Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 6/2021

07.09.2021 | Original Article

The Role of Preoperative Breast Reconstruction Information in Selection of Immediate Reconstruction After Modified Radical Mastectomy—A Randomized Study

verfasst von: Fan Zhang, Xiaojie Wang, Hailing Guo

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Immediate breast reconstruction has become an important supplement after modified radical mastectomy. The role of preoperative breast reconstruction information has not been widely popularized in China. It may play an important role in choosing immediate breast reconstruction. In this paper, we investigated whether there was an effect of the role of preoperative breast reconstruction information on the difference about choosing immediate breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy at signing the operation consent.

Methods

From 2015 January to March 2018, newly admitted 100 patients with breast carcinoma must receive modified radical mastectomy. All these patients’ conditions met the requirements of immediate breast reconstruction. Patient age, breast reconstruction cognition, marital status, education, and family economics were recorded. They were randomly classified into two groups (A & B). Preoperative breast reconstruction information was designed and prepared. When it came to signing operation consent, Group A received preoperative breast reconstruction information and Group B did not receive it. We recorded whether they were willing to receive immediate breast reconstruction in different groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in patient age, breast reconstruction cognition, marital status, education, and family economics (P > 0.05). Thirty-two patients agreed to receive breast reconstruction and 18 patients did not agree to receive breast reconstruction in Group A when 24 patients agreed to receive breast reconstruction and 26 patients did not agree to receive breast reconstruction in Group B. There was a statistical significance (P < 0.05) between the above two groups.

Conclusion

Preoperative breast reconstruction information may be a vital role for explaining about choosing immediate breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy at signing the operation consent.

