Background
Lead is a toxic heavy metal and can cause damage to human organs and tissues, particularly to the development of central nervous system. Lead exposure in children might cause permanent learning and behavior disorders [
1,
2]. Diagnosis of lead exposure is based on blood lead level (BLL) [
3]. The American Academy of Pediatrics defines lead poisoning as BLL of or higher than 10 μg/dL [
4]. Thus, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and World Health Organization stated that a BLL of 10 μg/dL or above needs to be concerned. However, lead exposure may have harmful effects on multiple organs even at lower levels [
5,
6].
Data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in USA indicated that an estimated percentage of BLL ≥10 μg/dL in children aged 1–5 years was 88 % during 1976–1980, then fell sharply to 4.4 % during 1991–1994, to 1.6 % during 1999–2002, and to 0.8 % during 2007–2010 [
7‐
10]. In developed countries, children living in poor families with lower educational level are at higher risk of elevated BLL [
8‐
11]. The situation is similar in the developing countries. Among Central and South American children, the percentage of children with BLL ≥10 μg/dL is 33 ~ 34 % [
12]. The world disease burden from lead poisoning in Western Pacific accounts for about one fifth, and in Southeast Asia accounts for another fifth [
12].
The Chinese government has begun to pay attention to childhood lead poisoning since 1990s, and at mean time Chinese scholars have conducted a couple of epidemiological studies to investigate childhood lead poisoning in local areas of China. To provide convincing evidence for policy making regarding children lead poisoning prevention, this study investigated the national trend of lead poisoning rate in the 0–18 year old of Chinese population during 1990–2012 by analyzing the published data.
Methods
Literature searching strategy
We searched epidemiologic studies about BLL in China mainland from electronic databases, CNKI, CBM disc, Wanfang Data, Pubmed and Medline between January 1990 and October 2012. The searching strategy was “blood lead level” OR “lead poisoning” in Chinese and English language. Two authors firstly screened articles by reading the titles and abstracts, and then reviewed the full text of the eligible publications.
Literature quality assessment
The assessing criteria based on the standard recommended by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) containing nine items was used to evaluate literature quality [
13]. The principals of literature quality assessment were described in Table
1. Two authors evaluated each eligible article independently. The discrepancy between two authors was solved through discussion.
Table 1
Assessment of observing study quality based on the standard recommended by AHRQ
Study question clearly focused |
Sampling of Study Population (Random, Convenient, Self-selected) |
Clear definition of including or excluding criteria |
Clear definition of research time |
Assessment of confounding effects of various factors (for example, age of the patients, patient sex) |
Appropriate measure of precision |
Clear description of response rate |
Clear description of dealing with missing data |
Conclusions supported by results with possible bias and limitations taken into consideration |
Inclusion criteria
1. Study subjects were not the specific lead exposure population; 2. Sample size should be not less than 100 (for neonatal, not less than 50); 3. BLL detection was under strict quality control; 4. Results must comprise the number of the subjects and number of lead poisoning subjects. Lead poisoning is defined as BLL ≥ 10 μg/dL in the studies included.
Two authors did data entry independently and cross-checked. The following details were recorded: authors, title, study year, study site, sample type, testing method, sample size, age range, gender, number of the subjects and number of lead poisoning subjects.
Data analysis
Heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran chi-square (
χ2) and quantified with the I
2 statistic, which was low when I
2 was less than 25 %, moderate when between 25 % ~ 50 %, high when more than 50 % [
14]. Considering heterogeneity across studies, a random-effects model was used to calculate pooled lead poisoning rate and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). DerSimonian and Laird method might be a robust approach to combine weighted effect size under random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was used to deal with heterogeneity. Publication bias was evaluated by Begg’s Test and Egger’s test [
15]. Significance was set at a
P value less than 0.05. Stata version 12.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA) was used for all statistical calculations.
Discussion
With increasing number of epidemiological studies about BLL in China in recent years, it is now possible to obtain direct evidence of lead poisoning situation of Chinese population aged 0–18 years old. Based on strict inclusion criteria, eliminated relative low-quality studies by quality assessment of cross-sectional study, we identified 55 articles in this meta-analysis including 200,002 subjects, covering 19 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities, thus the large population guaranteed the reliability of this study.
In this study, pooled rate of BLL ≥10 μg/dL in the 0–18 year old Chinese population during 1990–2012 was 25.1 % and corrected pooled rate under trim and fill method was 9 %, both much higher than all levels during 1991–1994 (4.4 %), 1999–2002 (1.6 %) and 2007–2010 (0.8 %) in US [
8‐
10].
