nach oben

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

Erschienen in:

05.04.2018 | Editorial

The Power of Knowledge, Responses to Change, and the Gymnastics of Causation

verfasst von: Michael A. Ashby, Bronwen Morrell

Erschienen in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

This issues explores, inter alia, and in its usual diversity, themes of disclosure, knowledge, response to change, and death causation. We have nine Original Research articles, five Critical Perspectives, one Critical Response, and one Book Review, as well as two Guest Editorials, and the usual Recent Developments. Amongst the Original Research and Critical Perspectives articles we have authors from Argentina, Australia, China, Italy, Jordan, The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. …

Armus, D. 2016. On TB vaccines, patients’ demands, and modern printed media in times of biomedical uncertainties: Buenos Aires, 1920–1950. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13(1): 35–45.CrossRefPubMed

Borgan, S.F., J.Z. Amarin, A.K. Othman, H.H. Suradi, Y.Z. Qwaider. 2018. Truth disclosure practices of physicians in Jordan. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9837-x

Camporesi, S. 2018. Human embryos, genome editing, and non-invasive prenatal testing: some reflections on ethics and reproduction looking back at 2017 and ahead at 2018. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1): https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9840-2.

Carfora, A., P. Cassandro, A. Feola, F. La Sala, R. Petrella, and R. Borriello. 2018. Ethical implications in vaccine pharmacotherapy for treatment and prevention of drug of abuse dependence. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9834-5

Cavaliere, G. 2018. Disciplining bioethics: The debate over human embryo research. Review of J. Benjamin Hurlbut, 2017, Experiments in democracy: Human embryo research and the politics of bioethics, Columbia University Press (New York, 978-0-231-17954-6, 376 pp.). Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9830-9

Duckett, S. 2018. Knowing, anticipating, even facilitating but still not intending: Another challenge to double effect reasoning. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9827-4

Essex, R., and D. Isaacs. 2018. The ethics of discharging asylum seekers to harm: A case from Australia. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9833-6

Frekelton, I., and D. Mendelson (eds). 2002. Causation in law and medicine. Dartmouth: Ashgate.

Jacmon, H. 2018. Disclosure is inadequate as a solution to managing conflicts of interest in human research. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9824-7

Lima, N.S. 2018. Narrative identity in third party reproduction: Normative aspects and ethical challenges. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9823-8

Magee, B. 1997. Confessions of a philosopher. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

Manzini, A., and D. Vears. 2018. Predictive psychiatric genetic testing in minors: An exploration of the non-medical benefits. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9828-3

Parker, M., L. Willmott, B. White, G. Williams, and C. Cartwright. 2018. Law as clinical evidence: A new constitutive model of medical education and decision-making. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9836-3

Penders, B. 2018. Beyond trust: Plagiarism and truth. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9825-6

Quiñones, E.B., L. Goldin, I.M.I. Bignone, and R.A. Diez. 2018. A critical view of “On TB vaccines, patients’ demands, and modern printed media in times of biomedical uncertainties: Buenos Aires, 1920–1950”. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9832-7

Richards, B., and J. Coggon. 2018. Assisted dying in Australia and limiting court involvement in withdrawal of nutrition and hydration. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9839-8

Shahvisi, A. 2018. Engendering harm: A critique of sex selection for “family balancing”. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9835-4

Shaw, D. 2018. Protecting participants in thought experiments: The role of the research ethics committee. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9831-8

Singer P. 1996. Rethinking life and death. St Martin’s Press.

Smith, M.K., and M. Taylor-Sands. 2018. Comparing non-medical sex selection and saviour sibling selection in the case of JS and LS v Patient Review Panel: Beyond the welfare of the child? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9838-9

Soofi, H. 2018. Mode 2 knowledge production in the context of medical research: A call for further clarifications. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9822-9

Tamariz, L., I. Kirolos, F. Pendola, E.N. Marcus, O. Carrasquillo, J. Rivadeneira, and A. Palacio. 2018. Minority veterans are more willing to participate in complex studies compared to non-minorities. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9829-2

Zhang, L., X.X. Huang, and H.F. Chen. 2018. An exploration of the protective effects of investigators’ ethical awareness upon subjects of drug clinical trials in China. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9826-5

Titel: The Power of Knowledge, Responses to Change, and the Gymnastics of Causation
verfasst von: Michael A. Ashby
Bronwen Morrell
Publikationsdatum: 05.04.2018
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Erschienen in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Elektronische ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9849-6

Springer Medizin

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

A Critical View of “On TB Vaccines, Patients’ Demands, and Modern Printed Media in Times of Biomedical Uncertainties: Buenos Aires, 1920–1950”

Protecting Participants in Thought Experiments: The Role of the Research Ethics Committee

Ethical Implications in Vaccine Pharmacotherapy for Treatment and Prevention of Drug of Abuse Dependence

The Ethics of Discharging Asylum Seekers to Harm: A Case From Australia

Comparing Non-Medical Sex Selection and Saviour Sibling Selection in the Case of JS and LS v Patient Review Panel: Beyond the Welfare of the Child?

Erratum to: Inhospitable Healthcare Spaces: Why Diversity Training on LGBTQIA Issues Is Not Enough