Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2023

25.09.2023 | 2023 SAGES Oral

The impact of virtual interviews on the Fellowship Council application and main match process

verfasst von: Douglas J. Cassidy, Julie M. Clanahan, Fei Wan, Rohan Jeyarajah, L. Michael Brunt

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 12/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic led the Fellowship Council (FC) to transition rapidly from in-person to virtual interviews. We investigated the impact of this transition on the FC application and main match process.

Methods

Five years (2018–2022) of deidentified FC applicant, program, and match rank data were used to assess differences between in-person (2018–2019) and virtual interview (2021–2022) cycles. Data are expressed as mean ± SD and one-way and two-way MANOVA tests were applied.

Results

Trainees applied to an average of 30.4 ± 24.3 programs and ranked an average of 10.7 ± 9.7 programs with a 57% match rate and average rank position of 3.6 ± 3.3. Fellowship programs received an average of 64.9 ± 28.6 applications and ranked an average of 15.4 ± 8.8 applicants with a 95% match rate and average applicant rank position of 3.0 ± 3.4. Applicants who interviewed virtually applied to a greater number of programs (32.7 vs. 27.0; p < 0.001) and ranked a greater number of programs (11.5 vs. 10.0; p = 0.004) with no difference in match rates (58% vs. 55%, p = 0.291). Among matched applicants, there was a significant difference in average rank position (3.20 vs. 4.30, p < 0.001), favoring the in-person cohort. Fellowship programs had more applicants per program (69.2 vs. 57.8; p < 0.001) and ranked more applicants (17.4 vs. 13.3; p < 0.001) during the virtual interview cycles. No difference in either match rates (93% vs. 96%, p = 0.178) or applicant rank position (3.09 vs. 2.93, p = 0.561) was seen between in-person and virtual application cycles.

Conclusion

Virtual interviews were associated with an increased number of applications for fellowship and applicants ranked by programs but did not impact match rates of either group. Rank match position declined somewhat for applicants but not for fellowship programs. Virtual interviews offer more opportunities for applicants and a greater number of candidates for fellowship programs with only a slight decrement in fellow match rank position.

