Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2014

01.08.2014 | Next Generation Genetic Counseling

Three Clinical Experiences with SNP Array Results Consistent with Parental Incest: A Narrative with Lessons Learned

verfasst von: Benjamin M. Helm, Katherine Langley, Brooke Spangler, Samantha Vergano

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays have the ability to reveal parental consanguinity which may or may not be known to healthcare providers. Consanguinity can have significant implications for the health of patients and for individual and family psychosocial well-being. These results often present ethical and legal dilemmas that can have important ramifications. Unexpected consanguinity can be confounding to healthcare professionals who may be unprepared to handle these results or to communicate them to families or other appropriate representatives. There are few published accounts of experiences with consanguinity and SNP arrays. In this paper we discuss three cases where molecular evidence of parental incest was identified by SNP microarray. We hope to further highlight consanguinity as a potential incidental finding, how the cases were handled by the clinical team, and what resources were found to be most helpful. This paper aims to contribute further to professional discourse on incidental findings with genomic technology and how they were addressed clinically. These experiences may provide some guidance on how others can prepare for these findings and help improve practice. As genetic and genomic testing is utilized more by non-genetics providers, we also hope to inform about the importance of engaging with geneticists and genetic counselors when addressing these findings.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adams, S. A., Coppinger, J., Saitta, S. C., Stroud, T., Kandamurugu, M., Fan, Z., et al. (2009). Impact of genotype-first diagnosis: the detection of microdeletion and microduplication syndromes with cancer predisposition by aCGH. Genetics in Medicine, 11, 314–322.PubMedCrossRef Adams, S. A., Coppinger, J., Saitta, S. C., Stroud, T., Kandamurugu, M., Fan, Z., et al. (2009). Impact of genotype-first diagnosis: the detection of microdeletion and microduplication syndromes with cancer predisposition by aCGH. Genetics in Medicine, 11, 314–322.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett, R. L., Motulsky, A. G., Bittles, A., Hudgins, L., Uhrich, S., Doyle, D. W., et al. (2002). Genetic counseling and screening of consanguineous couples and their offspring: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(2), 97–119.PubMedCrossRef Bennett, R. L., Motulsky, A. G., Bittles, A., Hudgins, L., Uhrich, S., Doyle, D. W., et al. (2002). Genetic counseling and screening of consanguineous couples and their offspring: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(2), 97–119.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berg, J. S., Khoury, M. J., & Evans, J. P. (2011). Deploying whole-genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a time. Genetics in Medicine, 13, 499–504.PubMedCrossRef Berg, J. S., Khoury, M. J., & Evans, J. P. (2011). Deploying whole-genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a time. Genetics in Medicine, 13, 499–504.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bittles, A. H. (2001). Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clinical Genetics, 60, 89–98.PubMedCrossRef Bittles, A. H. (2001). Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clinical Genetics, 60, 89–98.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boone, P. M., Soens, Z. T., Campbell, I. M., Stankiewicz, P., Cheung, S. W., Patel, A., et al. (2013). Incidental copy-number variants identified by routine genome testing in a clinical population. Genetics in Medicine, 15(1), 45–54.PubMedCrossRef Boone, P. M., Soens, Z. T., Campbell, I. M., Stankiewicz, P., Cheung, S. W., Patel, A., et al. (2013). Incidental copy-number variants identified by routine genome testing in a clinical population. Genetics in Medicine, 15(1), 45–54.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bruno, D. L., Ganesamoorthy, D., Schoumans, J., Bankier, A., Coman, D., Delatycki, M., et al. (2009). Detection of cryptic pathogenic copy number variations and constitutional loss of heterozygosity using high resolution SNP microarray analysis in 117 patients referred for cytogenetic analysis and impact on clinical practice. Journal of Medical Genetics, 46, 123–131.PubMedCrossRef Bruno, D. L., Ganesamoorthy, D., Schoumans, J., Bankier, A., Coman, D., Delatycki, M., et al. (2009). Detection of cryptic pathogenic copy number variations and constitutional loss of heterozygosity using high resolution SNP microarray analysis in 117 patients referred for cytogenetic analysis and impact on clinical practice. Journal of Medical Genetics, 46, 123–131.