Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2019

01.03.2019 | Original Scientific Report

The Effectiveness of Contralateral Drainage in Reducing Superficial Incisional Surgical Site Infection in Loop Ileostomy Closure: Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

verfasst von: Anna Serracant, Xavier Serra-Aracil, Laura Mora-López, Anna Pallisera-Lloveras, Sheila Serra-Pla, Alba Zárate-Pinedo, Salvador Navarro-Soto

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Loop ileostomy reduces the rates of morbidity due to colorectal anastomotic dehiscence. For its part, ileostomy closure is associated with low mortality (0–4%) but substantial morbidity (11–37%). Incisional surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most frequent complications (2–40%).

Methods

A single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial of two study groups: control (conventional primary skin closure) and experimental (primary skin closure with a contralateral Penrose® drain).

Results

Seventy patients undergoing loop ileostomy closure between April 2013 and June 2017 were included (35 per branch). Four were later removed from the study. Six of the remaining 66 patients (per protocol analysis) were diagnosed with incisional SSI (9.1%); there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (control group: 9.7%; experimental group: 8.6%) or between the risk factors associated with incisional SSI. Rates of overall and relevant morbidity (Clavien ≥ III) were considerable (28.1% and 9.1%, respectively), and there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. No patients died.

Conclusion

Contralateral drainage does not significantly affect the results of primary ileostomy closure. The rate of incisional SSI was similar in the drainage and non-drainage groups, and the overall rate of 9.1% was in the low range of those reported in the literature. The absence of mortality (0%) and the non-negligible rates of overall and relevant morbidity (28.1% and 9.1%, respectively) in our series suggest that loop ileostomy is a safe procedure. However, the bowel reconstruction involves risks that must be borne in mind.

