Introduction
Psychotropic drugs, including methamphetamine, are the most commonly used illegal drugs worldwide [
1]. The number of users has increased from 24 to 34.2 million people between 2006 and 2017, making methamphetamine use a major concern for the World Health Organization (WHO) [
2]. Therefore, the use of methamphetamine is one of the current concerns of the WHO (World Health Organization) [
3]. A systematic study and meta-analysis revealed the 12-month prevalence of methamphetamine use in Iran to be 2.4% [
4]. A study on 353 methamphetamine users found that mental problems, injuries, skin infections, and dental and oral hygiene problems affected approximately 18.7%, 18.4%, 11.11%, and 6.6% of users respectively [
5]. Methamphetamine use has also been linked to heart failure and stroke [
6,
7], and its long-term use can cause dysfunction and significant costs for families and communities [
8,
9].
Diagnosing methamphetamine dependence, its symptoms, and treatment is more complicated than the diagnostic criteria in DSM IV-TR [
10]. The high rate of relapse is a significant obstacle to the long-term effectiveness of substance use treatment programs [
11].
Returning to drug use occurs in two forms; (a) complete return or relapse, and (b) partial return or lapse (slip). Lapse is defined as a temporally restricted and isolated pattern of drug use, whereas relapse is defined as a more severe and prolonged pattern of drug use [
12].
Despite the implementation of advanced programs for treating substance use disorder, the recovery process, especially in cases of methamphetamine use, has been associated with high relapse rates [
13]. Therefore, identifying factors related to lapses and relapses is crucial in providing effective treatments and managing them. A recent study by Huang et al. (2032) identified high craving as a risk factor for methamphetamine relapse [
14]. Also, the study of Valencia and Peters (2023) showed that homesickness, lack of meeting and family support, fear of treatment, financial stress, stigma and social criticism, and boredom, are six barriers to recovery from methamphetamine use [
15].
However, current treatment models such as Marlatt's cognitive-behavioral model of relapse [
16], Marlatt's dynamic model of relapse [
17], and reinstatement model [
18] are based on studies conducted in the general population with substance use disorders. Therefore, further investigation is needed to develop specific treatment models for methamphetamine use disorder. It could be argued that these models were developed based on non-native studies, and since substance use is a human phenomenon influenced by culture, the cultural differences of various societies regarding lapses and relapse factors in treatment can impact the results. In Iran, the problem of drug use has specific local characteristics [
19‐
21], Additionally, concerns exist regarding the rising prevalence of deaths caused by methamphetamine in Iranian society and the high incidence of substance use-related deaths in North Khorasan province, located in the northeast of Iran [
22,
23]. Therefore, identifying factors associated with lapses and relapse among methamphetamine users is crucial. The present study aims to qualitatively investigate the lived experiences of methamphetamine users regarding lapses and relapse.
Methods and data
This study utilized a qualitative approach through content analysis. The target population consisted of individuals with methamphetamine use disorder who were in the abstinence phase and attended Narcotics Anonymous Association meetings in Bojnord between 2022–2023. Purposeful snowball sampling was used until data saturation was reached. Inclusion criteria included a history of relapse within the past six months, age between 20–50 years, and no serious mental or medical illness. Methamphetamine use by mouth or injection was also required. Exclusion criteria included lack of consent and inability to express experiences. Interviews lasted between 45–80 min and interviewees' opinions were only mentioned through coding to comply with ethical considerations and spiritual principles of NA. Participants were informed that participation was optional, written consent-to-participate statements were obtained, and the purpose of audio recording was explained. If participants refused audio recording, notes were taken instead.
The primary method of data collection utilized in this study was semi-structured in-depth interviews and note-taking. A total of 22 individuals participated in the research, including 10 individual interviews and 2 focus group interviews with 6 members each. The interviews continued until data saturation was achieved, and the codes from previous interviews were both confirmed and repeated.
The interviews were conducted in addiction treatment centers and a quiet room without the presence of any third person. A special guide for semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions was used to obtain information on physical, psychological, occupational, academic, family, social, and other factors related to methamphetamine use.