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cassa, C. A., Savage, S. K., Taylor, P. L., Green, R. C., McGuire, A. L., & Mandi, K. D. (2012). Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility. Genome Research, 22, 421–428.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cassa, C. A., Savage, S. K., Taylor, P. L., Green, R. C., McGuire, A. L., & Mandi, K. D. (2012). Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility. Genome Research, 22, 421–428.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cho, M. K. (2008). Understanding incidental findings in the context of genetics and genomics. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 36, 280–285. 212.CrossRef Cho, M. K. (2008). Understanding incidental findings in the context of genetics and genomics. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 36, 280–285. 212.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clayton, E. W., Haga, S., Kuszler, P., Bane, E., Shutske, K., Burke, W. (2013). Managing incidental findings: legal obligations of clinicians. Genetics in Medicine; Advanced online publication, 28 Feb 2013. Clayton, E. W., Haga, S., Kuszler, P., Bane, E., Shutske, K., Burke, W. (2013). Managing incidental findings: legal obligations of clinicians. Genetics in Medicine; Advanced online publication, 28 Feb 2013.
Zurück zum Zitat Dondorp, W., Sikkema-Raddatz, B., de Die-Smulders, C., & de Wert, G. (2012). Arrays in postnatal and prenatal diagnostics: an exploration of the ethics of consent. Human Mutation, 33(6), 916–922.PubMedCrossRef Dondorp, W., Sikkema-Raddatz, B., de Die-Smulders, C., & de Wert, G. (2012). Arrays in postnatal and prenatal diagnostics: an exploration of the ethics of consent. Human Mutation, 33(6), 916–922.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Downing, N. R., Williams, J. K., Daack-Hirsch, S., Driessnack, M., & Simon, C. M. (2013). Genetics specialists’ perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting. Patient Education and Counseling, 90, 133–138.PubMedCrossRef Downing, N. R., Williams, J. K., Daack-Hirsch, S., Driessnack, M., & Simon, C. M. (2013). Genetics specialists’ perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting. Patient Education and Counseling, 90, 133–138.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ellison, J. W., Ravnan, J. B., Rosenfeld, J. A., Morton, S. A., Neill, N. J., Williams, M. S., et al. (2012). Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis. Pediatrics, 130(5), e1085–e1095.PubMedCrossRef Ellison, J. W., Ravnan, J. B., Rosenfeld, J. A., Morton, S. A., Neill, N. J., Williams, M. S., et al. (2012). Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis. Pediatrics, 130(5), e1085–e1095.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fanos, J. H. (2012). New “first families”: the psychosocial impact of new genetic technologies. Genetics in Medicine, 14(2), 189–190.PubMedCrossRef Fanos, J. H. (2012). New “first families”: the psychosocial impact of new genetic technologies. Genetics in Medicine, 14(2), 189–190.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Farrelly, C. (2008). The case for re-thinking incest laws. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, e11.PubMedCrossRef Farrelly, C. (2008). The case for re-thinking incest laws. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, e11.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grote, L., Myers, M., Lovell, A., Saal, H., & Lipscomb, S. K. (2012). Variability in laboratory reporting practices for regions of homozygosity indicating parental relatedness as identified by SNP microarray testing. Genetics in Medicine, 14(12), 971–976.PubMedCrossRef Grote, L., Myers, M., Lovell, A., Saal, H., & Lipscomb, S. K. (2012). Variability in laboratory reporting practices for regions of homozygosity indicating parental relatedness as identified by SNP microarray testing. Genetics in Medicine, 14(12), 971–976.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haga, S. B., O’daniel, J. M., Tindall, G. M., Lipkus, I. R., & Agans, R. (2011). Public attitudes toward ancillary information revealed by pharmacogenetic testing under limited informational conditions. Genetics in Medicine, 13, 732–738. Haga, S. B., O’daniel, J. M., Tindall, G. M., Lipkus, I. R., & Agans, R. (2011). Public attitudes toward ancillary information revealed by pharmacogenetic testing under limited informational conditions. Genetics in Medicine, 13, 732–738.