Level of Evidence II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sousa H, Castro S, Abreu J, Pereira MG (2019) A systematic review of factors affecting quality of life after postmastectomy breast reconstruction in women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5206. [Epub ahead of print] Sousa H, Castro S, Abreu J, Pereira MG (2019) A systematic review of factors affecting quality of life after postmastectomy breast reconstruction in women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​pon.​5206. [Epub ahead of print]
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kummerow KL, Du L, Penson DF et al (2014) Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer [J]. JAMA Surg 150(1):9–16CrossRef Kummerow KL, Du L, Penson DF et al (2014) Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer [J]. JAMA Surg 150(1):9–16CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lam WW, Chan M, Or A et al (2013) Reducing treatment decision conflict difficulties in breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial [J]. J Clin Oncol 31(23):2879–2885CrossRef Lam WW, Chan M, Or A et al (2013) Reducing treatment decision conflict difficulties in breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial [J]. J Clin Oncol 31(23):2879–2885CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Herring B, Paraskeva N, Tollow P, Harcourt D (2019) Women’s initial experiences of their appearance after mastectomy and/or breast reconstruction: a qualitative study. Psychooncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5196. [Epub ahead of print] Herring B, Paraskeva N, Tollow P, Harcourt D (2019) Women’s initial experiences of their appearance after mastectomy and/or breast reconstruction: a qualitative study. Psychooncology. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​pon.​5196. [Epub ahead of print]
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Siotos C, Naska A, Bello RJ, Uzosike A, Orfanos P, Euhus DM, Manahan MA, Cooney CM, Lagiou P, Rosson GD (2019) Survival and disease recurrence rates among breast cancer patients following mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(2):169e–177eCrossRef Siotos C, Naska A, Bello RJ, Uzosike A, Orfanos P, Euhus DM, Manahan MA, Cooney CM, Lagiou P, Rosson GD (2019) Survival and disease recurrence rates among breast cancer patients following mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(2):169e–177eCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Flanagan MR, Zabor EC, Romanoff A, Fuzesi S, Stempel M, Mehrara BJ, Morrow M, Pusic AL, Gemignani ML (2019) A comparison of patient-reported outcomes after breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy with implant breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 26(10):3133–3140CrossRef Flanagan MR, Zabor EC, Romanoff A, Fuzesi S, Stempel M, Mehrara BJ, Morrow M, Pusic AL, Gemignani ML (2019) A comparison of patient-reported outcomes after breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy with implant breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 26(10):3133–3140CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nava MB, Benson JR, Audretsch W, Blondeel P, Catanuto G, Clemens MW, Cordeiro PG, De Vita R, Hammond DC, Jassem J, Lozza L, Orecchia R, Pusic AL, Rancati A, Rezai M, Scaperrotta G, Spano A, Winters ZE, Rocco N (2019) International multidisciplinary expert panel consensus on breast reconstruction and radiotherapy. Br J Surg 106(10):1327–1340CrossRef Nava MB, Benson JR, Audretsch W, Blondeel P, Catanuto G, Clemens MW, Cordeiro PG, De Vita R, Hammond DC, Jassem J, Lozza L, Orecchia R, Pusic AL, Rancati A, Rezai M, Scaperrotta G, Spano A, Winters ZE, Rocco N (2019) International multidisciplinary expert panel consensus on breast reconstruction and radiotherapy. Br J Surg 106(10):1327–1340CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Howes BH, Waston DI, Xu C et al (2016) Quality of life following total mastectomy with and without reconstruction versus breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: a case-controlled cohort study[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(9):1184–1191CrossRef Howes BH, Waston DI, Xu C et al (2016) Quality of life following total mastectomy with and without reconstruction versus breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: a case-controlled cohort study[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(9):1184–1191CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamann M, Brunnbauer M, Scheithauer H, Hamann U, Braun M, Pölcher M (2019) Quality of life in breast cancer patients and surgical results of immediate tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 300(2):409–420CrossRef Hamann M, Brunnbauer M, Scheithauer H, Hamann U, Braun M, Pölcher M (2019) Quality of life in breast cancer patients and surgical results of immediate tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 300(2):409–420CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai A, Suckau J, Arkudas A, Beier JP, Momeni A, Horch RE (2019) Autologous breast reconstruction with Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous (TRAM) or Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flaps: an analysis of the 100 most cited articles. Med Sci Monit 12(25):3520–3536CrossRef Cai A, Suckau J, Arkudas A, Beier JP, Momeni A, Horch RE (2019) Autologous breast reconstruction with Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous (TRAM) or Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flaps: an analysis of the 100 most cited articles. Med Sci Monit 12(25):3520–3536CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Baek SH, Bae SJ, Yoon CI, Park SE, Cha CH, Ahn SG, Kim YS, Roh TS, Jeong J (2019) Immediate breast reconstruction does not have a clinically significant impact on adjuvant treatment delay and subsequent survival outcomes. J Breast Cancer 22(1):109–119CrossRef Baek SH, Bae SJ, Yoon CI, Park SE, Cha CH, Ahn SG, Kim YS, Roh TS, Jeong J (2019) Immediate breast reconstruction does not have a clinically significant impact on adjuvant treatment delay and subsequent survival outcomes. J Breast Cancer 22(1):109–119CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Salgarello M, Rochira D, Barone-Adesi L, Farallo E (2012) Immediate breast reconstruction after skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy for previously augmented patients: a personal technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(2):313–322CrossRef Salgarello M, Rochira D, Barone-Adesi L, Farallo E (2012) Immediate breast reconstruction after skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy for previously augmented patients: a personal technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(2):313–322CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Brattwall M, Stomberg MW, Rawal N, Segerdahl M, Houltz E, Jakobsson J (2010) Patient assessed health profile: a six-month quality of life questionnaire survey after day surgery. Scand J Public Health. 