Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2019

19.01.2019 | General Gynecology

Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis and the classification of congenital uterine anomalies using the ESHRE/ESGE classification: a diagnostic accuracy study

verfasst von: Anna Kougioumtsidou, Themistoklis Mikos, Grigoris F. Grimbizis, Aikaterini Karavida, Theodoros D. Theodoridis, Alexandros Sotiriadis, Basil C. Tarlatzis, Apostolos P. Athanasiadis

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Study objective

To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography (3D US) compared to hysteroscopy/laparoscopy, in the investigation of uterine congenital anomalies using the ESHRE/ESGE classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies.

Design

Prospective blind, comparative, cohort study.

Setting

University Tertiary Hospital and affiliated private Hospital.

Patients and methods

Sixty-two women consecutively referred with a suspected diagnosis of uterine congenital anomalies. The ESHRE/ESGE classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract was used for the description of abnormal findings.

Interventions

All patients underwent (1) 3D US and (2) hysteroscopy with laparoscopy to establish the final diagnosis.

Results

Concordance between 3D US and hysteroscopy with laparoscopy about the type and the classification of uterine anomaly was verified in 61 cases, including all those with septate uterus, dysmorphic uterus, bicorporeal, hemi-uterus or unicorporeal, and aplastic uterus and one out of two with normal uterus. For the diagnosis of septate uteri, which was the most common anomaly, the sensitivity of 3D US was 100%, the specificity was 92.3%, the PPV was 98% and the NPV was 100%, with kappa index 0.950. For bicorporeal, dysmorphic uterus, hemi-uteri or unicorporeal and aplastic uterus the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were all 100% with K = 1.00. Overall, 3D US showed perfect diagnostic accuracy (Kappa index = 0.945) in the detection of congenital uterine anomalies.