The interview questions were compiled using main and general questions from the study as well as a review of related texts. Participants were asked about their experiences, feelings, and perceptions of lapses or returning to methamphetamine use. Additional information was obtained through STAR questions (situation, task, action, result) and w & h questions (who, what, where, when, why, how).
The interviewer was a psychologist specializing in substance use who held a briefing session for research participants to build trust before conducting the interviews. After each interview, the written transcript was reread several times by the interviewer.
Data analysis
Analysis and note-taking were done concurrently with coding and continuous comparison. The process of conducting interviews continued until new codes were no longer obtained and the data reached saturation, at which point previous findings were confirmed through repetition. If new codes were obtained during an interview, another interview was conducted in a theoretical manner to ensure comprehensive sampling. Focus group interviews were also conducted and analysed using the same method. The Astrid-Sterling model [
24], which has 3 stages and 6 steps, was used for data analysis. In addition, member checking, peer review, and recoding methods were used to measure the reliability of coding. As such, the text of the interviews and its summary were sent to a qualitative research method expert, and the problems related to the coding flow were resolved. To ensure the accuracy of the written account of the participants' comments and perspectives, the coding was returned to the participants and they were asked to confirm whether their experiences could be found in them. Based on the feedback of the participants, the coding was then modified and completed. Through re-coding and the Holsti method, coding reliability equal to 0.91 was obtained. The validity of the content analysis results was determined through content validity; the research results were sent to 11 experts in the field of substance use and qualitative research in the form of a 3-option (i.e. appropriate, somewhat appropriate, inappropriate) questionnaire. The Lavache coefficient of the questionnaire determined by the 11 experts was equal to 0.59 [
25], the coefficients obtained for each of the themes were higher than this number, and the validity of the findings of the thematic analysis was confirmed. MAXQDA software was used to classify the contents.
From the total of 22 participants, 10 people participated in individual interviews and 12 formed two focused focus groups of 6 members each.
Discussion
The aim of this study was to explore the causes of lapses and relapses among people who use methamphetamine in Iran, using a qualitative approach. The results revealed that one of the major risk factors for returning to methamphetamine use is the “evocation of positive emotions experienced during the use ". This refers to situations where individuals seek to create or enhance positive emotions through methamphetamine use. Hendianti & Uthis (2018) Hendianti and Uthis (2018) found a correlation between positive emotional states and the risk of relapse [
26]. The basic themes of positive emotional states include temptation to use, time and place of use, positive fantasizing, being cheerful, self-expression among friends, and lapses among friends. Marlatt (1996) suggests that substance use is often motivated by a desire to increase feelings of happiness, freedom, and pleasure or to experience the energizing effects of the drug. Therefore, individuals with methamphetamine use disorder may be more likely to relapse in response to stressors that trigger these desires. Another reason for lapses and relapses is cue reactivity, where individuals have a conditioned response to stimuli associated with drug use that draws them back into using again [
27].
Another organizing theme identified in this research is "
negative emotional states". This finding is consistent with previous studies [
26,
28,
29]. that have shown that negative emotions and ineffective interpersonal situations are responsible for more than half of lapses and relapses, according to Marlatt's analysis (1996) [
16]. Sinha (2007) also suggests that stress and related factors contribute to relapse [
30]. Typically, three factors trigger relapse: negative moods, cognitive factors, and environmental factors [
31]. Emotional relapse is often the first stage of relapse and occurs before the person realizes they may be at risk. During this stage, the individual experiences negative emotional states such as stress, anger, and anxiety. This can disrupt their diet and sleep cycle, reducing their desire to stay in treatment and recovery due to a lack of physical support systems [
32]. These early emotional and physical warning signs are often dealt with by individuals with methamphetamine use disorder through drug use as a coping strategy, leading to relapse.
