Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2011

01.05.2011 | Materno-fetal Medicine

The significance of fetal sacral length in the ultrasonographic assessment of gestational age

verfasst von: Mustafa Ozat, Mine Kanat-Pektas, Tayfun Gungor, Beril Gurlek, Mete Caglar

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 5/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The present study aims to establish a more sensitive nomogram of fetal sacral length measurements, as well as to specify the accuracy of fetal sacral length for the ultrasonographic assessment of gestational age.

Methods

The present study investigated a total of 2,184 pregnant women who were referred for routine pregnancy follow-up. All of the reviewed women had uncomplicated singleton pregnancies without known structural and chromosomal fetal anomalies.

Results

A statistically significant linear relationship was established between sacrum length and gestational age [gestational age = 4.49 + 0.92 × sacrum length (r = 0.98, R 2 = 0.96)]. The rate of increase in sacrum length of fetuses with a gestational age of <28 weeks was formulated as [gestational age = −0.05 + 1.01 × sacrum length (r = 0.96, R 2 = 0.98)], while the same formula was [gestational age = −0.09 + 1.32 × sacrum length (r = 0.94, R 2 = 0.96)] for fetuses with a gestational age of ≥28 weeks. On the other hand, a statistically significant correlation was found to exist between biparietal diameter (r = 0.68, P = 0.001), head circumference (r = 0.590, P = 0.001), femur length (r = 0.719, P = 0.001) and sacrum length (r = 0.696, P = 0.001). However, the same statistically significant correlation exists between abdominal circumference and the other sonographic measurements (r = 0.223, P = 0.375).