Zurück zum Zitat Harper, P. (2010). Practical genetic counselling, 7th Ed (pp. 135–138). London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd. Harper, P. (2010). Practical genetic counselling, 7th Ed (pp. 135–138). London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, A. D., Bhimavarapu, A., Benjamin, E. J., Fox, C., Levy, D., Jarvik, G. P., et al. (2010). CLIA-tested genetic variants on commercial SNP arrays: potential for incidental findings in genome-wide association studies. Genetics in Medicine, 12, 355–363.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Johnson, A. D., Bhimavarapu, A., Benjamin, E. J., Fox, C., Levy, D., Jarvik, G. P., et al. (2010). CLIA-tested genetic variants on commercial SNP arrays: potential for incidental findings in genome-wide association studies. Genetics in Medicine, 12, 355–363.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kohane, I. S., Hsing, M., & Kong, S. W. (2012). Taxonomizing, sizing, and overcoming the incidentalome. Genetics in Medicine, 14, 399–404.PubMedCrossRef Kohane, I. S., Hsing, M., & Kong, S. W. (2012). Taxonomizing, sizing, and overcoming the incidentalome. Genetics in Medicine, 14, 399–404.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li, M. M., & Andersson, H. C. (2009). Clinical application of microarray-based molecular cytogenetics: an emerging new era of genomic medicine. Journal of Pediatrics, 155, 311–317.PubMedCrossRef Li, M. M., & Andersson, H. C. (2009). Clinical application of microarray-based molecular cytogenetics: an emerging new era of genomic medicine. Journal of Pediatrics, 155, 311–317.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lohn, Z., Adam, S., Birch, P., Townsend, A., & Friedman, J. (2013a). Genetics professionals’ perspectives on reporting incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 161A, 542–549.PubMedCrossRef Lohn, Z., Adam, S., Birch, P., Townsend, A., & Friedman, J. (2013a). Genetics professionals’ perspectives on reporting incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 161A, 542–549.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lohn, Z., Adam, S., Birch, P. H., & Friedman, J. M. (2013b). Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 2013, 1–11. Lohn, Z., Adam, S., Birch, P. H., & Friedman, J. M. (2013b). Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 2013, 1–11.
Zurück zum Zitat McGuire, A. L., & Lupski, J. R. (2010). Personal genome research: what should the participant be told? Trends in Genetics, 26, 199–201.PubMedCrossRef McGuire, A. L., & Lupski, J. R. (2010). Personal genome research: what should the participant be told? Trends in Genetics, 26, 199–201.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, D. T., Adam, M. P., Aradhya, S., Biesecker, L., Brothman, A. R., Carter, N. P., et al. (2010). Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. American Journal of Human Genetics, 86, 749–764.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Miller, D. T., Adam, M. P., Aradhya, S., Biesecker, L., Brothman, A. R., Carter, N. P., et al. (2010). Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. American Journal of Human Genetics, 86, 749–764.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat National Society of Genetic Counselors. (2006). The code of ethics of the national society of genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(5), 309–311.CrossRef National Society of Genetic Counselors. (2006). The code of ethics of the national society of genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(5), 309–311.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Papenhausen, P., Schwartz, S., & Risheg, H. (2011). UPD detection using homozygosity profiling with a SNP genotyping microarray. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 155A, 757–768.PubMedCrossRef Papenhausen, P., Schwartz, S., & Risheg, H. (2011). UPD detection using homozygosity profiling with a SNP genotyping microarray. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 155A, 757–768.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paul, D. B., & Spencer, H. G. (2008). “It’s ok, we’re not cousins by blood”: the cousin marriage controversy in historical perspective. PLoS Biology, 6, 2627–2630.PubMedCrossRef Paul, D. B., & Spencer, H. G. (2008). “It’s ok, we’re not cousins by blood”: the cousin marriage controversy in historical perspective. PLoS Biology, 6, 2627–2630.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pichert, G., Mohammed, S. N., Ahn, J. W., Ogilvie, C. M., & Izatt, L. (2011). Unexpected findings in cancer predisposition genes detected by array comparative genomic hybridization: what are the issues? Journal of Medical Genetics, 48, 535–539.PubMedCrossRef Pichert, G., Mohammed, S. N., Ahn, J. W., Ogilvie, C. M., & Izatt, L. (2011). Unexpected findings in cancer predisposition genes detected by array comparative genomic hybridization: what are the issues? Journal of Medical Genetics, 48, 535–539.