38(6):574–579CrossRef Brattwall M, Stomberg MW, Rawal N, Segerdahl M, Houltz E, Jakobsson J (2010) Patient assessed health profile: a six-month quality of life questionnaire survey after day surgery. Scand J Public Health. 38(6):574–579CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Saariniemi KM, Helle MH, Salmi AM, Peltoniemi HH, Charpentier P, Kuokkanen HO (2012) The effects of aesthetic breast augmentation on quality of life, psychological distress, and eating disorder symptoms: a prospective study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(5):1090–1095CrossRef Saariniemi KM, Helle MH, Salmi AM, Peltoniemi HH, Charpentier P, Kuokkanen HO (2012) The effects of aesthetic breast augmentation on quality of life, psychological distress, and eating disorder symptoms: a prospective study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(5):1090–1095CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiu BQ et al (2019) Current trends of breast reconstruction after mastectomy in China: a cross-sectional study. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 41(7):546–551PubMed Xiu BQ et al (2019) Current trends of breast reconstruction after mastectomy in China: a cross-sectional study. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 41(7):546–551PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ye JM et al (2019) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy in breast cancer patients: specialization and standardization. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 57(2):88–91PubMed Ye JM et al (2019) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy in breast cancer patients: specialization and standardization. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 57(2):88–91PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang NS et al (2016) Current status of breast reconstruction in China: an experience of 951 breast reconstructions from a singleinstitute. Gland Surg 5(3):278–286CrossRef Huang NS et al (2016) Current status of breast reconstruction in China: an experience of 951 breast reconstructions from a singleinstitute. Gland Surg 5(3):278–286CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL (2017) Breast cancer and reconstruction: normative data for interpreting the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(5):1046e–1055eCrossRef Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL (2017) Breast cancer and reconstruction: normative data for interpreting the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(5):1046e–1055eCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL (2018) Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg 153(10):891–899CrossRef Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL (2018) Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg 153(10):891–899CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Klifto KM, Aravind P, Major M, Payne RM, Shen W, Rosson GD, Cooney CM, Manahan MA (2020) Differences between breast cancer reconstruction and institutionally established normative data using the BREAST-Q reconstruction module: a comparative study. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(6):1371–1379CrossRef Klifto KM, Aravind P, Major M, Payne RM, Shen W, Rosson GD, Cooney CM, Manahan MA (2020) Differences between breast cancer reconstruction and institutionally established normative data using the BREAST-Q reconstruction module: a comparative study. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(6):1371–1379CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Voineskos SH, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Pusic AL, Gibbons CJ (2020) Giving meaning to differences in BREAST-Q scores: minimal important difference for breast reconstruction patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(1):11e–20eCrossRef Voineskos SH, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Pusic AL, Gibbons CJ (2020) Giving meaning to differences in BREAST-Q scores: minimal important difference for breast reconstruction patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(1):11e–20eCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Novoa A, Varela-Lamas C, Builes-Ramirez S, Seoane-Pillado T, Balboa-Barreiro V (2018) Predictive factors of satisfaction and quality of life after immediate breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q©. J Clin Nurs 27(7–8):1464–1474 Novoa A, Varela-Lamas C, Builes-Ramirez S, Seoane-Pillado T, Balboa-Barreiro V (2018) Predictive factors of satisfaction and quality of life after immediate breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q©. J Clin Nurs 27(7–8):1464–1474
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kazzazi F, Haggie R, Forouhi P, Kazzazi N, Wyld L, Malata CM (2018) A comparison of patient satisfaction (using the BREAST-Q questionnaire) with bilateral breast reconstruction following risk-reducing or therapeutic mastectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71(9):1324–1331CrossRef Kazzazi F, Haggie R, Forouhi P, Kazzazi N, Wyld L, Malata CM (2018) A comparison of patient satisfaction (using the BREAST-Q questionnaire) with bilateral breast reconstruction following risk-reducing or therapeutic mastectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71(9):1324–1331CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Crittenden TA, Watson DI, Ratcliffe J, Griffin PA, Dean NR (2019) Outcomes of breast reduction surgery using the BREAST-Q: a prospective study and comparison with normative data. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(5):1034–1044CrossRef Crittenden TA, Watson DI, Ratcliffe J, Griffin PA, Dean NR (2019) Outcomes of breast reduction surgery using the BREAST-Q: a prospective study and comparison with normative data. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(5):1034–1044CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Role of Preoperative Breast Reconstruction Information in Selection of Immediate Reconstruction After Modified Radical Mastectomy—A Randomized Study
verfasst von
Fan Zhang
Xiaojie Wang
Hailing Guo
Publikationsdatum
07.09.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02567-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 6/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.