Conclusions

The fetal sacral length appears as an easily acquired and valuable parameter, which directly and strongly correlates with gestational age and other biometrical measurements. Therefore, fetal sacral length may be utilized as a complementary tool in both the evaluation of fetal growth and prediction of gestational age. Further research is required to determine the significance of fetal sacral length in prenatal follow-up.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Engle W (2004) American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Age terminology during the perinatal period. Pediatrics 114(5):1362–1364PubMedCrossRef Engle W (2004) American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Age terminology during the perinatal period. Pediatrics 114(5):1362–1364PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Adegboye AR, Heitmann B (2008) Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birth weight and gestational age. BJOG 115(7):886–893PubMedCrossRef Adegboye AR, Heitmann B (2008) Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birth weight and gestational age. BJOG 115(7):886–893PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearl M, Wier ML, Kharazzi M (2007) Assessing the quality of last menstrual period date on California birth records. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol 21(Suppl 2):50–61CrossRef Pearl M, Wier ML, Kharazzi M (2007) Assessing the quality of last menstrual period date on California birth records. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol 21(Suppl 2):50–61CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ananth CV (2007) Menstrual versus clinical estimate of gestational age dating in the United States: temporal trends and variability in indices of perinatal outcomes. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol 21(Suppl 2):22–30CrossRef Ananth CV (2007) Menstrual versus clinical estimate of gestational age dating in the United States: temporal trends and variability in indices of perinatal outcomes. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol 21(Suppl 2):22–30CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lynch CD, Zhang I (2007) The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol 21(Suppl 2):86–96CrossRef Lynch CD, Zhang I (2007) The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol 21(Suppl 2):86–96CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffman CS, Messer LG, Mendola P, Savitz DA, Herring AH, Hartmann KE (2008) Comparison of gestational age at birth based on last menstrual period and ultrasound during the first trimester. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol 22(6):587–596CrossRef Hoffman CS, Messer LG, Mendola P, Savitz DA, Herring AH, Hartmann KE (2008) Comparison of gestational age at birth based on last menstrual period and ultrasound during the first trimester. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol 22(6):587–596CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sherer DM, Sokolovski M, Dalloul M, Khouy-Collado F, Osho JA, Lamarque MD, Abulafia O (2006) Fetal clavicle length throughout gestation: a nomogram. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27(3):306–310PubMedCrossRef Sherer DM, Sokolovski M, Dalloul M, Khouy-Collado F, Osho JA, Lamarque MD, Abulafia O (2006) Fetal clavicle length throughout gestation: a nomogram. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27(3):306–310PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho TY, Ou SF, Huang SH, Lee CN, Ger LP, Hsieh KS et al (2009) Assessment of growth from foot length in Taiwanese neonates. Pediatr Neonatal 50(6):287–290CrossRef Ho TY, Ou SF, Huang SH, Lee CN, Ger LP, Hsieh KS et al (2009) Assessment of growth from foot length in Taiwanese neonates. Pediatr Neonatal 50(6):287–290CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahmatullah B, Besar R (2009) Analysis of semi-automated method for femur length measurement from fetal ultrasound. J Med Eng Technol 33(6):417–425PubMedCrossRef Rahmatullah B, Besar R (2009) Analysis of semi-automated method for femur length measurement from fetal ultrasound. J Med Eng Technol 33(6):417–425PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang CH, Yu CH, Ko HC, Chen CL, Chang FM (2006) Predicting fetal growth restriction by humerus volume: A three-dimensional ultrasound study. Ultrasound Med Biol 32(6):791–795PubMedCrossRef Chang CH, Yu CH, Ko HC, Chen CL, Chang FM (2006) Predicting fetal growth restriction by humerus volume: A three-dimensional ultrasound study. Ultrasound Med Biol 32(6):791–795PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sherer DM, Abramowicz JS, Plessinger MA, Woods JR (1993) Fetal sacral length in the ultrasonographic assessment of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168(2):626–633PubMed Sherer DM, Abramowicz JS, Plessinger MA, Woods JR (1993) Fetal sacral length in the ultrasonographic assessment of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168(2):626–633PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wldjaja E, Whitby EH, Paley MN, Griffiths PD (2006) Normal fetal lumbar spine on postmortem imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(3):553–559 Wldjaja E, Whitby EH, Paley MN, Griffiths PD (2006) Normal fetal lumbar spine on postmortem imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(3):553–559
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gottlieb AG, Galan HL (2008) Nontraditional sonographic pearls in estimating gestational age. Semin Perinatol 32(3):154–160PubMedCrossRef Gottlieb AG, Galan HL (2008) Nontraditional sonographic pearls in estimating gestational age. Semin Perinatol 32(3):154–160PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Qi BQ, Beasley SW, Arsic D (2004) Abnormalities of the vertebral column and ribs associated with anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 20(7):529–533PubMedCrossRef Qi BQ, Beasley SW, Arsic D (2004) Abnormalities of the vertebral column and ribs associated with anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 20(7):529–533PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Varol F, Saltik A, Kaplan PB, Kilic T, Yardim T (2001) Evaluation of gestational age based on ultrasound fetal growth measurements. Yonsei Med J 42(3):299–303PubMed Varol F, Saltik A, Kaplan PB, Kilic T, Yardim T (2001) Evaluation of gestational age based on ultrasound fetal growth measurements. Yonsei Med J 42(3):299–303PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Degani S (2001) Fetal biometry: clinical, pathological, and technical considerations. Obstet Gynecol Surv 56(3):159–167PubMedCrossRef Degani S (2001) Fetal biometry: clinical, pathological, and technical considerations. Obstet Gynecol Surv 56(3):159–167PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Duyme M, Dorrion A, Ville Y (2003) Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22(1):63–66PubMedCrossRef Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Duyme M, Dorrion A, Ville Y (2003) Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22(1):63–66PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dudley NJ, Chapman E (2002) The importance of quality management in fetal measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19(2):190–196PubMedCrossRef Dudley NJ, Chapman E (2002) The importance of quality management in fetal measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19(2):190–196PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Caughey AB, Nicholson JM, Washington AE (2008) First versus second trimester ultrasound: the effect on pregnancy dating and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(6):703PubMedCrossRef Caughey AB, Nicholson JM, Washington AE (2008) First versus second trimester ultrasound: the effect on pregnancy dating and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(6):703PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pajak J, Heimrath J, Gabrys M, Woyton J (1998) Usefulness of ultrasonographic measurement for fetal sacral length in assessment of gestational age in physiologic pregnancy. Ginekol Pol 69(7):563–569PubMed Pajak J, Heimrath J, Gabrys M, Woyton J (1998) Usefulness of ultrasonographic measurement for fetal sacral length in assessment of gestational age in physiologic pregnancy. Ginekol Pol 69(7):563–569PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Karabulut KA, Koyluoglu B, Uysal I (2001) Human foetal sacral length measurement for the assessment of foetal growth and development by ultrasonograpy and dissection. Anat Histol Embryol 10:141–146CrossRef Karabulut KA, Koyluoglu B, Uysal I (2001) Human foetal sacral length measurement for the assessment of foetal growth and development by ultrasonograpy and dissection. Anat Histol Embryol 10:141–146CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The significance of fetal sacral length in the ultrasonographic assessment of gestational age
verfasst von
Mustafa Ozat
Mine Kanat-Pektas
Tayfun Gungor
Beril Gurlek
Mete Caglar
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1510-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2011

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.