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rehder, C. W., David, K. L., Hirsch, B., Toriello, H., Wilson, C. M., & Kearney, H. M. (2013). American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics: standards and guidelines for documenting suspected consanguinity as an incidental finding of genomic testing. Genetics in Medicine, 15(2), 150–152.PubMedCrossRef Rehder, C. W., David, K. L., Hirsch, B., Toriello, H., Wilson, C. M., & Kearney, H. M. (2013). American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics: standards and guidelines for documenting suspected consanguinity as an incidental finding of genomic testing. Genetics in Medicine, 15(2), 150–152.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reiff, M., Ross, K., Mulchandani, S., Propert, K. J., Pyeritz, R. E., Spinner, N. B., et al. (2012). Physicians’ perspectives on the uncertainties and implications of chromosomal microarray testing of children and families. Clinical Genetics, 83, 23–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Reiff, M., Ross, K., Mulchandani, S., Propert, K. J., Pyeritz, R. E., Spinner, N. B., et al. (2012). Physicians’ perspectives on the uncertainties and implications of chromosomal microarray testing of children and families. Clinical Genetics, 83, 23–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schaff, C. P., Scott, D. A., Wiszniewska, J., & Beaudet, A. L. (2011). Identification of incestuous parental relationship by SNP-based DNA microarrays. Lancet, 377, 555–556.CrossRef Schaff, C. P., Scott, D. A., Wiszniewska, J., & Beaudet, A. L. (2011). Identification of incestuous parental relationship by SNP-based DNA microarrays. Lancet, 377, 555–556.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shaffer, L. G., Kashork, C. D., Saleki, R., Rorem, E., Sundin, K., Ballif, B. C., et al. (2006). Targeted genomic microarray analysis for identification of chromosome abnormalities in 1500 consecutive clinical cases. Journal of Pediatrics, 149, 98–102.PubMedCrossRef Shaffer, L. G., Kashork, C. D., Saleki, R., Rorem, E., Sundin, K., Ballif, B. C., et al. (2006). Targeted genomic microarray analysis for identification of chromosome abnormalities in 1500 consecutive clinical cases. Journal of Pediatrics, 149, 98–102.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sund, K. L., Zimmerman, S. L., Thomas, C., Mitchell, A. L., Prada, C. E., Grote, L., et al. (2013). Regions of homozygosity identified by SNP microarray analysis aids in the diagnosis of autosomal recessive disease and incidentally detect parental blood relationships. Genetics in Medicine, 15(1), 70–78.PubMedCrossRef Sund, K. L., Zimmerman, S. L., Thomas, C., Mitchell, A. L., Prada, C. E., Grote, L., et al. (2013). Regions of homozygosity identified by SNP microarray analysis aids in the diagnosis of autosomal recessive disease and incidentally detect parental blood relationships. Genetics in Medicine, 15(1), 70–78.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tarini, B. A., Konczal, L. L., Goldenberg, A. J., Goldman, E. B., & McCandless, S. E. (2013). The perils of SNP microarray testing: uncovering unexpected consanguinity. Pediatric Neurology, 49, 50–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tarini, B. A., Konczal, L. L., Goldenberg, A. J., Goldman, E. B., & McCandless, S. E. (2013). The perils of SNP microarray testing: uncovering unexpected consanguinity. Pediatric Neurology, 49, 50–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Three Clinical Experiences with SNP Array Results Consistent with Parental Incest: A Narrative with Lessons Learned
verfasst von
Benjamin M. Helm
Katherine Langley
Brooke Spangler
Samantha Vergano
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9669-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Hirsutismus bei PCOS: Laser- und Lichttherapien helfen

26.04.2024 Hirsutismus Nachrichten

Laser- und Lichtbehandlungen können bei Frauen mit polyzystischem Ovarialsyndrom (PCOS) den übermäßigen Haarwuchs verringern und das Wohlbefinden verbessern – bei alleiniger Anwendung oder in Kombination mit Medikamenten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bislang gibt es kein Medikament zur Prävention von Wochenbettdepressionen. Das Injektionsanästhetikum Esketamin könnte womöglich diese Lücke füllen.

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

22.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Kongressbericht

Durch die Häufung nach der COVID-19-Pandemie sind Infektionen mit dem Respiratorischen Synzytial-Virus (RSV) in den Fokus gerückt. Fachgesellschaften empfehlen eine Impfung inzwischen nicht nur für Säuglinge und Kleinkinder.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.