Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 2/2020

01.11.2019 | Original Article

‘Trifecta’ outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a large Japanese multicenter study

verfasst von: Junya Furukawa, Hiroomi Kanayama, Haruhito Azuma, Keiji Inoue, Yasuyuki Kobayashi, Akira Kashiwagi, Takehiko Segawa, Yoshihito Takahashi, Shigeo Horie, Osamu Ogawa, Atsushi Takenaka, Ryoichi Shiroki, Kazunari Tanabe, Masato Fujisawa

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the early surgical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for small renal masses in a large Japanese multicenter series.

Methods

A total of 804 consecutive cases of RAPN were examined at 42 institutes between 2011 and 2016. Medical records for clinical, pathological characteristics and perioperative outcomes were retrospectively reviewed. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine factors predicting Trifecta achievement.

Results

The median tumor size was 2.6 cm. The median RENAL score was 7. The median warm ischemia time was 21 min. The median estimated blood loss was 30 mL. Eight patients (1.0%) were converted to radical nephrectomy. The overall and Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ 3 complication rates were 13.0% and 5.8%, respectively. Pathologically, 91.4% of tumors were malignant and the positive surgical margin (PSM) rate was 1.1%. During the median 27.1-month observation period, the recurrence rate was 1.6%. Postoperative preservation rates of eGFR at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months were 90.3, 89.8, 89.4 and 89.2%, respectively. Trifecta was achieved in 62.1%. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that tumor diameter, estimated blood loss and hilar location of the tumor were significant negative factors predicting Trifecta achievement. The rate of Trifecta achievement for T1b tumors and hilar tumors was significantly lower (48.4% and 50.0%, respectively).