Considering high heterogeneity, subgroup analysis of different study year ranges showed overall decreasing trend of the rate with time. The decline appears to be attributed to government efforts of controlling lead pollution, including the phasing out of leaded gasoline, converting household fuel from coal to natural gas or other clean energy alternatives, and shutting down heavily polluted enterprises. But this study revealed that during 1993–2000 of survey time when leaded gasoline was not prohibited in China mainland and China had been undergoing rapid and drastic industrial development, tendency of lead poisoning rate was slightly increasing with time [
43]. After early 21 century when leaded gasoline was gradually phased out in China mainland, the results showed steadily decreasing trend of the rate with time [
73]. This result was consistent with studies conducted in USA which revealed the close correlation between the decreasing use of gasoline with lead and sharply declining BLL simultaneously [
74,
75]. In the age of leaded gasoline, the lead dust mainly attributed to the exhaust of leaded gasoline and diesel fuel, while the lead-free gasoline brought down the atmosphere lead concentration [
76‐
78].
Although the Chinese government and researchers continued to pay efforts to lead poisoning control and take preventative measurements for several decades, the study found that the declining tendency of lead poisoning rate was slow in the short term during 2000–2003. Several factors contributed to that as below. Though atmospheric lead emission from vehicle exhaust was decreasing rapidly in short period of time after unleaded gasoline application in China, it was hard to eliminate the lead accumulated in the soil in short time, which caused environmental pollution and potential lead exposure to high risk population, such as children and women [
79,
80]. After 2003 of survey time, the rate was decreasing rapidly from about 40 to 2.61 % in 2011. Although the rate of BLL ≥10 μg/dL gradually declined with time, in this study pooled rate was 8 % from data published during 2006–2012, still much higher than that (0.8 %) observed in the surveys conducted in USA from 2007 to 2010 [
10]. One of the key factors contributed to this observation in China might be the increasing lead discharge from the industrial emission [
81]. The data showed that coal consumption, as the most important contributing factor of the lead discharge, continued to rise in recent decades in China [
81].
When considering the factor of economic level, we found that pooled rate of BLL ≥10 μg/dL in eastern zone was slightly higher than that in the other two zones and still presented a sharp decreasing tendency since 2000. It is well known that low family income was a statistically significant independent predictor of elevated children’s BLL [
8]. According to the data of Chinese statistical inspection, the annual per-capita income of people in eastern China was much higher than that in western China [
82]. However, the slightly increasing tendency of lead poisoning rate in central zone since 2000 should be explained cautiously for a small quantity of epidemiological data. During 2006–2010, only five studies were included in this meta-analysis and rate of BLL ≥10 μg/dL in Hunan province was 24 % which accounted for a relatively large weight in pooled analysis [
52].
Pooled lead poisoning rate of male population aged 0–18 years old (24.9 %) was slightly higher than that of female, which was similar to what was observed in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES III) during 1999–2004 in USA [
8]. It might be associated with more outdoor activity for male population, which leads to higher risk of lead exposure. As for age factor, the lead poisoning percentage peaked at pre-school age (3–6 year old) and then declined with age, similar to the result of analogical study in Chinese population, but not consistent with the result of previous studies in which the percentage of BLL ≥10 μg/dL was higher in children aged 1 to 2 years old than 3–5 years old, which needs to be explored further [
8,
82].
There were several limitations needed to be classified: (a) for the coverage of evidence base, adequate epidemiological surveys encompassing the geographical, racial, economic, cultural, social diversity of nation as a whole were required. In this meta-analysis, the number of national wide surveys was small and data was missing during the periods of 1990–2000 and 2006–2012. The data from poor rural areas was limited, and this might cause underestimation of the pooled rate; (b) homogeneity test showed high heterogeneity between studies. The heterogeneity was still high within subgroups, which might be influenced by other factors, such as geographical distribution, living environment, living habits and ethnicities [
83,
84]; (c) in this meta-analysis, publication bias still exists, which might be caused by investigator’s loss of interest in the topics with null (negative or inconclusive) results, editor’s preference to articles with positive results, etc. [
85,
86]. The publication bias in this study might lead to overestimation of the rate of BLL ≥10 μg/dL. Thus, trim and fill method should be applied to correct the pooled effect size by supplementing 24 studies [
71].
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests. All the authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
Authors’ contributions
ML: developed the protocol and search strategy, screened all records, extracted data, carried out the data analysis, interpreted results, and prepared the manuscript draft; JC: extracted data, screened all records, reviewed and revised the manuscript. ZG: extracted data, reviewed and revised the manuscript. XS: supervised the study, reviewed and revised the manuscript. CY: supervised the study, screened all records for eligibility, provided arbitration, reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.