Conclusion

3D US appears to be a very accurate method for the diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Grimbizis GF, Campo R (2010) Congenital malformations of the female genital tract: the need for a new classification system. Fertil Steril 94:401–407CrossRefPubMed Grimbizis GF, Campo R (2010) Congenital malformations of the female genital tract: the need for a new classification system. Fertil Steril 94:401–407CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li T-C (2008) Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update 14:415–419CrossRefPubMed Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li T-C (2008) Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update 14:415–419CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A (2011) The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 17:761–771CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A (2011) The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 17:761–771CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Buttram VC, Gibbons WE (1979) Mullerian anomalies: a proposed classification (an analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril 32:40–46CrossRefPubMed Buttram VC, Gibbons WE (1979) Mullerian anomalies: a proposed classification (an analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril 32:40–46CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat The American Fertility Society (1988) The AFS classification of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49:944–955CrossRef The American Fertility Society (1988) The AFS classification of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49:944–955CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Acien P, Acien M, Sanchez-Ferrer M (2004) Complex malformations of the female genital tract: new types and revision of classification. Hum Reprod 19:2377–2384CrossRefPubMed Acien P, Acien M, Sanchez-Ferrer M (2004) Complex malformations of the female genital tract: new types and revision of classification. Hum Reprod 19:2377–2384CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Oppelt P, Renner SP, Brucker S, Strissel PL, Strick R, Oppelt PG, Doerr HG, Schott GE, Hucke J, Wallwiener D, Beckmann MW (2005) The VCUAM (vagina cervix uterus adnex associated malformation) classification: a new classification for genital malformations. Fertil Steril 84:1493–1497CrossRefPubMed Oppelt P, Renner SP, Brucker S, Strissel PL, Strick R, Oppelt PG, Doerr HG, Schott GE, Hucke J, Wallwiener D, Beckmann MW (2005) The VCUAM (vagina cervix uterus adnex associated malformation) classification: a new classification for genital malformations. Fertil Steril 84:1493–1497CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Grimbizis GF, Gordts G, Di Spiezio SA, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li T-C, Tanos V, Brölmann H, Gianaroli L, Campo R (2013) The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital malformations. Hum Reprod 28:2032–2044CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grimbizis GF, Gordts G, Di Spiezio SA, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li T-C, Tanos V, Brölmann H, Gianaroli L, Campo R (2013) The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital malformations. Hum Reprod 28:2032–2044CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Grimbizis GF, Gordts G, Di Spiezio SA, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li T-C, Tanos V, Brölmann H, Gianaroli L, Campo R (2013) The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital malformations. Gynecol Surg 10:199–212CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grimbizis GF, Gordts G, Di Spiezio SA, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li T-C, Tanos V, Brölmann H, Gianaroli L, Campo R (2013) The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital malformations. Gynecol Surg 10:199–212CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Van Schoubroeck D, Bermejo C, Amso NN, Nargund G, Timmermann D, Athanasiadis A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li TC, Tanos V, Tarlatzis B, Farquharson R, Gianaroli L, Campo R (2016) The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Gynecol Surg 13:1–16CrossRefPubMed Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Van Schoubroeck D, Bermejo C, Amso NN, Nargund G, Timmermann D, Athanasiadis A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li TC, Tanos V, Tarlatzis B, Farquharson R, Gianaroli L, Campo R (2016) The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Gynecol Surg 13:1–16CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Byrne J, Nussbaum-Blask A, Taylor WS, Rubin A, Hill M, O’Donnel R, Shulman S (2000) Prevalence of Mullerian duct anomalies detected at ultrasound. Am J Med Genet 94:9–12CrossRefPubMed Byrne J, Nussbaum-Blask A, Taylor WS, Rubin A, Hill M, O’Donnel R, Shulman S (2000) Prevalence of Mullerian duct anomalies detected at ultrasound. Am J Med Genet 94:9–12CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Troiano RN, McCarthy SM (2004) Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 233:19–34CrossRefPubMed Troiano RN, McCarthy SM (2004) Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 233:19–34CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicolini U, Bellotti M, Bonazzi B, Zamberletti D, Candiani GB (1987) Can ultrasound be used to screen uterine malformations? Fertil Steril 47:89–93CrossRefPubMed Nicolini U, Bellotti M, Bonazzi B, Zamberletti D, Candiani GB (1987) Can ultrasound be used to screen uterine malformations? Fertil Steril 47:89–93CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Salim R, Woelfer B, Backos M, Regan L, Jurkovic D, Letterie GS, Haggerty M, Lindee G (1995) A comparison of pelvic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging as diagnostic studies for mullerian tract abnormalities. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 40:34–38 Salim R, Woelfer B, Backos M, Regan L, Jurkovic D, Letterie GS, Haggerty M, Lindee G (1995) A comparison of pelvic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging as diagnostic studies for mullerian tract abnormalities. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 40:34–38
