Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2021

18.02.2020

Transanal total mesorectal excision: the Slagelse experience 2013–2019

verfasst von: Sharaf Karim Perdawood, Jens Kroeigaard, Marianne Eriksen, Pauli Mortensen

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To describe outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) 5 years from implementation at a large-volume colorectal unit, including local recurrence, distant metastasis, and survival.

Background

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a relatively new procedure for mid- and low-rectal cancer, with well-documented safety and feasibility. However, data on long-term results are limited.

Methods

This study was based on a prospective data collection via a maintained database in a large colorectal unit. The database included patients who underwent TaTME from December 2013 through July 2019. We have updated the database through a review of patient charts, including radiology and pathology reports. Data collection included operative details, intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, pathologic results, and oncologic results.

Results

During the study period, two hundred patients underwent TaTME in the study period (men = 147). The mean BMI was 26.7%, and the mean tumor height from the anal verge was 7.86 cm. Neoadjuvant treatment was given to 22% of patients. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 9.3% of patients, and the overall rate of postoperative complications was 24.5%. The TME specimen was incomplete in 11% of patients, and the CRM was positive in 5.5% of patients. Local recurrence (LR) occurred in seven patients with a follow-up of at least 2 years (4.7%). Distant metastasis (DM) occurred in 12% of patients. The overall survival was 90% and disease-free survival was 81%. The operating time was reduced in the later period of our experience.

