nach oben

Updates in Surgery

Erschienen in:

29.05.2020 | Review Article

The robotic single-port platform for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Vito Andrea Capozzi, Giulia Armano, Andrea Rosati, Alessandro Tropea, Antonio Biondi

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Since the first robotic single-site hysterectomy was performed, the research focused on the use of robotic single-site surgery (RSSS) for all gynecological conditions. This review aims to examine the studies available in the literature on RSSS in gynecology both for benign and malignant indications. The systematic review was carried out in agreement with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement (PRISMA). All the articles were grouped into three sets based on the surgical indication (Group 1, 2, and 3 for benign, malignant, and mixed diseases, respectively). Two hundred and fifty total studies were analyzed, and 27 articles were included in the review. A total of 1065 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 605 patients were included in group 1, 260 in group 2, and 200 in group 3. Ten (1.7%) patients with benign pathology, 16 (6.2%) patients with malignant disease, and 5 (2.5%) patients with both diseases developed major complications. Two (0.3%) patients in group 1, 3 (1.2%) patients in group 2 and 5 (2.5%) in group 3 were converted to a different type of surgery. No significant differences were found between groups for BMI (p = 0.235), operative time (p = 0.723), estimated blood loss (EBL) (p = 0.342), and hospital stay (p = 0.146). The complications and conversions incidence through pooled analysis showed a higher general conversion rate (p = 0.012) in group 3 (3.0%) and higher complications rate (p = 0.001) in group 2 (5.3%) compared to the other groups. RSSS seems to be a feasible and safe procedure for all gynecological surgical procedures. A long-term analysis would be necessary before considering the RSSS oncologically safe for patients with malignant disease.

Cosentino F, Vizzielli G, Turco LC, Fagotti A, Cianci S, Vargiu V, Zannoni GF, Ferrandina G, Scambia G (2018) Near-infrared imaging with indocyanine green for detection of endometriosis lesions (gre-endo trial): a pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25(7):1249–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.02.023CrossRefPubMed

Gallotta V, Conte C, Giudice MT, Nero C, Vizzielli G, Gueli Alletti S, Cianci S, Lodoli C, Di Giorgio A, De Rose AM, Fagotti A, Scambia G, Ferrandina G (2018) Secondary laparoscopic cytoreduction in recurrent ovarian cancer: a large single-institution experience. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25(4):644–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.024CrossRefPubMed

Bian C, Yao K, Li L, Yi T, Zhao X (2016) Primary debulking surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293(1):163–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3813-zCrossRefPubMed

Gueli Alletti S, Vizzielli G, Lafuenti L, Costantini B, Fagotti A, Fedele C, Cianci S, Perrone E, Gallotta V, Rossitto C, Scambia G (2018) Single-institution propensity-matched study to evaluate the psychological effect of minimally invasive interval debulking surgery versus standard laparotomic treatment: from body to mind and back. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25(5):816–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.007CrossRefPubMed

Bastu E, Yasa C, Dural O, Ozgor BY, Yilmaz G, Gungor Ugurlucan F, Buyru F, Banerjee S (2016) Comparison of 2 methods of vaginal cuff closure at laparoscopic hysterectomy and their effect on female sexual function and vaginal length: a randomized clinical study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(6):986–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.07.007CrossRefPubMed

Uccella S, Capozzi VA, Ricco M, Perrone E, Zanello M, Ferrari S, Zorzato PC, Seracchioli R, Cromi A, Serati M, Ergasti R, Fanfani F, Berretta R, Malzoni M, Cianci S, Vizza E, Guido M, Legge F, Ciravolo G, Gueli Alletti S, Ghezzi F, Candiani M, Scambia G (2019) Sexual function following laparoscopic versus transvaginal closure of the vaginal vault after laparoscopic hysterectomy: secondary analysis of a randomized trial by the italian society of gynecological endoscopy using a validated questionnaire. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.03.018CrossRefPubMed

Vitale SG, Valenti G, Gulino FA, Cignini P, Biondi A (2016) Surgical treatment of high stage endometrial cancer: current perspectives. Updat Surg 68(2):149–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-015-0340-1CrossRef

Zanfagnin V, Ferrero A, Biglia N, Aletti G, Gill SE, Makdisi PB, Multinu F, Mariani A (2016) The role of surgery in recurrent endometrial cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 16(7):741–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2016.1190650CrossRefPubMed

Vitale SG, Marilli I, Lodato M, Tropea A, Cianci A (2013) The role of cytoreductive surgery in advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a systematic review. Updates Surg 65(4):265–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-013-0213-4CrossRefPubMed

10.