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jurkovic D, Geipel A, Gruboeck K, Jauniaux E, Natucci M, Campbell S (1995) Three-dimensional ultra- sound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 5:233–237CrossRefPubMed Jurkovic D, Geipel A, Gruboeck K, Jauniaux E, Natucci M, Campbell S (1995) Three-dimensional ultra- sound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 5:233–237CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghi T, Casadio P, Kuleva M, Perrone AM, Savelli L, Giunchi S, Meriggiola MC, Gubbini G, Pilu G, Pelusi C, Pelusi G (2009) Accuracy of three-dimensional ultra- sound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies. Fertil Steril 92:808–813CrossRefPubMed Ghi T, Casadio P, Kuleva M, Perrone AM, Savelli L, Giunchi S, Meriggiola MC, Gubbini G, Pilu G, Pelusi C, Pelusi G (2009) Accuracy of three-dimensional ultra- sound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies. Fertil Steril 92:808–813CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Faivre E, Fernandez H, Deffieux X, Gervaise A, Frydman R, Levaillant JM (2012) Accuracy of three- dimensional ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus compared with office hysteroscopy and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19(1):101–106CrossRefPubMed Faivre E, Fernandez H, Deffieux X, Gervaise A, Frydman R, Levaillant JM (2012) Accuracy of three- dimensional ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus compared with office hysteroscopy and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19(1):101–106CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ludwin A, Pitynski K, Ludwin I, Banas T, Knafel A (2013) Two- and three- dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(1):90–99CrossRefPubMed Ludwin A, Pitynski K, Ludwin I, Banas T, Knafel A (2013) Two- and three- dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(1):90–99CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Graupera B, Pascual MA, Hereter L, Browne JL, Úbeda B, Rodriguez I, Pedrero C (2015) Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 46(5):616–622CrossRefPubMed Graupera B, Pascual MA, Hereter L, Browne JL, Úbeda B, Rodriguez I, Pedrero C (2015) Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 46(5):616–622CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Salim R, Woelfer B, Backos M, Regan L, Jurkovic D (2003) Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21(6):578–582CrossRefPubMed Salim R, Woelfer B, Backos M, Regan L, Jurkovic D (2003) Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21(6):578–582CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Saravelos SH, Li TC (2015) Intra- and inter-observer variability of uterine measurements with three-dimensional ultrasound and implications for clinical practice. Reprod Biomed Online 31(4):557–564CrossRefPubMed Saravelos SH, Li TC (2015) Intra- and inter-observer variability of uterine measurements with three-dimensional ultrasound and implications for clinical practice. Reprod Biomed Online 31(4):557–564CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ludwin A, Ludwin I, Kudla M, Kottner J (2015) Reliability of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy and American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification systems for congenital uterine anomalies detected using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Fertil Steril 104:688–697CrossRefPubMed Ludwin A, Ludwin I, Kudla M, Kottner J (2015) Reliability of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy and American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification systems for congenital uterine anomalies detected using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Fertil Steril 104:688–697CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Schoubroeck D, Van den Bosch T, Timmerman D (2015) 3D ultrasound. In: Grimbizis GF, Campo R, Tarlatzis BC, Gordts S (eds) Female genital tract congenital malformations. Classification, diagnosis and management. Springer, Berlin, pp 79–97CrossRef Van Schoubroeck D, Van den Bosch T, Timmerman D (2015) 3D ultrasound. In: Grimbizis GF, Campo R, Tarlatzis BC, Gordts S (eds) Female genital tract congenital malformations. Classification, diagnosis and management. Springer, Berlin, pp 79–97CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bermejo C, Ten MP, Cantarero R, Diaz D, Pedregosa JP, Barrón E, Labrador E, López LR (2010) Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35(5):593–601CrossRefPubMed Bermejo C, Ten MP, Cantarero R, Diaz D, Pedregosa JP, Barrón E, Labrador E, López LR (2010) Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35(5):593–601CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Spiezio Sardo A, Campo R, Gordts S, Spinelli M, Cosimato C, Tanos V, Brucker S, Li TC, Gergolet M, De Angelis C, Gianaroli L, Grimbizis G (2015) The comprehensiveness of the ESHRE/ESGE classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies: a systematic review of cases not classified by the AFS system. Hum Reprod 30(5):1046–1058CrossRef Di Spiezio Sardo A, Campo R, Gordts S, Spinelli M, Cosimato C, Tanos V, Brucker S, Li TC, Gergolet M, De Angelis C, Gianaroli L, Grimbizis G (2015) The comprehensiveness of the ESHRE/ESGE classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies: a systematic review of cases not classified by the AFS system. Hum Reprod 30(5):1046–1058CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ludwin A, Ludwin I (2015) Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Mullerian duct anomalies in everyday practice. Hum Reprod 30(3):569–580CrossRefPubMed Ludwin A, Ludwin I (2015) Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Mullerian duct anomalies in everyday practice. Hum Reprod 30(3):569–580CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Somayya M, Reda A, Atia H (2016) Performance of the ESHRE/ESGE classification in differentiating anomalies of double uterine cavity in comparison with the ASRM classification. Middle East Fertil Soc J 21(2):75–81CrossRef Somayya M, Reda A, Atia H (2016) Performance of the ESHRE/ESGE classification in differentiating anomalies of double uterine cavity in comparison with the ASRM classification. Middle East Fertil Soc J 21(2):75–81CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinonen PK (2016) Distribution of female genital tract anomalies in two classifications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 206:141–146CrossRefPubMed Heinonen PK (2016) Distribution of female genital tract anomalies in two classifications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 206:141–146CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis and the classification of congenital uterine anomalies using the ESHRE/ESGE classification: a diagnostic accuracy study
verfasst von
Anna Kougioumtsidou
Themistoklis Mikos
Grigoris F. Grimbizis
Aikaterini Karavida
Theodoros D. Theodoridis
Alexandros Sotiriadis
Basil C. Tarlatzis
Apostolos P. Athanasiadis
Publikationsdatum
19.01.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05050-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.