Conclusions

RAPN was safely performed with acceptable oncological and functional outcomes, but the rate of Trifecta accomplishment for T1b or hilar tumors was significantly lower than that for T1a or non-hilar tumors, respectively.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gill IS, Aron M, Gervais DA et al (2010) Clinical practice. Small renal mass. N Engl J Med 362:634 Gill IS, Aron M, Gervais DA et al (2010) Clinical practice. Small renal mass. N Engl J Med 362:634
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S et al (2015) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67:913–943CrossRef Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S et al (2015) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67:913–943CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R et al (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 62:1023–1033CrossRef Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R et al (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 62:1023–1033CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK et al (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology. 64:914–918CrossRef Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK et al (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology. 64:914–918CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka K, Teishima J, Takenaka A et al (2018) Prospective study of robotic partial nephrectomy for renal cancer in Japan: comparison with a historical control undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol. 25:472–478CrossRef Tanaka K, Teishima J, Takenaka A et al (2018) Prospective study of robotic partial nephrectomy for renal cancer in Japan: comparison with a historical control undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol. 25:472–478CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiroki R, Maruyama T, Kusaka M et al (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using da Vinci S-surgical system for localized renal tumor: report of initial five cases. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 102:679–685 (in Japanese) PubMed Shiroki R, Maruyama T, Kusaka M et al (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using da Vinci S-surgical system for localized renal tumor: report of initial five cases. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 102:679–685 (in Japanese) PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hung AJ, Cai J, Simmons MN et al (2013) "Trifecta" in partial nephrectomy. J Urol 189:36–42CrossRef Hung AJ, Cai J, Simmons MN et al (2013) "Trifecta" in partial nephrectomy. J Urol 189:36–42CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M et al (2009) Collaborators developing the Japanese equation for estimated GFR: Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis 53:982–992CrossRef Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M et al (2009) Collaborators developing the Japanese equation for estimated GFR: Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis 53:982–992CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu Z, Li M, Liu B et al (2014) Robotic versus open partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 9:e94878CrossRef Wu Z, Li M, Liu B et al (2014) Robotic versus open partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 9:e94878CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Marszalek M, Carini M, Chlosta P et al (2012) Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 61:757–763CrossRef Marszalek M, Carini M, Chlosta P et al (2012) Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 61:757–763CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Khalifeh A, Kaouk JH, Bhayani S et al (2013) Positive surgical margins in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of oncologic outcomes (leave no tumor behind). J Urol. 190:1674–1679CrossRef Khalifeh A, Kaouk JH, Bhayani S et al (2013) Positive surgical margins in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of oncologic outcomes (leave no tumor behind). J Urol. 190:1674–1679CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanagho YS, Kaouk JH, Allaf ME et al (2013) Perioperative complications of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of 886 patients at 5 United States centers. Urology 81:573–579CrossRef Tanagho YS, Kaouk JH, Allaf ME et al (2013) Perioperative complications of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of 886 patients at 5 United States centers. Urology 81:573–579CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jain S, Nyirenda T, Yates J et al (2013) Incidence of renal artery pseudoaneurysm following open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and comparative analysis. J Urol 189:1643–1648CrossRef Jain S, Nyirenda T, Yates J et al (2013) Incidence of renal artery pseudoaneurysm following open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and comparative analysis. J Urol 189:1643–1648CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kondo T, Takagi T, Morita S et al (2015) Early unclamping might reduce the risk of renal artery pseudoaneurysm after robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol 22:1096–1102CrossRef Kondo T, Takagi T, Morita S et al (2015) Early unclamping might reduce the risk of renal artery pseudoaneurysm after robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol 22:1096–1102CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hyams ES, Pierorazio P, Proteek O et al (2011) Iatrogenic vascular lesions after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional study of clinical and renal functional outcomes. Urology 78:820–826CrossRef Hyams ES, Pierorazio P, Proteek O et al (2011) Iatrogenic vascular lesions after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional study of clinical and renal functional outcomes. Urology 78:820–826CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohenpour M, Strauss S, Gottlieb P et al (2007) Pseudoaneurysm of the renal artery following partial nephrectomy: imaging findings and coil embolization. Clin Radiol 62:1104–1109CrossRef Cohenpour M, Strauss S, Gottlieb P et al (2007) Pseudoaneurysm of the renal artery following partial nephrectomy: imaging findings and coil embolization. Clin Radiol 62:1104–1109CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh D, Gill IS (2005) Renal artery pseudoaneurysm following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 174:2256–2259CrossRef Singh D, Gill IS (2005) Renal artery pseudoaneurysm following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 174:2256–2259CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanagho YS, Figenshau RS, Bhayani SB (2013) Technique, outcomes, and evolving role of extirpative laparoscopic and robotic surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 22:91–109CrossRef Tanagho YS, Figenshau RS, Bhayani SB (2013) Technique, outcomes, and evolving role of extirpative laparoscopic and robotic surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 22:91–109CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Volpe A, Blute ML, Ficarra V et al (2015) Renal ischemia and function after partial nephrectomy: a collaborative review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:61–74CrossRef Volpe A, Blute ML, Ficarra V et al (2015) Renal ischemia and function after partial nephrectomy: a collaborative review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:61–74CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Eyraud R, Long JA, Snow-Lisy D et al (2013) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: perioperative outcomes. Urology 81:1246–1251CrossRef Eyraud R, Long JA, Snow-Lisy D et al (2013) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: perioperative outcomes. Urology 81:1246–1251CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Dulabon LM, Kaouk JH, Haber GP et al (2011) Multi-institutional analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for hilar versus nonhilar lesions in 446 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 59:325–330CrossRef Dulabon LM, Kaouk JH, Haber GP et al (2011) Multi-institutional analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for hilar versus nonhilar lesions in 446 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 59:325–330CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Shim M, Song C, Park S et al (2015) Hilar location is an independent prognostic factor for recurrence in T1 renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 22:344–350CrossRef Shim M, Song C, Park S et al (2015) Hilar location is an independent prognostic factor for recurrence in T1 renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 22:344–350CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Petros F, Sukumar S, Haber GP et al (2012) Multi-institutional analysis of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors >4 cm versus ≤ 4 cm in 445 consecutive patients. J Endourol 26:642–646CrossRef Petros F, Sukumar S, Haber GP et al (2012) Multi-institutional analysis of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors >4 cm versus ≤ 4 cm in 445 consecutive patients. J Endourol 26:642–646CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim DK, Kim LH, Raheem AA et al (2016) Comparison of trifecta and pentafecta outcomes between T1a and T1b renal masses following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) with minimum one year follow up: can RAPN for T1b renal masses be feasible? PLoS One 11:e0151738CrossRef Kim DK, Kim LH, Raheem AA et al (2016) Comparison of trifecta and pentafecta outcomes between T1a and T1b renal masses following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) with minimum one year follow up: can RAPN for T1b renal masses be feasible? PLoS One 11:e0151738CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
‘Trifecta’ outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a large Japanese multicenter study
verfasst von
Junya Furukawa
Hiroomi Kanayama
Haruhito Azuma
Keiji Inoue
Yasuyuki Kobayashi
Akira Kashiwagi
Takehiko Segawa
Yoshihito Takahashi
Shigeo Horie
Osamu Ogawa
Atsushi Takenaka
Ryoichi Shiroki
Kazunari Tanabe
Masato Fujisawa
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2019
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01565-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 2/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

25.04.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.