Clinical trial registration

The study was registered and approved by the clinical research ethics committee of the study center (reference number 2012076). Clinical trial was registered in ClinicalTrial.gov (identification number NCT02574702 and reference: ILEOS-ISS_2013).
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Simert G et al (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246(2):207–214CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Simert G et al (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246(2):207–214CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Danielsen AK, Park J, Jansen JE, Bock D et al (2017) Early closure of a temporary ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 265(2):284–290CrossRefPubMed Danielsen AK, Park J, Jansen JE, Bock D et al (2017) Early closure of a temporary ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 265(2):284–290CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Poskus E, Kildusis E, Smolskas E, Ambrazevicius M et al (2014) Complications after loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective analysis of 132 patients. Visz Gastrointest Med Surg 30:276–280 Poskus E, Kildusis E, Smolskas E, Ambrazevicius M et al (2014) Complications after loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective analysis of 132 patients. Visz Gastrointest Med Surg 30:276–280
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lahat G, Tulchinsky H, Goldman G, Klauzner JM et al (2005) Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques. Tech Coloproctol 9:206–208CrossRefPubMed Lahat G, Tulchinsky H, Goldman G, Klauzner JM et al (2005) Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques. Tech Coloproctol 9:206–208CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Li LT, Hicks SC, Davila JA, Kao LS et al (2014) Circular closure is associated with the lowest rate of surgical site infection following stoma reversal: a systematic review and multiple treatment meta-analysis. Color Dis 16:406–416CrossRef Li LT, Hicks SC, Davila JA, Kao LS et al (2014) Circular closure is associated with the lowest rate of surgical site infection following stoma reversal: a systematic review and multiple treatment meta-analysis. Color Dis 16:406–416CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Haase O, Raue W, Böhm B, Neuss H et al (2005) Subcutaneous gentamycin implant to reduce wound infections after loop-ileostomy closure: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2025–2031CrossRefPubMed Haase O, Raue W, Böhm B, Neuss H et al (2005) Subcutaneous gentamycin implant to reduce wound infections after loop-ileostomy closure: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2025–2031CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Milanchi S, Nasseri Y, Kidner T, Fleshner P (2009) Wound infection after ileostomy closure can be eliminated by circumferential subcuticular wound approximation. Dis Colon Rectum 52:469–474CrossRefPubMed Milanchi S, Nasseri Y, Kidner T, Fleshner P (2009) Wound infection after ileostomy closure can be eliminated by circumferential subcuticular wound approximation. Dis Colon Rectum 52:469–474CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Harold DM, Johnson EK, Rizzo JA, Steele SR (2010) Primary closure of stoma site wounds after ostomy takedown. Am J Surg 199:621–624CrossRefPubMed Harold DM, Johnson EK, Rizzo JA, Steele SR (2010) Primary closure of stoma site wounds after ostomy takedown. Am J Surg 199:621–624CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LG (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20(4):247–278CrossRef Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LG (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20(4):247–278CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin A, Bombardo-Junca J et al (2009) The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification. Color Dis 11:173–177CrossRef Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin A, Bombardo-Junca J et al (2009) The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification. Color Dis 11:173–177CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien P-A, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRef Clavien P-A, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG et al (1991) The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients, results of the harvard medical practice study II. N Engl J Med 324(6):377–384CrossRef Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG et al (1991) The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients, results of the harvard medical practice study II. N Engl J Med 324(6):377–384CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Koedman TWA, Veltcamp M, Penna M, Wijsmuller A et al (2018) Short-term outcomes of transanal completion total mesorectal excision (cTaTME) for rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 33:103–109 Koedman TWA, Veltcamp M, Penna M, Wijsmuller A et al (2018) Short-term outcomes of transanal completion total mesorectal excision (cTaTME) for rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 33:103–109
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuritzkes BA, Pappou EP, Kiran RP, Baser O et al (2018) Visceral fat area, not body mass index, predicts postoperative 30-day morbidity in patients undergoing colon resection for cancer. Int J Color Dis 33(8):1019–1028CrossRef Kuritzkes BA, Pappou EP, Kiran RP, Baser O et al (2018) Visceral fat area, not body mass index, predicts postoperative 30-day morbidity in patients undergoing colon resection for cancer. Int J Color Dis 33(8):1019–1028CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hüser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, Schuster T et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer study. Ann Surg 248(1):52–60CrossRefPubMed Hüser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, Schuster T et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer study. Ann Surg 248(1):52–60CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S et al (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6, 107 cases. Int J Color Dis 24:711–723CrossRef Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S et al (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6, 107 cases. Int J Color Dis 24:711–723CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat McCambridge J, Witton JED (2014) Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol 67(3):267–277CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McCambridge J, Witton JED (2014) Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol 67(3):267–277CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Vermulst N, Vermeulen J, Hazebroek EJ, Coene EV (2006) Primary closure of the skin after stoma closure. Dig Surg 23:255–258CrossRefPubMed Vermulst N, Vermeulen J, Hazebroek EJ, Coene EV (2006) Primary closure of the skin after stoma closure. Dig Surg 23:255–258CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Reid K, Pockney P, Pollitt T, Draganic B et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of short-term outcomes following purse-string versus conventional closure of ileostomy wounds. Br J Surg 97:1511–1517CrossRefPubMed Reid K, Pockney P, Pollitt T, Draganic B et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of short-term outcomes following purse-string versus conventional closure of ileostomy wounds. Br J Surg 97:1511–1517CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JR, Kim YW, Sung JJ, Song O et al (2011) Coloproctology conventional linear versus purse-string skin closure after loop ileostomy reversal: comparison of wound infection rates and operative outcomes. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 27(2):58–63CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee JR, Kim YW, Sung JJ, Song O et al (2011) Coloproctology conventional linear versus purse-string skin closure after loop ileostomy reversal: comparison of wound infection rates and operative outcomes. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 27(2):58–63CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat McCartan DP, Burke JP, Walsh SR, Coffey JC (2013) Purse-string approximation is superior to primary skin closure following stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 17:345–351CrossRefPubMed McCartan DP, Burke JP, Walsh SR, Coffey JC (2013) Purse-string approximation is superior to primary skin closure following stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 17:345–351CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dusch N, Goranova D, Herrle F, Niedergethmann M et al (2013) Randomized controlled trial: comparison of two surgical techniques for closing the wound following ileostomy closure: purse string vs direct suture. Color Dis 15:1033–1041CrossRef Dusch N, Goranova D, Herrle F, Niedergethmann M et al (2013) Randomized controlled trial: comparison of two surgical techniques for closing the wound following ileostomy closure: purse string vs direct suture. Color Dis 15:1033–1041CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Habbe N, Hannes S, Liese J, Woeste G et al (2014) The use of purse-string skin closure in loop ileostomy reversals leads to lower wound infection rates—a single high-volume centre experience. Int J Color Dis 29(6):709–714CrossRef Habbe N, Hannes S, Liese J, Woeste G et al (2014) The use of purse-string skin closure in loop ileostomy reversals leads to lower wound infection rates—a single high-volume centre experience. Int J Color Dis 29(6):709–714CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Sajid MS, Bhatti MI, Miles WF (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials comparing purse-string vs conventional linear closure of the wound following ileostomy (stoma) closure. Gastroenterol Rep 3:156–161CrossRef Sajid MS, Bhatti MI, Miles WF (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials comparing purse-string vs conventional linear closure of the wound following ileostomy (stoma) closure. Gastroenterol Rep 3:156–161CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Effectiveness of Contralateral Drainage in Reducing Superficial Incisional Surgical Site Infection in Loop Ileostomy Closure: Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
verfasst von
Anna Serracant
Xavier Serra-Aracil
Laura Mora-López
Anna Pallisera-Lloveras
Sheila Serra-Pla
Alba Zárate-Pinedo
Salvador Navarro-Soto
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-04972-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

World Journal of Surgery 7/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.