nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.03.2011 | Original Article

Validation of web-based administration of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12)

verfasst von: Brent A. Parnell, Gena C. Dunivan, AnnaMarie Connolly, Mary L. Jannelli, Ellen C. Wells, Elizabeth J. Geller

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We studied a web-based version of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12).

Methods

A randomized crossover study in which subjects completed both a web-based and paper-based version of the PISQ-12, with a 2-week separation between the completion of the two versions. Demographic data and questionnaire preferences were also assessed. Group 1 completed the web version first, and group 2 completed the paper version first.

Results

We recruited 52 women and 50 (96.2%) completed the study. Demographic data were similar for the two groups. There was no difference in total PISQ-12 score (P = 0.41) and a high degree of correlation between versions (r = 0.88). Women preferred the web-based PISQ-12 (77.6%) over the paper-based version.

Conclusion

The web-based version of the PISQ-12 is a reliable alternative to the standard paper-based version and was preferred by women in this study regardless of age, race, and education.

Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J et al (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 300(11):1311–1316CrossRefPubMed

Rogers RG, Villarreal A, Kammerer-Doak D, Qualls C (2001) Sexual function in women with and without urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12(6):361–365CrossRefPubMed

Rogers RG, Kammerer-Doak D, Villarreal A, Coates K, Qualls C (2001) A new instrument to measure sexual function in women with urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184(4):552–558CrossRefPubMed

Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C (2003) A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14(3):164–168, discussion 168CrossRefPubMed

Newman JC, Des Jarlais DC, Turner CF, Gribble J, Cooley P, Paone D (2002) The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. Am J Public Health 92(2):294–297CrossRefPubMed

Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, Lindberg LD, Pleck JH, Sonenstein FL (1998) Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science 280(5365):867–873CrossRefPubMed

Drummond HE, Ghosh S, Ferguson A, Brackenridge D, Tiplady B (1995) Electronic quality of life questionnaires: a comparison of pen-based electronic questionnaires with conventional paper in a gastrointestinal study. Qual Life Res 4(1):21–26CrossRefPubMed

Ryan JM, Corry JR, Attewell R, Smithson MJ (2002) A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire to the standard paper version. Qual Life Res 11(1):19–26CrossRefPubMed

Geller EJ, Barbee ER, Wu JM, Loomis MJ, Visco AG (2007) Validation of telephone administration of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(6):631–634CrossRef

10.

Kwon S, Visco AG, Fitzgerald MP, Ye W, Whitehead WE (2005) Validity and reliability of the Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire in assessing patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 48(2):323–331, discussion 331–324CrossRefPubMed

11.

Hewett PC, Mensch BS, Ribeiro MC, Jones HE, Lippman SA, Montgomery MR et al (2008) Using sexually transmitted infection biomarkers to validate reporting of sexual behavior within a randomized, experimental evaluation of interviewing methods. Am J Epidemiol 168(2):202–211CrossRefPubMed

12.

Richter JG, Becker A, Koch T, Nixdorf M, Willers R, Monser R et al (2008) Self-assessments of patients via Tablet PC in routine patient care: comparison with standardised paper questionnaires. Ann Rheum Dis 67(12):1739–1741CrossRefPubMed

13.

Bliven BD, Kaufman SE, Spertus JA (2001) Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: validity, time benefits, and patient preference. Qual Life Res 10(1):15–22CrossRefPubMed

14.

Handa VL, Barber MD, Young SB, Aronson MP, Morse A, Cundiff GW (2008) Paper versus web-based administration of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(10):1331–1335CrossRefPubMed

15.

Theiler R, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Good M, Bellamy N (2004) Responsiveness of the electronic touch screen WOMAC 3.1 OA index in a short term clinical trial with rofecoxib. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 12(11):912–916CrossRefPubMed

16.

Whitcomb EL, Rortveit G, Brown JS, Creasman JM, Thom DH, Van Den Eeden SK et al (2009) Racial differences in pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 114(6):1271–1277CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Validation of web-based administration of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12)
verfasst von: Brent A. Parnell
Gena C. Dunivan
AnnaMarie Connolly
Mary L. Jannelli
Ellen C. Wells
Elizabeth J. Geller
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2011
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1297-8

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Validation of web-based administration of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12)