Cianci S, Gueli Alletti S, Rumolo V, Rosati A, Rossitto C, Cosentino F, Turco LC, Vizzielli G, Fagotti A, Gallotta V, Ciccarone F, Scambia G, Uccella S (2019) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: factors associated with the rate of conversion to open surgery. J Obstet Gynecol 39(6):805–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2019.1575342CrossRef

11.

Kondo W, Bourdel N, Marengo F, Azuar AS, Tran-ba-Vang X, Roman H, Jardon K, Pouly JL, Rabischong B, Botchorishvili R, Mage G, Canis M (2011) Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy for enlarged uteri. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(3):310–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2011.01.006CrossRefPubMed

12.

Gueli Alletti S, Cianci S, Perrone E, Fanfani F, Vascone C, Uccella S, Gallotta V, Vizzielli G, Fagotti A, Monterossi G, Scambia G, Rossitto C (2019) Technological innovation and personalized surgical treatment for early-stage endometrial cancer patients: a prospective multicenter Italian experience to evaluate the novel percutaneous approach. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 234:218–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.024CrossRefPubMed

13.

Maenpaa MM, Nieminen K, Tomas EI, Laurila M, Luukkaala TH, Maenpaa JU (2016) Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.005CrossRefPubMed

14.

Gueli Alletti S, Rossitto C, Perrone E, Cianci S, De Blasis I, Fagotti A, Scambia G (2017) Needleoscopic conservative staging of borderline ovarian tumor. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24(4):529–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.009CrossRefPubMed

15.

Lagana AS, Vitale SG, De Dominici R, Padula F, Rapisarda AM, Biondi A, Cianci S, Valenti G, Capriglione S, Frangez HB, Sturlese E (2016) Fertility outcome after laparoscopic salpingostomy or salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy a 12-years retrospective cohort study. Ann Ital Chir 87:461–465PubMed

16.

Rossitto C, Cianci S, Gueli Alletti S, Perrone E, Pizzacalla S, Scambia G (2017) Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, single-port and percutaneous hysterectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive approaches in gynecologic surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 216:125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.026CrossRefPubMed

17.

Bellia A, Vitale SG, Lagana AS, Cannone F, Houvenaeghel G, Rua S, Ladaique A, Jauffret C, Ettore G, Lambaudie E (2016) Feasibility and surgical outcomes of conventional and robot-assisted laparoscopy for early-stage ovarian cancer: a retrospective, multicenter analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294(3):615–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4087-9CrossRefPubMed

18.

van de Vrie R, Rutten MJ, Asseler JD, Leeflang MM, Kenter GG, Mol BWJ, Buist M (2019) Laparoscopy for diagnosing resectability of disease in women with advanced ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858(CD009786.pub3)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Rossetti D, Vitale SG, Gulino FA, Rapisarda AMC, Valenti G, Zigarelli M, Sarpietro G, Frigerio L (2016) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for the assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis resectability in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Eur J Gynecol Oncol 37(5):671–673

20.

Fagotti A, Costantini B, Gallotta V, Cianci S, Ronsini C, Petrillo M, Pacciani M, Scambia G, Fanfani F (2015) Minimally invasive secondary cytoreduction plus HIPEC versus open surgery plus HIPEC in isolated relapse from ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study on perioperative outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22(3):428–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.11.008CrossRefPubMed

21.

Gueli Alletti S, Rossitto C, Cianci S, Perrone E, Pizzacalla S, Monterossi G, Vizzielli G, Gidaro S, Scambia G (2018) The senhance surgical robotic system ("Senhance") for total hysterectomy in obese patients: a pilot study. J Robot Surg 12(2):229–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0718-9CrossRefPubMed

22.

Moukarzel LA, Fader AN, Tanner EJ (2017) Feasibility of robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in the gynecologic oncology setting. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24(2):258–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.013CrossRefPubMed

23.

Gueli Alletti S, Rossitto C, Cianci S, Restaino S, Costantini B, Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Cosentino F, Scambia G (2016) Telelap ALF-X vs standard laparoscopy for the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer: a single-institution retrospective cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(3):378–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.11.006CrossRefPubMed

24.

Eklind S, Lindfors A, Sjoli P, Dahm-Kahler P (2015) A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25(2):250–256. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000357CrossRefPubMed

25.