Conclusions

This study showed that TaTME is feasible, safe, and had acceptable short-term outcomes and an acceptable rate of LR. The study included, however, one group that was non-randomized, and the follow-up was not long enough for most patients. Studies with longer follow-up data are awaited.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald RJ (2013) A new solution to some old problems: transanal TME. Tech Coloproctol 17(3):257–258PubMed Heald RJ (2013) A new solution to some old problems: transanal TME. Tech Coloproctol 17(3):257–258PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Perdawood, S.K. and G.A. Al Khefagie, Transanal vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial experience from Denmark. Colorectal Dis, 2016. 18(1):51–58. Perdawood, S.K. and G.A. Al Khefagie, Transanal vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial experience from Denmark. Colorectal Dis, 2016. 18(1):51–58.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Perdawood SK, Thinggaard BS, Bjoern MX (2018) Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open surgeries. Surg Endosc 32(5):2312–2321PubMed Perdawood SK, Thinggaard BS, Bjoern MX (2018) Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open surgeries. Surg Endosc 32(5):2312–2321PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Perdawood SK et al (2019) The pattern of defects in mesorectal specimens: is there a difference between transanal and laparoscopic approaches? Scand J Surg 108(1):49–54PubMed Perdawood SK et al (2019) The pattern of defects in mesorectal specimens: is there a difference between transanal and laparoscopic approaches? Scand J Surg 108(1):49–54PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bjoern MX, Nielsen S, Perdawood SK (2019) Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: a comparison of functional outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic approaches. J Gastrointest Surg 23(8):1623–1630PubMed Bjoern MX, Nielsen S, Perdawood SK (2019) Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: a comparison of functional outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic approaches. J Gastrointest Surg 23(8):1623–1630PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Knol JJ et al (2015) Transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision: technical aspects of approaching the mesorectal plane from below—a preliminary report. Tech Coloproctol 19(4):221–229PubMed Knol JJ et al (2015) Transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision: technical aspects of approaching the mesorectal plane from below—a preliminary report. Tech Coloproctol 19(4):221–229PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Atallah S (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision: full steam ahead. Tech Coloproctol 19(2):57–61PubMed Atallah S (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision: full steam ahead. Tech Coloproctol 19(2):57–61PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Atallah S (2014) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 23(1):10–16PubMed Atallah S (2014) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 23(1):10–16PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Quirke, P., et al., Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet, 1986. 2(8514):996–999. Quirke, P., et al., Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet, 1986. 2(8514):996–999.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Quirke P et al (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373(9666):821–828PubMedPubMedCentral Quirke P et al (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373(9666):821–828PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagtegaal ID et al (2002) Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 20(7):1729–1734PubMed Nagtegaal ID et al (2002) Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 20(7):1729–1734PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman J et al (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs. open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1346–1355PubMedPubMedCentral Fleshman J et al (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs. open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1346–1355PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196PubMed Clavien PA et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nerup N et al (2013) Promising results after endoscopic vacuum treatment of anastomotic leakage following resection of rectal cancer with ileostomy. Dan Med J 60(4):A4604PubMed Nerup N et al (2013) Promising results after endoscopic vacuum treatment of anastomotic leakage following resection of rectal cancer with ileostomy. Dan Med J 60(4):A4604PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Penna M et al (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg 266(1):111–117PubMed Penna M et al (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg 266(1):111–117PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Adamina M et al (2018) St.Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 32(3):1091–1103PubMed Adamina M et al (2018) St.Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 32(3):1091–1103PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rouanet P et al (2013) Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis. Dis Colon Rectum 56(4):408–415PubMed Rouanet P et al (2013) Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis. Dis Colon Rectum 56(4):408–415PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Dickson EA et al (2019) Carbon dioxide embolism associated with transanal total mesorectal excision surgery: a report from the international registries. Dis Colon Rectum 62(7):794–801PubMed Dickson EA et al (2019) Carbon dioxide embolism associated with transanal total mesorectal excision surgery: a report from the international registries. Dis Colon Rectum 62(7):794–801PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bulow S et al (2011) Intra-operative perforation is an important predictor of local recurrence and impaired survival after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 13(11):1256–1264PubMed Bulow S et al (2011) Intra-operative perforation is an important predictor of local recurrence and impaired survival after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 13(11):1256–1264PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bjorn MX, Perdawood SK (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision—a systematic review. Dan Med J 62(7):5105 Bjorn MX, Perdawood SK (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision—a systematic review. Dan Med J 62(7):5105
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Penna M et al (2019) Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the International TaTME Registry. Ann Surg 269(4):700–711PubMed Penna M et al (2019) Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the International TaTME Registry. Ann Surg 269(4):700–711PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma B et al (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. BMC Cancer 16:380PubMedPubMedCentral Ma B et al (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. BMC Cancer 16:380PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevenson AR et al (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 314(13):1356–1363PubMed Stevenson AR et al (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 314(13):1356–1363PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Perdawood SK (2018) A case of local recurrence following transanal total mesorectal excision: a new form of port-site metastasis? Tech Coloproctol 22(4):319–320PubMed Perdawood SK (2018) A case of local recurrence following transanal total mesorectal excision: a new form of port-site metastasis? Tech Coloproctol 22(4):319–320PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald RJ (1979) A new approach to rectal cancer. Br J Hosp Med 22(3):277–281PubMed Heald RJ (1979) A new approach to rectal cancer. Br J Hosp Med 22(3):277–281PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery–the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69(10):613–616PubMed Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery–the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69(10):613–616PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald RJ et al (1998) Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997. Arch Surg 133(8):894–899PubMed Heald RJ et al (1998) Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997. Arch Surg 133(8):894–899PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer HJ et al (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 373(2):194PubMed Bonjer HJ et al (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 373(2):194PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong SY et al (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15(7):767–774PubMed Jeong SY et al (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15(7):767–774PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang SB et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11(7):637–645PubMed Kang SB et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11(7):637–645PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman J (2016) Current status of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 20(5):1056–1064PubMed Fleshman J (2016) Current status of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 20(5):1056–1064PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman J et al (2019) Disease-free Survival and local recurrence for laparoscopic resection compared with open resection of stage II to III rectal cancer: follow-up results of the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269(4):589–595PubMed Fleshman J et al (2019) Disease-free Survival and local recurrence for laparoscopic resection compared with open resection of stage II to III rectal cancer: follow-up results of the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269(4):589–595PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer HJ et al (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332PubMed Bonjer HJ et al (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagtegaal ID et al (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23(36):9257–9264PubMed Nagtegaal ID et al (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23(36):9257–9264PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne D et al (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318(16):1569–1580PubMedPubMedCentral Jayne D et al (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318(16):1569–1580PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Funahashi K et al (2009) Transanal rectal dissection: a procedure to assist achievement of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for bulky tumor in the narrow pelvis. Am J Surg 197(4):e46–50PubMed Funahashi K et al (2009) Transanal rectal dissection: a procedure to assist achievement of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for bulky tumor in the narrow pelvis. Am J Surg 197(4):e46–50PubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Denost Q et al (2014) Perineal transanal approach: a new standard for laparoscopic sphincter-saving resection in low rectal cancer, a randomized trial. Ann Surg 260(6):993–999PubMed Denost Q et al (2014) Perineal transanal approach: a new standard for laparoscopic sphincter-saving resection in low rectal cancer, a randomized trial. Ann Surg 260(6):993–999PubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Denost Q et al (2018) Transanal versus abdominal low rectal dissection for rectal cancer: long-term results of the Bordeaux' randomized trial. Surg Endosc 32(3):1486–1494PubMed Denost Q et al (2018) Transanal versus abdominal low rectal dissection for rectal cancer: long-term results of the Bordeaux' randomized trial. Surg Endosc 32(3):1486–1494PubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Buess G et al (1992) Technique and results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in early rectal cancer. Am J Surg 163(1):63–69PubMed Buess G et al (1992) Technique and results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in early rectal cancer. Am J Surg 163(1):63–69PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Whiteford MH, Denk PM, Swanstrom LL (2007) Feasibility of radical sigmoid colectomy performed as natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 21(10):1870–1874PubMed Whiteford MH, Denk PM, Swanstrom LL (2007) Feasibility of radical sigmoid colectomy performed as natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 21(10):1870–1874PubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Telem DA et al (2013) Transanal rectosigmoid resection via natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with total mesorectal excision in a large human cadaver series. Surg Endosc 27(1):74–80PubMed Telem DA et al (2013) Transanal rectosigmoid resection via natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with total mesorectal excision in a large human cadaver series. Surg Endosc 27(1):74–80PubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat de Lacy FB et al (2018) Transanal total mesorectal excision: pathological results of 186 patients with mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 32(5):2442–2447PubMed de Lacy FB et al (2018) Transanal total mesorectal excision: pathological results of 186 patients with mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 32(5):2442–2447PubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Simillis C et al (2016) A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 18(1):19–36PubMed Simillis C et al (2016) A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 18(1):19–36PubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Larsen SG et al (2019) Norwegian moratorium on transanal total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 106(9):1120–1121PubMed Larsen SG et al (2019) Norwegian moratorium on transanal total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 106(9):1120–1121PubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Hol JC et al (2019) Long-term oncological results after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma. Tech Coloproctol 23:903–911PubMedPubMedCentral Hol JC et al (2019) Long-term oncological results after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma. Tech Coloproctol 23:903–911PubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Atallah S, Sylla P, Wexner SD (2019) Norway versus the Netherlands: will taTME stand the test of time? Tech Coloproctol 23(9):803–806PubMed Atallah S, Sylla P, Wexner SD (2019) Norway versus the Netherlands: will taTME stand the test of time? Tech Coloproctol 23(9):803–806PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Transanal total mesorectal excision: the Slagelse experience 2013–2019
verfasst von
Sharaf Karim Perdawood
Jens Kroeigaard
Marianne Eriksen
Pauli Mortensen
Publikationsdatum
18.02.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07454-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.