Graphical abstract

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB, Jeyarajah DR, Swanstrom LL, Aye RW, Wexner SD, Martinez JM, Ross SB, Awad MM (2013) General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg 258:440–449CrossRefPubMed Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB, Jeyarajah DR, Swanstrom LL, Aye RW, Wexner SD, Martinez JM, Ross SB, Awad MM (2013) General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg 258:440–449CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Swendiman RA, Jones RE, Blinman TA, Krummel T (2021) Disrupting the fellowship match: COVID-19 and the applicant arms race. J Surg Educ 78:1069–1072CrossRefPubMed Swendiman RA, Jones RE, Blinman TA, Krummel T (2021) Disrupting the fellowship match: COVID-19 and the applicant arms race. J Surg Educ 78:1069–1072CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Buonpane C, Young S, Tuliszewski R, Forman J, Jayanathan M, Dudash M, Maloney C (2020) Do’s and don’ts of the virtual interview: perspectives from residency and fellowship applicants. J Grad Med Educ 12:671–673CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Buonpane C, Young S, Tuliszewski R, Forman J, Jayanathan M, Dudash M, Maloney C (2020) Do’s and don’ts of the virtual interview: perspectives from residency and fellowship applicants. J Grad Med Educ 12:671–673CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Huppert LA, Hsiao EC, Cho KC, Marquez C, Chaudhry RI, Frank J, Goglin SE, Hsu G, Kathpalia P, Khanna R (2021) Virtual interviews at graduate medical education training programs: determining evidence-based best practices. Acad Med 96:1137–1145CrossRefPubMed Huppert LA, Hsiao EC, Cho KC, Marquez C, Chaudhry RI, Frank J, Goglin SE, Hsu G, Kathpalia P, Khanna R (2021) Virtual interviews at graduate medical education training programs: determining evidence-based best practices. Acad Med 96:1137–1145CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee TC, McKinley SK, Dream SY, Grubbs EG, Dissanaike S, Fong ZV (2021) Pearls and pitfalls of the virtual interview: perspectives from both sides of the camera. J Surg Res 262:240–243CrossRefPubMed Lee TC, McKinley SK, Dream SY, Grubbs EG, Dissanaike S, Fong ZV (2021) Pearls and pitfalls of the virtual interview: perspectives from both sides of the camera. J Surg Res 262:240–243CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat McKinley SK, Fong ZV, Udelsman B, Rickert CG (2021) Successful virtual interviews: perspectives from recent surgical fellowship applicants and advice for both applicants and programs. Ann Surg 273:e55–e59CrossRefPubMed McKinley SK, Fong ZV, Udelsman B, Rickert CG (2021) Successful virtual interviews: perspectives from recent surgical fellowship applicants and advice for both applicants and programs. Ann Surg 273:e55–e59CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill MV, Ross EA, Crawford D, Lai L, Turaga K, Grubbs EG, Mullen J, Dineen S, D’Angelica M, Reddy S (2021) Program and candidate experience with virtual interviews for the 2020 Complex General Surgical Oncology interview season during the COVID pandemic. Am J Surg 222:99–103CrossRefPubMed Hill MV, Ross EA, Crawford D, Lai L, Turaga K, Grubbs EG, Mullen J, Dineen S, D’Angelica M, Reddy S (2021) Program and candidate experience with virtual interviews for the 2020 Complex General Surgical Oncology interview season during the COVID pandemic. Am J Surg 222:99–103CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenbluth AL, Nagaraj MB, Brunt LM, Scott DJ (2022) Survey of the 2020 Fellowship Council application and match process and the impact of COVID-19. Surg Endosc 36(9):6653–6660CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rosenbluth AL, Nagaraj MB, Brunt LM, Scott DJ (2022) Survey of the 2020 Fellowship Council application and match process and the impact of COVID-19. Surg Endosc 36(9):6653–6660CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Allam JS, Burkart KM, Çoruh B, Lee M, Hinkle L, Kreider M, Tatem G, Witt C, Ashton RW, Huie T (2022) The virtual interview experience: perspectives of pulmonary and critical care fellowship applicants. ATS Sch 3:76–86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Allam JS, Burkart KM, Çoruh B, Lee M, Hinkle L, Kreider M, Tatem G, Witt C, Ashton RW, Huie T (2022) The virtual interview experience: perspectives of pulmonary and critical care fellowship applicants. ATS Sch 3:76–86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Grova MM, Donohue SJ, Meyers MO, Kim HJ, Ollila DW (2021) Direct comparison of in-person versus virtual interviews for complex general surgical oncology fellowship in the COVID-19 era. Ann Surg Oncol 28:1908–1915CrossRefPubMed Grova MM, Donohue SJ, Meyers MO, Kim HJ, Ollila DW (2021) Direct comparison of in-person versus virtual interviews for complex general surgical oncology fellowship in the COVID-19 era. Ann Surg Oncol 28:1908–1915CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Newsome K, Selvakumar S, McKenny M, Elkbuli A (2021) Shifting the surgical residency match to a 100% virtual interview format during the COVID-19 pandemic, how has it affected placement into surgical training programs? Am Surg 89(4):935–941CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Newsome K, Selvakumar S, McKenny M, Elkbuli A (2021) Shifting the surgical residency match to a 100% virtual interview format during the COVID-19 pandemic, how has it affected placement into surgical training programs? Am Surg 89(4):935–941CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajesh A, Asaad M, Elmorsi R, Ferry AM, Maricevich RS (2021) The virtual interview experience for MATCH 2021: a pilot survey of general surgery residency program directors. Am Surg 89(4):720–725CrossRefPubMed Rajesh A, Asaad M, Elmorsi R, Ferry AM, Maricevich RS (2021) The virtual interview experience for MATCH 2021: a pilot survey of general surgery residency program directors. Am Surg 89(4):720–725CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson KA, Shin B, Gangadharan SP (2021) A comparison between in-person and virtual fellowship interviews during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Surg Educ 78:1175–1181CrossRefPubMed Robinson KA, Shin B, Gangadharan SP (2021) A comparison between in-person and virtual fellowship interviews during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Surg Educ 78:1175–1181CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fowler DL, Hogle NJ (2013) The fellowship council: a decade of impact on surgical training. Surg Endosc 27:3548–3554CrossRefPubMed Fowler DL, Hogle NJ (2013) The fellowship council: a decade of impact on surgical training. Surg Endosc 27:3548–3554CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammoud MM, Standiford T, Carmody JB (2020) Potential implications of COVID-19 for the 2020–2021 residency application cycle. JAMA 324:29–30CrossRefPubMed Hammoud MM, Standiford T, Carmody JB (2020) Potential implications of COVID-19 for the 2020–2021 residency application cycle. JAMA 324:29–30CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajesh A, Asaad M (2021) Alternative strategies for evaluating general surgery residency applicants and an interview limit for MATCH 2021: an impending necessity. Ann Surg 273:109–111CrossRefPubMed Rajesh A, Asaad M (2021) Alternative strategies for evaluating general surgery residency applicants and an interview limit for MATCH 2021: an impending necessity. Ann Surg 273:109–111CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang CD, Thorne MC, Malekzadeh S, Pletcher SD (2023) Two-year interview and match outcomes of otolaryngology preference signaling. Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 168:377–383CrossRefPubMed Chang CD, Thorne MC, Malekzadeh S, Pletcher SD (2023) Two-year interview and match outcomes of otolaryngology preference signaling. Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 168:377–383CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Leopold Z, Rajagopalan A, Mikhail M, Lee G, Tabakin A, Park JH, Jang T, Elsamra SE, Singer EA (2022) Preference signaling in the 2022 urology residency match—the applicant perspective. Urology 170:33–37CrossRefPubMed Leopold Z, Rajagopalan A, Mikhail M, Lee G, Tabakin A, Park JH, Jang T, Elsamra SE, Singer EA (2022) Preference signaling in the 2022 urology residency match—the applicant perspective. Urology 170:33–37CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Traxel E, Richstone L, Brown J, Mirza M, Greene K, Thavaseelan S (2022) Preference signaling pilot in the urology match: outcomes and perceptions. Urology 170:27–32CrossRefPubMed Traxel E, Richstone L, Brown J, Mirza M, Greene K, Thavaseelan S (2022) Preference signaling pilot in the urology match: outcomes and perceptions. Urology 170:27–32CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Daniel M, Gottlieb M, Wooten D, Stojan J, Haas MR, Bailey J, Evans S, Lee D, Goldberg C, Fernandez J (2022) Virtual interviewing for graduate medical education recruitment and selection: a BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 80. Med Teach 44(12):1313–1331CrossRefPubMed Daniel M, Gottlieb M, Wooten D, Stojan J, Haas MR, Bailey J, Evans S, Lee D, Goldberg C, Fernandez J (2022) Virtual interviewing for graduate medical education recruitment and selection: a BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 80. Med Teach 44(12):1313–1331CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Anteby R, Sinyard RD, Jogerst KM, McKinley SK, Coe TM, Petrusa E, Phitayakorn R, Scott DJ, Brunt LM, Gee DW (2022) Challenges of virtual interviewing for surgical fellowships: a qualitative analysis of applicant experiences. Surg Endosc 36:3763–3771CrossRefPubMed Anteby R, Sinyard RD, Jogerst KM, McKinley SK, Coe TM, Petrusa E, Phitayakorn R, Scott DJ, Brunt LM, Gee DW (2022) Challenges of virtual interviewing for surgical fellowships: a qualitative analysis of applicant experiences. Surg Endosc 36:3763–3771CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ponterio JM, Levy L, Lakhi NA (2022) Evaluation of the virtual interview format for resident recruitment as a result of COVID-19 restrictions: residency program directors’ perspectives. Acad Med 97:1360–1367CrossRefPubMed Ponterio JM, Levy L, Lakhi NA (2022) Evaluation of the virtual interview format for resident recruitment as a result of COVID-19 restrictions: residency program directors’ perspectives. Acad Med 97:1360–1367CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lamberton T, Tung C, Kaji AH, Neville AL, Singer GA, Simms ER, Lona Y, de Virgilio C (2022) Faculty scoring of general surgery residency interviewees: a comparison of in-person and virtual interview formats. J Surg Educ 79:e69–e75CrossRef Lamberton T, Tung C, Kaji AH, Neville AL, Singer GA, Simms ER, Lona Y, de Virgilio C (2022) Faculty scoring of general surgery residency interviewees: a comparison of in-person and virtual interview formats. J Surg Educ 79:e69–e75CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho JW, Joung RH, Krueger M, Cid C, Holmstrom AL, Schlick CJR, Tatebe LC, Alam HB, Halverson AL, Christopher DA (2022) Understanding general surgery applicant expectations and perceptions in the virtual interview process. J Surg Educ 79:e61–e68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ho JW, Joung RH, Krueger M, Cid C, Holmstrom AL, Schlick CJR, Tatebe LC, Alam HB, Halverson AL, Christopher DA (2022) Understanding general surgery applicant expectations and perceptions in the virtual interview process. J Surg Educ 79:e61–e68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLay TK, Singh NP, Duong TA, Rais-Bahrami S, King TW, Chen H, Corey BL (2022) Virtual interactions and the 2020–2021 residency application cycle in general surgery: a look ahead. J Surg Res 278:331–336CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral DeLay TK, Singh NP, Duong TA, Rais-Bahrami S, King TW, Chen H, Corey BL (2022) Virtual interactions and the 2020–2021 residency application cycle in general surgery: a look ahead. J Surg Res 278:331–336CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Majumder A, Eckhouse SR, Brunt LM, Awad MM, Dimou FM, Eagon JC, Holden S, Fone H, Blatnik JA (2020) Initial experience with a virtual platform for advanced gastrointestinal minimally invasive surgery fellowship interviews. J Am Coll Surg 231:670–678CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Majumder A, Eckhouse SR, Brunt LM, Awad MM, Dimou FM, Eagon JC, Holden S, Fone H, Blatnik JA (2020) Initial experience with a virtual platform for advanced gastrointestinal minimally invasive surgery fellowship interviews. J Am Coll Surg 231:670–678CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Geary AD, Wang TS, Lindeman B, Kuo JH, Lyden ML, Shen WT, Morris-Wiseman LF, Carty SE, Drake FT (2022) Perspectives on virtual interviews—a follow-up study of the comprehensive endocrine surgery fellowship interview process. Surgery 171:259–264CrossRefPubMed Geary AD, Wang TS, Lindeman B, Kuo JH, Lyden ML, Shen WT, Morris-Wiseman LF, Carty SE, Drake FT (2022) Perspectives on virtual interviews—a follow-up study of the comprehensive endocrine surgery fellowship interview process. Surgery 171:259–264CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The impact of virtual interviews on the Fellowship Council application and main match process
verfasst von
Douglas J. Cassidy
Julie M. Clanahan
Fei Wan
Rohan Jeyarajah
L. Michael Brunt
Publikationsdatum
25.09.2023
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 12/2023
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10424-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2023

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Medizinstudium Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.