Another organizing theme identified in this research is "
interpersonal factors". Witkiewitz and Marlatt have emphasized the role of interpersonal factors in relapse based on Marlatt's model [
17]. Menon & Kandasamy (2018) suggest that positive social support can effectively prevent relapse and interpersonal conflicts, social pressure, and negative family behaviours [
12]. The literature review also indicates that interpersonal stress and rejection sensitivity increase the risk of relapse in individuals with alcohol or drug use [
33]. Mousali et al. (2021) found that family conflicts and having close friends and relatives who use substances are reasons for slipping into substance use among Iranian individuals who use substances [
34]. Another study observed that individuals who did not return to substance use had better and closer relationships with their families and spouses [
35]. Negative environments, such as lack of peace, being chastised, ridiculed, belittled, exposed to physical violence by relatives, and stigmatization, can damage an individual's recovery by damaging their sense of worth. This damage can cause the individual not to feel positive enough about themselves to protect themselves from engaging in harmful behaviours such as substance use. Resuming past relationships involved in substance use can also be a serious trigger leading to substance use.
The present study's results indicate that "
environmental factors" are one of the most critical factors in returning to methamphetamine use. Family problems such as intense parental control, being forced by the family to quit, low family income, and discriminatory treatment in the family are some environmental factors influencing the return to substance use. Many studies have also found that bad family conditions and families with substance dependence are causes of returning to substance dependence [
36,
37]. In their 2021 study, John and Kim found that having user friends can lead to drug use [
38]. A meta-analysis conducted in Iran also revealed that environmental factors have a larger effect size on relapse (0.64) compared to individual factors (0.41) [
39]. The role of environmental factors in relapse can be broken down into four dimensions. Firstly, individuals who use substances may turn to substances to cope with unpleasant emotions caused by environmental and social conflicts. Secondly, mistreatment, violence, and stigmatization can damage an individual's sense of self-worth, leading to harmful behaviours such as substance use. Thirdly, extreme family control and interference can push individuals towards drug use. Lastly, these factors prevent individuals from receiving positive social support which is crucial in preventing relapse [
40,
41].
Another factor affecting relapse is negative physical states related to treatment. This includes heart palpitations, sweating, high blood pressure, nausea and vomiting, muscle pain and cramps, fatigue, sleeplessness, high irritability, illness and injury. Physical illness causes pain and stress which may lead individuals to turn to drug use as a means of reducing discomfort. In some studies, it has been found that individuals who use substances may turn to drugs again to alleviate the pain caused by chronic and incurable diseases or unexpected incidents [
42,
43].
Limitation
However, one limitation of this study is that some participants may not remember all their laps experiences, leading to the possibility of neglecting some relapses and their causes. Additionally, due to the principle of anonymity in the Addicts Anonymous association, some participants may refuse to disclose the truth. To address this limitation, participants were assured that their data and information would remain confidential and anonymous. However, another limitation is that the statistical population of this study was limited to the Narcotics Anonymous association in Bojnord, making it difficult to generalize these findings to other cultures and geographical conditions. Therefore, it is recommended to investigate the causes of laps and relapse in other substance users as well.
Based on the results obtained from this study, therapists and specialists should focus on factors such as negative emotional states, negative physical states, interpersonal factors, environmental factors, and positive emotional states in order to prevent laps and relapse and increase the duration of methamphetamine treatment.
Furthermore, as negative emotional states are identified as the primary underlying factors (12 categories) contributing to lapses and relapses in methamphetamine dependence, it is recommended that research be conducted to develop appropriate therapeutic interventions aimed at reducing these negative emotional states in affected individuals. Additionally, it is suggested that an educational package be created and evaluated for individuals surrounding those undergoing the quitting process, focusing on social and environmental factors as well as interpersonal conflicts, with the aim of reducing lapses and relapses. The authors of this study extend their gratitude to all the guides and participants who contributed to the interviews and data collection.
Conclusion
Based on the findings of our study, it is clear that methamphetamine use is a complex issue that involves a range of factors, including emotional states, interpersonal relationships, environmental factors, and physical symptoms.
Overall, our study highlights the need for a comprehensive approach to addressing methamphetamine use that takes into account the multiple factors involved and the findings suggest that interventions aimed at preventing laps and relapse should address these underlying factors. For example, interventions could focus on helping individuals develop coping strategies for negative emotional states or improving their social support networks to reduce dependence on substance-using friends. Additionally, addressing environmental factors such as discrimination or excessive parental control may also be important in preventing laps and relapse. By taking a holistic approach to treatment, we can improve outcomes for individuals struggling with methamphetamine use and reduce the overall impact of this issue on society.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.