Park DA, Lee DH, Kim SW, Lee SH (2016) Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(9):1303–1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.06.400CrossRefPubMed

26.

Gueli Alletti S, Rossitto C, Cianci S, Scambia G (2016) Telelap ALF-X total hysterectomy for early stage endometrial cancer: new frontier of robotic gynecological surgery. Gynecol Oncol 140(3):575–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.01.018CrossRefPubMed

27.

Fader AN, Escobar PF (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol 114(2):157–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.05.020CrossRefPubMed

28.

Beasley R, Clayton T, Crane J, von Mutius E, Lai CK, Montefort S, Stewart A, Group IPTS (2008) Association between paracetamol use in infancy and childhood, and risk of asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema in children aged 6–7 years: analysis from phase three of the ISAAC programme. Lancet 372(9643):1039–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61445-2CrossRefPubMed

29.

Evers L, Bouvy N, Branje D, Peeters A (2017) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 31(9):3437–3448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5381-0CrossRefPubMed

30.

Bogliolo S, Ferrero S, Cassani C, Musacchi V, Zanellini F, Dominoni M, Spinillo A, Gardella B (2016) Single-site versus multiport robotic hysterectomy in benign gynecologic diseases: a retrospective evaluation of surgical outcomes and cost analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(4):603–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.02.006CrossRefPubMed

31.

Chen YJ, Wang PH, Ocampo EJ, Twu NF, Yen MS, Chao KC (2011) Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 117(4):906–912. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820c666aCrossRefPubMed

32.

Cianci S, Rosati A, Rumolo V, Gueli Alletti S, Gallotta V, Turco LC, Corrado G, Vizzielli G, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Scambia G, Uccella S (2019) Robotic single-port platform in general, urologic, and gynecologic surgeries: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. World J Surg 43(10):2401–2419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05049-0CrossRefPubMed

33.

Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, Group P-P (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 350:g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647CrossRefPubMed

34.

Health UDo, Services H (2009) Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.0. National Institutes of Health. Nat Cancer Inst 4(3):1–79

35.

Akdemir A, Yildirim N, Zeybek B, Karaman S, Sendag F (2015) Single incision trans-umbilical total hysterectomy: robotic or laparoscopic? Gynecol Obstet Invest 80(2):93–98. https://doi.org/10.1159/000370000CrossRefPubMed

36.

Bogliolo S, Mereu L, Cassani C, Gardella B, Zanellini F, Dominoni M, Babilonti L, Delpezzo C, Tateo S, Spinillo A (2015) Robotic single-site hysterectomy: two institutions’ preliminary experience. Int J Med Robot 11(2):159–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1613CrossRefPubMed

37.

Cela V, Freschi L, Simi G, Ruggiero M, Tana R, Pluchino N (2013) Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome. Surg Endosc 27(7):2638–2643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2780-8CrossRefPubMed

38.

Choi EJ, Rho AM, Lee SR, Jeong K, Moon HS (2017) Robotic single-site myomectomy: clinical analysis of 61 consecutive cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24(4):632–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.02.003CrossRefPubMed

39.

Chung H, Jang TK, Nam SH, Kwon SH, Shin SJ, Cho CH (2019) Robotic single-site staging operation for early-stage endometrial cancer: initial experience at a single institution. Obstet Gynecol Sci 62(3):149–156. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2019.62.3.149CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Corrado G, Mereu L, Bogliolo S, Cela V, Freschi L, Carlin R, Gardella B, Mancini E, Tateo S, Spinillo A, Vizza E (2016) Robotic single site staging in endometrial cancer: a multi-institution study. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(10):1506–1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.08.014CrossRefPubMed

41.

Fagotti A, Corrado G, Fanfani F, Mancini M, Paglia A, Vizzielli G, Sindico S, Scambia G, Vizza E (2013) Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSS-H) vs laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy (LESS-H) in early endometrial cancer: a double-institution case-control study. Gynecol Oncol 130(1):219–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.004CrossRefPubMed

42.

Gargiulo AR, Choussein S, Srouji SS, Cedo LE, Escobar PF (2017) Coaxial robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy. J Robot Surg 11(1):27–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0603-yCrossRefPubMed

43.

Gungor M, Kahraman K, Dursun P, Ozbasli E, Genim C (2018) Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic. J Robot Surg 12(1):87–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0699-8CrossRefPubMed

44.

Jayakumaran J, Wiercinski K, Buffington C, Caceres A (2018) Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site benign gynecologic surgery: a single-center experience. J Robot Surg 12(3):447–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0755-4CrossRefPubMed

45.

Kim M, Kim MK, Kim ML, Jung YW, Yun BS, Seong SJ (2019) Robotic single-site myomectomy: a single-center experience of 101 consecutive cases. Int J Med Robot 15(1):e1959. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1959CrossRefPubMed

46.

Kliethermes C, Blazek K, Ali K, Nijjar JB, Kliethermes S, Guan X (2017) Postoperative pain after single-site versus multiport hysterectomy. JSLS. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2017.00065CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Lauterbach R, Mustafa-Mikhail S, Matanes E, Amit A, Wiener Z, Lowenstein L (2019) Single-port versus multi-port robotic sacrocervicopexy: Establishment of a learning curve and short-term outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 239:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.034CrossRefPubMed

48.

Liu J, Bardawil E, Zurawin RK, Wu J, Fu H, Orejuela F, Guan X (2018) Robotic single-site sacrocolpopexy with retroperitoneal tunneling. JSLS. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Matanes E, Lauterbach R, Mustafa-Mikhail S, Amit A, Wiener Z, Lowenstein L (2017) Single port robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy: our experience with the first 25 cases. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 23(3):e14–e18. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000397CrossRefPubMed

50.

Moawad GN, Tyan P, Paek J, Tappy EE, Park D, Choussein S, Srouji SS, Gargiulo A (2019) Comparison between single-site and multiport robot-assisted myomectomy. J Robot Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00919-0CrossRefPubMed

51.

Moon HS, Shim JE, Lee SR, Jeong K (2018) The comparison of robotic single-site surgery to single-port laparoendoscopic surgery for the treatment of advanced-stage endometriosis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28(12):1483–1488. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0118CrossRefPubMed

52.

Moukarzel LA, Sinno AK, Fader AN, Tanner EJ (2017) Comparing single-site and multiport robotic hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer: surgical outcomes and cost analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24(6):977–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.05.016CrossRefPubMed

53.

Paek J, Lee JD, Kong TW, Chang SJ, Ryu HS (2016) Robotic single-site versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a propensity score matching study. Surg Endosc 30(3):1043–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4292-9CrossRefPubMed

54.

Paek J, Lee JD, Kong TW, Chang SJ, Ryu HS (2016) Robotic single-site versus laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for adnexal tumours: a propensity score-matching analysis. Int J Med Robot 12(4):694–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1707CrossRefPubMed

55.

Scheib SA, Fader AN (2015) Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(2):179–e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.057CrossRefPubMed

56.

Sendag F, Akdemir A, Zeybek B, Ozdemir A, Gunusen I, Oztekin MK (2014) Single-site robotic total hysterectomy: standardization of technique and surgical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(4):689–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.02.006CrossRefPubMed

57.

Vizza E, Chiofalo B, Cutillo G, Mancini E, Baiocco E, Zampa A, Bufalo A, Corrado G (2018) Robotic single site radical hysterectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancers. J Gynecol Oncol 29(1):e2. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e2CrossRefPubMed

58.

Vizza E, Corrado G, Mancini E, Baiocco E, Patrizi L, Fabrizi L, Colantonio L, Cimino M, Sindico S, Forastiere E (2013) Robotic single-site hysterectomy in low risk endometrial cancer: a pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol 20(8):2759–2764. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2922-9CrossRefPubMed

59.

Buckley de Meritens A, Kim J, Dinkelspiel H, Chapman-Davis E, Caputo T, Holcomb KM (2017) Feasibility and learning curve of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24(2):323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.007CrossRefPubMed

60.

Caruso S, Cianci S, Malandrino C, Cicero C, Lo Presti L, Cianci A (2014) Quality of sexual life of women using the contraceptive vaginal ring in extended cycles: preliminary report. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 19(4):307–314. https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2014.914488CrossRefPubMed

61.

Caruso S, Iraci M, Cianci S, Fava V, Casella E, Cianci A (2016) Comparative, open-label prospective study on the quality of life and sexual function of women affected by endometriosis-associated pelvic pain on 2 mg dienogest/30 microg ethinyl estradiol continuous or 21/7 regimen oral contraceptive. J Endocrinol Invest 39(8):923–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-016-0460-6CrossRefPubMed

62.

