Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1/2018

07.03.2017 | Review

The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Return-to-Work Outcomes for Workers with Psychological or Upper-Body Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Review of the Literature

verfasst von: Oliver Black, Tessa Keegel, Malcolm R. Sim, Alexander Collie, Peter Smith

Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose Work absence can result in substantial losses to the economy and workers. As a result, identifying modifiable factors associated with return-to-work (RTW) following an injury or illness is the focus of many empirical investigations. Self-efficacy, the belief about one’s ability to undertake behaviours to achieve desired goals, has been identified as an important factor in RTW for injured workers. This paper systematically reviewed the literature on the association between self-efficacy and RTW outcomes for workers with an upper-body musculoskeletal injury or psychological injury. Methods A systematic search was conducted across five databases using two main search concepts- ‘self-efficacy’ and ‘RTW’. After removing duplicates, our search strategy identified 836 studies, which were screened for relevance using titles and abstracts. Results A two stage screening process reduced the study pool to six studies using psychological injury cohorts and three using upper-body musculoskeletal (UB-MSK) cohorts. Eight cohorts from seven prospective cohort studies and one sample from a randomised control trial (RCT) were subjected to a risk of bias assessment. Higher levels of self-efficacy appeared to have a consistent and positive association with RTW across return-to-work status and work absence outcomes, injury type and follow-up periods. Effect ratios ranged from 1.00 to 5.26 indicating a potentially large impact of self-efficacy on RTW outcomes. The relationship between self-efficacy and RTW strengthened as the domain of self-efficacy became more specific to RTW and job behaviours. Studies assessing workers with psychological injuries were of a lower quality compared to those assessing workers with UB-MSK injuries. Conclusions Higher self-efficacy had consistent positive associations with RTW outcomes. Further empirical research should identify the determinants of self-efficacy, and explore the processes by which higher self-efficacy improves RTW outcomes.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Takala J, Hamalainen P, Saarela KL, Yun LY, Manickam K, Jin TW, et al. Global estimates of the burden of injury and illness at work in 2012. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014;11(5):326–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Takala J, Hamalainen P, Saarela KL, Yun LY, Manickam K, Jin TW, et al. Global estimates of the burden of injury and illness at work in 2012. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014;11(5):326–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Australia S. The cost of work-related injury and illness for Australian employers, workers and the community: 2008–09. Canberra: SafeWork Australia; 2012. Australia S. The cost of work-related injury and illness for Australian employers, workers and the community: 2008–09. Canberra: SafeWork Australia; 2012.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilks J, Logan R. Occupational injuries and diseases in Canada, 1996–2008. Ottawa: Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, Division OHaS; 2010. Gilks J, Logan R. Occupational injuries and diseases in Canada, 1996–2008. Ottawa: Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, Division OHaS; 2010.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Murgatroyd DF, Casey PP, Cameron ID, Harris IA. The effect of financial compensation on health outcomes following musculoskeletal injury: systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(2):e0117597.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Murgatroyd DF, Casey PP, Cameron ID, Harris IA. The effect of financial compensation on health outcomes following musculoskeletal injury: systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(2):e0117597.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams H, Ellis T, Stanish WD, Sullivan MJ. Psychosocial factors related to return to work following rehabilitation of whiplash injuries. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(2):305–15.CrossRefPubMed Adams H, Ellis T, Stanish WD, Sullivan MJ. Psychosocial factors related to return to work following rehabilitation of whiplash injuries. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(2):305–15.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Krause N, Frank JW, Dasinger LK, Sullivan TJ, Sinclair SJ. Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40(4):464–84.CrossRefPubMed Krause N, Frank JW, Dasinger LK, Sullivan TJ, Sinclair SJ. Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40(4):464–84.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Rudolph L, Brand RJ. Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40(4):374–92.CrossRefPubMed Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Rudolph L, Brand RJ. Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40(4):374–92.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gallagher MW. Self-efficacy. In: Ramachandran VS, editor. Encyclopedia of human behavior (second edition). San Diego: Academic Press; 2012. pp. 314–20.CrossRef Gallagher MW. Self-efficacy. In: Ramachandran VS, editor. Encyclopedia of human behavior (second edition). San Diego: Academic Press; 2012. pp. 314–20.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215.CrossRefPubMed Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–24.CrossRefPubMed Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–24.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Bultmann U, van der Klink JJ, Groothoff JW. A prospective study of return to work across health conditions: perceived work attitude, self-efficacy and perceived social support. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(1):104–12.CrossRefPubMed Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Bultmann U, van der Klink JJ, Groothoff JW. A prospective study of return to work across health conditions: perceived work attitude, self-efficacy and perceived social support. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(1):104–12.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wahlin C, Ekberg K, Persson J, Bernfort L, Oberg B. Association between clinical and work-related interventions and return-to-work for patients with musculoskeletal or mental disorders. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(4):355–62.CrossRefPubMed Wahlin C, Ekberg K, Persson J, Bernfort L, Oberg B. Association between clinical and work-related interventions and return-to-work for patients with musculoskeletal or mental disorders. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(4):355–62.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dionne CE, Bourbonnais R, Fremont P, Rossignol M, Stock SR, Nouwen A, et al. Determinants of “return to work in good health” among workers with back pain who consult in primary care settings: a 2-year prospective study. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(5):641–55.CrossRefPubMed Dionne CE, Bourbonnais R, Fremont P, Rossignol M, Stock SR, Nouwen A, et al. Determinants of “return to work in good health” among workers with back pain who consult in primary care settings: a 2-year prospective study. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(5):641–55.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Richard S, Dionne C, Nouwen A. Self-efficacy and health locus of control: relationship to occupational disability among workers with back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(3):421–30.CrossRefPubMed Richard S, Dionne C, Nouwen A. Self-efficacy and health locus of control: relationship to occupational disability among workers with back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(3):421–30.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nieuwenhuijsen K, Noordik E, van Dijk FJH, van der Klink JJ. Return to work perceptions and actual return to work in workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(2):290–9.CrossRefPubMed Nieuwenhuijsen K, Noordik E, van Dijk FJH, van der Klink JJ. Return to work perceptions and actual return to work in workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(2):290–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Niemeyer LO. Identifying psychosocial indicators of high risk for delayed recovery in an outpatient industrially injured population. Diss Abstr Int. 2000;60(9-B):4564. Niemeyer LO. Identifying psychosocial indicators of high risk for delayed recovery in an outpatient industrially injured population. Diss Abstr Int. 2000;60(9-B):4564.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaw WS, Reme SE, Linton SJ, Huang YH, Pransky G. 3rd place, PREMUS best paper competition: development of the return-to-work self-efficacy (RTWSE-19) questionnaire-psychometric properties and predictive validity. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37(2):109–19.CrossRefPubMed Shaw WS, Reme SE, Linton SJ, Huang YH, Pransky G. 3rd place, PREMUS best paper competition: development of the return-to-work self-efficacy (RTWSE-19) questionnaire-psychometric properties and predictive validity. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37(2):109–19.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagerveld SE, Blonk RWB, Brenninkmeijer V, Schaufeli WB. Return to work among employees with mental health problems: development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire. Work Stress. 2010;24(4):359–75.CrossRef Lagerveld SE, Blonk RWB, Brenninkmeijer V, Schaufeli WB. Return to work among employees with mental health problems: development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire. Work Stress. 2010;24(4):359–75.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kendell R. “The distinction between mental and physical illness”: author’s reply. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;179(5):462–3.CrossRef Kendell R. “The distinction between mental and physical illness”: author’s reply. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;179(5):462–3.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat OHSCO. MSD prevention guideline for Ontario. Part 1. OHSCO; 2005. OHSCO. MSD prevention guideline for Ontario. Part 1. OHSCO; 2005.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Safework Australia. Australian workers’ compensation statistics 2011–2012. Canberra: Safework Australia; 2013. Safework Australia. Australian workers’ compensation statistics 2011–2012. Canberra: Safework Australia; 2013.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gnam W. Mental disorders, mental disability at work, and workers’ compensation. Institute for Work and Health; 1998. Gnam W. Mental disorders, mental disability at work, and workers’ compensation. Institute for Work and Health; 1998.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Endnote X6 ed: Thomson Reuters; 2012. Endnote X6 ed: Thomson Reuters; 2012.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Nevis I, Sikich N, Ye C, Kabali C. Quality control tool for screening titles and abstracts by second reviewer: QCTSTAR. J Biomet Biostat. 2015;6:230. Nevis I, Sikich N, Ye C, Kabali C. Quality control tool for screening titles and abstracts by second reviewer: QCTSTAR. J Biomet Biostat. 2015;6:230.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews. 2014. Report NO.: Contract No.: AHRQ Publication No. 10(14)-EHC063-EF. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews. 2014. Report NO.: Contract No.: AHRQ Publication No. 10(14)-EHC063-EF.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sterne JAC HJ, on behalf of the development group for ACROBAT NRSI. A cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: for non-randomized studies of interventions (ACROBATNRSI): Cochrane; 2014 [cited version 1.0.0 22/06/2015]. http://www.riskofbias.info. Sterne JAC HJ, on behalf of the development group for ACROBAT NRSI. A cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: for non-randomized studies of interventions (ACROBATNRSI): Cochrane; 2014 [cited version 1.0.0 22/06/2015]. http://​www.​riskofbias.​info.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat van Beurden K, van der Klink J, Brouwers E, Joosen M, Mathijssen J, Terluin B, et al. Effect of an intervention to enhance guideline adherence of occupational physicians on return-to-work self-efficacy in workers sick-listed with common mental disorders. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):796. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2125-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Beurden K, van der Klink J, Brouwers E, Joosen M, Mathijssen J, Terluin B, et al. Effect of an intervention to enhance guideline adherence of occupational physicians on return-to-work self-efficacy in workers sick-listed with common mental disorders. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):796. doi:10.​1186/​s12889-015-2125-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Brouwer S, Amick BC, 3rd, Lee H, Franche RL, Hogg-Johnson S. The predictive validity of the return-to-work self-efficacy scale for return-to-work outcomes in claimants with musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(4):725–32CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brouwer S, Amick BC, 3rd, Lee H, Franche RL, Hogg-Johnson S. The predictive validity of the return-to-work self-efficacy scale for return-to-work outcomes in claimants with musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(4):725–32CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Ekberg K, Wahlin C, Persson J, Bernfort L, Oberg B. Early and late return to work after sick leave: predictors in a cohort of sick-listed individuals with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(3):627–37.CrossRefPubMed Ekberg K, Wahlin C, Persson J, Bernfort L, Oberg B. Early and late return to work after sick leave: predictors in a cohort of sick-listed individuals with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(3):627–37.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Hailpern SM, Visintainer PF. Odds ratios and logistic regression: further examples of their use and interpretation. Stata J. 2003;3(3):213–25. Hailpern SM, Visintainer PF. Odds ratios and logistic regression: further examples of their use and interpretation. Stata J. 2003;3(3):213–25.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Fewtrell MS, Kennedy K, Singhal A, Martin RM, Ness A, Hadders-Algra M, et al. How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies? Arch Dis Childhood. 93(6):458–61. Fewtrell MS, Kennedy K, Singhal A, Martin RM, Ness A, Hadders-Algra M, et al. How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies? Arch Dis Childhood. 93(6):458–61.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Altmaier EM, Russell DW, Kao CF, Lehmann TR, Weinstein JN. Role of self-efficacy in rehabilitation outcome among chronic low back pain patients. J Couns Psychol. 1993;40(3):335–9.CrossRef Altmaier EM, Russell DW, Kao CF, Lehmann TR, Weinstein JN. Role of self-efficacy in rehabilitation outcome among chronic low back pain patients. J Couns Psychol. 1993;40(3):335–9.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Brouwer S, Franche RL, Hogg-Johnson S, Lee H, Krause N, Shaw WS. Return-to-work self-efficacy: development and validation of a scale in claimants with musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):244–58.CrossRefPubMed Brouwer S, Franche RL, Hogg-Johnson S, Lee H, Krause N, Shaw WS. Return-to-work self-efficacy: development and validation of a scale in claimants with musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):244–58.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Black OC, Sim MR, Collie A, Smith P. A return-to-work self-efficacy scale for workers with psychological or musculoskeletal work-related injuries. Qual Quant. 2017;51(1):413–24.CrossRef Black OC, Sim MR, Collie A, Smith P. A return-to-work self-efficacy scale for workers with psychological or musculoskeletal work-related injuries. Qual Quant. 2017;51(1):413–24.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Safe Work Australia. Australian workers’ compensation statistics 2011–2012. In: Australia SW, editor. Canberra: Safe Work Australia; 2013. Safe Work Australia. Australian workers’ compensation statistics 2011–2012. In: Australia SW, editor. Canberra: Safe Work Australia; 2013.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.CrossRefPubMed Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Clay FJ, Berecki-Gisolf J, Collie A. How well do we report on compensation systems in studies of return to work: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(1):111–24.CrossRefPubMed Clay FJ, Berecki-Gisolf J, Collie A. How well do we report on compensation systems in studies of return to work: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(1):111–24.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Vlasveld MC, Van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Ader HJ, Anema JR, Hoedeman R, Van Mechelen W, et al. Collaborative care for sick-listed workers with major depressive disorder: a randomised controlled trial from the netherlands depression initiative aimed at return to work and depressive symptoms. Occup Environ Med. 2013;70(4):223–30.CrossRefPubMed Vlasveld MC, Van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Ader HJ, Anema JR, Hoedeman R, Van Mechelen W, et al. Collaborative care for sick-listed workers with major depressive disorder: a randomised controlled trial from the netherlands depression initiative aimed at return to work and depressive symptoms. Occup Environ Med. 2013;70(4):223–30.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Hoedeman R, de Jong FJ, Meeuwissen JA, Drewes HW, van der Laan NC, et al. Faster return to work after psychiatric consultation for sicklisted employees with common mental disorders compared to care as usual. A randomized clinical trial. Neuropsychiatry Dis Treat. 2010;6(1):375–85.CrossRef van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Hoedeman R, de Jong FJ, Meeuwissen JA, Drewes HW, van der Laan NC, et al. Faster return to work after psychiatric consultation for sicklisted employees with common mental disorders compared to care as usual. A randomized clinical trial. Neuropsychiatry Dis Treat. 2010;6(1):375–85.CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Volker D, Zijlstra-Vlasveld MC, Anema JR, Beekman AT, Brouwers EP, Emons WH, et al. Effectiveness of a blended web-based intervention on return to work for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(5):e116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Volker D, Zijlstra-Vlasveld MC, Anema JR, Beekman AT, Brouwers EP, Emons WH, et al. Effectiveness of a blended web-based intervention on return to work for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(5):e116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Zurück zum Zitat van Oostrom SH, Anema JR, Terluin B, de Vet HC, Knol DL, van Mechelen W. Cost-effectiveness of a workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Oostrom SH, Anema JR, Terluin B, de Vet HC, Knol DL, van Mechelen W. Cost-effectiveness of a workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Return-to-Work Outcomes for Workers with Psychological or Upper-Body Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Review of the Literature
verfasst von
Oliver Black
Tessa Keegel
Malcolm R. Sim
Alexander Collie
Peter Smith
Publikationsdatum
07.03.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9697-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe