Skip to main content
Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics 4/2019

01.04.2019 | Original Research Article

Using Discrete-Choice Experiment Methods to Estimate the Value of Informal Care: The Case of Children with Intellectual Disability

verfasst von: Sheena Arora, Stephen Goodall, Rosalie Viney, Stewart Einfeld

Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

This research produces a preference-based monetary valuation of informal care provided to children with intellectual disability (ID) that can be directly applied in economic evaluations.

Methods

A discrete-choice experiment (DCE) was designed to elicit an individual’s willingness to accept compensation for different care tasks. Respondents were presented choice sets that included a care package comprising different amounts and types of care and asked to choose between the care package provided free of charge or providing that care themselves and receiving cash compensation. The care package included personal care, social support, household errands and housework, with the value of compensation, number of care hours provided and types of care varied across the choice sets. Choices were analysed using a generalised multinomial logit model and latent class model.

Results

A representative sample of 198 caregivers completed the survey (response rate 52%). Participants were recruited in Australia. Overall, caregivers would accept a minimum of Australian dollars ($A)20.61 to provide 1 h of care. The preferences for assistance varied significantly with different types of care tasks. Individuals placed the highest value on receiving assistance with social support ($A35.96) and the least value on receiving assistance with household errands ($A-0.92)

Conclusions

This study produces a value of informal care provided to children with ID that can be directly applied in economic evaluations. The study shows that informal care tasks are not valued equally. Caregivers placed the most value on receiving assistance with social support, which may reflect the time spent by caregivers on these tasks.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat McDaid D. Estimating the costs of informal care for people with Alzheimer’s disease: methodological and practical challenges. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001;16:400–5.CrossRefPubMed McDaid D. Estimating the costs of informal care for people with Alzheimer’s disease: methodological and practical challenges. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001;16:400–5.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of healthcare programs. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of healthcare programs. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodrich K, Kaambwa B, Al-Janabi H. The inclusion of informal care in applied economic evaluation: a review. Value Health. 2012;15:975–81.CrossRefPubMed Goodrich K, Kaambwa B, Al-Janabi H. The inclusion of informal care in applied economic evaluation: a review. Value Health. 2012;15:975–81.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Exel J, Bobinac A, Koopmanschap M, et al. The invisible hands made visible: recognizing the value of informal care in healthcare decision-making. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2008;8:557–61.CrossRefPubMed Van Exel J, Bobinac A, Koopmanschap M, et al. The invisible hands made visible: recognizing the value of informal care in healthcare decision-making. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2008;8:557–61.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Krol M, Papenburg J, Van Exel J. Does including informal care in economic evaluations matter? A systematic review of inclusion and impact of informal care in cost-effectiveness studies. PharmacoEconomics. 2015;33:123–35.CrossRefPubMed Krol M, Papenburg J, Van Exel J. Does including informal care in economic evaluations matter? A systematic review of inclusion and impact of informal care in cost-effectiveness studies. PharmacoEconomics. 2015;33:123–35.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Berg B, Brouwer W, van Exel J, et al. Economic valuation of informal care: Lessons from the application of the opportunity costs and proxy good methods. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:835–45.CrossRefPubMed Van den Berg B, Brouwer W, van Exel J, et al. Economic valuation of informal care: Lessons from the application of the opportunity costs and proxy good methods. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:835–45.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Berg B, Brouwer WBF, Koppmanschap MA. Economic valuation of informal care: an overview of methods and applications. Eur J Health Econ. 2004;5:36–45.CrossRefPubMed Van den Berg B, Brouwer WBF, Koppmanschap MA. Economic valuation of informal care: an overview of methods and applications. Eur J Health Econ. 2004;5:36–45.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Bureau of Statistics. Caring in the community, Australia. Sydney: Commonw Aust; 2009. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Caring in the community, Australia. Sydney: Commonw Aust; 2009.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Exel J, Bobinac A, Koopmanschap M, et al. Providing informal care: a burden and a blessing. Geneva Assoc Inform Newsl-Health Ageing. 2007;16:10–3. Van Exel J, Bobinac A, Koopmanschap M, et al. Providing informal care: a burden and a blessing. Geneva Assoc Inform Newsl-Health Ageing. 2007;16:10–3.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith K, Wright K. Informal care and economic appraisal: a discussion of possible methodological approaches. Health Econ. 1994;3:137–48.CrossRefPubMed Smith K, Wright K. Informal care and economic appraisal: a discussion of possible methodological approaches. Health Econ. 1994;3:137–48.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy NA, Christian B, Caplin DA, et al. The health of caregivers for children with disabilities: caregiver perspectives. Child Care Health Dev. 2007;33:180–7.CrossRefPubMed Murphy NA, Christian B, Caplin DA, et al. The health of caregivers for children with disabilities: caregiver perspectives. Child Care Health Dev. 2007;33:180–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Raina P, O’Donnell M, Schwellnus H, et al. Caregiving process and caregiver burden: conceptual models to guide research and practice. BMC Pediatr. 2004;4:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Raina P, O’Donnell M, Schwellnus H, et al. Caregiving process and caregiver burden: conceptual models to guide research and practice. BMC Pediatr. 2004;4:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat The World Health Organisation (WHO). International statistical classification of disases and related health problems 10th revision (ICD-10). Geneva: WHO; 1992. The World Health Organisation (WHO). International statistical classification of disases and related health problems 10th revision (ICD-10). Geneva: WHO; 1992.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Disability in Australia: intellectual disability, Bulletin 67. Canberra: Australian Government, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2008. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Disability in Australia: intellectual disability, Bulletin 67. Canberra: Australian Government, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2008.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Goddard L, Davidson PM, Daly J, et al. People with an intellectual disability in the discourse of chronic and complex conditions: an invisible group? Austral Health Rev. 2008;32:405–14.CrossRef Goddard L, Davidson PM, Daly J, et al. People with an intellectual disability in the discourse of chronic and complex conditions: an invisible group? Austral Health Rev. 2008;32:405–14.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Doran CM, Einfeld SL, Madden RH, et al. How much does intellectual disability really cost? First estimates for Australia. J Intell Dev Disab. 2012;37:42–9.CrossRef Doran CM, Einfeld SL, Madden RH, et al. How much does intellectual disability really cost? First estimates for Australia. J Intell Dev Disab. 2012;37:42–9.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chia YH, Lunsky Y. Dual diagnosis and access to services. J Dev Disab. 2003;10:79–82. Chia YH, Lunsky Y. Dual diagnosis and access to services. J Dev Disab. 2003;10:79–82.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat McGill P, Papachristoforou E, Cooper V. Support for family carers of children and young people with developmental disabilities and challenging behaviour. Child Care Health Dev. 2006;32:159–65.CrossRefPubMed McGill P, Papachristoforou E, Cooper V. Support for family carers of children and young people with developmental disabilities and challenging behaviour. Child Care Health Dev. 2006;32:159–65.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kenny K, McGilloway S. Caring for children with learning disabilities: an exploratory study of parental strain and coping. Br J Learn Disabil. 2007;35:221–8.CrossRef Kenny K, McGilloway S. Caring for children with learning disabilities: an exploratory study of parental strain and coping. Br J Learn Disabil. 2007;35:221–8.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Berg B, Al M, Brouwer W, et al. Economic valuation of informal care: the conjoint measurement method applied to informal caregiving. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:1342–55.CrossRefPubMed Van den Berg B, Al M, Brouwer W, et al. Economic valuation of informal care: the conjoint measurement method applied to informal caregiving. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:1342–55.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Berg B, Al M, Van Exel J, et al. Economic valuation of informal care: conjoint analysis applied in a heterogeneous population of informal caregivers. Value Health. 2008;11:1041–50.CrossRefPubMed Van den Berg B, Al M, Van Exel J, et al. Economic valuation of informal care: conjoint analysis applied in a heterogeneous population of informal caregivers. Value Health. 2008;11:1041–50.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mentzakis E, Ryan M, McNamee P. Using discrete choice experiments to value informal care tasks: exploring preference heterogeneity. Health Econ. 2011;20:930–44.CrossRefPubMed Mentzakis E, Ryan M, McNamee P. Using discrete choice experiments to value informal care tasks: exploring preference heterogeneity. Health Econ. 2011;20:930–44.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Berg B, Bleichrodt H, Eeckhoudt L. The economic value of informal care: a study of informal caregivers’ and patients’ willingness to pay and willingness to accept for informal care. Health Econ. 2005;14:363–76.CrossRefPubMed Van den Berg B, Bleichrodt H, Eeckhoudt L. The economic value of informal care: a study of informal caregivers’ and patients’ willingness to pay and willingness to accept for informal care. Health Econ. 2005;14:363–76.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Government Fair Work Commission. Annual wage review 2012–2013. C2013/1. Canberra, 2013. Australian Government Fair Work Commission. Annual wage review 2012–2013. C2013/1. Canberra, 2013.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Bureau of Statistics. Employee earnings and hours, Australia, 2010. Canberra, 2011. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Employee earnings and hours, Australia, 2010. Canberra, 2011.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Bureau of Statistics. Wage Price Index, Australia, Cat 6345.0. Canberra, 2013. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Wage Price Index, Australia, Cat 6345.0. Canberra, 2013.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Coast J, Flynn T, Salisbury C, et al. Maximising responses to discrete choice experiments. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2006;5:249–60.CrossRefPubMed Coast J, Flynn T, Salisbury C, et al. Maximising responses to discrete choice experiments. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2006;5:249–60.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Fiebig DG, Keane MP, Louviere J, et al. The generalized multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Mark Sci. 2010;29:393–421.CrossRef Fiebig DG, Keane MP, Louviere J, et al. The generalized multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Mark Sci. 2010;29:393–421.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Einfeld SL, Tonge BJ. Manual for the developmental behaviour checklist. 2nd ed. Primary Carer Version and Teacher Version: University of New South Wales and Monash University; 2002. Einfeld SL, Tonge BJ. Manual for the developmental behaviour checklist. 2nd ed. Primary Carer Version and Teacher Version: University of New South Wales and Monash University; 2002.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Carers Australia. The economic value of informal care in Australia in 2015. Canberra, 2015. Carers Australia. The economic value of informal care in Australia in 2015. Canberra, 2015.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Howard K, Salkeld G. Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer. Value Health. 2009;12:354–63.CrossRefPubMed Howard K, Salkeld G. Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer. Value Health. 2009;12:354–63.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Using Discrete-Choice Experiment Methods to Estimate the Value of Informal Care: The Case of Children with Intellectual Disability
verfasst von
Sheena Arora
Stephen Goodall
Rosalie Viney
Stewart Einfeld
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
PharmacoEconomics / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0637-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

PharmacoEconomics 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe