according to OTU abundance.
Statistical Analyses
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (IBM, Armonk, NY) and R. The
χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test were used for analysis of categorical data and Student’s
t test or the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test for analysis of continuous data. Eradication efficacy was performed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) population where patients who dropped out were considered as treatment failures. Secondary per-protocol (PP) analyses were performed which excluded patients lost to follow-up or prematurely withdrew before completion of the study. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate the ecological similarity between and within groups. Analysis of similarities (ANOSIM), a nonparametric statistical test widely used in the field of ecology, was used to test whether the beta-diversity between groups (two or more) was significantly greater than the differences within groups. Best subsets regression and backward stepwise regression were used to pick variables capable of predicting the result of
H. pylori eradication. The leaps performs an exhaustive search for the best subsets of the variables for predicting the result of
H. pylori eradication by using an efficient branch-and-bound algorithm. The picked variables were then loaded into the stepAIC function of the MASS package (version 7.3-51.4,
http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/) in R for backward stepwise regression. Backward stepwise regression starts with the model including all predictors and deletes one variable at a time until the model quality is reduced, which was used to validate the robustness of the final variables. All statistical tests were two-tailed.
P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Discussion
In this study, we performed a multicenter randomized trial to show the distinct effects of bismuth quadruple therapy and probiotics (Medilac-S) supplementation on gut microbiota. Various studies have shown that the administration of antibiotics reduces the diversity of the gut microbiota [
11‐
13]. Alpha diversity decreased 1 week post eradication therapy and was restored to almost pre-eradication levels 8 weeks later [
16]. Consistent with these studies, our data also presented a significant disruption of gut microbiota at the end (week 2) of eradication therapy. We then observed a trend of gradual restoration with time from week 4 to week 8, and the alpha and beta diversities were almost restored at week 8 in both groups. Unlike a previous study in which probiotics could maintain the diversity of gut microbiota after eradication therapy [
11], we found that probiotics supplementation failed to increase or maintain the diversity after
H. pylori eradication.
In accordance with previous reports [
17,
18], in our current study, the gut microbiota before
H. pylori eradication therapy predominantly contained commensal microbes of the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria. Different eradication regimens containing different antibiotics might exert distinct effects on gut microbiota [
15]. McNicholl et al. showed that the relative abundance of Firmicutes decreased and that of Proteobacteria increased immediately after triple therapy [
14]. Hsu and colleagues showed that the relative abundance of Proteobacteria increased, whereas that of Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia decreased immediately after bismuth quadruple therapy containing pantoprazole, bismuth tripotassium dicitrate, tetracycline, and metronidazole [
8]. Another study showed that reverse therapy containing pantoprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole reduced the relative abundances of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria, but increased the abundance of Proteobacteria [
18]. The enrolled patients in our present study received a 14-day bismuth quadruple therapy consisting of esomeprazole, amoxicillin, furazolidone, and bismuth potassium citrate. We observed a significantly increased abundance of Proteobacteria, and a reduced abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes 2 weeks after treatment, which almost returned to the baseline levels at week 8. Amoxicillin and clarithromycin were supposed to contribute to the reduction of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria following eradication [
18]. Our data revealed that Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicrobia were also significantly reduced, which might be attributed to furazolidone. The dramatic increase in the relative abundance of Proteobacteria, a major phylum of gram-negative bacteria including
Escherichia,
Proteus,
Salmonella,
Klebsiella, and
Morganella, was observed after bismuth quadruple therapy. These discrepant observations may be explained partially by different eradication regimens, drug doses, and treatment duration lengths. In addition, other factors, such as dietary habit, previous antibiotic treatment history, and individual differences in the absorption rate for antibiotics, can affect the influence of eradication therapy on gut microbiota [
19]. There were important taxonomic changes at the genus level after treatment.
H. pylori eradication treatment at week 2 was associated with decreased abundance of
Bacteroides,
Faecalibacterium,
Roseburia,
Lachnospira,
Phascolarctobacterium,
Bifidobacterium, and
Butyricimonas, most of which are known to have beneficial effects, such as producing the short chain fatty acid butyrate. On the contrary, there was an increase in relative abundances of some detrimental bacteria, such as
Klebsiella,
Streptococcus,
Fusobacterium,
Prevotella, and
Morganella. Since amoxicillin and furazolidone have limited activity against these bacteria, it is likely that these detrimental bacteria may rapidly increase as a result of inhibition of other commensal bacteria.
A probiotic is defined as a “live microbial organism which, when ingested, beneficially affects human health”. Here, in our study, we found that
H. pylori eradication therapy could lead to persistent antibiotics resistance of
Klebsiella. However, probiotics supplementation rapidly decreased the enrichment of
Klebsiella, suggesting that the concomitant use of probiotics might be beneficial to reduce conditioned bacteria and antibiotics resistance. At weeks 2 and 4, we observed colonization of
Enterococcus and
Bacillus, the main components of the probiotics Medilac-S; this disappeared at weeks 6 and 8, suggesting the colonization of probiotics closely depends on the supplementation duration. Most importantly, probiotics supplementation increased the beneficial bacteria such as
Oscillospira and Lactobacillales at weeks 2 and 4, which is reported to produce the short chain fatty acid butyrate, regulate host immune response, and improve gastrointestinal symptoms [
19‐
21]. Furthermore, the probiotics supplementation reduced the abundance of
Dialister,
Sutterella, and
Collinsella, mainly contributing to the digestive disorder, inflammation, abnormal lipids metabolism, and various metabolic syndromes [
22]. However, we did not observed much valuable difference at weeks 6 and 8 between the two groups, probably because the probiotics supplementation was abolished in this period. We further observed that the abundance of probiotics in patients varied significantly among participants. Different regression models revealed that the abundance of
Oscillospira,
Akkermansia, and
Clostridium closely correlates with the abundance of probiotics.
The differences of functional profiles of gut microbiota after treatments were compared in the placebo group and probiotic group. The proportion of pathways involved in starch degradation, glycolysis, and amino acid biosynthesis was decreased after treatment in both groups, whereas the proportion of pathways involved in the fatty acid oxidation and sucrose degradation increased. Various bacterial taxa such as
Ruminococcus bromii and
Bifidobacterium adolescentis are able to degrade starch [
23], leading to an increase in specific fermentation end products, in particular butyrate, promoting epithelial integrity and immune homeostasis [
24]. During the metabolism of glycolysis and amino acid biosynthesis, these compounds act as donors for sugar residues in glycosylation reactions that produce polysaccharides, which are important constituents of the cell wall [
22,
25]. Moreover, the increased incidence of sucrose metabolism and fatty acid oxidation after eradication therapy was closely associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome [
26,
27], which was consistent with some previous data indicating that
H. pylori eradication contributed to changes in the metabolic parameters [
27,
28]. These intriguing findings suggest that
H. pylori eradication therapy might bring some potential detrimental effect through gut microbiota alterations; whether these changes are associated with significant clinical outcomes should be assessed in future studies.
We further compared the changes of functional pathways between the placebo group and probiotics group. Surprisingly, we only observed distinct differences between the two groups at week 4. The proportion of pathways involved in the lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis and polymyxin resistance was increased only in the placebo group, while the metabolic pathways associated with metabolism of cofactors and vitamins were enriched in the probiotics group. Enterococcus spp., the main components of probiotics, were positively correlated with thiamin diphosphate biosynthesis, tetrahydrofolate biosynthesis, and coenzyme A biosynthesis, but negatively related to lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis and polymyxin resistance, suggesting that probiotics supplementation might help to construct a beneficial profile of gut microbiota after eradication therapy. To identify the specific microbial taxa associated with the eradication outcome, the abundances of each bacterial taxon were modeled using the best subset selection regression analysis. We found that increased relative abundances of Roseburia and Dialister were strong predictors of achieving a positive eradication rate. Pathways relating to naphthalene degradation, oxidative phosphorylation and cytochrome metabolism (P < 0.05) were associated with the positive primary eradication outcome.
Different types of probiotics are potentially involved in the reversal of dysbiosis in the gut microbiota by restoration of gut mucosal homeostasis and modulation of resident microbiota [
29]. Other probiotic supplementations during
H. pylori eradication therapy have been described in several previous studies [
13,
30‐
32], which report that probiotics exert numerous beneficial effects involving moderation of disturbance of gut microbiota, alleviation of side effects associated with antibiotic therapy, and reduction of antibiotic resistance. However, several studies indicated that probiotics supplementation appeared to result in fewer changes in the microbiota and no significant differences in
H. pylori eradication rates [
13,
33]. This discrepancy might be because all these conducted clinical trials have used different probiotic strains, dosing, and administration routes. A growing body of evidence also supports that different strains of probiotics are able to exert their beneficial effects by multiple mechanisms and that the effects might vary with strain and study population. Specially, previous studies have shown a positive impact of probiotics such as
Lactobacillus GG,
Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium breve, and
Lactobacillus paracasei on
H. pylori therapy-related side effects and on overall treatment tolerability [
30‐
34]. However, these probiotic strains are not widely commercially available in China; thus, we chose the widely used probiotics capsule Medilac-S. Unlike other trials, the probiotics capsule Medilac-S contains two strains of living probiotics (
Bacillus subtilis and
Enterococcus faecium), and helps construct a beneficial profile of gut microbiota after eradication therapy. This is because probiotics exert their beneficial effect on multifactorial diseases, with a variety of probiotic properties, and such properties may be strain-specific [
35]. When administered as a combination of strains, probiotics may complement each other and thus have synergistic probiotic effects. Here in our study, we suppose that Medilac-S supplementation might help to construct a beneficial profile of gut microbiota after eradication therapy, and it may be responsible for its remarkable impact on
H. pylori eradication in and outside China.
Nevertheless, there were some limitations to this study. First, although the strength of this study includes a multicenter randomized trial, longer duration of follow-up is needed to investigate the long-term effect of eradication therapy and probiotics in gut microbiota. Second, the changes at the species level and detailed function profiles after eradication therapy could not be assessed through 16S rRNA sequencing. Further whole-genome shotgun sequencing would be needed.
Acknowledgements
We thank all the participants of the study.