Guida M, Di Spiezio SA, Bramante S, Sparice S, Acunzo G, Tommaselli GA, Di Carlo C, Pellicano M, Greco E, Nappi C (2005) Effects of two types of hormonal contraception–oral versus intravaginal–on the sexual life of women and their partners. Hum Reprod 20(4):1100–1106. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh686CrossRefPubMed

63.

Caruso S, Rapisarda AM, Cianci S (2016) Sexuality in menopausal women. Curr Opin Psychiatry 29(6):323–330. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000280CrossRefPubMed

64.

Vitale SG, Caruso S, Rapisarda AMC, Cianci S, Cianci A (2018) Isoflavones, calcium, vitamin D and inulin improve quality of life, sexual function, body composition and metabolic parameters in menopausal women: result from a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Prz Menopauzalny 17(1):32–38. https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2018.73791CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

65.

Whicker M, Black J, Altwerger G, Menderes G, Feinberg J, Ratner E (2017) Management of sexuality, intimacy, and menopause symptoms in patients with ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 217(4):395–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.012CrossRefPubMed

66.

Caruso S, Agnello C, Malandrino C, Lo Presti L, Cicero C, Cianci S (2014) Do hormones influence women’s sex? Sexual activity over the menstrual cycle. J Sex Med 11(1):211–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12348CrossRefPubMed

67.

Paris I, Cianci S, Vizzielli G, Fagotti A, Ferrandina G, Gueli Alletti S, Costantini B, Cosentino F, Capoluongo E, Pasqualoni M, Scambia G (2018) Upfront HIPEC and bevacizumab-containing adjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Hyperthermia 35(1):370–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2018.1503346CrossRefPubMed

68.

Caruso S, Cianci S, Cariola M, Fava V, Di Pasqua S, Cianci A (2017) Improvement of low sexual desire due to antiandrogenic combined oral contraceptives after switching to an oral contraceptive containing 17β-Estradiol. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 26(7):728–734. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.5801CrossRef

69.

Caruso S, Mauro D, Maiolino L, Grillo C, Rapisarda AMC, Cianci S (2018) Effects of combined oral contraception containing drospirenone on premenstrual exacerbation of Meniere’s disease: preliminary study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 224:102–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.015CrossRefPubMed

70.

Gaboardi F, Pini G, Suardi N (2019) Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy (R-LESS-RP) with daVinci single-site^® platform concept and evolution of the technique following an IDEAL phase 1. J Robot Surg 13(2):215–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0839-9CrossRefPubMed

71.

Han HJ, Kang CM (2019) Reduced port minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: single-port laparoscopic versus robotic single-site plus one-port distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 33(4):1091–1099CrossRefPubMed

Titel: The robotic single-port platform for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
verfasst von: Vito Andrea Capozzi
Giulia Armano
Andrea Rosati
Alessandro Tropea
Antonio Biondi
Publikationsdatum: 29.05.2020
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00812-8

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren.

Recycling im OP – möglich, aber teuer

05.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Auch wenn sich Krankenhäuser nachhaltig und grün geben – sie tragen aktuell erheblich zu den CO₂-Emissionen bei und produzieren jede Menge Müll. Ein Pilotprojekt aus Bonn zeigt, dass viele Op.-Abfälle wiederverwertet werden können.

Im OP der Zukunft läuft nichts mehr ohne Kollege Roboter

04.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Der OP in der Zukunft wird mit weniger Personal auskommen – nicht, weil die Technik das medizinische Fachpersonal verdrängt, sondern weil der Personalmangel es nötig macht.

Nur selten Nachblutungen nach Abszesstonsillektomie

03.05.2024 Tonsillektomie Nachrichten

In einer Metaanalyse von 18 Studien war die Rate von Nachblutungen nach einer Abszesstonsillektomie mit weniger als 7% recht niedrig. Nur rund 2% der Behandelten mussten nachoperiert werden. Die Therapie scheint damit recht sicher zu sein.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

The robotic single-port platform for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

Recycling im OP – möglich, aber teuer

Im OP der Zukunft läuft nichts mehr ohne Kollege Roboter

Nur selten Nachblutungen nach Abszesstonsillektomie

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Robotic hepatectomy and biliary reconstruction for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a pioneer western case series

Robotic rectal resection: oncologic outcomes

Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Robotic-assisted resection for beyond TME rectal cancer: a novel classification and analysis from a specialized center

Cholecystectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system from Korea: the first clinical study

Perioperative and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopy-assisted hemicolectomy for left-sided colon cancers: a retrospective study

Update Chirurgie