Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 3/2019

24.01.2019 | Pediatrics

Use of log-scaled crowded visual acuity charts in clinical studies regarding amblyopia

verfasst von: Asimina Mataftsi, Nikolaos Kappos, Paraskevi Riga, Stamatia Kokkali, Paraskevi Malamaki, Periklis Brazitikos, Anna-Bettina Haidich

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Log-scaled crowded charts using standardized testing protocol are essential for precise and reproducible visual acuity (VA) testing regarding amblyopia. Despite common acceptance of these standards, current VA testing clinical practice shows considerable diversity. The purpose of this retrospective literature review was to investigate the methodology of VA measurement and reporting in pediatric ophthalmology literature regarding amblyopia.

Methods

We searched PubMed for clinical trials regarding amblyopia, published from January 1994 to July 2016. Primary outcomes included VA measurement methodology, namely use of (a) log-scaled chart, (b) crowded chart, and (c) specified testing protocol. The study design, publication year, and the journal’s impact factor were analyzed in relation to the primary outcomes.

Results

Out of the 165 initial reports, 150 were included. VA was measured with a log-scaled chart in 65%, with a crowded chart in 57%, and with a specified protocol in 51% of studies. All three criteria were met in 43% of studies and in multivariable logistic model, they were associated with more recent publication year (odds ratio [OR] = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 1.03–1.20) and were more likely to be present in higher impact factor journals (OR = 1.42, 95%CI = 1.17–1.72) or randomized controlled trials (OR = 3.09, 95%CI = 1.44–6.59).

Conclusions

In the last two decades, more than half of clinical trials addressing amblyopia have not followed the recommended methodology for optimal visual acuity assessment. Thus, their measurements may have been contaminated with noise, and their respective results and conclusions may include errors. Adhering to optimal, standardized methodology is key to progress in both clinical and research grounds.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bailey I, Lovie J (1976) New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Optic 53:740–745CrossRef Bailey I, Lovie J (1976) New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Optic 53:740–745CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lovie–Kitchin J (1988) Validity and reliability of visual acuity. Ophthal Physiol Opt 8:363–370CrossRef Lovie–Kitchin J (1988) Validity and reliability of visual acuity. Ophthal Physiol Opt 8:363–370CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartmann E, Dobson V, Hainline L et al (2001) Preschool vision screening: summary of a task force report. Ophthalmology 108:479–486CrossRefPubMed Hartmann E, Dobson V, Hainline L et al (2001) Preschool vision screening: summary of a task force report. Ophthalmology 108:479–486CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat McGraw P, Winn B, Gray L, Elliott D (2000) Improving the reliability of visual acuity measures in young children. Ophthal Physiol Opt 20:173–184CrossRef McGraw P, Winn B, Gray L, Elliott D (2000) Improving the reliability of visual acuity measures in young children. Ophthal Physiol Opt 20:173–184CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart C (2000) Comparison of Snellen and log-based acuity scores for school aged children. Br Orthopt J 57:32–38 Stewart C (2000) Comparison of Snellen and log-based acuity scores for school aged children. Br Orthopt J 57:32–38
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fern K, Manny R, Davis J, Gibson R (1986) Contour interaction in the preschool child. Am J Optom Physiol Optic 63:313–318CrossRef Fern K, Manny R, Davis J, Gibson R (1986) Contour interaction in the preschool child. Am J Optom Physiol Optic 63:313–318CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rydberg A, Ericson B, Lennerstrand G et al (1999) Assessment of visual acuity in children aged 1 1/2-6 years, with normal and subnormal vision. Strabismus 7:1–24CrossRefPubMed Rydberg A, Ericson B, Lennerstrand G et al (1999) Assessment of visual acuity in children aged 1 1/2-6 years, with normal and subnormal vision. Strabismus 7:1–24CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hessa RF, Jacobsa RJ (1979) A preliminary report of acuity and contour interactions across the amblyope’s visual field. Vis Res 19:1403–1408CrossRef Hessa RF, Jacobsa RJ (1979) A preliminary report of acuity and contour interactions across the amblyope’s visual field. Vis Res 19:1403–1408CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Blackhurst D, Maguire M (1989) Reproducibility of refraction and visual acuity measurement under a standard protocol. The Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Retina 9:163–169 Blackhurst D, Maguire M (1989) Reproducibility of refraction and visual acuity measurement under a standard protocol. The Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Retina 9:163–169
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson M (2009) The art and science of examining a child. In: Wilson M, Trivedi R, Saunders R (eds) Pediatric ophthalmology: current thought and a practical guide. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1–6 Wilson M (2009) The art and science of examining a child. In: Wilson M, Trivedi R, Saunders R (eds) Pediatric ophthalmology: current thought and a practical guide. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1–6
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Holmes J, Beck R, Repka M et al (2001) The amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol. Arch Ophthalmol 119:1345–1353CrossRefPubMed Holmes J, Beck R, Repka M et al (2001) The amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol. Arch Ophthalmol 119:1345–1353CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Maldonado G, Greenland S (1993) Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol 138:923–936CrossRefPubMed Maldonado G, Greenland S (1993) Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol 138:923–936CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulze-Bonsel K1, Feltgen N, Burau H, Hansen L, Bach M (2006) Visual acuities “hand motion” and “counting fingers” can be quantified with the freiburg visual acuity test. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(3):1236–1240CrossRefPubMed Schulze-Bonsel K1, Feltgen N, Burau H, Hansen L, Bach M (2006) Visual acuities “hand motion” and “counting fingers” can be quantified with the freiburg visual acuity test. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(3):1236–1240CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Use of log-scaled crowded visual acuity charts in clinical studies regarding amblyopia
verfasst von
Asimina Mataftsi
Nikolaos Kappos
Paraskevi Riga
Stamatia Kokkali
Paraskevi Malamaki
Periklis Brazitikos
Anna-Bettina Haidich
Publikationsdatum
24.01.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-04235-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.